Advancing understanding of collaborative learning with data derived from video records

The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 203-220

  Barron, Brigid J S ^a   Pea, Roy ^a   Engle, Randi A ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84888018770     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203837290-19     Document Type: Chapter

References (82)

1. Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour, 49, 227-267.
2. Angelillo, C., Rogoff, B., & Chavajay, P. (2007). Examining shared endeavors by abstracting video coding schemes with fidelity to cases. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 189-206). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Ash, D. (2007). Using video data to capture discontinuous science meaning making in non-school settings. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 207-226). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Ash, D., Crain, R., Brandt, C., Loomis, M., Wheaton, M., Bennett, C. (2007). Talk, tools, and tensions: Observing biological talk over time. International Journal for Science Education, 29, 1581-1602.
5. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bakeman R., & Adamson, L. B. (1984). Coordinating attention to people and objects in mother-infant and peer-infant interaction. Child Development, 55, 1278-1289.
7. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 403-436.
9. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307-359.
10. Bavelas, J. B. (1994). Gestures as part of speech: Methodological implications. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27, 201-221.
11. Beardsley, L., Cogan-Drew, D., & Olivero, F. (2007). VideoPaper: Bridging research and practice for pre-service and experienced teachers. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry, (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 479-494). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Chafe, W. L. (1980). The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14. Cherry, G., Fournier, J., & Stevens, R. (2003). Using a digital video annotation tool to teach dance composition. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning. Retrieved from http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2003/1/01/
15. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271-315
16. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Cobb, P., & Whitenack, J. W. (1996). A method for conducting longitudinal analyses of classroom videorecordings and transcripts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 213-228.
18. Creswell, J. L., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Crook, C. (1996). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. East Sussex, England: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
20. Derry, S., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R.,… Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19, 3-53.
21. DiMattia, C. (2002). VideoPapers. Hands On! 25, 12-15.
22. Dressler, R. A., & Kreuz, R. J. (2000). Transcribing oral discourse: A survey and model system. Discourse Processes, 29, 25-36.
23. Du Bois, J. W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, D. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 45-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Edwards, J. A. (1993). Principles and contrasting systems of discourse transcription. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert, (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 3-31). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Edwards, J. A., & Lampert, M. D. (Eds.). (1993). Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Engle, R. A. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners’ classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 451-498.
27. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. C. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399-483.
28. Engle, R. A., Conant, F. R., & Greeno, J. G. (2007). Progressive refinement of hypotheses in video-supported research. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 239-254). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Engle, R. A., Langer-Osuna, J., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2008). Toward a model of differential influence in discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, and access within a heated classroom argument. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2010-2015). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
30. Engle, R. A., McKinney de Royston, M., Langer-Osuna, J., Bergan, J., & Mazzei, P. (2007). From positioning to differential influence in a student-led argument: Students’ negotiating authority, the conversational floor, and interactional space. Paper presented at AERA, Chicago, IL.
31. Erickson, F. (1977). Some approaches to inquiry in school-community ethnography. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 8, 58-69.
32. Erickson, F. (1982). Audiovisual records as a primary data source. Sociological Methods & Research, 11, 213-232.
33. Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177-205). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.
35. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Fogel, A. (1993). Developing through relationships: Origins of communication, self, and culture. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
37. Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
38. Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., & Derry, S. (2007). (Eds.). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Goodenough, F.L. (1928). Measuring behavior traits by means of repeated short samples. Journal of Juvenile Research, 12, 230-235.
40. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606-633.
41. Goodwin, C. (2003). Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 217-241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
42. Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance, and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society, 18, 53-73.
43. Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Formulating planes: Seeing as a situated activity. In D. Middleton & Y. Engestrom (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 61-95). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
44. Greeno, J. G. (2006). Authoritative, accountable positioning and connected, general knowing: progressive themes in understanding transfer. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 537-547.
45. Gumperz, J. J., & Berenz, N. (1993). Transcribing conversational exchanges. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 91-122). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Hall, R. (2000). Video recording as theory. In D. Lesh & A. Kelley (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 647-664). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Hall, R., Wieckert, K., & Wright, K. (2010). How does cognition get distributed? Case studies of making concepts general in technical and scientific work. In M. Banich & D. Caccamise (Eds.), Generalization of knowledge: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 225-246). East Sussex, England: Psychology Press.
48. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39-103.
50. Kendon, A. (1982). The study of gesture: Some observations on its history. Recherches S'emiotiques/Semiotic Inquiry, 2, 45-62.
51. Kendon, A. (1997). Gesture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 109-128.
52. Koschmann, T., Glenn, P., & Conlee, M. (1999). Theory presentation and assessment in a problem-based learning group. Discourse Processes, 27, 119-133.
53. Lamont, M., & White, P. (2009). Workshop on interdisciplinary standards for systematic qualitative research. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/ses/soc/ISSQR_work-shop_rpt.pdf.
54. Lapadat, J. C., & Lindsay, A. C. (1999). Transcription in research and practice: From standardization of technique to interpretive positionings. Qualitative Inquiry, 5, 64-86.
55. Leander, K. M. (2002a). Locating Latanya: The situated production of identity artifacts in classroom interaction. Research in the Teaching of English, 37, 198-250.
56. Leander, K. M. (2002b). Silencing in classroom interaction: Producing and relating social spaces. Discourse Processes, 34, 193-235.
57. Lemke, J. (2007). Video epistemology in- and outside the box: traversing attentional spaces. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 39-51). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Leonard, M. J., & Derry, S. J. (2006). Tensions and tradeoffs in a “design for science” classroom: The “forces in balloon lecture.” In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 411-417). Bloomington, IN: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
59. Maxwell, J. A. (2004b). Using qualitative methods for causal explanation. Field Methods, 16, 243-264.
60. Maxwell, J. A., & Loomis, D. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 241-271). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61. McNeill, D. (1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
62. Meier, A., Spada, H., & Rummel, N. (2007). A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 63-86.
63. Mercier, E. (2010). The influence of achievement goals on dyadic interactions and outcomes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
64. Mischler, E. G. (1991). Representing discourse: The rhetoric of transcription. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1, 255-280.
65. Ninio, A., & Bruner, J. S. (1978). The achievement and antecedents of labelling. Journal of Child Language, 5, 1-15.
66. Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In B. Schieffelin (Ed.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43-72). New York: Academic Press.
67. Ochs, E., & Taylor, C. (1996). “The father knows best” dynamic in family dinner narratives. In K. Hall (Ed.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 99-122). London: Routledge.
68. Parten, M. B. (1932). Social participation among preschool children. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 27, 243-269.
69. Pea, R., & Hoffert, E. (2007). Video workflow in the learning sciences: Prospects of emerging technologies for augmenting work practices. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 427-460). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
70. Ragin, C. C., Nagel, J., & White, P. (2004). Workshop on scientific foundations of qualitative research. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2004/nsf04219/nsf04219.pdf
71. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 235-276.
72. Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Journal of Language and Social Interaction, 26, 99-128.
73. Sfard, A., & McClain, K. (Eds.). (2002). Analyzing tools: Perspectives on the role of designed artifacts in mathematics learning [Special issue]. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11.
74. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin
75. Stevens, R., Satwicz, T., & McCarthy, L. (2008). In-game, in-room, in-world: Reconnecting video game play to the rest of kids’ lives. In K. Salen (Ed.), The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games and learning (pp. 41-66). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76. Stevens, R., & Toro-Martell, S. (2003). Leaving a trace: Supporting museum visitor interpretation and interaction with digital media annotation systems. Journal of Museum Education, 28, 25-31.
77. Strijbos, J-W, & Fischer, F. (2007). Methodological challenges for collaborative learning research. Learning and Instruction, 17, 389-393.
78. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
79. Teasley, S. D., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229-258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
80. Wortham, S. (2004). From good student to outcast: The emergence of a classroom identity. Ethos, 32, 164-187.
81. Zahn C., Pea, R., Hesse, F. W., & Rosen, J. (2010). Comparing simple and advanced video tools as supports for collaborative design processes. Journal Learning Sciences, 19, 1-38.
82. Znaniecki, F. (1934). The method of sociology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.