A comparison of ray pointing techniques for very large displays

Proceedings - Graphics Interface

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 269-276

  Jota, Ricardo ^a   Nacenta, Miguel A ^b   Jorge, Joaquim A ^a   Carpendale, Sheelagh ^b   Greenberg, Saul ^b  

^a INESC ID   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Distant pointing; Image plane; Index of difficulty; ISO 9241; Large displays; Parallax; Ray pointing; Targeting; Tracing

Indexed keywords

DISTANT POINTING; IMAGE-PLANE; INDEX OF DIFFICULTY; ISO 9241; LARGE DISPLAYS; PARALLAX; RAY POINTING; TARGETING; TRACING;

ASTROPHYSICS; GEOMETRICAL OPTICS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 77955625169     PISSN: 07135424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Argelaguet, F. and Andujar, C. Visual feedback techniques for virtual pointing on stereoscopic displays. Proc. VRST'09, 163-170.
2. Bolt, R. A. 1980. "Put-that-there": Voice and gesture at the graphics interface. Proc. SIGGRAPH '80, 262-270.
3. Bowman, D.A. and Hodges, L.F. An evaluation of techniques for grabbing and manipulating remote objects in immersive virtual environments. Proc. Interactive 3D graphics '97, 35.
4. Bowman, D.A., Johnson, D.B., and Hodges, L.F. Testbed Evaluation of Virtual Environment Interaction Techniques. Presence: Teleope-rators & Virtual Environments 10, 1 (2001), 75-95.
5. Cavens, D., Vogt, F., Fels, S., and Meitner, M. Interacting with the big screen: pointers to ponder. Ext. Abs. CHI '02, 678-679.
6. Davis, J. and Chen, X. Lumipoint: multi-user laser-based interaction on large tiled displays. Displays 23, 5 (2002), 205-211.
7. Hill, A. and Johnson, A. Withindows: A Framework for Transitional Desktop and Immersive User Interfaces. Proc. 3DUI'2008, 3-10.
8. ISO. Iso 9241-9:2000(e): Requirements for non-keyboard input devices (iso 9241-9). 2002.
9. Jota, R., Pereira, J.M., and Jorge, J.A. A comparative study of interaction metaphors for large-scale displays. Ext. Abs. CHI'09, 4135-4140.
10. Kondraske, G.V. An Angular Motion Fitts' Law For Human Performance Modeling And Prediction. Proc. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 1994, 307.
11. König, W. A., Gerken, J., Dierdorf, S., and Reiterer, H. Adaptive pointing: implicit gain adaptation for absolute pointing devices. Ext. Abs. CHr09, 4171-4176.
12. Kopper, R., Bowman, D., and Silva, M. A Human Motor Behavior Model for Distant Pointing Tasks. Virginia Tech. Technical Report. (2008). http://eprints.cs.vt.edu/archive/00001056/01/chi2009-DistantPointing-Final.pdf
13. Lee, S. Evaluation of pointing techniques for ray casting selection in virtual environments. Proc. SPIE'2003, 38.
14. Mackenzie, I. and Jusoh, S. An Evaluation of Two Input Devices for Remote Pointing. In Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction. 2001,235-250.
15. Myers, B.A., Bhatnagar, R., Nichols, J., et al. Interacting at a distance: measuring the performance of laser pointers and other devices. Proc. CHI'02, 33-40.
16. Myers, B., Peck, C., Nichols, J., Kong, D., and Miller, R. Interacting at a Distance Using Semantic Snarling. Proc. Ubicomp 2001, 305-314.
17. Nacenta, M. A., Pinelle, D., Stuckel, D., and Gutwin, C. 2007. The effects of interaction technique on coordination in tabletop group-ware. Proc. GI'07, 191-198.
18. Nacenta, M.A., Sallam, S., Champoux, B., Subramanian, S., and Gutwin, C. Perspective cursor: perspective-based interaction for multi-display environments. Proc. CHV'06, 289-298.
19. NASA Human Performance Research Group. Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) 1987. NASA
20. Olsen, Dan., and Nielsen, T. Laser pointer interaction. Proc. CHI 2001, 17-22.
21. Parker, J. K., Mandryk, R. L., and Inkpen, K. M. 2005. Tractor-Beam: seamless integration of local and remote pointing for tabletop displays. In Proc. GI'05, 33-40.
22. Pavlovych, A. and Stuerzlinger, W. The tradeoff between spatial jitter and latency in pointing tasks. Proc. EICS'09, 187-196.
23. Peck, C.H. Useful parameters for the design of laser pointer interaction techniques. Ext. Abs. CHI'01, 461-462.
24. Pierce, J.S., Forsberg, A.S., Conway, M.J., Hong, S., Zeleznik, R.C., and Mine, M.R. Image plane interaction techniques in 3D immersive environments. Proc Interactive 3D graphics 1997, 39.
25. Shoemaker, G., Tang, A., and Booth, K.S. Shadow reaching: a new perspective on interaction for large displays. Proc. UIST'07, 53-56.
26. Soukoreff, R.W. and MacKenzie, I.S. Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 61, 6 (2004), 751-789.
27. Stuerzlinger, W and Oh, J. laser pointers as collaborative pointing devices. Proc. of Graphics interface 2002.
28. Teather, R.J. and Stuerzlinger, W. Assessing the Effects of Orientation and Device on (Constrained) 3D Movement Techniques. Proc. 3DUI, 43-50.
29. Tse, E., Hancock, M., and Greenberg, S. Speech-filtered bubble ray: improving target acquisition on display walls. Proc Multimodal Interfaces 2007, 307-314.
30. Vogel, D. and Balakrishnan, R. Distant freehand pointing and clicking on very large, high resolution displays. Proc. UIST'2005, 33-42.
31. Voida, S., Podlaseck, M., Kjeldsen, R., and Pinhanez, C. A study on the manipulation of 2D objects in a projector/camera-based augmented reality environment. Proc. CHI'05, 611-620.
32. Ware, C. and Lowther, K. Selection using a one-eyed cursor in a fish tank VR environment. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 4, 4 (1997), 309-322.
33. Wingrave, C., Tintner, R., Walker, B., Bowman, D., and Hodges, L. Exploring individual differences in raybased selection: strategies and traits. Virtual Reality, 2005, 163-170.