When is homology not homology?

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 675-680

  Wray, Gregory A ^a   Abouheif, Ehab ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DROSOPHILA; GENE STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATOR GENE; REVIEW; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

EID: 0031794446     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-437X(98)80036-1     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. de Beer GR. Homology: an Unsolved Problem. 1971;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. Zuckerkandl E. Molecular pathways to parallel evolution: I. Gene nexuses and their morphological correlates. J Mol Evol. 39:1994;661-678.
3. Gerhart J, Kirschner M. . of special interest Cells, Embryos, and Evolution. 1997;Blackwell Science, Boston, A central theme of this book is the multiple uses to which regulatory genes have been put during the course of animal evolution.
4. Duboule D, Wilkins AS. The evolution of 'bricolage'. of special interest Trends Genet. 14:1998;54-59 This review discusses the recruitment of existing genes to new developmental roles in terms of the idea of evolution as a 'tinkering' process.
5. Wray GA. Evolutionary dissociations between homologous genes and homologous structures. Homology. 1998;Wiley, Chichester. in press.
6. Dickinson WJ. Molecules and morphology: where's the homology? Trends Genet. 11:1995;119-121.
7. Abouheif E, Akam M, Dickinson WJ, Holland PWH, Meyer A, Patel N, Raff RA, Roth VL, Wray GW. Homology and developmental genes. of outstanding interest Trends Genet. 13:1997;432-433 This short paper outlines some pitfalls associated with using regulatory genes as indices of homology at the morphological level: failure to distinguish genes which are orthologous (gene copies derived from speciation) and paralogous (gene copies derived from duplication); use of the term 'functional homology' which confuses similarity because of a common evolutionary origin (homology) with similarity due to functional convergence (analogy); and conflicting comparisons across different levels of biological organization, such as genes, their expression patterns, their developmental roles, and the structure to which they give rise. The paper provides practical solutions to avoid these.
8. Mayr E. The Growth of Biological Thought. 1982;Belknap Press, Boston.
9. Hall BK. Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. 1994;Academic Press, San Francisco.
10. Abouheif E. Developmental genetics and homology: a hierarchical approach. Trends Ecol Evol. 12:1997;405-408.
11. Bang AG, Bailey AM, Posakony JW. Hairless promotes stable commitment to the sensory organ precursor cell fate by negatively regulating the activity of the Notch signaling pathway. Dev Biol. 172:1995;479-494.
12. Kim J, Irvine KD, Carroll SB. Cell recognition, signal induction, and symmetrical gene activation at the dorsal-ventral boundary of the developing Drosophila wing. Cell. 82:1995;795-802.
13. Robey E. Notch in vertebrates. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 7:1997;551-557.
14. Crowe R, Henrique D, Ish-Horowicz D, Niswander L. A new role for Notch and Delta in cell fate decisions: patterning the feather array. Development. 125:1998;767-775.
15. Patel NH, Martin-Blanco E, Coleman KG, Poole SJ, Ellis MC, Kornberg TB, Goodman CS. Expression of engrailed proteins in arthropods, annelids, and chordates. Cell. 58:1989;955-968.
16. Rogers BT, Kaufman TC. Structure of the insect head as revealed by the EN protein pattern in developing embryos. Development. 122:1996;3419-3432.
17. Davis CA, Holmyard DP, Millen KJ, Joyner AL. Examining pattern formation in mouse, chicken and frog embryos with an EN-specific antiserum. Development. 111:1991;287-298.
18. Lowe CJ, Wray GA. Radical alterations in the roles of homeobox genes during echinoderm evolution. of special interest Nature. 389:1997;718-721 This paper provides several examples of probable gains and losses of developmental roles for three transcription factors (distal-less, engrailed, and orthodenticle). These factors play some developmental roles that are distinct from those in either arthropods and chordates, and play different developmental roles from class to class within echinoderms.
19. Savage RM, Shankland M. Identification and characterization of a hunchback orthologue, Lzf2, and its expression during leech embryogenesis. Dev Biol. 175:1996;205-217.
20. DeRobertis EM, Sasai Y. A common plan for dorsoventral patterning in Bilateria. Nature. 380:1996;37-40.
21. McGinnis W, Krumlauf R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell. 68:1992;283-302.
