A cytochrome P450 regulates a domestication trait in cultivated tomato

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 42, 2013, Pages 17125-17130

  Chakrabarti, Manohar ^a   Zhang, Na ^a,f   Sauvage, Christopher ^b   Muños, Stéphane ^c   Blanca, Jose ^d   Cañizares, Joaquin ^d   Diez, Maria Jose ^d   Schneider, Rhiannon ^a   Mazourek, Michael ^e   McClead, Jammi ^a   Causse, Mathilde ^b   Van Der Knaap, Esther ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Researches Center of Avignon   (France)

^c LABORATOIRE DES INTERACTIONS PLANTES MICROORGANISMES LIPM   (France)

^d UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^e Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^f DUPONT COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME P450; KLUH PROTEIN; SIKLUH PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CAPSICUM ANNUUM; CELL COUNT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTIVATED SPECIES; DOMESTICATION; DOWN REGULATION; FRUIT RIPENING; GENE MAPPING; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEGREGATION; MOLECULAR CLONING; ORTHOLOGY; PERICARP; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SEGREGATION ANALYSIS; SHOOT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TOMATO; WEIGHT;

CYTOCHROME P-450 ENZYME SYSTEM; DOWN-REGULATION; FRUIT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, ENZYMOLOGIC; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; HUMANS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PLANT PROTEINS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 84885721311     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1307313110     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Darwin C (1868) The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication (John Murray, London).
2. Diamond J (1997) Guns, Germs, and Steel (WW Norton & Co, New York).
3. Smith BD (1995) Seed plant domestication in eastern North America. Last Hunters- First Farmers 354: 193-213.
4. Pickersgill B (2007) Domestication of plants in the Americas: Insights from Mendelian and molecular genetics. Ann Bot (Lond) 100(5): 925-940.
5. Blanca J, et al. (2012) Variation revealed by SNP genotyping and morphology provides insight into the origin of the tomato. PLoS ONE 7(10):e48198.
6. Klee HJ, Giovannoni JJ (2011) Genetics and control of tomato fruit ripening and quality attributes. Annu Rev Genet 45: 41-59.
7. Paran I, van der Knaap E (2007) Genetic and molecular regulation of fruit and plant domestication traits in tomato and pepper. J Exp Bot 58(14): 3841-3852.
8. Tanksley SD (2004) The genetic, developmental, and molecular bases of fruit size and shape variation in tomato. Plant Cell 16(Suppl):S181-S189.
9. Grandillo S, Ku HM, Tanksley SD (1999) Identifying loci responsible for natural variation in fruit size and shape in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 99(6): 978-987.
10. Frary A, et al. (2000) fw2.2: A quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289(5476): 85-88.
11. Guo M, et al. (2010) Cell Number Regulator1 affects plant and organ size in maize: Implications for crop yield enhancement and heterosis. Plant Cell 22(4): 1057-1073.
12. Libault M, et al. (2010) A member of the highly conserved FWL (tomato FW2.2-like) gene family is essential for soybean nodule organogenesis. Plant J 62(5): 852-864.
13. van der Knaap E, Tanksley SD (2003) The making of a bell pepper-shaped tomato fruit: Identification of loci controlling fruit morphology in Yellow Stuffer tomato. Theor Appl Genet 107(1): 139-147.
14. Zhang N, Brewer MT, van der Knaap E (2012) Fine mapping of fw3.2 controlling fruit weight in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 125(2): 273-284.
15. Blas AL, et al. (2012) Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling fruit size and shape in papaya. Mol Breed 29(2): 457-466.
16. Costantini L, Battilana J, Lamaj F, Fanizza G, Grando MS (2008) Berry and phenologyrelated traits in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): From quantitative trait loci to underlying genes. BMC Plant Biol 8: 38.
17. Doganlar S, Frary A, Daunay MC, Lester RN, Tanksley SD (2002) Conservation of gene function in the solanaceae as revealed by comparative mapping of domestication traits in eggplant. Genetics 161(4): 1713-1726.
18. Eduardo I, et al. (2011) QTL analysis of fruit quality traits in two peach intraspecific populations and importance of maturity date pleiotropic effect. Tree Genet Genomes 7(2): 323-335.
19. Zhang GR, et al. (2010) Fruit size QTL analysis of an F-1 population derived from a cross between a domesticated sweet cherry cultivar and a wild forest sweet cherry. Tree Genet Genomes 6(1): 25-36.
20. Ranc N, Muños S, Santoni S, Causse M (2008) A clarified position for Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme in the evolutionary history of tomatoes (solanaceae). BMC Plant Biol 8: 130.
21. Zhang N (2012) Fine mapping and characterization of fw3.2, one of the major QTL controlling fruit size in tomato. PhD dissertation (The Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH).
