Ergonomic evaluation of interaction techniques and 3D menus for the practical design of 3D stereoscopic displays

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

Volumn 53, Issue , 2016, Pages 205-218

  Jeong, Seongwook ^a   Jung, Eui S ^a   Im, Youngjae ^b  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

^b Korea Institute for Defense Analyses   (South Korea)

Author keywords

3D menu; Interaction technique; Stereoscopic display

Indexed keywords

DISPLAY DEVICES; ERGONOMICS; HELMET MOUNTED DISPLAYS; RENDERING (COMPUTER GRAPHICS); STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

3D MENU; ERGONOMIC EVALUATION; HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAYS; INTERACTION TECHNIQUES; STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAY; STRUCTURAL LAYOUT; SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENTS; VIRTUAL-REALITY ENVIRONMENT;

USER INTERFACES;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ERGONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE DISPLAY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAY; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL ACUITY; WORKLOAD;

EID: 84957592081     PISSN: 01698141     EISSN: 18728219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2016.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aras R., Shen Y., Noor A. Quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of using display techniques with a haptic device for manipulating 3D objects in virtual environments. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2014, 76:43-47.
2. Banerjee A., Burstyn J., Girouard A., Vertegaal R. MultiPoint: comparing laser and manual pointing as remote input in large display interactions. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2012, 70(10):690-702.
3. Bateman S., Mandryk R.L., Gutwin C., Xiao R. Analysis and comparison of target assistance techniques for relative ray-cast pointing. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2013, 71(5):511-532.
4. Berard F., Ip J., Benovoy M., El-Shimy D., Blum J.R., Cooperstock J.R. Did "Minority report" get it wrong? Superiority of the mouse over 3D input devices in a 3D placement task. INTERACT '09 Proceedings of the 12th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-computer Interaction 2009, 400-414.
5. Bowman D.A., Badillo B., Andmanek D. Evaluating the need for display-specific and device-specific 3D interaction techniques. Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference 2007, 195-204.
6. Bowman D.A., Chen J., Wingrave C.A., Lucas J. New directions in 3D user interfaces. Int. J. Virtual Real. 2006, 5(2):3-14.
7. Bowman D.A., Hodges L.F. Formalizing the design, evaluation, and application of interaction techniques for immersive virtual environments. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 1999, 10:37-53.
8. Bowman D.A., Johnson D.B., Hodges L.F. Test-bed evaluation of virtual environment interaction techniques. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology 1999, 26-33.
9. Bowman D.A., Wingrave C.A. Design and evaluation of menu systems for immersive virtual environment. Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference 2001, 149-156.
10. Conner D.B., Snibbe S.S., Herndon K.P., Robbins D.C. Three-dimensional widgets. Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics 1992, 183-188.
11. Chen J.Y.C., Oden R.V.N., Merritt J.O. Utility of stereoscopic displays for indirect-vision driving and robot teleoperation. Ergonomics 2014, 57(1):12-22.
12. Chertoff D.B., Byers R.W., LaViola J.J. An exploration of menu techniques using a 3D game input device. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games 2009, 256-262.
13. Choi E., Kim H., Chung M.K. A taxonomy and notation method for three-dimensional hand gestures. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2014, 44(1):171-188.
14. Dachselt R., Hübner A. Three-dimensional menus: a survey and taxonomy. Comput. Graph. 2007, 31(1):53-65.
15. Datcu D., Lukosch S., Brazier F. On the usability and effectiveness of different interaction types in augmented reality. Int. J. Human-Comp. Interact. 2015, 31(3):193-209.
16. Dubois E., Nedel L.P., Freitas C.M.D.S., Jacon L. Beyond user experimentation: notational-based systematic evaluation of interaction techniques in virtual reality environments. Virtual Real. 2005, 8:118-128.
17. Gerber D., Bechmann D. Design and evaluation of the ring menu in virtual environments. IPT 2004: 8th Immersive Projection Technology Workshop 2004.
18. Gerber D., Bechmann D. The spin menu: a menu system for virtual environments. IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality 2005, 271-272.
19. Grossman T., Wigdor D., Balakrishnan R. Multi-finger gestural interaction with 3d volumetric displays. Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology 2004, 61-70.
20. Hasan M.M., Arnold J.F., Frater M.R. Subjective evaluation and statistical analysis for improved frame-loss error concealment of 3D videos. Proceedings of Visual Communications and Image Processing, Valletta, Malta 2014, 181-184.
21. Hickey S., Pakanen M., Arhippainen L., Kuusela E., Karhu A. Service fusion: an interactive 3D user interface. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia 2012.
