Molecular modeling of myrosinase from brassica oleracea: A structural investigation of sinigrin interaction

Genes

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1315-1329

  Natarajan, Sathishkumar ^a   Thamilarasan, Senthil Kumar ^a   Park, Jong In ^a   Chung, Mi Young ^a   Nou, Ill Sup ^a  

^a Sunchon National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Brassica oleracea; Docking and dynamics; Homology modeling; Myrosinase; Sinigrin

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; DISULFIDE; NUCLEOPHILE; SINIGRIN; THIOGLUCOSIDASE;

ARTICLE; BRASSICA OLERACEA; CABBAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLYCOSYLATION; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; SINAPIS ALBA;

EID: 84951287719     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/genes6041315     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Kelly, P.; Bones, A.; Rossiter, J. Sub-cellular immunolocalization of the glucosinolate sinigrin in seedlings of Brassica juncea. Planta 1998, 206, 370-377.
2. Ciska, E.; Martyniak-Przybyszewska, B.; Kozlowska, H. Content of glucosinolates in cruciferous vegetables grown at the same site for two years under different climatic conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 2862-2867.
3. Kliebenstein, D.J.; Kroymann, J.; Mitchell-Olds, T. The glucosinolate-myrosinase system in an ecological and evolutionary context. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 264-271.
4. Martinez-Ballesta, M.; Carvajal, M. Myrosinase in Brassicaceae: The most important issue for glucosinolate turnover and food quality. Phytochem. Rev. 2015, 14, 1045-1051.
5. Ishida, M.; Hara, M.; Fukino, N.; Kakizaki, T.; Morimitsu, Y. Glucosinolate metabolism, functionality and breeding for the improvement of Brassicaceae vegetables. Breed. Sci. 2014, 64, 48-59.
6. Tiedink, H.; Davies, J.; van Broekhoven, L.; van der Kamp, H.; Jongen, W. Formation of mutagenic N-nitroso compounds in vegetable extracts upon nitrite treatment: A comparison with the glucosinolate content. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1988, 26, 947-954.
7. Avato, P.; Argentieri, M.P. Brassicaceae: A rich source of health improving phytochemicals. Phytochem. Rev. 2015, 14, 1019-1033.
8. Bones, A.M.; Rossiter, J.T. The myrosinase-glucosinolate system, its organisation and biochemistry. Physiol. Plant. 1996, 97, 194-208.
9. Burmeister, W.P.; Cottaz, S.; Rollin, P.; Vasella, A.; Henrissat, B. High resolution X-ray crystallography shows that ascorbate is a cofactor for myrosinase and substitutes for the function of the catalytic base. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 39385-39393.
10. Gleadow, R.M.; Møller, B.L. Cyanogenic glycosides: Synthesis, physiology, and phenotypic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014, 65, 155-185.
11. Bednarek, P.; Osbourn, A. Plant-microbe interactions: Chemical diversity in plant defense. Science 2009, 324, 746-748.
12. Halkier, B.A.; Gershenzon, J. Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 303-333.
13. Fan, S.; Meng, Q.; Xu, J.; Jiao, Y.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, X.; Sarkar, F.H.; Brown, M.L.; Dritschilo, A.; Rosen, E.M. DIM (3, 3'-diindolylmethane) confers protection against ionizing radiation by a unique mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 18650-18655.
14. Verkerk, R.; Schreiner, M.; Krumbein, A.; Ciska, E.; Holst, B.; Rowland, I.; de Schrijver, R.; Hansen, M.; Gerhäuser, C.; Mithen, R.; et al. Glucosinolates in Brassica vegetables: The influence of the food supply chain on intake, bioavailability and human health. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2009, doi:10.1002/mnfr.200800065.
15. Kadir, N.H.; David, R.; Rossiter, J.T.; Gooderham, N.J. The selective cytotoxicity of the alkenyl glucosinolate hydrolysis products and their presence in Brassica vegetables. Toxicology 2015, 334, 59-71.
16. Gill, C.I.; Haldar, S.; Porter, S.; Matthews, S.; Sullivan, S.; Coulter, J.; McGlynn, H.; Rowland, I. The effect of cruciferous and leguminous sprouts on genotoxicity, in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2004, 13, 1199-1205.
17. Porrini, M.; Riso, P.; Oriani, G. Spinach and tomato consumption increases lymphocyte DNA resistance to oxidative stress but this is not related to cell carotenoid concentrations. Eur. J. Nutr. 2002, 41, 95-100.
18. Aires, A.; Mota, V.R.; Saavedra, M.J.; Rosa, E.A.; Bennett, R.N. The antimicrobial effects of glucosinolates and their respective enzymatic hydrolysis products on bacteria isolated from the human intestinal tract. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 106, 2086-2095.
19. Riga, E. The effects of Brassica green manures on plant parasitic and free living nematodes used in combination with reduced rates of synthetic nematicides. J. Nematol. 2011, 43, 119-121.
20. Sotelo, T.; Lema, M.; Soengas, P.; Cartea, M.; Velasco, P. In vitro activity of glucosinolates and their degradation products against brassica-pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 432-440.
21. Vaughn, S.F.; Palmquist, D.E.; Duval, S.M.; Berhow, M.A. Herbicidal activity of glucosinolate-containing seedmeals. 2009, 57, 1821-1826.
22. Magrath, R.; Herron, C.; Giamoustaris, A.; Mithen, R. The inheritance of aliphatic glucosinolates in Brassica napus. Plant Breed. 1993, 111, 55-72.
23. Devi, J.R.; Thangam, E.B. Mechanisms of anticancer activity of sulforaphane from Brassica oleracea in HEp-2 human epithelial carcinoma cell line. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2012, 13, 2095-2100.
24. Fahey, J.W.; Zalcmann, A.T.; Talalay, P. The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry 2001, 56, 5-51.
