Plant and herbivore evolution within the trophic sandwich

Trophic Ecology: Bottom-Up and Top-Down Interactions Across Aquatic and Terrestrial Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 340-364

  Abdala Roberts, Luis ^a   Mooney, Kailen A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954414308     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139924856.014     Document Type: Chapter

References (127)

1. Abdala-Roberts, L. and Mooney, K. A. (2013). Environmental and plant genetic effects on tri-trophic interactions. OItos, 122,1157-1166.
2. Abdala-Roberts, L., Parra-Tabla, V., Salinas-Peba, L., Diaz-Castelazo, C. and Delfin-Gonzalez, H. (2010). Spatial variation in the strength of a trophic cascade involving Ruellia nudiflora (Acanthaceae), an insect seed predator and associated parasitoid fauna in Mexico. Biotropica, 42, 180-187.
3. Abdala-Roberts, L., Agrawal, A. A. and Mooney, K. A. (2012). Ant-aphid interactions on Asclepias syriaca are mediated by plant genotype and caterpillar damage. Oikos, 121, 1905-1913.
4. Abdala-Roberts, L., Parra-Tabla, V., Campbell, D. R. and Mooney, K. A. (2014). Soil fertility and parasitoids shape herbivore selection on plants. Journal of Ecology,102,1120-1128.
5. Abrams, P. A. (1995). Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying, and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communities. American Naturalist, 146, 112-134.
6. Abrams, P. A. (2000). The evolution of predator-prey interactions: theory and evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31, 79-105.
7. Abrams, P. A. and Ginzburg, L. R. (2000). The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 337-341.
8. Adler, L. S., Karban, R. and Strauss, S. Y. (2001). Direct and indirect effects of alkaloids on plant fitness via herbivory and pollination. Ecology, 82, 2032-2044.
9. Agrawal, A. A. (2011). Current trends in the evolutionary ecology of plant defence. Functional Ecology, 25, 420-432.
10. Agrawal, A. A., Laforsch, C. and Tollrian, R. (1999). Transgenerational induction of defences in animals and plants. Nature, 401, 60-63.
11. Agrawal, A. A., Fishbein, M., Halitschke, R., et al. (2009). Evidence for adaptive radiation from a phylogenetic study of plant defenses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106, 18067-18072.
12. Bailey, J. K., Genung, M. A., Ware, I., et al. (2014). Indirect genetic effects: an evolutionary mechanism linking feedbacks, genotypic diversity, and coadaptation in climate change context. Functional Ecology, 28, 87-95.
13. Becerra, J. X. (1997). Insects on plants: macroevolutionary chemical trends in host use. Science, 276, 253-256.
14. Becerra, J. X. (2003). Synchronous coadaptation in an ancient case of herbivory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 100, 12804-12807.
15. Becerra, J. X., Noge, K. and Venable, D. L. (2009). Macroevolutionary chemical escalation in an ancient plant-herbivore arms race. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106, 18062-18066.
16. Benkman, C. W. (2013). Biotic interaction strength and the intensity of selection. Ecology Letters, 16, 1054-1060.
17. Berdegue, M., Trumble, J. T., Hare, J. D. and Redak, R. A. (1996). Is it enemy-free space? The evidence for terrestrial insects and freshwater arthropods. Ecological Entomology, 21, 203-217.
18. Berenbaum, M. R. and Zangerl, A. R. (1998). Chemical phenotype matching between a plant and its insect herbivore.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 95, 13743-13748.
19. Bernays, E. A. (1998). Evolution of feeding behavior in insect herbivores: success seen as different ways to eat without being eaten. Bioscience, 48, 35-44.
20. Boiser, R. C. and Hay, M. E. (1996). Are tropical plants better defended? Palatability and defenses of temperate vs tropical seaweeds. Ecology, 77, 2269-2286.
21. Borer, E. T., Seabloom, E. W., Shurin, J. B., et al. (2005). What determines the strength of a trophic cascade? Ecology, 86, 528-537.
22. Borer, E. T., Halpern, B. S. and Seabloom, E. W. (2006). Asymmetry in community regulation: effects of predators and productivity. Ecology, 87, 2813-2820.
23. Chapin, F. S. (1993). Physiological controls over plant establishment in primary succession. In Primary Succession on Land, ed. J. Miles and D. W. H. Walton. Oxford, Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp 161-178.
