Evolution in response to direct and indirect ecological effects in pitcher plant inquiline communities

American Naturalist

Volumn 176, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 675-685

  TerHorst, Casey P ^a,b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Colpoda; Competition; Predation; Protozoa; Sarracenia purpurea; Selection

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; CILIATE; COEXISTENCE; EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; GROWTH RATE; INQUILINISM; LARVA; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MOSQUITO; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CILIATE; CYTOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; LARVA; MOSQUITO; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION; SARRACENIACEAE;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CILIOPHORA; CULICIDAE; ECOSYSTEM; LARVA; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SARRACENIACEAE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

COLPODA; COLPODA SP.; MYXOZOA; PROTOZOA; SARRACENIA PURPUREA; SARRACENIACEAE;

EID: 78649688224     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/657047     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abrams, P. A. 1992. Predators that benefit prey and prey that harm predators: unusual effects of interacting foraging adaptation. American Naturalist 140:573-600.
2. Alatalo, R. V., and J. Mappes. 1996. Tracking the evolution of warning signals. Nature 382:708-710.
3. Astles, P. A., A. J. Moore, and R. F. Preziosi. 2005. Genetic variation in response to an indirect ecological effect. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272:2577-2581.
4. Blaustein, L. 1997. Non-consumptive effects of larval Salamandra on crustacean prey: can eggs detect predators? Oecologia (Berlin) 110: 212-217.
5. Dunthorn, M., W. Foissner, and L. A. Katz. 2008. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of class Colpodea (phylum Ciliophora) using broad taxon sampling. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 46: 316-327.
6. Ekelund, F., H. B. Frederiksen, and R. Ronn. 2002. Population dynamics of active and total ciliate populations in arable soil amended with wheat. Applied Environmental Microbiology 68: 1096-1101.
7. Fenster, C. B., W. S. Armbruster, P. Wilson, M. R. Dudash, and J. D. Thomson. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 220: 375-403.
8. Foissner, W., B. Weissenbacher, W. D. Krautgartner, and U. Lutz- Meindl. 2009. A cover of glass: first report of biomineralized silicon in a ciliate, Maryna umbrellata (Ciliophora: Colpodea). Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 56:519-530.
9. Herre, E. A., N. Knowlton, U. G. Mueller, and S. A. Rehner. 1999. The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14:49-53.
10. Holt, R. D. 1977. Predation, apparent competition, and structure of prey communities. Theoretical Population Biology 12:197-229.
11. Irwin, R. E. 2006. The consequences of direct versus indirect species interactions to selection on traits: Pollination and nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata. American Naturalist 167:315-328.
12. Kneitel, J. M. 2002. Species diversity and trade-offs in pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea) inquiline communities. PhD diss. Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
13. Lau, J. A. 2008. Beyond the ecological: biological invasions alter natural selection on a native plant species. Ecology 89:1023-1031.
14. Lawler, S. P. 1993. Direct and indirect effects in microcosm communities of protists. Oecologia (Berlin) 93:184-190.
15. Leibold, M. A., and T. E. Miller. 2004. From metapopulations to metacommunities. Pages 133-150 in I. Hanski and O. Gaggiotti, eds. Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
16. Lüftnegger, G., W. Foissner, and H. Adam. 1990. r- and K-selection in soil ciliates: a field and experimental approach. Oecologia (Berlin) 66:574-579.
17. Mauricio, R., and M. D. Rausher. 1997. Experimental evidence of putative selective agents provides evidence for the role of natural enemies in the evolution of plant defense. Evolution 51:1435-1444.
18. McGoey, B. V., and J. R. Stinchcombe. 2009. Interspecific competition alters natural selection on shade avoidance phenotypes in Impatiens capensis. New Phytologist 183:880-891.
19. Menge, B. A. 1995. Indirect effects in marine rocky intertidal interaction webs: Patterns and importance. Ecological Monographs 65: 21-74.
