Evaluating the performance of selection scans to detect selective sweeps in domestic dogs

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 342-356

  Schlamp, Florencia ^a,b   Van Der Made, Julian ^a   Stambler, Rebecca ^a   Chesebrough, Lewis ^a   Boyko, Adam R ^b   Messer, Philipp W ^a  

^a Plant Breeding and Genetics Section in the School of Integrative Plant Science   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

adaptation; contemporary evolution; population genetics empirical; population genetics theoretical

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BREEDING; CLASSIFICATION; DOG; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPE; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; DOGS; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPES; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84954052528     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/mec.13485     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Akey JM, Ruhe AL, Akey DT, et al. (2010) Tracking footprints of artificial selection in the dog genome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 1160-1165
2. Auton A, Rui Li Y, Kidd J, et al. (2013) Genetic recombination is targeted towards gene promoter regions in dogs. PLoS Genetics, 9, e1003984
3. Axelsson E, Ratnakumar A, Arendt M-L, et al. (2013) The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature, 495, 360-364
4. Bank C, Ewing GB, Ferrer-Admettla A, Foll M, Jensen JD, (2014) Thinking too positive? Revisiting current methods of population genetic selection inference. Trends in Genetics, 30, 540-546
5. Barrett RDH, Schluter D, (2008) Adaptation from standing genetic variation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 38-44
6. Barton NH, (2000) Genetic hitchhiking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 355, 1553-1562
7. Boyko AR, Quignon P, Li L, et al. (2010) A simple genetic architecture underlies morphological variation in dogs. PLoS Biology, 8, e1000451
8. Braverman JM, Hudson RR, Kaplan NL, Langley CH, Stephan W, (1995) The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics, 140, 783-796
9. Cadieu E, Neff MW, Quignon P, et al. (2009) Coat variation in the domestic dog is governed by variants in three genes. Science, 326, 150-153
10. Cutter AD, Payseur BA, (2013) Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species. Nature Reviews Genetics, 14, 262-274
11. Delaneau O, Howie B, Cox AJ, Zagury J-F, Marchini J, (2013) Haplotype estimation using sequencing reads. American Journal of Human Genetics, 93, 687-696
12. Fariello MI, Boitard S, Naya H, SanCristobal M, Servin B, (2013) Detecting signatures of selection through haplotype differentiation among hierarchically structured populations. Genetics, 193, 929-941
13. Fay JC, Wu CI, (2000) Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics, 155, 1405-1413
14. Ferrer-Admetlla A, Liang M, Korneliussen T, Nielsen R, (2014) On detecting incomplete soft or hard selective sweeps using haplotype structure. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 31, 1275-1291
15. Foll M, Shim H, Jensen JD, (2014) WFABC: a Wright-Fisher ABC-based approach for inferring effective population sizes and selection coefficients from time-sampled data. Molecular Ecology Resources, 15, 87-98
16. Garud NR, Messer PW, Buzbas EO, Petrov DA, (2015) Recent selective sweeps in North American Drosophila melanogaster show signatures of soft sweeps. PLoS Genetics, 11, e1005004
17. Gray MM, Sutter NB, Ostrander EA, Wayne RK, (2010) The IGF1 small dog haplotype is derived from Middle Eastern grey wolves. BMC Biology, 8, 16
18. Hermisson J, Pennings PS, (2005) Soft sweeps: molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation. Genetics, 169, 2335-2352
19. Huff CD, Harpending HC, Rogers AR, (2010) Detecting positive selection from genome scans of linkage disequilibrium. BMC Genomics, 11, 8
20. Innan H, Kim Y, (2004) Pattern of polymorphism after strong artificial selection in a domestication event. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 10667-10672
21. Kaplan NL, Hudson RR, Langley CH, (1989) The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics, 123, 887-899
22. Karasov T, Messer PW, Petrov DA, (2010) Evidence that adaptation in Drosophila is not limited by mutation at single sites. PLoS Genetics, 6, e1000924
23. Kim Y, Stephan W, (2002) Detecting a local signature of genetic hitchhiking along a recombining chromosome. Genetics, 160, 765-777
24. Larson G, Karlsson EK, Perri A, et al. (2012) Rethinking dog domestication by integrating genetics, archeology, and biogeography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 8878-8883
