CACTA-like transposable element in ZmCCT attenuated photoperiod sensitivity and accelerated the postdomestication spread of maize

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 42, 2013, Pages 16969-16974

  Yang, Qin ^a   Li, Zhi ^a   Li, Wenqiang ^b   Ku, Lixia ^c   Wang, Chao ^a   Ye, Jianrong ^a   Li, Kun ^a   Yang, Ning ^b   Li, Yipu ^a   Zhong, Tao ^a   Li, Jiansheng ^a   Chen, Yanhui ^c   Yan, Jianbing ^b   Yang, Xiaohong ^a   Xu, Mingliang ^a  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HUAZHONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c HENAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CACTA LIKE TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENT; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOMESTICATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GERMPLASM; GROWTH ACCELERATION; HAPLOTYPE; INBRED STRAIN; MAIZE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PHOTOPERIODICITY; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GENE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; SELECTIVE SWEEP; TRANSGENIC PLANT; TRANSPOSON; ZMCTT GENE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; FLOWERS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHOTOPERIOD; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84885829511     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1310949110     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Matsuoka Y, et al. (2002) A single domestication for maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(9): 6080-6084.
2. Emerson RA (1924) A genetic view of sex expression in the flowering plants. Science 59(1521): 176-182.
3. Piperno DR, Ranere AJ, Holst I, Iriarte J, Dickau R (2009) Starch grain and phytolith evidence for early ninth millennium B.P. maize from the Central Balsas River Valley, Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(13): 5019-5024.
4. van Heerwaarden J, et al. (2011) Genetic signals of origin, spread, and introgression in a large sample of maize landraces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(3): 1088-1092.
5. Colasanti J, Coneva V (2009) Mechanisms of floral induction in grasses: Something borrowed, something new. Plant Physiol 149(1): 56-62.
6. Colasanti J, Yuan Z, Sundaresan V (1998) The indeterminate gene encodes a zinc finger protein and regulates a leaf-generated signal required for the transition to flowering in maize. Cell 93(4): 593-603.
7. Colasanti J, et al. (2006) The maize INDETERMINATE1 flowering time regulator defines a highly conserved zinc finger protein family in higher plants. BMC Genomics 7: 158.
8. Meng X, Muszynski MG, Danilevskaya ON (2011) The FT-like ZCN8 gene functions as a floral activator and is involved in photoperiod sensitivity in maize. Plant Cell 23(3): 942-960.
9. Muszynski MG, et al. (2006) delayed flowering1 Encodes a basic leucine zipper protein that mediates floral inductive signals at the shoot apex inmaize. Plant Physiol 142(4): 1523-1536.
10. Bomblies K, Doebley JF (2006) Pleiotropic effects of the duplicate maize FLORICAULA/LEAFY genes zfl1 and zfl2 on traits under selection during maize domestication. Genetics 172(1): 519-531.
11. Miller TA, Muslin EH, Dorweiler JE (2008) A maize CONSTANS-like gene, conz1, exhibits distinct diurnal expression patterns in varied photoperiods. Planta 227(6): 1377-1388.
12. Salvi S, et al. (2007) Conserved noncoding genomic sequences associated with a floweringtime quantitative trait locus in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(27): 11376-11381.
13. Colasanti J, Muszynski M (2009) Handbook of Maize: Its Biology, eds Bennetzen J, Hake S (Springer, New York), pp 41-55.
14. Buckler ES, et al. (2009) The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 325(5941): 714-718.
15. Coles ND, McMullen MD, Balint-Kurti PJ, Pratt RC, Holland JB (2010) Genetic control of photoperiod sensitivity in maize revealed by joint multiple population analysis. Genetics 184(3): 799-812.
16. Coles ND, Zila CT, Holland JB (2011) Allelic effect variation at key photoperiod response quantitative trait loci in maize. Crop Sci 51(3): 1036-1049.
17. Ducrocq S, et al. (2009) Fine mapping and haplotype structure analysis of a major flowering time quantitative trait locus on maize chromosome 10. Genetics 183(4): 1555-1563.
