Genomic data do not support comb jellies as the sister group to all other animals

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 50, 2015, Pages 15402-15407

  Pisani, Davide ^a   Pett, Walker ^b   Dohrmann, Martin ^c   Feuda, Roberto ^d   Rota Stabelli, Omar ^e   Philippe, Hervé ^f,g   Lartillot, Nicolas ^b   Wörheide, Gert ^c,h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^d California Institute of Technology   (United States)

^e RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Italy)

^f Moulis   (France)

^g Universite de Montreal   (Canada)

^h BAYERISCHE STAATSSAMMLUNG FÜR PALÄONTOLOGIE UND GEOLOGIE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ctenophora; Evolution; Metazoa; Phylogenomics; Porifera

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL GENETICS; ARTICLE; ASCERTAINMENT BIAS; BILATERIA; CNIDARIA; CTENOPHORA; GENE LOSS; GENETIC DATABASE; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOMICS; LAST COMMON ANCESTOR; LONG BRANCH ATTRACTION; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENOMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SISTER GROUP; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOME; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL BIAS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CTENOPHORA; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENOME; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84950103731     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1518127112     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Dohrmann M, Wörheide G (2013) Novel scenarios of early animal evolution-is it time to rewrite textbooks? Integr Comp Biol 53(3):503-511.
2. Dunn CW, et al. (2008) Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452(7188):745-749.
3. Hejnol A, et al. (2009) Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylo-genomic methods. Proc Biol Sci 276(1677):4261-4270.
4. Ryan JF, et al. (2013) The genome of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and its implications for cell type evolution. Science 342(6164):1242592.
5. Moroz LL, et al. (2014) The ctenophore genome and the evolutionary origins of neural systems. Nature 510(7503):109-114.
6. Whelan NV, Kocot KM, Moroz LL, Halanych KM (2015) Error, signal, and the placement of Ctenophora sister to all other animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(18):5773-5778.
7. Dunn CW, Giribet G, Edgecombe GD, Hejnol A (2014) Animal phylogeny and its evolutionary implications. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 45:371-395.
8. Dunn CW, Leys SP, Haddock SHD (2015) The hidden biology of sponges and cteno-phores. Trends Ecol Evol 30(5):282-291.
9. Marlow H, Arendt D (2014) Evolution: Ctenophore genomes and the origin of neurons. Curr Biol 24(16):R757-R761.
10. Jékely G, Paps J, Nielsen C (2015) The phylogenetic position of ctenophores and the origin(s) of nervous systems. Evodevo 6:1.
11. Moroz LL (2015) Convergent evolution of neural systems in ctenophores. J Exp Biol 218(Pt 4):598-611.
12. Pick KS, et al. (2010) Improved phylogenomic taxon sampling noticeably affects nonbilaterian relationships. Mol Biol Evol 27(9):1983-1987.
13. Philippe H, et al. (2011) Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: Why more sequences are not enough. PLoS Biol 9(3):e1000602.
14. Jeffroy O, Brinkmann H, Delsuc F, Philippe H (2006) Phylogenomics: The beginning of incongruence? Trends Genet 22(4):225-231.
15. Rannala B, Yang Z (2008) Phylogenetic inference using whole genomes. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 9:217-231.
16. Yang Z, Rannala B (2012) Molecular phylogenetics: Principles and practice. Nat Rev Genet 13(5):303-314.
17. Telford MJ, Budd GE, Philippe H (2015) Phylogenomic insights into animal evolution. Curr Biol 25(19):R876-R887.
18. Delsuc F, Tsagkogeorga G, Lartillot N, Philippe H (2008) Additional molecular support for the new chordate phylogeny. Genesis 46(11):592-604.
19. Singh TR, et al. (2009) Tunicate mitogenomics and phylogenetics: Peculiarities of the Herdmania momus mitochondrial genome and support for the new chordate phy-logeny. BMC Genomics 10:534.
20. Whelan S, Goldman N (2001) A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol Biol Evol 18(5):691-699.
21. Lartillot N (2015) Probabilistic models of eukaryotic evolution: Time for integration. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 370(1678):20140338.
22. Lartillot N, Philippe H (2004) A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol Biol Evol 21(6):1095-1109.
23. Nosenko T, et al. (2013) Deep metazoan phylogeny: When different genes tell different stories. Mol Phylogenet Evol 67(1):223-233.
24. Philippe H, et al. (2011) Acoelomorph flatworms are deuterostomes related to Xenoturbella. Nature 470(7333):255-258.
25. Bergsten J (2005) A review of long-branch attraction. Cladistics 21(2):163-193.
26. Gouy R, Baurain D, Philippe H (2015) Rooting the tree of life: The phylogenetic jury is still out. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 370(1678):20140329.