24. Choat, J. H. and Clements, K. D. (1998). Vertebrate herbivores in marine and terrestrial environments: a nutritional ecology perspective. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 29, 375-403.
25. Coley, P. D., Bryant, J. P. and Chapin, F. S. (1985). Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science, 230, 895-899.
26. Connell, J. H. and Slatyer, R. O. (1977). Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. American Naturalist, 111,1119-1144.
27. Cremieux, L., Bischoff, A., Smilauerova, M., et al. (2008). Potential contribution of natural enemies to patterns of local adaptation in plants. New Phytologist, 180, 524-533.
28. Demment, M. W. and Van Soest, P. J. (1985). A nutritional explanation for body-size patterns of ruminant and nonruminant herbivores. American Naturalist, 125, 641-672.
29. Dethier, V. G. (1954). Evolution of feeding preference in phytophagous insects. Evolution, 8, 33-54.
30. Dodson, S. I. (1989). The ecological role of chemical stimuli for the zooplankton: predator-induced morphology in Daphnia. Oecologia, 78, 361-367.
31. Duffy, J. E. and Hay, M. E. (1990). Seaweed adaptations to herbivory: chemical, structural, and morphological defenses are often adjusted to spatial or temporal patterns of attack. Bioscience, 40, 368-375.
32. Dyer, L. A. (1995). Tasty generalists and nasty specialists: antipredator mechanisms in tropical lepidopteran larvae. Ecology,76, 1483-1496.
33. Dyer, L. A. (2008). Tropical tritrophic interactions: nasty hosts and ubiquitous cascades. In Tropical Forest Community Ecology, ed. W. P. Carson and S. A. Schnitzer. Oxford: Blackwell Science, pp 275-293.
34. Edwards, K. F., Klausmeier, C. A. and Litchman, E. In press. A three-way tradeoff maintains functional diversity under variable resource supply. American Naturalist.
35. Ehrlich, P. R. and Raven, P. H. (1964). Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution, 18, 586-608.
36. Elser, J. J., Fagan, W. F., Denno, R. F., et al. (2000). Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs. Nature, 408, 578-580.
37. Elzinga, J. A., Atlan, A., Biere, A., et al. (2007). Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interactions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22, 432-439.
38. Endara, M.-J. and Coley, P. D. (2011). The resource availability hypothesis revisited: a metaanalysis. Functional Ecology, 25, 389-398.
39. Erb, M. and Lu, J. (2013). Soil abiotic factors influence interactions between belowground herbivores and plant roots. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64, 1295-1303.
40. Estes, J. A., Brashares, J. S. and Power, M. E. (2013). Predicting and detecting reciprocity between indirect ecological interactions and evolution. American Naturalist, 181, 76-99.
41. Eubanks, M. D. and Denno, R. F. (2000). Host plants mediate omnivore-herbivore interactions and influence prey suppression.Ecology, 81, 936-947.
42. Feeny, P. P. (1976). Plant apparency and chemical defense. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry, 10, 1-40.
43. Fine, P. V. A., Mesones, I. and Coley, P. D. (2004). Herbivores promote habitat specialization by trees in amazonian forests.Science, 305, 663-665.
44. Fraenkel, G. S. (1959). Raison d’etre of secondary plant substances. Science, 129,1466-1470.
45. Gaines, S. D. and Lubchenco, J. (1982). A unified approach to marine plant-herbivore interactions. 2. Biogeography. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 13,111-138.
46. Grime, J. P. (1977). Evidence for existence of 3 primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist, 111, 1169-1194.
47. Gripenberg, S. and Roslin, T. (2007). Up or down in space? Uniting the bottom-up versus top-down paradigm and spatial ecology. Oikos, 116,181-188.
48. Gruner, D. S., Smith, J. E., Seabloom, E. W., et al. (2008). A cross-system synthesis of consumer and nutrient resource control on producer biomass. Ecology Letters, 11, 740-755.
49. Hagen, E. M., Mccluney, K. E., Wyant, K. A., et al. (2012). A meta-analysis of the effects of detritus on primary producers and consumers in marine, freshwater, and terrestrial ecosystems. Oikos, 121,1507-1515.
50. Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E. and Slobodkin, L. G. (1960). Community structure, population control, and competition.American Naturalist, 94, 421-425.
51. Haloin, J. R. and Strauss, S. Y. (2008). Interplay between ecological communities and evolution review of feedbacks from microevolutionary to macroevolutionary scales. Year in Evolutionary Biology, 1133, 87-125.