18. Hung HY, et al. (2012) ZmCCT and the genetic basis of day-length adaptation underlying the postdomestication spread of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(28):E1913-E1921.
19. Biémont C, Vieira C (2006) Genetics: Junk DNA as an evolutionary force. Nature 443(7111): 521-524.
20. Bourque G (2009) Transposable elements in gene regulation and in the evolution of vertebrate genomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 19(6): 607-612.
21. Cordaux R, Batzer MA (2009) The impact of retrotransposons on human genome evolution. Nat Rev Genet 10(10): 691-703.
22. Lisch D (2009) Epigenetic regulation of transposable elements in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60: 43-66.
23. Lisch D (2013) How important are transposons for plant evolution? Nat Rev Genet 14(1): 49-61.
24. Britten RJ (2010) Transposable element insertions have strongly affected human evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(46): 19945-19948.
25. Xiao H, Jiang N, Schaffner E, Stockinger EJ, van der Knaap E (2008) A retrotransposonmediated gene duplication underlies morphological variation of tomato fruit. Science 319(5869): 1527-1530.
26. Studer A, Zhao Q, Ross-Ibarra J, Doebley J (2011) Identification of a functional transposon insertion in the maize domestication gene tb1. Nat Genet 43(11): 1160-1163.
27. Zhou L, Zhang J, Yan J, Song R (2011) Two transposable element insertions are causative mutations for the major domestication gene teosinte branched 1 in modern maize. Cell Res 21(8): 1267-1270.
28. Li H, et al. (2013) Genome-wide association study dissects the genetic architecture of oil biosynthesis in maize kernels. Nat Genet 45(1): 43-50.
29. Yang X, et al. (2011) Characterization of a global germplasm collection and its potential utilization for analysis of complex quantitative traits in maize. Mol Breed 28(4): 511-526.
30. Hufford MB, et al. (2013) The genomic signature of crop-wild introgression in maize. PLoS Genet 9(5):e1003477.
31. Fukunaga K, et al. (2005) Genetic diversity and population structure of teosinte. Genetics 169(4): 2241-2254.
32. Gallavotti A, et al. (2004) The role of barren stalk1 in the architecture of maize. Nature 432(7017): 630-635.
33. Ross-Ibarra J, Tenaillon M, Gaut BS (2009) Historical divergence and gene flow in the genus Zea. Genetics 181(4): 1399-1413.
34. Xue W, et al. (2008) Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet 40(6): 761-767.
35. Wenkel S, et al. (2006) CONSTANS and the CCAAT box binding complex share a functionally important domain and interact to regulate flowering of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18(11): 2971-2984.
36. Sekhon RS, et al. (2011) Genome-wide atlas of transcription during maize development. Plant J 66(4): 553-563.
37. Slotkin RK, Martienssen R (2007) Transposable elements and the epigenetic regulation of the genome. Nat Rev Genet 8(4): 272-285.
38. Parisod C, et al. (2009) Rapid structural and epigenetic reorganization near transposable elements in hybrid and allopolyploid genomes in Spartina. New Phytol 184(4): 1003-1015.
39. Song YH, Ito S, Imaizumi T (2010) Similarities in the circadian clock and photoperiodism in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13(5): 594-603.
40. Dong Z, et al. (2012) A gene regulatory network model for floral transition of the shoot apex in maize and its dynamic modeling. PLoS ONE 7(8):e43450.
41. Jarillo J, et al. (2008) Review. Photoperiodic control of flowering time. Span J Agric Res 6: 221-244.
42. Sawa M, Nusinow DA, Kay SA, Imaizumi T (2007) FKF1 and GIGANTEA complex formation is required for day-length measurement in Arabidopsis. Science 318(5848): 261-265.
43. Wang CL, et al. (2008) Genetic analysis of photoperiod sensitivity in a tropical by temperate maize recombinant inbred population using molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 117(7): 1129-1139.
44. Wang C, et al. (2010) Mapping QTL associated with photoperiod sensitivity and assessing the importance of QTL×environment interaction for flowering time in maize. PLoS ONE 5(11):e14068.
45. Wright SI, et al. (2005) The effects of artificial selection on the maize genome. Science 308(5726): 1310-1314.