22. Jacoby R.H., Ellis S.R. Using virtual menus in a virtual environment. Course Notes 43 - Implementing Virtual Reality - Pages 7.1 to 7.8. SIGGRAPH'93, 20th International Conference on Computer Graphics Llild Interactive Techniques (Anallcim, August 1993) 1993, ACM, New York.
23. Jota R., Nacenta M.A., Jorge J.A., Carpendale S., Greenberg S. A comparison of ray pointing techniques for very large displays. Proceedings of Graphics Interface Canadian Information Processing Society Toronto, Ont., Canada 2010, 269-276.
24. Kang J., Seo D., Jung D. A study on the control method of 3-Dimensional space application using KINECT system. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur. 2011, 11(9):55-59.
25. Karnik A., Grossman T., Subramanian S. Comparison of user performance in mixed 2D-3D multi-display environments. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2013, 8117:260-277.
26. Kim N., Kim G.J., Park C.M., Lee I., Lim S.H. Multimodal menu presentation and selection in immersive virtual environments. Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality 2000.
27. Lambooij M., IJsselsteijn W.A., Heynderickx I. Visual discomfort of 3D TV: assessment methods and modeling. Displays 2011, 32(4):209-218.
28. Li Y., Jeon W.R., Nam C.S. Navigation by vibration: effects of vibrotactile feedback on a navigation task. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2015, 46:76-84.
29. Liang J., Green M. Interaction techniques for a highly interactive 3D geometric modeling system. Proceedings on the Second ACM Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications 1993, 475-476.
30. Lin C.J., Chen H.J., Cheng P.Y., Sun T.L. Effects of displays on visually controlled task performance in three-dimensional virtual reality environment. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 2015, 25(5):523-533.
31. Lin C.J., Ho S.H., Chen Y.J. An investigation of pointing postures in a 3D stereoscopic environment. Appl. Ergon. 2015, 48:154-163.
32. McIntire J.P., Havig P.R., Geiselman E.E. Stereoscopic 3D displays and human performance: a comprehensive review. Displays 2014, 35:18-26.
33. Mine M. Virtual Environment Interaction Techniques 1995, UNC Chapel Hill Computer Science Technical Report TR95-018.
34. Müller C., Tomatisa L., Läubli T. Muscular load and performance compared between a pen and a computer mouse as input devices. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2010, 40(6):607-617.
35. Mun S., Park M.C., Yano S. Performance comparison of a SSVEP BCI task by individual stereoscopic 3D susceptibility. Int. J. Human-Comp. Interact. 2013, 29(12):789-797.
36. Ntuena C.A., Goings M., Reddinb M., Holmesb K. Comparison between 2-D & 3-D using an autostereoscopic display: the effects of viewing field and illumination on performance and visual fatigue. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2009, 39(2):388-395.
37. Park K.S., Hong G.B., Lee S. Fatigue problems in remote pointing and the use of an upper-arm support. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2012, 42:293-303.
38. Park S., Won M.J., Lee E.C., Mun S., Park M.C., Whang M. Evaluation of 3D cognitive fatigue using heart-brain synchronization. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2015, 97(2):120-130.
39. Polonen M., Jarvenpaa T., Bilcu B. Stereoscopic 3D entertainment and its effect on viewing comfort: comparison of children and adults. Appl. Ergon. 2013, 44(1):151-160.
40. Poupyrev I., Billinghurst M., Weghorst S., Ichikawa T. The go-go interaction technique: non-linear mapping for direct manipulation in VR. Proceedings of the 9th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology 1996, 79-80.
41. Read J.C.A., Bohr I. User experience while viewing stereoscopic 3D television. Ergonomics 2014, 57(8):1140-1153.
42. Read J.C.A. Viewer experience with stereoscopic 3D television in the home. Displays 2014, 35(5):252-260.
43. Rempel D., Camilleri M.J., Lee D.L. The design of hand gestures for human?computer interaction: lessons from sign language interpreters. Int. J. Human-Comp. Stud. 2014, 72:728-735.
44. Steinicke F., Ropinski T., Bruder G., Hinrichs K. Towards applicable 3D user interfaces for everyday working environments. Proceedings of the 11th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-computer Interaction 2007, 564-559.
45. Taha Z., Soewardi H., Dawal S.Z.M. Axiomatic design principles in analysing the ergonomics design parameter of a virtual environment. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2014, 44(3):368-373.
46. Ukai K., Howarth P.A. Visual fatigue caused by viewing stereoscopic motion images: background, theories, and observations. Displays 2008, 29(2):106-116.
47. Vanacken L., Grossman T., Coninx K. Multimodal selection techniques for dense and occluded 3D virtual environments. Int. J. Human-Comp. Stud. 2009, 67(3):237-255.
48. Wang P., Xie S., Sang X., Chen D., Li C., Gao X., Yu X., Yu C., Yan B., Dou W., Xiao L. A large depth of field frontal multi-projection three-dimensional display with uniform light field distribution. Opt. Commun. 2015, 354:321-329.
49. Yano S., Idea S., Mitsuhashib T., Thwaites H. A study of visual fatigue and visual comfort for 3D HDTV/HDTV images. Displays 2002, 23(4):191-201.
50. Zeri F., Livi S. Visual discomfort while watching stereoscopic three-dimensional movies at the cinema. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 2015, 35(3):271-282.