Nanobodies: Site-specific labeling for super-resolution imaging, rapid epitope- mapping and native protein complex isolation

eLife

Volumn 4, Issue DECEMBER2015, 2015, Pages

  Pleiner, Tino ^a   Bates, Mark ^a   Trakhanov, Sergei ^a   Lee, Chung Tien ^a,b   Schliep, Jan Erik ^a   Chug, Hema ^a   Böhning, Marc ^a   Stark, Holger ^a   Urlaub, Henning ^a,b   Görlich, Dirk ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYSTEINE; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; MALTOSE BINDING PROTEIN; NANOBODY; MACROMOLECULE; NUCLEOPORIN;

ALPACA; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANTIBODY LABELING; ANTIGEN ANTIBODY COMPLEX; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS LINKING; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; EGG EXTRACT; EPITOPE MAPPING; FEMALE; FIELD EMISSION SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMMUNIZATION; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX; PHAGE DISPLAY; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; XENOPUS LAEVIS; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MACROMOLECULE; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; STAINING;

EPITOPE MAPPING; HUMANS; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX PROTEINS; OPTICAL IMAGING; SINGLE-DOMAIN ANTIBODIES; STAINING AND LABELING;

EID: 84956906213     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.11349     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkó czi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Hung L-W, Kapral GJ, Grosse- Kunstleve RW, McCoy AJ, Moriarty NW, Oeffner R, Read RJ, Richardson DC, Richardson JS, Terwilliger TC, Zwart PH. 2010. PHENIX : A comprehensive python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 66:213–221. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925.
2. Amlacher S, Sarges P, Flemming D, van Noort V, Kunze R, Devos DP, Arumugam M, Bork P, Hurt E. 2011. Insight into structure and assembly of the nuclear pore complex by utilizing the genome of a eukaryotic thermophile. Cell 146:277–289. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.039.
3. Andersen KR, Onischenko E, Tang JH, Kumar P, Chen JZ, Ulrich A, Liphardt JT, Weis K, Schwartz TU. 2013. Scaffold nucleoporins Nup188 and Nup192 share structural and functional properties with nuclear transport receptors. eLife 2:e00745. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00745.
4. Arbabi Ghahroudi M, Desmyter A, Wyns L, Hamers R, Muyldermans S. 1997. Selection and identification of single domain antibody fragments from camel heavy-chain antibodies. FEBS Letters 414:521–526. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(97)01062-4.
5. Baneyx F, Mujacic M. 2004. Recombinant protein folding and misfolding in escherichia coli. Nature Biotechnology 22:1399–1408. doi: 10.1038/nbt1029.
6. Bates M, Huang B, Dempsey GT, Zhuang X. 2007. Multicolor super-resolution imaging with photo-switchable fluorescent probes. Science 317:1749–1753. doi: 10.1126/science.1146598.
7. Beckett D, Kovaleva E, Schatz PJ. 1999. A minimal peptide substrate in biotin holoenzyme synthetase-catalyzed biotinylation. Protein Science 8:921–929. doi: 10.1110/ps.8.4.921.
8. Blow JJ, Laskey RA. 1986. Initiation of DNA replication in nuclei and purified DNA by a cell-free extract of xenopus eggs. Cell 47:577–587. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90622-7.
9. Bui KH, von Appen A, DiGuilio AL, Ori A, Sparks L, Mackmull M-T, Bock T, Hagen W, Andrés-Pons A, Glavy JS, Beck M. 2013. Integrated structural analysis of the human nuclear pore complex scaffold. Cell 155:1233–1243. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.055.
10. Busche B. 2013. New Algorithms for Automated Processing of Electronmicroscopic Images. Göttingen, Germany: Shaker Verlag.
11. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. 2006. The single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate– phenol–chloroform extraction: Twenty-something years on. Nature Protocols 1:581–585. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.83.
