Utility of stereoscopic displays for indirect-vision driving and robot teleoperation

Ergonomics

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 12-22

  Chen, Jessie Y C ^a   Oden, Razia V N ^b   Merritt, John O ^c  

^a US Army Research Laboratory Human Research and Engineering Directorate   (United States)

^b Design Interactive Inc   (United States)

^c Merritt Group   (United States)

Author keywords

human robot interaction; indirect vision driving; military; simulation; stereoscopic display; visual discomfort

Indexed keywords

INDIRECT-VISION DRIVING; MILITARY; SIMULATION; STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAY; VISUAL DISCOMFORT;

DISPLAY DEVICES; GLASS; REMOTE CONTROL; ROBOTICS; ROBOTS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

COMPUTER VISION;

ADULT; CAR DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; ROBOTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISION; WORKLOAD;

ADULT; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA DISPLAY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; REACTION TIME; ROBOTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; WORKLOAD;

EID: 84893798324     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2013.859739     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alpaslan, Z. Y., A. A. Sawchuk, A. A. Rizzo III, and S. Yeh.2006. "Effects of Gender, Application, Experience, and Constraints on Interaction Performance Using Autostereoscopic Displays." Proceedings of SPIE (Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems XIII), Vol. 6055.
2. Bando, T., A.Iijima, and S.Yano. 2012. "Visual Fatigue Caused by Stereoscopic Images and the Search for the Requirement to Prevent Them: A Review." Displays33: 76-83.
3. Blavier, A., and A. S.Nyssen. 2009. "Influence of 2D and 3D View on Performance and Time Estimation in Minimal Invasive Surgery." Ergonomics52: 1342-1349.
4. Draper, J. V., S. Handel, and C. C. Hood. 1991. "Three Experiments with Stereoscopic Television: When It Works and Why." Proceedings of IEEE International conference on Systems, Man, & Cybernetics2: 1047-1052.
5. Drascic, D.1991. "An Investigation of Monoscopic and Stereoscopic Video for Teleoperation." Master's thesis, University of Toronto.
6. Drascic, D., and J. Grodski. 1993. "Defense Teleoperation and Stereoscopic Video." Proceedings of SPIE (Stereoscopic Displays and Applications IV)1915: 58-69.
7. Drexler, J. M., J. Y. C.Chen, S. A.Quinn, and D.Solomon.2012. Effects of Display Dimension and Viewpoint Synchronization on Robot Teleoperation Performance in a Simulated Environment. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Technical Report (ARL-TR-6255).
8. Durkee, K., M. Paley, K. Kudzma, and D. Reiners.2010. "Evaluation of 2D and 3D Displays to Validate the Integration of Human Performance Analysis Methods into Submarine Acquisitions." In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting, 2196-2200.
9. Froner, B., N. S.Holliman, and S. P.Liversedge. 2008. "A Comparative Study of Fine Depth Perception on Two-View 3D Displays." Displays29: 440-450.
10. General Dynamics Land Systems. 2007. Vetronics Technology Integration: A Synopsis (unpublished internal report).
11. Green, J., E. Dougherty, and E. Savacool. 2003. "Stereovision System for Shipboard Cranes." Proceedings of Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, & Education Conference (I/ITSEC).
12. Grossman, T., and R. Balakrishnan. 2006. "An Evaluation of Depth Perception on Volumetric Displays." Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI 2006), 193-200.
13. Hart, S., and L.Staveland. 1988. "Development of NASA TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research." In Human Mental Workload, edited by P.Hancock, and N.Meshkati, 139-183. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
14. Holzhausen, K., F. D.Pitrella, and H.Wolf. 1993. "Human Engineering Experiments Using a Telerobotic Vehicle." In Vision in Vehicles-IV, edited by A. G.Gale, I. D.Brown, S. P.Taylor, and C. M.Haslegrave,223-230. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