52. Hamback, P. A. and Beckerman, A. P. (2003). Herbivory and plant resource competition: a review of two interacting interactions. Oikos, 101, 26-37.
53. Hare, J. D. (2002). Plant genetic variation in tritrophic interactions. In Multitrophic Level Interactions, ed. T. Tscharntke and B. A. Hawkins. Cambridge, UK/NewYork: Cambridge University Press, pp 278-298.
54. Hay, M. E. (1991). Marine terrestrial contrasts in the ecology of plant-chemical defenses against herbivores. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 362-365.
55. Hay, M. E. (1992). The role of seaweed chemical defenses in the evolution of feeding specialization and in the mediation of complex interactions. In Ecological Roles of Marine Natural Products, ed. V. Paul. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
56. Hay, M. E. (1996). Marine chemical ecology: what’s known and what’s next? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology,200, 103-134.
57. Hay, M. E. and Fenical, W. (1988). Marine plant-herbivore interactions: the ecology of chemical defense. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 19, 111-145.
58. Hay, M. E. and Steinberg, P. D. (1992). The chemical ecology of plant-herbivore interactions in marine versus terrestrial communities. In Herbivores: Their Interaction with Secondary Metabolites, Evolutionary and Ecological Processes, ed. G. A. Rosenthal and M. Berenbaum. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
59. Hays, G. C. (2003). A review of the adaptive significance and ecosystem consequences of zooplankton diel vertical migrations. Hydrobiologia, 503, 163-170.
60. Heil, M. (2008). Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. NewPhytologist, 178, 41-61.
61. Herms, D. A. and Mattson, W. J. (1992). The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quarterly Review of Biology, 67, 283-335.
62. Hunter, M. D. and Price, P. W. (1992). Playing chutes and ladders: heterogeneity and the relative roles of bottom-up and top-down forces in natural communities. Ecology, 73, 724-732.
63. Ingram, T., Svanback, R., Kraft, N. J. B., et al. (2012). Intraguild predation drives evolutionary niche shift in threespine stickleback. Evolution, 66, 1819-1832.
64. Inouye, B. and Stinchcombe, J. R. (2001). Relationships between ecological interaction modifications and diffuse coevolution: similarities, differences, and causal links. OUos, 95, 353-360.
65. Iwao, K. and Rausher, M. D. (1997). Evolution of plant resistance to multiple herbivores: quantifying diffuse coevolution.American Naturalist, 149, 316-335.
66. Juenger, T. and Bergelson, J. (1998). Pairwise versus diffuse natural selection and the multiple herbivores of scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution, 52,1583-1592.
67. Karban, R. and Baldwin, I. T. (1997). InducedResponses to Herbivory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
68. Kessler, A. and Heil, M. (2011). The multiple faces of indirect defences and their agents of natural selection. Functional Ecology,25, 348-357.
69. Lampert, W. (1989). The adaptive significance of diel vertical migration of zooplankton. Functional Ecology, 3, 21-27.
70. Lawton, J. H. and McNeill, S. (1979). Between the devil and the deep blue sea: on the problems of being an herbivore. In Population Dynamics. Symposium of the British Ecological Society, ed. R. M. Anderson, B. D. Turner and L. R. Taylor. Oxford: Blackwell.
71. Leong, W. and Pawlik, J. R. (2010). Evidence of a resource trade-off between growth and chemical defenses among Caribbean coral reef sponges. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 406, 71-78.
72. Lind, E. M., Borer, E., Seabloom, E., et al. (2013). Life-history constraints in grassland plant species: a growth-defence trade-off is the norm. Ecology Letters, 16, 513-21.
73. Linhart, Y. B., Keefover-Ring, K., Mooney, K. A., Breland, B. and Thompson, J. D. (2005). A chemical polymorphism in a multitrophic setting: thyme monoterpene composition and food web structure. American Naturalist, 166, 517-529.
74. Litchman, E. and Klausmeier, C. A. (2008). Trait-based community ecology of phytoplankton. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39, 615-639.
75. Loose, C. J., Vonelert, E. and Dawidowicz, P. (1993). Chemically-induced diel vertical migration in Daphnia: a new bioassay for kairomones exuded by fish. Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie, 126, 329-337.