20. Miller, T., D. Cassill, C. Johnson, C. Kindell, J. Leips, D. McInnes, T. Bevis, D. Mehlman, and B. Richard. 1994. Intraspecific and interspecific competition of Wyeomyia smithii (COQ) (Culcidae) in pitcher plant communities. American Midland Naturalist 131: 136-145.
21. Miller, T. E. 1994. Direct and indirect species interactions in an early old-field plant community. American Naturalist 143:1007-1025.
22. Miller, T. E., and W. C. Kerfoot. 1987. Redefining indirect effects. Pages 33-37 in W. C. Kerfoot and A. Sih, eds. Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. New England University Press, Hanover, NH.
23. Miller, T. E., and J. M. Kneitel. 2005. Inquiline communities in pitcher plants as prototypical metacommunities. Pages 122-145 in M. Holyoak, M. A. Leibold, and R. D. Holt, eds.Metacommunities: Spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
24. Miller, T. E., and J. Travis. 1996. The evolutionary role of indirect effects in communities. Ecology 77:1329-1335.
25. Nelson, E. H., C. E. Matthews, and J. A. Rosenheim. 2004. Predators reduce prey population growth by inducing changes in prey behavior. Ecology 85:1853-1858.
26. Núñez-Farfán, J., and R. Dirzo. 1994. Evolutionary ecology of Datura stramonium L. in central Mexico: natural selection for resistance to herbivorous insects. Evolution 48:423-436.
27. Preisser, E. L., D. I. Bolnick, and M. F. Benard. 2005. Scared to death the effects of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. Ecology 86:501-509.
28. Quinn, G., and M. Keough. 2003. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
29. Reimchen, T. E., and P. Nosil. 2002. Temporal variation in divergent selection on spine number in threespine stickleback. Evolution 56: 2472-2483.
30. Santos, M., D. J. Borash, A. Joshi, N. Bounlutay, and L. D. Mueller. 1997. Density-dependent natural selection in Drosophila: evolution of growth rate and body size. Evolution 51:420-432.
31. Schluter, D. 1994. Experimental evidence that competition promotes divergence in adaptive radiation. Science 266:798-801.
32. Schmitz, O. J., J. H. Grabowski, B. L. Peckarsky, E. L. Pressier, G. C. Trussell, and J. R. Vonesh. 2008. From individuals to ecosystem function: Toward an integration of evolutionary and ecosystem ecology. Ecology 89:2436-2445.
33. Seeley, R. H. 1986. Intense natural selection caused by a rapid morphological transition in a living marine snail. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 83:6897-6901.
34. Shonle, I., and J. Bergelson. 2000. Evolutionary ecology of the tropane alkaloids of Datura stramonium L. (Solanaceae). Evolution 54:778-788.
35. Smith, R. A. and M. D. Rausher. 2008. Experimental evidence that selection favors character displacement in the ivyleaf morning glory. American Naturalist 171:1-9.
36. Sokolowski, M. D., H. S. Pereira, and K. Hughes. 1997. Evolution of foraging behavior in Drosophila by density-dependent selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94: 7373-7377.
37. Srivastava, D. S., J. Kolasa, J. Bengtsson, A. Gonzalez, S. P. Lawler, T. E. Miller, P. Munguia, T. Romanuk, D. C. Schneider, and M. K. Trzcinski. 2004. Are natural microcosms useful model systems for ecology? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19:379-384.
38. Stone, L., and A. Roberts. 1991. Conditions for a species to gain advantage from the presence of competitors. Ecology 72:1964-1972.
39. Strauss, S. Y. 1991. Indirect effects in community ecology: Their definition, study and importance. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 6: 206-210.
40. terHorst, C. P. 2010. Experimental evolution of protozoan traits in response to interspecific competition. Journal of Evolutionary Biology (forthcoming).
41. terHorst, C. P., T. E. Miller, and D. R. Levitan. 2010. Discrepancies in evolutionary rates change ecological effect size of predators on prey. Ecology 91:629-636.
42. Trussell, G. C., P. J. Ewanchuk, and C. M. Matassa. 2006. Habitat effects on the relative importance of trait- and density-mediated indirect interactions Ecology Letters 9:1245-1252.
43. Vandermeer, J. H. 1969. Competitive structure of communities: an experimental approach with protozoa. Ecology 50:362-371.
44. Wootton, J. T. 1994. The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25:443-466.
45. Yamaoka, M., T. Watoh, and T. Matsuoka. 2004. Effects of salt concentration and bacteria on encystment induction in ciliated protozoan Colpoda sp. Acta Protozoolgica 43:93-98