Toward a more trait-centered approach to diffuse (co)evolution

New Phytologist

Volumn 165, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 81-90

  Strauss, Sharon Y ^a   Sahli, Heather ^b   Conner, Jeffrey K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community ecology; Community genetics; Diffuse coevolution; Diffuse evolution; Diffuse selection; Plant herbivore interactions

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; COMMUNITY ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; SELECTION;

ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; PLANT; REVIEW;

ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; PLANTS; SELECTION (GENETICS);

EID: 11144249775     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01228.x     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Adler LS. 2003. Host species affects herbivory, pollination, and reproduction in experiments with parasitic Castilleja. Ecology 84: 2083-2091.
2. Agrawal AA, Sherriffs MF. 2001. Induced plant resistance and susceptibility to late-season herbivores of wild radish. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 94: 71-75.
3. Agrawal AA, Van Zandt PA. 2003. Ecological play in the coevolutionary theatre: genetic and environmental determinants of attack by a specialist weevil on milkweed. Journal of Ecology 91: 1049-1059.
4. Anderson LL, Paige KN. 2003. Multiple herbivores and coevolutionary interactions in an Ipomopsis hybrid swarm. Evolutionary Ecology 17: 139-156.
5. Arnold SJ, Wade MJ. 1984a. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38: 720-734.
6. Arnold SJ, Wade MJ. 1984b. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38: 709-719.
7. Benkman CW. 1996. Are the ratios of bill crossing morphs in crossbills the result of frequency-dependent selection? Evolutionary Ecology 10: 119-126.
8. Benkman CW. 1999. The selection mosaic and diversifying coevolution between crossbills and lodgepole pine. American Naturalist 153: S75-S91.
9. Benkman CW. 2003. Divergent selection drives the adaptive radiation of crossbills. Evolution 57: 1176-1181.
10. Benkman CW, Holimon WC, Smith JW. 2001. The influence of a competitor on the geographic mosaic of coevolution between crossbills and lodgepole pine. Evolution 55: 282-294.
11. Benkman CW, Parchman TL, Favis A, Siepielski AM. 2003. Reciprocal selection causes a coevolutionary arms race between crossbills and lodgepole pine. American Naturalist 162: 182-194.
12. Brody AK. 1992. Oviposition choices by a predispersal seed predator (Hylemya sp.). 1. Correspondence with hummingbird pollinators, and the role of plant size, density and floral morphology. Oecologia 91: 56-62.
13. Conner JK. 2002. Genetic mechanisms of floral trait correlations in a natural population. Nature 420: 407-410.
14. Conner JK, Franks R, Stewart C. 2003. Expression of additive genetic variances and covariances for wild radish floral traits: Comparison between field and greenhouse environments. Evolution 57: 487-495.
15. Conner JK, Hartl DL. 2004. A primer of ecological genetics. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
16. Faeth SH. 1986. Indirect Interactions between temporally separated herbivores mediated by the host plant. Ecology 67: 479-494.
17. Felton GW, Korth KL. 2000. Trade-offs between pathogen and herbivore resistance. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3: 309-314.
18. Fox LR. 1981. Defense and dynamics in plant-herbivore systems. American Zoologist 21: 853-864.
19. Galen C. 1999. Flowers and enemies: Predation by nectar-thieving ants in relation to variation in floral form of an alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. Oikos 85: 426-434.
20. Galen C, Cuba J. 2001. Down the tube: pollinators, predators, and the evolution of flower shape in the Alpine skypilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 55: 1963-1971.
21. Ghalambor CK, Walker JA, Reznick DN. 2003. Multi-trait selection, adaptation, and constraints on the evolution of burst swimming performance. Integrative and Comparative Biology 43: 431-438.
22. Gould F. 1988. Genetics of pairwise and multispecies plant-herbivorel coevolution. In: Spencer KC, eds. Chemical mediation of coevoluuon. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 13-55.
23. Goulson D, Stout JC, Langley J, Hughes WOH. 2000. The identity and function of scent marks deposited by foraging bumblebees. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26: 2897-2911.
24. Guirfa M. 1993. The repellent scent-mark of the honeybee Apis mellifera ligustica and its role as communication cue during foraging. Insectes Sociaux 40: 59-67.
25. Heil M, Bostock RM. 2002. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) against pathogens in the context of induced plant defences. Annals of Botany 89: 503-512.
26. Herrera C, M. 2000. Measuring the effects of pollinators and herbivores: Evidence for non-additivity in a perennial herb. Ecology 81: 2170-2176.
27. Herrera CM, Medrano M, Rey Pedro J, Sanchez-Lafuente AM, Garcia MB, Guitian J, Manzaneda A, J. 2002. Interaction of pollinators and herbivores on plant fitness suggests a pathway for correlated evolution of mutualism- and antagonism-related traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 16823-16828.
