A guide to analyzing message-response sequences and group interaction patterns in computer-mediated communication

Distance Education

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 367-383

  Jeong, Allan ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944462750     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587910500291470     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baker, M. (1999). Argumentation and constructive interaction. In P. Courier & J. E. B. Andriessen (Eds.), Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 179-202). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
4. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. (Ed., M. Holquist). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
5. Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, E., & Kirschner, P. (2004, April). Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments. Paper presented at the Annual American Educational Research Association Conference, San Diego, CA.
6. Carr, C., & Anderson, A. (2001, March). Computer-supported collaborative argumentation: Supporting problem-based learning in legal education. Paper presented at the Annual Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2001 Conference. Retrieved October 30, 2003, from http:// www.mmi.unimaas.nl/euro-cscl/Papers/25.pdf
7. Cho, K., & Jonassen, D. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 5-22. Retrieved March 3, 2004, from http://tiger.coe. missouri.edu/-jonassen/Argumentation.pdf
8. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. (2005). The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9. England, E. (1985). Interactional analysis: The missing factor in computer-aided learning design and evaluation. Educational Technology, 25(9), 24-28.
10. st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1}, 1-17.
11. Gottman, J. M., (1979). Marital interactions: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.
12. Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C., & Andersen, T. (1997). Analysis of global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 397-431.
13. Jeong, A. (2003a). The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online threaded discussions. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 25-43.
14. Jeong, A. (2003b, October). The effects of message-reply and time-based structures on group interactions and critical thinking in asynchronous online discussions. Paper presented at the Annual Association of Educational Communication and Technology Conference, Anaheim, CA.
15. Jeong, A. (2003c, October). Gender interactions in online debates; Look who's arguing with whom. Paper presented at a meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
16. Jeong, A. (2004a). The combined effects of response time and message content on group interactions in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 36-53.
17. Jeong, A. (2004c). Forum Manager. Retrieved July 6, 2005, from http://garnet.fsu.edu/ajeong
18. Jeong, A. (2005a). Discussion analysis tool (DAT). Retrieved April 18, 2005, from http:// garnet.fsu.edu/-ajeong/DAT
19. Jeong, A. (2005b). The effects of supportive styles of communication on group interaction patterns and argumentation in online discussion. Proceedings of the Association of Educational Communication and Technology Conference 2005, Chicago, IL [CD-ROM].
20. Jeong, A., & Joung, S. (in press). The effects of constraint-based argumentation on interaction patterns and argumentation in online threaded discussions. Computers and Education.
21. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1992). Creative controversy: Intellectual challenge in the classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
22. King, F., & Roblyer, M. (1984). Alternative designs for evaluating computer-based instruction. Journal of Instructional Development, 7(3), 23-29.
23. Koschmann, T. (1999). Toward a dialogic theory of learning: Bakhtin's contribution to understanding learning in settings of collaboration. In C. M. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 1999, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (pp. 308-313). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Lemus, D., Seibold, D., Flanagin, A., & Metzger, M. (2004). Argument and decision-making in computer-mediated groups,. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 302-320.
25. Mandl, H., & Renkl, A. (1992). A plea for "more local" theories of cooperative learning. Learning and Instruction, 2, 281-285.
26. McAlister, S. (2003). Assessing good argumentation. Retrieved April 10, 2004, from http:// iet.open.ac.uk/pp/s.r.mcalister/personal/AssessingGEA.htm
27. st Century, 4(1), 57-74.
28. Olson, G., Herbsleb, J., & Rueter, H. (1994). Characterizing the sequential structure of interactive behaviors through statistical and grammatical techniques. Human-Computer Interaction, 9(3/ 4), 427-472.
29. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8-22. Retrieved July 09, 2005, from http://aied.inf.ed.ac.uk/ members01/archive/vol_12/rourke/full.html
30. Sloffer, S., Dueber, B., & Duffy, T. (1999). Using asynchronous conferencing to promote critical thinking: Two implementations in higher education. Retrieved October 30, 2003, from http://crlt.indiana.edu/ publications/crlt99-8.pdf
31. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W., M. G., & Kirschner, P. A., (2004, April). The effect of functional roles on perceived group efficiency and communication during computer-supported collaborative learning. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
32. Veerman, A., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (1999). Collaborative learning through computer-mediated argumentation. In C. M. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 1999, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (pp. 640-650). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Wiley, J., & Voss, J. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 301-311.