25. Lenman, M.; Falk, A.; Rodin, J.; Hoglund, A.; Ek, B.; Rask, L. Differential expression of myrosinase gene families. Plant Physiol. 1993, 103, 703-711.
26. Kumar, R.; Kumar, S.; Sangwan, S.; Yadav, I.S.; Yadav, R. Protein modeling and active site binding mode interactions of myrosinase-sinigrin in Brassica juncea-An in silico approach. J. Mol. Gr. Model. 2011, 29, 740-746.
27. Cavasotto, C.N.; Phatak, S.S. Homology modeling in drug discovery: Current trends and applications. Drug Discov. Today 2009, 14, 676-683.
28. Peng, J.; Xu, J. Low-homology protein threading. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, i294-i300.
29. Bhattacharya, A.; Wunderlich, Z.; Monleon, D.; Tejero, R.; Montelione, G.T. Assessing model accuracy using the homology modeling automatically software. Proteins 2008, 70, 105-118.
30. Benson, D.A.; Karsch-Mizrachi, I.; Lipman, D.J.; Ostell, J.; Wheeler, D.L. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, D34-D38.
31. Zhang, Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-40.
32. Burmeister, W.P.; Cottaz, S.; Driguez, H.; Iori, R.; Palmieri, S.; Henrissat, B. The crystal structures of Sinapis alba myrosinase and a covalent glycosyl-enzyme intermediate provide insights into the substrate recognition and active-site machinery of an S-glycosidase. Structure 1997, 5, 663-675.
33. Burmeister, W.P. Structural changes in a cryo-cooled protein crystal owing to radiation damage. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2000, 56 Pt 3, 328-341.
34. Verdoucq, L.; Moriniere, J.; Bevan, D.R.; Esen, A.; Vasella, A.; Henrissat, B.; Czjze, M. Structural determinants of substrate specificity in family 1 beta-glucosidases: Novel insights from the crystal structure of sorghum dhurrinase-1, a plant beta-glucosidase with strict specificity, in complex with its natural substrate. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 31796-31803.
35. Tankrathok, A.; Iglesias-Fernandez, J.; Luang, S.; Robinson, R.C.; Kimura, A.; Rovira, C.; Hrmova, M.; Ketudat Cairns, J.R. Structural analysis and insights into the glycon specificity of the rice GH1 Os7BGlu26 beta-D-mannosidase. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2013, 69 Pt 10, 2124-2135.
36. Glaser, F.; Pupko, T.; Paz, I.; Bell, R.E.; Bechor-Shental, D.; Martz, E.; Ben-Tal, N. ConSurf: Identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 163-164.
37. Yang, J.; Roy, A.; Zhang, Y. Protein-ligand binding site recognition using complementary binding-specific substructure comparison and sequence profile alignment. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 2588-2595.
38. Berendsen, H.J.; van der Spoel, D.; van Drunen, R. GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1995, 91, 43-56.
39. Hess, B.; Kutzner, C.; van der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4, 435-447.
40. Darden, T.; York, D.; Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: An N·log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 10089-10092.
41. Hess, B.; Bekker, H.; Berendsen, H.J.; Fraaije, J.G. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 18, 1463-1472.
42. Wallner, B.; Fang, H.; Elofsson, A. Automatic consensus-based fold recognition using Pcons, ProQ, and Pmodeller. Proteins 2003, 53, 534-541.
43. Eisenberg, D.; Luthy, R.; Bowie, J.U. VERIFY3D: Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Methods Enzymol. 1997, 277, 396-404.
44. Laurie, A.T.; Jackson, R.M. Q-SiteFinder: An energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 1908-1916.
45. Gupta, R.; Brunak, S. Prediction of glycosylation across the human proteome and the correlation to protein function. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 2002, 310-322.
46. Barzilai, J.; Borwein, J.M. Two-Point Step Size Gradient Methods. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 1988, 8, 141-148.
47. Wolf, L.K. Digital briefs. Chem. Eng. News Arch. 2009, doi: 10.1021/cen-v086n047.p044.
48. Rappé, A.K.; Casewit, C.J.; Colwell, K.; Goddard, W., III; Skiff, W. UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10024-10035.
49. Trott, O.; Olson, A.J. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31, 455-461.
50. Karpagam, V.; Sathishkumar, N.; Sathiyamoorthy, S.; Rasappan, P.; Shila, S.; Kim, Y.-J.; Yang, D.-C. Identification of BACE1 inhibitors from Panax ginseng saponins-An Insilco approach. Comput. Biol. Med. 2013, 43, 1037-1044.
51. Wang, R.; Lai, L.; Wang, S. Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 11-26.
52. SchuÈttelkopf, A.W.; van Aalten, D.M. PRODRG: A tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004, 60, 1355-1363.
53. Pettersen, E.F.; Goddard, T.D.; Huang, C.C.; Couch, G.S.; Greenblatt, D.M.; Meng, E.C.; Ferrin, T.E. UCSF Chimera-A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1605-1612.
54. Naumoff, D.G. Hierarchical classification of glycoside hydrolases. Biochemistry 2011, 76, 622-635.
55. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, H. Deriving chemically essential interactions based on active site alignments and quantum chemical calculations: A case study on glycoside hydrolases. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 2559-2572.
56. Barleben, L.; Panjikar, S.; Ruppert, M.; Koepke, J.; Stockigt, J. Molecular architecture of strictosidine glucosidase: The gateway to the biosynthesis of the monoterpenoid indole alkaloid family. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 2886-2897.
57. Launay, G.; Simonson, T. Homology modelling of protein-protein complexes: A simple method and its possibilities and limitations. BMC Bioinform. 2008, doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-427.