28. Hougen-Eitzman D, Rausher MD. 1994. Interactions between herbivorous insects and plant-insect coevolution. American Naturalist 143: 677-697.
29. Hufbauer RA, Root RB. 2002. Interactive effects of different types of herbivore damage: Trirhabda beetle larvae and Philaenus spittlebugs on goldenrod (Solidago altissima). American Midland Naturalist 147: 204-213.
30. Inouye B, Stinchcombe JR. 2001. Relationships between ecological interaction modifications and diffuse coevolution: Similarities, differences, and causal links. Oikos 95: 353-360.
31. Iwao K, Rausher MD. 1997. Evolution of plant resistance to multiple herbivores: quantifying diffuse coevolution. American Naturalist 149: 316-335.
32. Janzen DH. 1980. When is it coevolution? Evolution 34: 611-612.
33. Juenger T, Bergelson J. 1998. Pairwise versus diffuse natural selection and the multiple herbivores of scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 52: 1583-1592.
34. Karban R, Baldwin I. 1997. Induced responses to herbivory. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
35. Karban R, Strauss SY. 1993. Effects of herbivores on growth and reproduction of their perennial host, Erigeron glaucus. Ecology 74: 39-46.
36. Kliebenstein D, Pedersen D, Barker B, Mitchell-Olds T. 2002. Comparative analysis of quantitative trait loci controlling glucosinolates, myrosinase and insect resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 161: 325-332.
37. Knouft JH. 2003. Convergence, divergence, and the effect of congeners on body size ratios in stream fishes. Evolution 57: 2374-2382.
38. Lande R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33: 402-416.
39. Lande R, Arnold SJ. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210-1226.
40. Parmesan C. 2000. Unexpected density-dependent effects of herbivory in a wild population of the annual Collinsia torreyi. Journal of Ecology 88: 392-400.
41. Peckarsky BL, McIntosh AR. 1998. Fitness and community consequences of avoiding multiple predators. Oecologia 113: 565-576.
42. Pilson D. 1996. Two herbivores and constraints on selection for resistance in Brassica rapa. Evolution 50: 1492-1500.
43. Rausher MD. 1992. The measurement of selection on quantitative traits: biases due to environmental covariances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46: 616-626.
44. Rausher MD. 1996. Genetic analysis of coevolution between plants and their natural enemies. Trends in Genetics 12: 212-217.
45. Relyea RA. 2002a. Competitor-induced plasticity in tadpoles: Consequences, cues, and connections to predator-induced plasticity. Ecological Monographs 72: 523-540.
46. Relyea RA. 2002b. Local population differences in phenotypic plasticity: Predator-induced changes in wood frog tadpoles. Ecological Monographs 72: 77-93.
47. Relyea RA. 2004. Fine-tuned phenotypes: Tadpole plasticity under 16 combinations of predators and competitors. Ecology 85: 172-179.
48. Schluter D, Price TD, Grant PR. 1985. Ecological character displacement in Darwins finches. Science 227: 1056-1059.
49. Simms EL. 1990. Examining selection on the multivariate phenotype - plant-resistance to herbivores. Evolution 44: 1177-1188.
50. Stinchcombe JR, Rausher MD. 2002. The evolution of tolerance to deer herbivory: modifications caused by the abundance of insect herbivores. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences Series B 269: 1241-1246.
51. Strauss SY. 1991. Direct indirect and cumulative effects of three native herbivores on a shared host plant. Ecology 72: 543-558.
52. Strauss SY, Irwin RE. 2004. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant-animal itneractions. In: Futuyma D, ed. Annual review of ecology, evolution and systematics, vol. 35. Palo Alto, CA, USA: Annual reviews, 435-466.
53. Thaler JS, Karban R, Ullman DE, Boege K, Bostock RM. 2002. Cross-talk between jasmonate and salicylate plant defense pathways: Effects on several plant parasites. Oecologia 131: 227-235.
54. Tiffin P. 2002. Competition and time of damage affect the pattern of selection acting on plant defense against herbivores. Ecology 83: 1981-1990.
55. Van Buskirk J, McCollum SA. 1999. Plasticity and selection explain variation in tadpole phenotype between ponds with different predator composition. Oikos 85: 31-39.
56. Van Dam NM, Vuister LWM, Bergshoeff C, De Vos H, Van Der Meijden E. 1995. The 'raison d'etre' of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Cynoglossum officinale: Deterrent effects against generalist herbivores. Journal of Chemical Ecology 21: 507-523.
57. Via S. 1994. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity: what do we really know? In LA Real, eds. Ecological Genetics. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, pp. 35-57.
58. Wilson DS. 1976. Evolution on the level of communities. Science 192: 1358-1360.
59. Wise MJ, Sacchi CF. 1996. Impact of two specialist insect herbivores on reproduction of horse nettle, Solanum carolinense. Oecologia 108: 328-337.