22. Anastasiou E, et al. (2007) Control of plant organ size by KLUH/CYP78A5-dependent intercellular signaling. Dev Cell 13(6): 843-856.
23. Paterson AH, et al. (1995) Convergent domestication of cereal crops by independent mutations at corresponding genetic Loci. Science 269(5231): 1714-1718.
24. Adamski NM, Anastasiou E, Eriksson S, O'Neill CM, Lenhard M (2009) Local maternal control of seed size by KLUH/CYP78A5-dependent growth signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(47): 20115-20120.
25. Fang W, Wang Z, Cui R, Li J, Li Y (2012) Maternal control of seed size by EOD3/CYP78A6 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 70(6): 929-939.
26. Ito T, Meyerowitz EM (2000) Overexpression of a gene encoding a cytochrome P450, CYP78A9, induces large and seedless fruit in arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12(9): 1541-1550.
27. Miyoshi K, et al. (2004) PLASTOCHRON1, a timekeeper of leaf initiation in rice, encodes cytochrome P450. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(3): 875-880.
28. Katsumata T, et al. (2011) Involvement of the CYP78A subfamily of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases in protonema growth and gametophore formation in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 75(2): 331-336.
29. Meyer KB, et al. (2011) A functional variant at a prostate cancer predisposition locus at 8q24 is associated with PVT1 expression. PLoS Genet 7(7):e1002165.
30. Näkki A, et al. (2010) Allelic variants of IL1R1 gene associate with severe hand osteoarthritis. BMC Med Genet 11: 50.
31. Nischwitz S, et al. (2011) More CLEC16A gene variants associated with multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 123(6): 400-406.
32. Uno S, et al. (2010) A genome-wide association study identifies genetic variants in the CDKN2BAS locus associated with endometriosis in Japanese. Nat Genet 42(8): 707-710.
33. Sandal NN, Bojsen K, Marcker KA (1987) A small family of nodule specific genes from soybean. Nucleic Acids Res 15(4): 1507-1519.
34. Stougaard J, Jørgensen JE, Christensen T, Kühle A, Marcker KA (1990) Interdependence and nodule specificity of cis-acting regulatory elements in the soybean leghemoglobin lbc3 and N23 gene promoters. Mol Gen Genet 220(3): 353-360.
35. Vieweg MF, et al. (2004) The promoter of the Vicia faba L. leghemoglobin gene VfLb29 is specifically activated in the infected cells of root nodules and in the arbuscule- containing cells of mycorrhizal roots from different legume and nonlegume plants. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 17(1): 62-69.
36. Gillaspy G, Ben-David H, GruissemW(1993) Fruits: A developmental perspective. Plant Cell 5(10): 1439-1451.
37. Iglesias DJ, et al. (2007) Physiology of citrus fruiting. Braz J Plant Physiol 19(4): 333-362.
38. Marcelis L, Hofman-Eijer L (1993) Cell division and expansion in the cucumber fruit. J Hortic Sci 68(5): 665-671.
39. Xiao H, et al. (2009) Integration of tomato reproductive developmental landmarks and expression profiles, and the effect of SUN on fruit shape. BMC Plant Biol 9: 49.
40. Cong B, Liu J, Tanksley SD (2002) Natural alleles at a tomato fruit size quantitative trait locus differ by heterochronic regulatory mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(21): 13606-13611.
41. Rao GU, Ben Chaim A, Borovsky Y, Paran I (2003) Mapping of yield-related QTLs in pepper in an interspecific cross of Capsicum annuum and C. frutescens. Theor Appl Genet 106(8): 1457-1466.
42. Brewer MT, et al. (2006) Development of a controlled vocabulary and software application to analyze fruit shape variation in tomato and other plant species. Plant Physiol 141(1): 15-25.
43. Xiao H, Jiang N, Schaffner E, Stockinger EJ, van der Knaap E (2008) A retrotransposonmediated gene duplication underlies morphological variation of tomato fruit. Science 319(5869): 1527-1530.
44. Zhong S, et al. (2011) High-throughput illumina strand-specific RNA sequencing library preparation. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2011(8): 940-949.
45. Huang ZJ, Van Houten J, Gonzalez G, Xiao H, van der Knaap E (2013) Genome-wide identification, phylogeny and expression analysis of SUN, OFP and YABBY gene family in tomato. Mol Genet Genomics 288(3-4): 111-129.
46. Ben-Chaim A, et al. (2006) QTL analysis for capsaicinoid content in Capsicum. Theor Appl Genet 113(8): 1481-1490.
47. Schardl CL, et al. (1987) Design and construction of a versatile system for the expression of foreign genes in plants. Gene 61(1): 1-11.
48. Ossowski S, Schwab R, Weigel D (2008) Gene silencing in plants using artificial microRNAs and other small RNAs. Plant J 53(4): 674-690.
49. Bradbury PJ, et al. (2007) TASSEL: Software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23(19): 2633-2635.
50. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2007) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Notes 7(4): 574-578.
51. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGeDi: A versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2(4): 618-620.
52. Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25(11): 1451-1452.
53. Tamura K, et al. (2011) MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28(10): 2731-2739.