12. Chug H, Trakhanov S, Hülsmann BB, Pleiner T, Görlich D. 2015. Crystal structure of the metazoan.
13. Nup62.Nup58.Nup54 nucleoporin complex. Science 350:106–110. doi: 10.1126/science.aac7420.
14. Colwill, K., Gräslund, S. 2011. A roadmap to generate renewable protein binders to the human proteome. Nature Methods 8:551–558. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1607.
15. Conrath KE, Lauwereys M, Galleni M, Matagne A, Frère JM, Kinne J, Wyns L, Muyldermans S. 2001. Beta- lactamase inhibitors derived from single-domain antibody fragments elicited in the camelidae. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 45:2807–2812. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.10.2807-2812.2001.
16. De Marco A. 2009. Strategies for successful recombinant expression of disulfide bond-dependent proteins in escherichia coli. Microbial Cell Factories 8:26. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-8-26.
17. Dempsey GT, Vaughan JC, Chen KH, Bates M, Zhuang X. 2011. Evaluation of fluorophores for optimal performance in localization-based super-resolution imaging. Nature Methods 8:1027–1036. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1768.
18. Desmyter A, Spinelli S, Roussel A, Cambillau C. 2015. Camelid nanobodies: killing two birds with one stone. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 3232C, :1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2015.01.001.
19. Djender S, Schneider A, Beugnet A, Crepin R, Desrumeaux KE, Romani C, Moutel S, Perez F, de Marco A. 2014. Bacterial cytoplasm as an effective cell compartment for producing functional VHH-based affinity reagents and camelidae IgG-like recombinant antibodies. Microbial Cell Factories 13. doi: 10.1186/s12934-014-0140-1.
20. Dube P, Tavares P, Lurz R, van Heel M. 1993. The portal protein of bacteriophage SPP1: A DNA pump with 13- fold symmetry. The EMBO Journal 12:1303–1309.
21. Eibauer M, Pellanda M, Turgay Y, Dubrovsky A, Wild A, Medalia O. 2015. Structure and gating of the nuclear pore complex. Nature Communications 6:7532. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8532.
22. Eisenhardt N, Redolfi J, Antonin W. 2014. Interaction of Nup53 with Ndc1 and Nup155 is required for nuclear pore complex assembly. Journal of Cell Science 127:908–921. doi: 10.1242/jcs.141739.
23. Ellison TR, Mathisen PM, Miller L. 1985. Developmental changes in keratin patterns during epidermal maturation. Developmental Biology 112:329–337. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(85)90403-8.
24. Fairhead M, Howarth M. 2015. Site-specific biotinylation of purified proteins using BirA. Methods in Molecular Biology 1266:171–184. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2272-7_12.
25. Feilmeier BJ, Iseminger G, Schroeder D, Webber H, Phillips GJ. 2000. Green fluorescent protein functions as a reporter for protein localization in escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology 182:4068–4076. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.14.4068-4076.2000.
26. Finlay DR. 1991. A complex of nuclear pore proteins required for pore function. The Journal of Cell Biology 114: 169–183. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.1.169.
27. Frey S, Görlich D. 2014. A new set of highly efficient, tag-cleaving proteases for purifying recombinant proteins. Journal of Chromatography A 1337:95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.02.029.
28. Fridy PC, Li Y, Keegan S, Thompson MK, Nudelman I, Scheid JF, Oeffinger M, Nussenzweig MC, Fenyo¨ D, Chait BT, Rout MP. 2014. A robust pipeline for rapid production of versatile nanobody repertoires. Nature Methods 11:1253–1260. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3170.
29. Fridy PC, Thompson MK, Ketaren NE, Rout MP. 2015. Engineered high-affinity nanobodies recognizing staphylococcal protein a and suitable for native isolation of protein complexes. Analytical Biochemistry 477:92–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2015.02.013.
30. Govaert J, Pellis M, Deschacht N, Vincke C, Conrath K, Muyldermans S, Saerens D. 2012. Dual beneficial effect of interloop disulfide bond for single domain antibody fragments. Journal of Biological Chemistry 287:1970–1979. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.242818.
31. Griffis ER. 2003. Nup98 localizes to both nuclear and cytoplasmic sides of the nuclear pore and binds to two distinct nucleoporin subcomplexes. Molecular Biology of the Cell 14:600–610. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E02-09-0582.