76. Marquis, R. J. (1984). Leaf herbivores decrease fitness of a tropical plant. Science, 226, 537-539.
77. Marquis, R. J. (1992). Selective impact of herbivores. In Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens: Ecology, Evolution, and Genetics, ed. R. S. Fritz and E. L. Simms. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
78. Marquis, R. J. and Whelan, C. (1996). Plant morphology, and recruitment of the third trophic level: subtle and little-recognized defenses? Oikos, 75, 330-334.
79. Miller, T. E. and Travis, J. (1996). The evolutionary role of indirect effects in communities. Ecology, 77, 1329-1335.
80. Mooney, K. A. and Agrawal, A. A. (2008). Plant genotype shapes ant-aphid interactions: implications for community structure and indirect plant defense. American Naturalist, 168, 195-205.
81. Mooney, K. A. and Singer, M. S. (2012). Plant variation in herbivore-enemy interactions in natural systems. In Trait-Mediated Indirect Interactions: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives, ed. T. Ohgushi, O. J. Schmitz and R. D. Holt. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
82. Mooney, K. A., Halitschke, R., Kessler, A. And Agrawal, A. A. (2010). Evolutionary trade-offs in plants mediate the strength of trophic cascades. Science, 327, 1642-1644.
83. Mooney, K. A., Pratt, R. T. and Singer, M. S. (2012). The tri-trophic interactions hypothesis: interactive effects of host plant quality, diet breadth and natural enemies on herbivores. PLoS One, 7, 344-403.
84. Moran, N. and Hamilton, W. D. (1980). Low nutritive quality as defense against herbivores. Journal of Theoretical Biology,86, 247-254.
85. Murdoch, W. W. (1966). Community structure population control and competition: a critique. American Naturalist, 100, 219-226.
86. Ness, J. H., Morris, W. F. and Bronstein, J. L. (2009). For ant-protected plants, the best defense is a hungry offense. Ecology, 90, 2823-2831.
87. Oksanen, L., Fretwell, S. D., Arruda, J. And Niemela, P. (1981). Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. American Naturalist, 118, 240-261.
88. Palkovacs, E. P., Wasserman, B. A. and Kinnison, M. T. (2011). Eco-evolutionary trophic dynamics: loss of top predators drives trophic evolution and ecology of prey. PLoS One, 6.
89. Pennings, S. C., Siska, E. L. and Bertness, M. D. (2001). Latitudinal differences in plant palatability in Atlantic coast salt marshes. Ecology, 82, 1344-1359.
90. Pennings, S. C., Ho, C. K., Salgado, C. S., et al. (2009). Latitudinal variation in herbivore pressure in Atlantic Coast salt marshes. Ecology, 90, 183-195.
91. Polis, G. A. and Strong, D. R. (1996). Food web complexity and community dynamics. American Naturalist, 147, 813-846.
92. Post, D. M. and Palkovacs, E. P. (2009). Eco-evolutionary feedbacks in community and ecosystem ecology: interactions between the ecological theatre and the evolutionary play. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1629-1640.
93. Preisser, E. L., Bolnick, D. I. and Benard, M. F. (2005). Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. Ecology, 86, 501-509.
94. Reznick, D. and Endler, J. A. (1982). The impact of predation on life-history evolution in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia-Reticulata). Evolution, 36, 160-177.
95. Rhoades, D. F. and Cates, R. G. (1976). Toward a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry, 10, 168-213.
96. Rico-Gray, V. and Oliveira, P. S. (2007). The Ecology and Evolution of Ant-Plant Interactions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
97. Rosenheim, J. A. and Corbett, A. (2003). Omnivory and the indeterminacy of predator function: can a knowledge of foraging behavior help? Ecology, 84, 2538-2548.
98. Rudgers, J. A. (2004). Enemies of herbivores can shape plant traits: selection in a facultative ant-plant mutualism. Ecology,85,192-205.
99. Rutter, M. T. and Rausher, M. D. (2004). Natural selection on extrafloral nectar production in Chamaecrista fasciculata: the costs and benefits of a mutualism trait. Evolution, 58, 2657-2668.
100. Salgado-Luarte, C. and Gianoli, E. (2012). Herbivores modify selection on plant functional traits in a temperate rainforest understory. American Naturalist, 180, 42-53.
101. Schultz, J. C. (1988). Many factors influence the evolution of herbivore diets, but plant chemistry is central. Ecology, 69, 896-897.