25. Leroy G, Mary-Huard T, Verrier E, et al. (2013) Methods to estimate effective population size using pedigree data: examples in dog, sheep, cattle and horse. Genetics Selection Evolution, 45, 1
26. Lewontin RC, Krakauer J, (1973) Distribution of gene frequency as a test of the theory of the selective neutrality of polymorphisms. Genetics, 74, 175-195
27. Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, et al. (2005) Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature, 438, 803-819
28. Lotterhos KE, Whitlock MC, (2015) The relative power of genome scans to detect local adaptation depends on sampling design and statistical method. Molecular Ecology, 24, 1031-1046
29. Malaspinas A-S, Malaspinas O, Evans SN, Slatkin M, (2012) Estimating allele age and selection coefficient from time-serial data. Genetics, 192, 599-607
30. Maynard Smith J, Haigh J, (1974) The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genetical Research, 23, 23-35
31. Messer PW, Neher RA, (2012) Estimating the strength of selective sweeps from deep population diversity data. Genetics, 191, 593-605
32. Messer PW, Petrov DA, (2013) Population genomics of rapid adaptation by soft selective sweeps. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 659-669
33. Nielsen R, Williamson S, Kim Y, et al. (2005) Genomic scans for selective sweeps using SNP data. Genome Research, 15, 1566-1575
34. Orr HA, Betancourt AJ, (2001) Haldane's sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation. Genetics, 157, 875-884
35. Parker HG, (2004) Genetic structure of the purebred domestic dog. Science, 304, 1160-1164
36. Pavlidis P, Živkovic D, Stamatakis A, Alachiotis N, (2013) SweeD: likelihood-based detection of selective sweeps in thousands of genomes. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30, 2224-2234
37. Pennings PS, Hermisson J, (2006a) Soft sweeps II-molecular population genetics of adaptation from recurrent mutation or migration. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 23, 1076-1084
38. Pennings PS, Hermisson J, (2006b) Soft sweeps III: the signature of positive selection from recurrent mutation. PLoS Genetics, 2, e186
39. Poh Y-P, Domingues VS, Hoekstra HE, Jensen JD, (2014) On the prospect of identifying adaptive loci in recently bottlenecked populations. PLoS ONE, 9, e110579
40. Pritchard JK, Pickrell JK, Coop G, (2010) The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation. Current Biology», 20, R208-R215
41. Przeworski M, Coop G, Wall JD, (2005) The signature of positive selection on standing genetic variation. Evolution International Journal of Organic Evolution, 59, 2312-2323
42. Rimbault M, Beale HC, Schoenebeck JJ, et al. (2013) Derived variants at six genes explain nearly half of size reduction in dog breeds. Genome Research, 23, 1985-1995
43. Sabeti PC, Reich DE, Higgins JM, et al. (2002) Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure. Nature, 419, 832-837
44. Sabeti PC, Varilly P, Fry B, et al. (2007) Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations. Nature, 449, 913-918
45. Schmutz SM, Melekhovets Y, (2012) Coat color DNA testing in dogs: theory meets practice. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 26, 238-242
46. Schoenebeck JJ, Ostrander EA, (2013) The genetics of canine skull shape variation. Genetics, 193, 317-325
47. Schrider DR, Mendes FK, Hahn MW, Kern AD, (2015) Soft shoulders ahead: spurious signatures of soft and partial selective sweeps result from linked hard sweeps. Genetics, 200, 267-284
48. Shannon LM, Boyko RH, Castelhano M, et al. (2015) Genetic structure in village dogs reveals a Central Asian domestication origin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 13639-13644
49. Szpiech ZA, Hernandez RD, (2014) Selscan: an efficient multi-threaded program to perform EHH-based scans for positive selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 31, 2824-2827
50. Sutter NB, Eberle MA, Parker HG, et al. (2004) Extensive and breed-specific linkage disequilibrium in Canis familiaris. Genome Research, 14, 2388-2396
51. Tajima F, (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics, 123, 585-595
52. Teshima KM, Coop G, Przeworski M, (2006) How reliable are empirical genomic scans for selective sweeps? Genome Research, 16, 702-712
53. Vaysse A, Ratnakumar A, Derrien T, et al. (2011) Identification of genomic regions associated with phenotypic variation between dog breeds using selection mapping (JM Akey, Ed,). PLoS Genetics, 7, e1002316
54. Vitti JJ, Grossman SR, Sabeti PC, (2013) Detecting natural selection in genomic data. Annual Review of Genetics, 47, 97-120
55. Voight BF, Kudaravalli S, Wen X, Pritchard JK, (2006) A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biology, 4, e72
56. Wilson BA, Petrov DA, Messer PW, (2014) Soft selective sweeps in complex demographic scenarios. Genetics, 198, 669-684