32. Göttfert F, Wurm CA, Mueller V, Berning S, Cordes VC, Honigmann A, Hell SW. 2013. Coaligned dual-channel STED nanoscopy and molecular diffusion analysis at 20 nm resolution. Biophysical Journal 105:L01–L03. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.029.
33. Hamers-Casterman C, Atarhouch T, Muyldermans S, Robinson G, Hammers C, Songa EB, Bendahman N, Hammers R. 1993. Naturally occurring antibodies devoid of light chains. Nature 363:446–448. doi: 10.1038/363446a0.
34. Harel A, Orjalo AV, Vincent T, Lachish-Zalait A, Vasu S, Shah S, Zimmerman E, Elbaum M, Forbes DJ. 2003. Removal of a single pore subcomplex results in vertebrate nuclei devoid of nuclear pores. Molecular Cell 11: 853–864. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00116-3.
35. Harris LJ, Skaletsky E, McPherson A. 1998. Crystallographic structure of an intact IgG1 monoclonal antibody. Journal of Molecular Biology 275:861–872. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1508.
36. Hawryluk-Gara LA. 2005. Vertebrate Nup53 interacts with the nuclear lamina and is required for the assembly of a Nup93-containing complex. Molecular Biology of the Cell 16:2382–2394. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-10-0857.
37. Hawryluk-Gara LA, Platani M, Santarella R, Wozniak RW, Mattaj IW. 2008. Nup53 is required for nuclear envelope and nuclear pore complex assembly. Molecular Biology of the Cell 19:1753–1762. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-08-0820.
38. Hell SW. 2009. Microscopy and its focal switch. Nature Methods 6:24–32. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1291.
39. Helma J, Cardoso MC, Muyldermans S, Leonhardt H. 2015. Nanobodies and recombinant binders in cell biology. The Journal of Cell Biology 209:633–644. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201409074.
40. Hodel AE, Hodel MR, Griffis ER, Hennig KA, Ratner GA, Xu S, Powers MA. 2002. The three-dimensional structure of the autoproteolytic, nuclear pore-targeting domain of the human nucleoporin Nup98. Molecular Cell 10:347–358. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00589-0.
41. Hu T. 1996. Molecular and functional characterization of the p62 complex, an assembly of nuclear pore complex glycoproteins. The Journal of Cell Biology 134:589–601. doi: 10.1083/jcb.134.3.589.
42. Huang B, Bates M, Zhuang X. 2009. Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. Annual Review of Biochemistry 78:993–1016. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061906.092014.
43. Hurt E, Beck M. 2015. Towards understanding nuclear pore complex architecture and dynamics in the age of integrative structural analysis. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 34:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2015.04.009.
44. Hu¨ lsmann BB, Labokha AA, Go¨ rlich D. 2012. The permeability of reconstituted nuclear pores provides direct evidence for the selective phase model. Cell 150:738–751. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.019.
45. Jeudy S, Schwartz TU. 2007. Crystal structure of nucleoporin Nic96 reveals a novel, intricate helical domain architecture. Journal of Biological Chemistry 282:34904–34912. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705479200.
46. Kastner B, Fischer N, Golas MM, Sander B, Dube P, Boehringer D, Hartmuth K, Deckert J, Hauer F, Wolf E, Uchtenhagen H, Urlaub H, Herzog F, Peters JM, Poerschke D, Lu¨ hrmann R, Stark H. 2008. GraFix: Sample preparation for single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. Nature Methods 5:53–55. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1139.
47. Kelley K, Knockenhauer KE, Kabachinski G, Schwartz TU. 2015. Atomic structure of the y complex of the nuclear pore. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 22:425–431. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2998.
48. Kirchhofer A, Helma J, Schmidthals K, Frauer C, Cui S, Karcher A, Pellis M, Muyldermans S, Casas-Delucchi CS, Cardoso MC, Leonhardt H, Hopfner K-P, Rothbauer U. 2010. Modulation of protein properties in living cells using nanobodies. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 17:133–138. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1727.
