Comparison of user performance in mixed 2D-3D multi-display environments

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8117 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2013, Pages 260-277

  Karnik, Abhijit ^a   Grossman, Tovi ^b   Subramanian, Sriram ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b AUTODESK RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

autostereoscopic display; mental load; multi display environment; performance; stereoscopic display; volumetric display; zone of comfort

Indexed keywords

AUTO-STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAY; MENTAL LOADS; MULTI-DISPLAY ENVIRONMENTS; PERFORMANCE; STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAY; VOLUMETRIC DISPLAY;

GEOMETRICAL OPTICS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

DISPLAY DEVICES;

EID: 84883278775     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40483-2_18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Aliakseyeu, D., Martens, J.-B., Sriram Subramanian, M., Vroubel, W.W.: Visual Interaction Platform. In: Proc. INTERACT 2001, pp. 232-239. IOS Press (2001)
2. Bailly, G., Nigay, L., Auber, D.: NAVRNA: visualization - exploration - editing of RNA. In: Proc. AVI 2006, pp. 504-507. ACM, New York (2006)
3. Berezin, O.: Digital cinema in Russia: Is 3D still a driver for the development of the cinema market. 3D Media 2010 (2010)
4. Bowman, D.A., North, C., Chen, J., Polys, N.F., Pyla, P.S., Yilmaz, U.: Information-rich virtual environments: theory, tools, and research agenda. In: Proc. VRST 2003, pp. 81-90. ACM, New York (2003)
5. Butler, A., Hilliges, O., Izadi, S., Hodges, S., Molyneaux, D., Kim, D., Kong, D.: Vermeer: direct interaction with a 360° viewable 3D display. In: Proc. UIST 2011, pp. 569-576. ACM, New York (2011)
6. Cossairt, O.S., Napoli, J., Hill, S.L., Dorval, R.K., Favalora, G.E.: Occlusion-capable multiview volumetric three-dimensional display. Appl. Opt. 46, 1244-1250 (2007)
7. Czernuszenko, M., Pape, D., Sandin, D., DeFanti, T., Dawe, G.L., Brown, M.D.: The ImmersaDesk and Infinity Wall projection-based virtual reality displays. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 31, 46-49 (1997)
8. Ebert, D., Bedwell, E., Maher, S., Smoliar, L., Downing, E.: Realizing 3D visualization using crossed-beam volumetric displays. Commun. ACM 42, 100-107 (1999)
9. Emoto, M., Niida, T., Okano, F.: Repeated vergence adaptation causes the decline of visual functions in watching stereoscopic television. Display Technology 1, 328-340 (2005)
10. Favalora, G.E.: Volumetric 3D Displays and Application Infrastructure. Computer 38, 37-44 (2005)
11. Forlines, C., Esenther, A., Shen, C., Wigdor, D., Ryall, K.: Multi-user, multi-display interaction with a single-user, single-display geospatial application. In: Proc. UIST 2006, pp. 273-276. ACM, New York (2006)
12. Grossman, T., Balakrishnan, R.: The design and evaluation of selection techniques for 3D volumetric displays. In: Proc. UIST 2006, pp. 3-12. ACM, New York (2006)
13. Grossman, T., Balakrishnan, R.: An evaluation of depth perception on volumetric displays. In: Proc. AVI 2006, pp. 193-200. ACM, New York (2006)
14. Hachet, M., Bossavit, B., Cohé, A., Rivière, J.-B.D.L.: Toucheo: multitouch and stereo combined in a seamless workspace. In: Proc. UIST 2011, pp. 587-592. ACM, NY (2011)
15. Hancock, M., Nacenta, M., Gutwin, C., Carpendale, S.: The effects of changing projection geometry on the interpretation of 3D orientation on tabletops. In: Proc. ITS 2009, pp. 157-164. ACM, New York (2009)
16. Hilliges, O., Kim, D., Izadi, S., Weiss, M., Wilson, A.: HoloDesk: direct 3d interactions with a situated see-through display. In: Proc. CHI 2012, pp. 2421-2430. ACM, NY (2012)
17. Hoffman, D.M., Girshick, A.R., Akeley, K., Banks, M.S.: Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. Vision 8 (2008)
18. Jiang, H., Wigdor, D., Forlines, C., Borkin, M., Kauffmann, J., Shen, C.: LivOlay: interactive ad-hoc registration and overlapping of applications for collaborative visual exploration. In: Proc. CHI 2008, pp. 1357-1360. ACM (2008)