102. Shurin, J. B., Borer, E. T., Seabloom, E. W., et al. (2002). A cross-ecosystem comparison of the strength of trophic cascades.Ecology Letters,5, 785-791.
103. Shurin, J. B., Gruner, D. S. and Hillebrand, H. (2006). All wet or dried up? Real differences between aquatic and terrestrial food webs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273,1-9.
104. Singer, M. S. (2008). Evolutionary ecology of polyphagy. In Specialization, Speciation, and Radiation: The Evolutionary Biology of Herbivorous Insects, ed. K. J. Tilmon. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
105. Singer, M. S. and Stireman, J. O. (2005). The tri-trophic niche concept and adaptive radiation of phytophagous insects.Ecology Letters, 8, 1247-1255.
106. Singer, M. S., Carriere, Y., Theuring, C. and Hartmann, T. (2004). Disentangling food quality from resistance against parasitoids: diet choice by a generalist caterpillar. American Naturalist, 164, 423-429.
107. Singer, M. S., Farkas, T. E., Skorik, C. M. and Mooney, K. A. (2012). Tri-trophic interactions at a community level: effects of host-plant species quality on bird predation of caterpillars. American Naturalist, 179, 363-374.
108. Sork, V. L., Stowe, K. A. and Hochwender, C. (1993). Evidence for local adaptation in closely adjacent subpopulations of northern red oak (Quercus rubra L) expressed as resistance to leaf herbivores. American Naturalist, 142, 928-936.
109. Stachowicz, J. J. and Hay, M. E. (1999). Reduced mobility is associated with compensatory feeding and increased diet breadth of marine crabs. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 188, 169-178.
110. Stamp, N. (2003). Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses. Quarterly Review of Biology, 78, 23-55.
111. Steinberg, P. D., Estes, J. A. and Winter, F. C. (1995). Evolutionary consequences of food-chain length in kelp forest communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 92, 8145-8148.
112. Stenberg, J. A., Lehrman, A. and Bjorkman, C. (2011). Plant defence: feeding your bodyguards can be counter-productive.Basic and Applied Ecology, 12, 629-633.
113. Stinchcombe, J. R. and Rausher, M. D. (2001). Diffuse selection on resistance to deer herbivory in the ivyleaf morning glory, Ipomoea hederacea. American Naturalist, 158, 376-388.
114. Strauss, S. Y., Sahli, H. and Conner, J. K. (2005). Toward a more trait-centered approach to diffuse (co)evolution. New Phytologist, 165, 81-89.
115. Strong, D. R., Lawton, J. H. and Southwood, R. (1984). Insects on Plants: Community Patterns and Mechanisms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
116. Terhorst, C. P. (2010). Evolution in response to direct and indirect ecological effects in pitcher plant inquiline communities. American Naturalist, 176, 675-685.
117. Thomas, M. K., Kremer, C. T., Klausmeier, C. A. and Litchman, E. (2012). A global pattern of thermal adaptation in marine phytoplankton. Science, 338,1085-1088.
118. Thompson, J. N. (2005). The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
119. Tilman, D. (1982). Resource Competition andCommunity Structure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
120. Turley, N. E., Odell, W. C., Schaefer, H., et al. (2013). Contemporary evolution of plant growth rate following experimental removal of herbivores. American Naturalist, 181, 21-34.
121. Urabe, J. and Sterner, R. W. (2001). Contrasting effects of different types of resource depletion on life-history traits in Daphnia. Functional Ecology, 15, 165-174.
122. Urban, M. C. (2013). Evolution mediates the effects of apex predation on aquatic food webs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280,1-9.
123. Walsh, M. R. and Reznick, D. N. (2008). Interactions between the direct and indirect effects of predators determine life history evolution in a killifish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 594-599.
124. Whitham, T. G., Bailey, J. K., Schweitzer, J. A., et al. (2006). A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems. Nature Reviews Genetics, 7, 510-523.
125. Williams, I. S. (1999). Slow-growth, high-mortality: a general hypothesis, or is it? Ecological Entomology, 24, 490-495.
126. Wootton, J. T. (1994). Putting the pieces together: testing the independence of interactions among organisms. Ecology, 75, 1544-1551.
127. Wootton, J. T. and Emmerson, M. (2005). Measurement of interaction strength in nature. Annual Review ofEcology, Evolution, and Systematics, 36, 419-444.