Pairwise versus diffuse natural selection and the multiple herbivores of scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata

Evolution

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1583-1592

  Juenger, Thomas ^a,b   Bergelson, Joy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Diffuse coevolution; Heliothis phloxiphagus; Hylemya; Ipomopsis aggregata; Multispecies coevolution; Pairwise coevolution; Plant herbivore interaction; Scarlet gilia

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; FLOWERING; PHENOLOGY; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; SELECTION;

AGGREGATA; ANIMALIA; GILIA; HELIOTHIS; HEXAPODA; HYLEMYA; INSECTA; IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA;

EID: 0032437759     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2411332     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ABACUS CONCEPTS. 1990. SuperAnova. Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA.
2. _. 1992 Statview. Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA.
3. ALONSO, C., AND C. M. HERRERA. 1996. Variation in herbivory within and among plants of Daphne laureola (Thymelaeaceae): correlation with plant size and architecture. J. Ecol. 84:495-502.
4. ARNOLD, S. J., AND M. J. WADE. 1984a. On the measurement of natural selection: theory. Evolution 38:709-719.
5. _. 1984b. On the measurement of natural selection: applications. Evolution 38:720-734.
6. BERGELSON, J., AND M. J. CRAWLEY. 1992a. The effects of grazers on the performance of individuals and populations of scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 90:435-441.
7. _. 1992b. Herbivory and Ipomopsis aggregata: the disadvantages of being eaten. Am. Nat. 139:870-882.
8. BERGELSON, J., T. JUENGER, AND M. J. CRAWLEY. 1996. Regrowth following herbivory in Ipomopsis aggregata: compensation but not overcompensation. Am. Nat. 148:744-755.
9. BRODIE, E. D., A. J. MOORE, AND F. J. JANZEN. 1995. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:313-318.
10. BRODY, A. K. 1992a. Oviposition choices by a pre-dispersal seed predator (Hylemya sp.) I. correspondence with hummingbird pollinators, and the role of plant size, density and floral morphology. Oecologia 91:56-62.
11. _. 1992b. Oviposition choices by a pre-dispersal seed predator (Hylemya sp.) II. a positive association between female choice and fruit set. Oecologia 91:63-67.
12. _. 1997. Effects of pollinators, herbivores, and seed predation on flowering phenology. Ecology 78:1624-1631.
13. BRODY, A. K., AND R. J. MITCHELL. 1997. Effects of experimental manipulation of inflorescence size on pollination and pre-dispersal seed predation in the hummingbird-pollinated plant Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 110:86-93.
14. BRODY, A. K., AND N. M. WASER. 1995. Oviposition pattern and larval success of a pre-dispersal seed predator attacking two confamilial host plants. Oikos 74:447-452.
15. BROWN, D. G., AND A. E. WEISS. 1995. Direct and indirect effects of prior grazing of goldenrod upon the performance of a leaf beetle. Ecology 76:426-436.
16. CAMPBELL, D. R. 1991. Effects of floral traits on sequential components of fitness in Ipomopsis aggregata. Am. Nat. 137:713-737.
17. DAMMAN, H. 1987. Leaf quality and enemy avoidance by the larvae of a pyralid moth. Ecology 68:88-97.
18. DIXON, P. M. 1993. The bootstrap and the jacknife: describing the precision of ecological indices. Pp. 290-318 in S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch, eds. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York.