27. Philippe H, Laurent J (1998) How good are deep phylogenetic trees? Curr Opin Genet Dev 8(6):616-623.
28. Philippe H, Germot A (2000) Phylogeny of eukaryotes based on ribosomal RNA: Long-branch attraction and models of sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol 17(5):830-834.
29. Brinkmann H, van der Giezen M, Zhou Y, Poncelin de Raucourt G, Philippe H (2005) An empirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phy-logenomics. Syst Biol 54(5):743-757.
30. Dabert M, Witalinski W, Kazmierski A, Olszanowski Z, Dabert J (2010) Molecular phy-logeny of acariform mites (Acari, Arachnida): Strong conflict between phylogenetic signal and long-branch attraction artifacts. Mol Phylogenet Evol 56(1):222-241.
31. Derelle R, et al. (2015) Bacterial proteins pinpoint a single eukaryotic root. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(7):E693-E699.
32. Holton TA, Pisani D (2010) Deep genomic-scale analyses of the metazoa reject Coelomata: Evidence from single-and multigene families analyzed under a supertree and supermatrix paradigm. Genome Biol Evol 2:310-324.
33. Philippe H, et al. (2009) Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships. Curr Biol 19(8):706-712.
34. Felsenstein J (1992) Phylogenies from restriction sites: A maximum-likelihood approach. Evolution 46(1):159-173.
35. Lewis PO (2001) A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst Biol 50(6):913-925.
36. Stone M (1974) Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 36(2):111-147.
37. Blanquart S, Lartillot N (2008) A site-and time-heterogeneous model of amino acid replacement. Mol Biol Evol 25(5):842-858.
38. Li H, et al. (2015) Higher-level phylogeny of paraneopteran insects inferred from mitochondrial genome sequences. Sci Rep 5:8527.
39. Goremykin VV, etal. (2013) The evolutionary root of flowering plants. Syst Biol 62(1):50-61.
40. Campbell LI, et al. (2011) MicroRNAs and phylogenomics resolve the relationships of Tardigrada and suggest that velvet worms are the sister group of Arthropoda. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(38):15920-15924.
41. Struck TH, et al. (2011) Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid evolution. Nature 471(7336):95-98.
42. Tavaré S (1986) Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. Lect Math Life Sci 17:57-86.
43. Nakano H (2015) What is Xenoturbella? Zoological Letters 1:22.
44. Le SQ, Gascuel O (2008) An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol Biol Evol 25(7):1307-1320.
45. Lartillot N, Lepage T, Blanquart S (2009) PhyloBayes 3: A Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics 25(17):2286-2288.
46. Borowiec ML, Lee EK, Chiu JC, Plachetzki DC (2015) Dissecting phylogenetic signal and accounting for bias in whole-genome data sets: A case study of the Metazoa. bioRxiv: 10.1101/013946.
47. Leys SP (2015) Elements of a 'nervous system' in sponges. J Exp Biol 218(4):581-591.
48. Scheel BM, Hausdorf B (2014) Dynamic evolution of mitochondrial ribosomal proteins in Holozoa. Mol Phylogenet Evol 76:67-74.
49. Bucher D, Anderson PAV (2015) Evolution of the first nervous systems-What can we surmise? J Exp Biol 218:501-503.
50. Feuda R, Rota-Stabelli O, Oakley TH, Pisani D (2014) The comb jelly opsins and the origins of animal phototransduction. Genome Biol Evol 6(8):1964-1971.
51. Schüler A, et al. (2015) The rise and fall of TRP-N, an ancient family of mechanogated ion channels, in Metazoa. Genome Biol Evol 7(6):1713-1727.
52. Wray GA, Abouheif E (1998) When is homology not homology? Curr Opin Genet Dev 8(6):675-680.
53. Wagner GP (2007) The developmental genetics of homology. Nat Rev Genet 8(6):473-479.
54. Sommer RJ (2009) The future of evo-devo: Model systems and evolutionary theory. Nat Rev Genet 10(6):416-422.
55. Chang ES, et al. (2015) Genomic insights into the evolutionary origin of Myxozoa within Cnidaria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(48):14912-14917.
56. Liebeskind BJ, Hillis DM, Zakon HH (2015) Convergence of ion channel genome content in early animal evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(8):E846-E851.
57. Dabe EC, Sanford RS, Kohn AB, Bobkova Y, Moroz LL (2015) DNA methylation in basal metazoans: Insights from ctenophores. Integr Comp Biol, 10.1093/icb/icv086.
58. Schnitzler CE, Simmons DK, Pang K, Martindale MQ, Baxevanis AD (2014) Expression of multiple Sox genes through embryonic development in the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi is spatially restricted to zones of cell proliferation. Evodevo 5:15.
59. Lartillot N, Rodrigue N, Stubbs D, Richer J (2013) PhyloBayes MPI: Phylogenetic reconstruction with infinite mixtures of profiles in a parallel environment. Syst Biol 62(4):611-615.
60. Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30(9):1312-1313.
61. Stamatakis A (2006) Phylogenetic models of rate heterogeneity: A high performance computing perspective. Parallel and Distributed Processing (IPDPS), 2006 20th IEEE International Symposium, 10.1109/IPDPS.20061639535.
62. Ronquist F, et al. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61(3):539-542.