49. Liu L, Spurrier J, Butt TR, Strickler JE. 2008. Enhanced protein expression in the baculovirus/insect cell system using engineered SUMO fusions. Protein Expression and Purification 62:21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2008.07.010.
50. Lobstein J, Emrich CA, Jeans C, Faulkner M, Riggs P, Berkmen M. 2012. SHuffle, a novel escherichia coli protein expression strain capable of correctly folding disulfide bonded proteins in its cytoplasm. Microbial Cell Factories 11:56. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-11-56.
51. Löschberger A, van de Linde S, Dabauvalle MC, Rieger B, Heilemann M, Krohne G, Sauer M. 2012. Super- resolution imaging visualizes the eightfold symmetry of gp210 proteins around the nuclear pore complex and resolves the central channel with nanometer resolution. Journal of Cell Science 125:570–575. doi: 10.1242/jcs.098822.
52. Maass DR, Sepulveda J, Pernthaner A, Shoemaker CB. 2007. Alpaca (lama pacos) as a convenient source of recombinant camelid heavy chain antibodies (vHHs). Journal of Immunological Methods 324:13–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2007.04.008.
53. Marcon E, Jain H, Bhattacharya A, Guo H, Phanse S, Pu S, Byram G, Collins BC, Dowdell E, Fenner M, Guo X, Hutchinson A, Kennedy JJ, Krastins B, Larsen B, Lin Z-Y, Lopez MF, Loppnau P, Miersch S, Nguyen T, Olsen JB, Paduch M, Ravichandran M, Seitova A, Vadali G, Vogelsang MS, Whiteaker JR, Zhong G, Zhong N, Zhao L, Aebersold R, Arrowsmith CH, Emili A, Frappier L, Gingras A-C, Gstaiger M, Paulovich AG, Koide S, Kossiakoff AA, Sidhu SS, Wodak SJ, Gräslund S, Greenblatt JF, Edwards AM. 2015. Assessment of a method to characterize antibody selectivity and specificity for use in immunoprecipitation. Nature Methods 12:725–731. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3472.
54. Massa S, Xavier C, De Vos J, Caveliers V, Lahoutte T, Muyldermans S, Devoogdt N. 2014. Site-specific labeling of cysteine-tagged camelid single-domain antibody-fragments for use in molecular imaging. Bioconjugate Chemistry 25:979–988. doi: 10.1021/bc500111t.
55. Mellacheruvu D, Wright Z, Couzens AL, Lambert J-P, St-Denis NA, Li T, Miteva YV, Hauri S, Sardiu ME, Low TY, Halim VA, Bagshaw RD, Hubner NC, al-Hakim A, Bouchard A, Faubert D, Fermin D, Dunham WH, Goudreault M, Lin Z-Y, Badillo BG, Pawson T, Durocher D, Coulombe B, Aebersold R, Superti-Furga G, Colinge J, Heck AJR, Choi H, Gstaiger M, Mohammed S, Cristea IM, Bennett KL, Washburn MP, Raught B, Ewing RM, Gingras A-C, Nesvizhskii AI. 2013. The CRAPome: A contaminant repository for affinity purification–mass spectrometry data. Nature Methods 10:730–736. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2557.
56. Miller L, Daniel JC. 1977. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro ribosomal RNA synthesis in nucleolar mutants ofXenopus laevis. In Vitro 13:557–563. doi: 10.1007/BF02627851.
57. Mitchell JM, Mansfeld J, Capitanio J, Kutay U, Wozniak RW. 2010. Pom121 links two essential subcomplexes of the nuclear pore complex core to the membrane. The Journal of Cell Biology 191:505–521. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201007098.
58. Muyldermans S. 2013. Nanobodies: Natural single-domain antibodies. Annual Review of Biochemistry 82:775–797. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-063011-092449.
59. Niesen FH, Berglund H, Vedadi M. 2007. The use of differential scanning fluorimetry to detect ligand interactions that promote protein stability. Nature Protocols 2:2212–2221. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.321.
