Performance comparison of a SSVEP BCI task by individual stereoscopic 3D susceptibility

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 29, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 789-797

  Mun, Sungchul ^a,b   Park, Min Chul ^a,b   Yano, Sumio ^c  

^a University of Science and Technology (UST)   (South Korea)

^b Korea Institute of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

^c SHIMANE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NAVIGATION TASKS; PERFORMANCE COMPARISON; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; STEADY-STATE VISUALLY EVOKED POTENTIAL; SUBJECTIVE EVALUATIONS; TASK COMPLETION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIRTUAL HOME ENVIRONMENT;

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84890047057     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: 15327590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2013.765289     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Allison, B., Luth, T., Valbuena, D., Teymourian, A., Volosyak, I., & Graser, A. (2010). BCI demographics: How many (and what kinds of) people can use an SSVEP BCI? IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 18, 107-116.
2. Coghill, R. C. (2010). Individual differences in the subjective experience of pain: New insights into mechanisms and models. Headache, 50, 1531-1535.
3. Danno, D., Kawabata, K., & Tachibana, H. (2012). Clinical features of 16 cases of headache which were provoked after watching 3-D videos. Internal Medicine, 51, 1195-1198.
4. Davenport, K., Burns, A., Helo, S., Bailey, G., Peters, C., & Schenkman, N. (2012). Comparison of 3D stereoscope vs. standard 2d laparoscope for performance of two standard laparoscopic tasks by urology residents. Journal of Urology, 187, E611-E611.
5. Diez, P. F., Mut, V. A., Avila Perona, E. M., & Laciar Leber, E. (2011). Asynchronous BCI control using high-frequency SSVEP. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 8, 39-46.
6. Engelmann, J. B., Damaraju, E., Padmala, S., & Pessoa, L. (2009). Combined effects of attention and motivation on visual task performance: Transient and sustained motivational effects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 4.
7. Faller, J., Mluller-Putz, G., Schmalstieg, D., & Pfurtscheller, G. (2010). An application framework for controlling an avatar in a desktop-based virtual environment via a software SSVEP brain-computer interface. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 19, 25-34.
8. Frey, A., Hartig, J., Ketzel, A., Zinkernagel, A., &Moosbrugger, H. (2007). The use of virtual environments based on a modification of the computer game Quake III Arena in psychological experimenting. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2026-2039.
9. Fukushima, T., Torii, M., Ukai, K., Wolffsohn, J. S., & Gilmartin, B. (2009). The Relationship between CA/C ratio and individual differences in dynamic accommodative responses while viewing stereoscopic images. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-13.
10. Gurkok, H., & Nijholt, A. (2012). Brain-computer interfaces for multimodal interaction: A survey and principles. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28, 292-307.
11. Jourdan, I. C., Dutson, E., Garcia, A., Vleugels, T., Leroy, J., Mutter, D., & Marescaux, J. (2004). Stereoscopic vision provides a significant advantage for precision robotic laparoscopy. British Journal of Surgery, 91, 879-885.
12. Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Berbaum, K. S., & Lilienthal, M. G. (1993). Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 203-220.
13. Kham, K., Li, H. C. O., & Lee, S. (2009). The effect of viewing distance and the speed of motion-in-depth on visual fatigue. Korean Journal of the Science of Emotion and Sensibility, 12, 169-180.
14. Koh, C., Tan, H. S., Tan, K. C., Fang, L., Fong, F. M., Kan, D., Wee, M. L. (2010). Investigating the effect of 3D simulation-based learning on the motivation and performance of engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 99, 237-251.
15. Kuze, J., & Ukai, K. (2008). Subjective evaluation of visual fatigue caused by motion images. Displays, 29, 159-166.
16. Lalor, E. C., Kelly, S. P., Finucane, C., Burke, R., Smith, R., Reilly, R. B., & McDarby, G. (2005). Steady-state VEP-based brain-computer interface control in an immersive 3D gaming environment. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, 19, 3156-3164.