15. Howarth, P. A.2011. "Potential Hazards of Viewing 3-D Stereoscopic Television, Cinema and Computer Games: A Review." Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics31: 111-122.
16. Huber, J. W., N.Taffinder, R. C. G.Russell, and A.Darzi.2003. "The Effects of Different Viewing Conditions on Performance in Simulated Minimal Access Surgery." Ergonomics46: 999-1016.
17. Kawai, S., V. A.Summers, C. L.Mackenzie, C. J.Ivens, and T.Yamamoto.2002. "Grasping an Augmented Object to Analyse Manipulative Force Control." Ergonomics45: 1091-1102.
18. Kennedy, R. S., N. E.Lane, K. S.Berbaum, and M. G.Lilienthal.1993. "Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness." International Journal of Aviation Psychology3: 203-220.
19. Lambooij, M., W.IJsselsteijn, M.Fortuin, and I.Heynderickx.2009. "Visual Discomfort in Stereoscopic Displays: A Review." Journal of Imaging Science and Technology53: 1-14.
20. Mcintire, J. P., P. R. Havig, and E. E. Geiselman. 2012. "What is 3D Good for? A Review of Human Performance on Stereoscopic 3D Displays." Proceedings of SPIE (Head- and Helmet-Mounted Displays XVII), Vol. 8383.
21. Merritt, J. O., V. G. CuQlock-Knopp, and K. Myles. 1997. Enhanced Perception of Terrain Hazards in Off-Road Path Choice: Stereoscopic 3D Versus 2D Displays." Proceedings of SPIE (Targets and Backgrounds)3062: 101-104.
22. Merritt, J. O., V. G. CuQlock-Knopp, M. Kregel, J. Smoot, and W. Monaco.2005. "Perception of Terrain Drop-Offs As a Function of L-R Viewpoint Separation in Stereoscopic Video." Proceedings of SPIE (Helmet- and Head- Mounted Displays X)5800: 169-176.
23. Noyes, J. M., and D. P.Bruneau. 2007. "A Self-Analysis of the NASA-TLX Workload Measure." Ergonomics50: 514-519.
24. Ntuen, C. A., M.Goings, M.Reddin, and K.Holmes.2008. "Comparison Between 2-D & 3-D Using an Autostereoscopic Display: The Effects of Viewing Field and Illumination on Performance and Visual Fatigue." International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics39: 388-395.
25. Pezzaniti, J. L., R. Edmondson, J. Vaden, B. Hyatt, D. B. Chenault, D. Kingston, V. M. Geulen, S. Newell, and B. Pettijohn.2009. "3D Vision System Assessment." Proceedings of Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XX (SPIE-IΣ&T Electronic Imaging, SPIE) Vol. 7237.
26. Rosen, P., Z. Pizlo, C. Hoffmann, and V. S. Popescu.2004. "Perception of 3D Spatial Relations for 3D Displays." Proceedings of SPIE (Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems XI) 5291: 9-16.
27. Rosenberg, L. B.1993. "The Effect of Interocular Distance upon Operator Performance Using Stereoscopic Displays to Perform Virtual Depth Tasks." In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium27-32. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
28. Scribner, D., and J. Gombash. 1998. The Effect of Stereoscopic and Wide Field of View Conditions on Teleoperator Performance (ARL Tech. Rep. ARL-TR-1598).Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Army Research Laboratory.
29. Singer, M., J.Ehrlich, S.Cinq-Mars, and J.Papin.1995. Task Performance in Virtual Environments: Stereoscopic Versus Monoscopic Displays and Head-Coupling(Tech. Rep. 1034)Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral & Social Sciences.
30. Spain, E., and T. Hughes. 1991. "Objective Assessments of Mobility with an Early Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV) Prototype Viewing System." (NOSC Tech. Rep. AD-A237317).
31. Umeda, A. Y., S. W. Martin, and J. O. Merritt. 1991. "Remote Vision Systems for Teleoperated Ground Vehicles." Proceedings of NATO Defense Research Group on Robotics in the Air-Land Battle, 2008. http://www.dtic.mil/cgibin/GetTRDoc?AD = AΔA236765&Λoχατιoν = Y2&δoχ = GetTRDoc.pdf].
32. Van Beurden, M. H. P. H., W. A. IJsselsteijn, and J. F. Juola. 2012. "Effectiveness of Stereoscopic Displays in Medicine: A Review." 3D Research 3: 3.
33. Walker, E. C.2009. Soldier Operational Exercise 1.0 Test Report for the Robotic Vehicle Control Architecture (RVCA). Warren, MI: U.S. Army Tank-Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center.