60. Olichon A, Surrey T. 2007. Selection of genetically encoded fluorescent single domain antibodies engineered for efficient expression in escherichia coli. Journal of Biological Chemistry 282:36314–36320. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704908200.
61. Pardon E, Laeremans T, Triest S, Rasmussen SGF, Wohlkönig A, Ruf A, Muyldermans S, Hol WGJ, Kobilka BK, Steyaert J. 2014. A general protocol for the generation of nanobodies for structural biology. Nature Protocols 9:674–693. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.039.
62. Platonova E, Winterflood CM, Junemann A, Albrecht D, Faix J, Ewers H. 2015. Single-molecule microscopy of molecules tagged with GFP or RFP derivatives in mammalian cells using nanobody binders. Methods 88. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.06.018.
63. Ries J, Kaplan C, Platonova E, Eghlidi H, Ewers H. 2012. A simple, versatile method for GFP-based super-resolution microscopy via nanobodies. Nature Methods 9:582–584. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1991.
64. Rothbauer U, Zolghadr K, Tillib S, Nowak D, Schermelleh L, Gahl A, Backmann N, Conrath K, Muyldermans S, Cardoso MC, Leonhardt H. 2006. Targeting and tracing antigens in live cells with fluorescent nanobodies. Nature Methods 3:887–889. doi: 10.1038/nmeth953.
65. Rothbauer U, Zolghadr K, Muyldermans S, Schepers A, Cardoso MC, Leonhardt H. 2008. A versatile nanotrap for biochemical and functional studies with fluorescent fusion proteins. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 7:282–289. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700342-MCP200.
66. Rust MJ, Bates M, Zhuang X. 2006. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (sTORM). Nature Methods 3:793–796. doi: 10.1038/nmeth929.
67. Sachdev R, Sieverding C, Flotenmeyer M, Antonin W. 2012. The c-terminal domain of Nup93 is essential for assembly of the structural backbone of nuclear pore complexes. Molecular Biology of the Cell 23:740–749. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-09-0761.
68. Sander B, Golas MM, Stark H. 2003. Automatic CTF correction for single particles based upon multivariate statistical analysis of individual power spectra. Journal of Structural Biology 142:392–401. doi: 10.1016/S1047-8477(03)00072-8.
69. Schatz PJ. 1993. Use of peptide libraries to map the substrate specificity of a peptide-modifying enzyme: a 13 residue consensus peptide specifies biotinylation in escherichia coli. Bio/Technology 11:1138–1143. doi: 10.1038/nbt1093-1138.
70. Schermelleh L, Carlton PM, Haase S, Shao L, Winoto L, Kner P, Burke B, Cardoso MC, Agard DA, Gustafsson MGL, Leonhardt H, Sedat JW. 2008. Subdiffraction multicolor imaging of the nuclear periphery with 3D structured illumination microscopy. Science 320:1332–1336. doi: 10.1126/science.1156947.
71. Schmidt C, Urlaub H. 2009. ITRAQ-labeling of in-gel digested proteins for relative quantification. Methods in Molecular Biology 564:207–226. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-157-8_12.
72. Schmitz KR, Bagchi A, Roovers RC, van Bergen en Henegouwen PMP, Ferguson KM. 2013. Structural evaluation of EGFR inhibition mechanisms for Nanobodies/VHH domains. Structure 21:1214–1224. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2013.05.008.
73. Schrader N, Stelter P, Flemming D, Kunze R, Hurt E, Vetter IR. 2008. Structural basis of the Nic96 subcomplex organization in the nuclear pore channel. Molecular Cell 29:46–55. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.10.022.
74. Siniossoglou S. 2000. Structure and assembly of the Nup84p complex. The Journal of Cell Biology 149:41–54. doi: 10.1083/jcb.149.1.41.
75. Stuwe T, Schada von Borzyskowski L, Davenport AM, Hoelz A. 2012. Molecular basis for the anchoring of proto- oncoprotein Nup98 to the cytoplasmic face of the nuclear pore complex. Journal of Molecular Biology 419: 330–346. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.03.024.