17. Lambooij, M., Fortuin, M., Ijsselsteijn, W. A., Evans, B. J., & Heynderickx, I. (2011). Susceptibility to visual discomfort of 3-D displays by visual performance measures. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 21, 1913-1923.
18. Lambooij, M., Fortuin, M. F., Ijsselsteijn, W. A., & Heynderickx, I. (2012). Reading performance as screening tool for visual complaints from stereoscopic content. Displays, 33, 84-90.
19. Lambooij, M., Ijsselsteijn, W., Fortuin, M., & Heynderickx, I. (2009). Visual discomfort and visual fatigue of stereoscopic displays: A review. Journal of Imaging Science & Technology, 53, 030201-030214.
20. Leeb, R., Lee, F., Keinrath, C., Scherer, R., Bischof, H., & Pfurtscheller, G. (2007). Brain-computer communication: motivation, aim, and impact of exploring a virtual apartment. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 15, 473-482.
21. Legeny, J., Abad, R. V., & Lecuyer, A. (2011). Navigating in virtual worlds using a self-paced SSVEP-based brain-computer interface with integrated stimulation and real-time feedback. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 20, 529-544.
22. Li, H.-C. O. (2010). Human factor research on the measurement of subjective three dimensional fatigue. Journal of Broadcast Engineering, 15, 607-616.
23. Li, H.-C.O., Seo, J. H., Kham, K. T., & Lee, S. H. (2008). Measurement of 3D visual fatigue using event-related potential (ERP): 3D oddball paradigm. 3DTV-CON' 08: Proceedings of the True Vision-Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video, 213-216.
24. Lin, C.-T., Wu, H.-C., & Chien, T.-Y. (2010). Effects of e-map format and subwindows on driving performance and glance behavior when using an invehicle navigation system. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40, 330-336.
25. Mun, S., Cho, S., Whang, M., Ju, B.-K., & Park, M.-C. (2012). SSVEP-based BCI for manipulating three dimensional contents and devices. Proceedings of SPIE Defense Security, and Sensing, 8384, 83840T-1-83830T-8.
26. Mun, S., Park, M.-C., Park, S., &Whang, M. (2012). SSVEP and ERP measurement of cognitive fatigue caused by stereoscopic 3D. Neuroscience Letters, 525, 89-94.
27. Ntuen, C. A., Goings, M., Reddin, M., & Holmes, K. (2009). Comparison between 2-D & 3-D using an autostereoscopic display: The effects of viewing field and illumination on performance and visual fatigue. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39, 388-395.
28. Ozok, A. A., & Komlodi, A. (2009). Better in 3D? An empirical investigation of user satisfaction and preferences concerning two-dimensional and three-dimensional product representations in business-to-consumer ecommerce. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25, 243-281.
29. Price, A., & Lee, H.-S. (2010). The effect of two-dimensional and stereoscopic presentation on middle school students' performance of spatial cognition tasks. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 90-103.
30. Shin, D.-H., & Baek, S.-G. (2012). Can 3DTV create immersive environments? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28, 281-291.
31. Takatalo, J., Kawai, T., Kaistinen, J., Nyman, G., & Hakkinen, J. (2011). User experience in 3D stereoscopic games. Media Psychology, 14, 387-414.
32. Tam, W. J., Speranza, F., Yano, S., Shimono, K., & Ono, H. (2011). Stereoscopic 3D-TV: Visual comfort. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 57, 335-346.
33. Tory, M., Kirkpatrick, A. E., Atkins, M. S., & Moller, T. (2006). Visualization task performance with 2D, 3D, and combination displays. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12, 2-13.
34. Wang, H.-C., Chang, C.-Y., & Li, T.-Y. (2007). The comparative efficacy of 2DVersus 3D-based media design for influencing spatial visualization skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1943-1957.
35. Wickens, C. D., Merwin, D. H., & Lin, E. L. (1994). Implications of graphics enhancements for the visualization of scientific-data-Dimensional integrality, stereopsis, motion, and mesh. Human Factors, 36, 44-61.
36. Wong, S. C., Nawawi, O., Ramli, N., & Abd Kadir, K. A. (2012). Benefits of 3D rotational DSA compared with 2D DSA in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysm. Academic Radiology, 19, 701-707.
37. Yano, S., Ide, S., Mitsuhashi, T., & Thwaites, H. (2002). A study of visual fatigue and visual comfort for 3D HDTV/HDTV images. Displays, 23, 191-201.
38. Yoon, S.-Y., Laffey, J., & Oh, H. (2008). Understanding usability and user experience of web-based 3d graphics technology. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24, 288-306.