19. Jin, Z.X., Zhang, Y.J., Wang, X., Plocher, T.: Evaluating the Usability of an Autostereoscopic Display. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4551, pp. 605-614. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
20. Johnston, E.B., Cumming, B.G., Landy, M.S.: Integration of stereopsis and motion shape cues. Vision Research 34, 2259-2275 (1994)
21. Jones, A., McDowall, I., Yamada, H., Bolas, M., Debevec, P.: An interactive 360° light field display. In: Proc. SIGGRAPH 2007 ETech, p. 13. ACM, New York (2007)
22. Karnik, A., Mayol-Cuevas, W., Subramanian, S.: MUSTARD: a multi user see through AR display. In: Proc. CHI 2012, pp. 2541-2550. ACM, New York (2012)
23. Karnik, A., Plasencia, D.M., Mayol-Cuevas, W., Subramanian, S.: PiVOT: personalized view-overlays for tabletops. In: Proc. UIST 2012, pp. 271-280. ACM, New York (2012)
24. Kooi, F.L., Toet, A.: Visual comfort of binocular and 3D displays. Displays 25, 99-108 (2004)
25. Langhans, K., Bahr, D., Bezecny, D., Homann, D., Oltmann, K., Oltmann, K., Guill, C., Rieper, E., Ardey, G.: FELIX 3D display: an interactive tool for volumetric imaging. In: Proc. Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems IX, pp. 176-190. SPIE (2002)
26. Lin, Q., Qiong-Hua, W., Jiang-Yong, L., Wu-Xiang, Z., Cheng-Qun, S.: An Autostereoscopic 3D Projection Display Based on a Lenticular Sheet and a Parallax Barrier. J. Display Technology 8, 397-400 (2012)
27. Marshall, P., Rogers, Y., Hornecker, E.: Are tangible interfaces really any better than other kinds of interfaces? In: Proc. Tangible User Interfaces in Context and Theory Workshop, CHI 2007. ACM, New York (2007)
28. Matusik, W., Pfister, H.: 3D TV: a scalable system for real-time acquisition, transmission, and autostereoscopic display of dynamic scenes. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 814-824 (2004)
29. Nacenta, M.A., Sakurai, S., Yamaguchi, T., Miki, Y., Itoh, Y., Kitamura, Y., Subramanian, S., Gutwin, C.: E-conic: a perspective-aware interface for multi-display environments. In: Proc. UIST 2007, pp. 279-288. ACM, New York (2007)
30. Nayar, S.K., Anand, V.N.: 3D Display Using Passive Optical Scatterers. Computer 40, 54-63 (2007)
31. Oliveira, S., Jorge, J., González-Méijome, J.M.: Dynamic accommodative response to different visual stimuli (2D vs 3D) while watching television and while playing Nintendo 3DS Console. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 32, 383-389 (2012)
32. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J.E., Tabbers, H., Van Gerven, P.W.M.: Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory. Educational Psychol. 38, 63-71 (2003)
33. Perlin, K., Paxia, S., Kollin, J.S.: An autostereoscopic display. In: Proc. SIGGRAPH 2000, pp. 319-326. ACM, New York (2000)
34. Price, A., Lee, H.-S.: The Effect of Two-dimensional and Stereoscopic Presentation on Middle School Students' Performance of Spatial Cognition Tasks. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 19, 90-103 (2010)
35. Shepard, R.N., Metzler, J.: Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects. Science 171, 701-703 (1971)
36. Shibata, T., Kim, J., Hoffman, D.M., Banks, M.S.: The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays. Vision 11 (2011)
37. John, M., Cowen, M.B., Smallman, H.S., Oonk, H.M.: The Use of 2D and 3D Displays for Shape-Understanding versus Relative-Position Tasks. Human Factors 43, 79-98 (2001)
38. Sullivan, A.: DepthCube solid-state 3D volumetric display. In: Proc. Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems XI, pp. 279-284. SPIE (2004)
39. Tam, W.J., Speranza, F., Yano, S., Shimono, K., Ono, H.: Stereoscopic 3D-TV: Visual Comfort. IEEE Trans. Broadcasting 57, 335-346 (2011)
40. Wigdor, D., Jiang, H., Forlines, C., Borkin, M., Shen, C.: WeSpace: the design development and deployment of a walk-up and share multi-surface visual collaboration system. In: Proc. CHI 2009, pp. 1237-1246. ACM, New York (2009)