76. Stuwe T, Bley CJ, Thierbach K, Petrovic S, Schilbach S, Mayo DJ, Perriches T, Rundlet EJ, Jeon YE, Collins LN, Huber FM, Lin DH, Paduch M, Koide A, Lu V, Fischer J, Hurt E, Koide S, Kossiakoff AA, Hoelz A. 2015a. Architecture of the fungal nuclear pore inner ring complex. Science 350:56–64. doi: 10.1126/science.aac9176.
77. Stuwe T, Correia AR, Lin DH, Paduch M, Lu VT, Kossiakoff AA, Hoelz A. 2015b. Architecture of the nuclear pore complex coat. Science 347:1148–1152. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4136.
78. Szymborska A, de Marco A, Daigle N, Cordes VC, Briggs JAG, Ellenberg J. 2013. Nuclear pore scaffold structure analyzed by super-resolution microscopy and particle averaging. Science 341:655–658. doi: 10.1126/science.1240672.
79. Theerthagiri G, Eisenhardt N, Schwarz H, Antonin W. 2010. The nucleoporin Nup188 controls passage of membrane proteins across the nuclear pore complex. The Journal of Cell Biology 189:1129–1142. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200912045.
80. van Heel M, Harauz G, Orlova EV, Schmidt R, Schatz M. 1996. A new generation of the IMAGIC image processing system. Journal of Structural Biology 116:17–24. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0004.
81. Vasu S. 2001. Novel vertebrate nucleoporins Nup133 and Nup160 play a role in mRNA export. The Journal of Cell Biology 155:339–354. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200108007.
82. Vincke C, Gutiérrez C, Wernery U, Devoogdt N, Hassanzadeh-Ghassabeh G, Muyldermans S. 2012. Generation of single domain antibody fragments derived from camelids and generation of manifold constructs. Methods in Molecular Biology 907:145–176. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-974-7_8.
83. Vollmer B, Antonin W. 2014. The diverse roles of the Nup93/Nic96 complex proteins – structural scaffolds of the nuclear pore complex with additional cellular functions. Biological Chemistry 395:515–528. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2013-0285.
84. von Appen A, Kosinski J, Sparks L, Ori A, DiGuilio AL, Vollmer B, Mackmull M-T, Banterle N, Parca L, Kastritis P, Buczak K, Mosalaganti S, Hagen W, Andres-Pons A, Lemke EA, Bork P, Antonin W, Glavy JS, Bui KH, Beck M. 2015. In situ structural analysis of the human nuclear pore complex. Nature 526:140–143. doi: 10.1038/nature15381.
85. Walther TC, Alves A, Pickersgill H, Loïodice I, Hetzer M, Galy V, Hülsmann BB, Köcher T, Wilm M, Allen T, Mattaj IW, Doye V. 2003. The conserved Nup107-160 complex is critical for nuclear pore complex assembly. Cell 113: 195–206. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00235-6.
86. Witte MD, Cragnolini JJ, Dougan SK, Yoder NC, Popp MW, Ploegh HL. 2012. Preparation of unnatural n-to-n and c-to-c protein fusions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109:11993–11998. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205427109.
87. Wühr M, Freeman RM, Presler M, Horb ME, Peshkin L, Gygi SP, Kirschner MW. 2014. Deep proteomics of the xenopus laevis egg using an mRNA-derived reference database. Current Biology 24:1467–1475. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.044.
88. Yang B, Wu Y-J, Zhu M, Fan S-B, Lin J, Zhang K, Li S, Chi H, Li Y-X, Chen H-F, Luo S-K, Ding Y-H, Wang L-H, Hao Z, Xiu L-Y, Chen S, Ye K, He S-M, Dong M-Q. 2012. Identification of cross-linked peptides from complex samples. Nature Methods 9:904–906. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2099.
89. Zarschler K, Witecy S, Kapplusch F, Foerster C, Stephan H. 2013. High-yield production of functional soluble single-domain antibodies in the cytoplasm of escherichia coli. Microbial Cell Factories 12:97. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-12-97.
90. Zhang Y. 2008. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-40.