Visual discomfort while watching stereoscopic three-dimensional movies at the cinema

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 271-282

  Zeri, Fabrizio ^a   Livi, Stefano ^b  

^a ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

2D movie; Stereoscopic three dimensional movie; Visual discomfort; Visual symptoms

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; ASTHENOPIA; CHILD; COMPLICATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVIE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; RISK FACTOR; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ASTHENOPIA; CHILD; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PICTURES AS TOPIC; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84928271877     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: 14751313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/opo.12194     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Mendiburu B. 3D Movie Making. Stereoscopic Digital Cinema from Script to Screen. Elsevier: Burlington, 2009.
2. Brooks FP. What's real about virtual reality? IEEE Comput Graph Appl 1999; 19: 16-27.
3. Yang S, Schlieski T, Selmins B et al. Stereoscopic viewing and reported perceived immersion and symptoms. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: 1068-1080.
4. Baños RM, Botella C, Rubió I, Quero S, García-Palacios A & Alcañiz M. Presence and emotions in virtual environments: the influence of stereoscopy. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008; 11: 1-8.
5. Lambooij M, Ijsselsteijn W, Fortuin M & Heynderickx I. Visual discomfort and visual fatigue of stereoscopic displays: a review. J Imaging Sci Technol 2009; 53: 030201-(14).
6. Howarth PA. Potential hazards of viewing 3-D stereoscopic television, cinema and computer games: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011; 31: 111-122.
7. Wopking M. Viewing comfort with stereoscopic pictures: an experimental study on the subjective effects of disparity magnitude and depth of focus. J Soc Inf Disp 1995; 3: 101-103.
8. Kooi FL & Toet A. Visual comfort of binocular and 3D displays. Displays 2004; 25: 99-108.
9. Shibata T, Kim J, Hoffman DM & Banks MS. The zone of comfort: predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays. J Vis 2011; 11: 1-29.
10. Read JCA & Bohr I. User experience while viewing stereoscopic 3D television. Ergonomics 2014; 57: 1140-1153.
11. Cooper SC, Gietzen JA, Hayes JR & Sheedy JE. Comparison of eye and vision-related symptoms when viewing a 2d versus 3d movies. American Academy of Optometry Scientific Poster Session November 17-20, 2010. San Francisco, CA.
12. Solimini AG. Are there side effects to watching 3D movies? A prospective crossover observational study on visually induced motion sickness. PLoS One 2013; 8: 1-8.
13. Maffei L & Fiorentini A. Arte e Cervello. Zanichelli Editore: Bologna, 1995.
14. Cutting JE & Vishton PM. Perceiving layout and knowing distance: the integration, relative potency and contextual use of different information about depth. In: Perception of Space and Motion (Epstein W & Rogers S, editors), Academic Press: New York, 1995; pp. 69-117.
15. Goldstein EB. Sensation and Perception, 6th edn. Wadsworth-Thomson Learning: Pacific Grove, 2002.
16. Inoue T & Ohzu H. Accommodative responses to stereoscopic three-dimensional display. Appl Opt 1997; 36: 4509-4515.
17. Ukai K & Kato Y. The use of video refraction to measure the dynamic properties of the near triad in observers of a 3-D display. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22: 385-388.
18. Emoto M, Niida T & Okano F. Repeated vergence adaptation causes the decline of visual. J Dis Technol 2005; 1: 328-340.
19. Okada Y, Ukai K, Wolffsohn JS et al. Target spatial frequency determines the response to conflicting defocus- and convergence-driven accommodative stimuli. Vision Res 2006; 46: 475-484.
20. Ukai K & Howarth PA. Visual fatigue caused by viewing stereoscopic motion images: background, theories, and observations. Displays 2008; 29: 106-116.
21. Hoffman DM, Girshick AR, Akeley K & Banks MS. Vergence accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. J Vis 2008; 8: 1-30.
22. Seuntiëns PJH, Meesters LMJ & IJsselsteijn WA. Perceptual attributes of crosstalk in 3D images. Displays 2005; 26: 177-183.
23. Jones GR, Lee D, Holliman NS & Ezra D. Controlling perceived depth in stereoscopic images. Proc SPIE 2001; 4297: 42-53.
24. Sun G & Holliman N. Evaluating Methods for Controlling Depth Perception in Stereoscopic Cinematography. IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2009: 72370I-72370I-12.
25. Chen MJ, Kwon DK, Cormack LK & Bovik AC. Optimizing 3D image display using the stereoacuity function. In Image Processing (ICIP), 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (pp. 617-620). IEEE.
26. Yano S, Ide S, Mitsuhashi T & Thwaites H. A study of visual fatigue and visual comfort for 3D HDTV/HDTV images. Displays 2002; 23: 191-201.
27. Speranza F, Tam WJ, Renaud R & Hur N. Effect of disparity and motion on visual comfort of stereoscopic images. Proc SPIE 2006; 6055: 94-103.
28. Lee S, Jung Y, Sohn H, Ro YM & Wook Park H. Visual discomfort induced by fast salient object motion in stereoscopic video. Proc SPIE 2011; 7863: 1-12.
29. Woods A, Docherty T & Koch R. Image distortions in stereoscopic video systems. Proc SPIE 1993; 1915: 1-13.
30. Dodgson NA. Variation and extrema of human interpupillary distance. In: Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems XI (Woods AJ, Merritt JO, Benton SA & Bolas MT, editors), Proc SPIE 2004; 529.
31. Fukushima T, Torii M, Ukai K, Wolffsohn JS & Gilmartin B. The relationship between CA/C ratio and individual differences in dynamic accommodative responses while viewing stereoscopic images. J Vis 2009; 21: 1-13.
32. Sheedy JE, Hayes JN & Engle J. Is all asthenopia the same? Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 732-739.
33. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC & Strahan EJ. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods 1999; 4: 272-299.
34. Horn JL. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 1965; 30: 179-185.
35. Patil VH, Singh SN, Mishra S & Todd Donavan D. Efficient theory development and factor retention criteria: abandon the 'eigenvalue greater than one' criterion. J Bus Res 2008; 61: 162-170.
36. Walline JJ, Zadnik K & Mutti DO. Validity of surveys reporting myopia, astigmatism, and presbyopia. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73: 376-381.
37. Breslin KM, O'Donoghue L & Saunders KJ. An investigation into the validity of self-reported classification of refractive error. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2014; 34: 346-352.