22. Shubin N, Tabin C, Carroll S. Fossils, genes, and the evolution of animal limbs. of outstanding interest Nature. 388:1997;639-648 This review provides instructive analyses of comparative gene expression data during limb development in arthropods and chordates. The discussions highlight the importance of a robust phylogenetic framework and a detailed understanding of comparative anatomy for understanding the role that particular genes have played in the course of morphological evolution.
23. Satokata I, Benson G, Maas R. Sexually dimorphic sterility phenotypes in Hox a-10 deficient mice. Nature. 374:1995;460-463.
24. Nüsslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature. 287:1980;795-801.
25. Doe CQ, Smouse D, Goodman CS. Control of neuronal fate by the Drosophila segmentation gene even-skipped. Nature. 333:1988;376-388.
26. Patel NH, Condron BG, Zinn K. Pair-rule expression patterns of even-skipped are found in both short- and long-germ beetles. Nature. 367:1994;429-434.
27. Patel NH, Ball EE, Goodman CS. Changing role of even-skipped during the evolution of insect pattern formation. Nature. 357:1992;339-342.
28. Grbic M, Strand MR. Shifts in the life history of parasitic wasps correlate with pronounced alterations in early development. of special interest Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:1998;1097-1101 This paper provides a good example of how the developmental role of a regulatory gene can change in association with shifts in an organism's life history. It describes the surprising evolutionary loss of the well-studied segmentation role of eve.
29. Cline T. The Drosophila sex determination signal: how do flies count to two? Trends Genet. 9:1993;385-390.
30. Bopp D, Calhoun G, Horabin JI, Samuels M, Schedl P. Sex-specific control of Sex-lethal is a conserved mechanism for sex determination in the genus Drosophila. Development. 122:1996;971-982.
31. Meise M, Hilfikerkleiner D, Dubendorfer A, Brunner C, Nothiger R, Bopp D. Sex-lethal, the master sex-determining gene in Drosophila, is not sex-specifically regulated in Musca domestica. of special interest Development. 125:1998;1487-1494 This, and the following report [32], demonstrate that a regulatory gene (Sxl) can become involved in a developmental process (sex determination) after that process first evolved. It also demonstrates that Sxl is probably not a 'master regulatory gene' for sex deteremination in most flies.
32. Saccone G, Peluso I, Artiaco D, Giordano E, Bopp D, Polito LC. The Ceratitis capitata homologue of the Drosophila sex determining gene sex-lethal is structurally conserved, but not sex-specifically regulated. of special interest Development. 125:1998;1495-1500 See annotation [31].
33. Dawes R, Dawson I, Falciani F, Tear G, Akam M. Dax, a locust Hox gene related to fushi-tarazu but showing no pair-rule expression. Development. 120:1994;1561-1572.
34. Brown S, Hilgenfeld RB, Denell RE. The beetle Tribolium castaneum has a fushi tarazu homolog expressed in stripes during segmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91:1994;12922-12926.
35. Falciani F, Hausdorf B, Schroder R, Akam M, Tautz D, Denell R, Brown S. Class 3 Hox genes in insects and the origin of zen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:1996;8479-8484.
36. Slack JMW. A Rosetta Stone for pattern formation in animals? Nature. 310:1984;364-365.
37. Holland ND, Panganiban G, Henyey EL, Holland LZ. Sequence and developmental expression of AmphiDll, an amphioxus Distal-less gene transcribed in the ectoderm, epidermis and nervous system: insights into the evolution of the craniate forebrain and neural crest. Development. 122:1996;2911-2920.
38. Wada H, Saiga H, Satoh N, Holland PWH. Tripartite organization of the ancestral chordate brain and the antiquity of placodes: insights from ascidian Pax-2/5/8, Hox, and Otx genes. of special interest Development. 125:1998;1113-1122 The authors illustrate how the expression domains of several genes provide a more secure interpretation of morphological homologies among species than does a single gene. The discussion provides a clear example of applying expression data to understanding the history of morphology.
39. Averof M, Patel N. Crustacean appendage evolution associated with changes in Hox gene expression. of special interest Nature. 388:1997;682-686 This paper provides another careful application of gene expression data to understanding the history of morphological change.
40. Sordino P, Duboule D. A molecular approach to the evolution of vertebrate paired appendages. Trends Ecol Evol. 11:1996;114-119.
41. Bolker JA, Raff RA. Developmental genetics and traditional homology. Bioessays. 18:1996;489-494.
42. Holland PWH. How gene duplication affects homology. Homology. 1998;Wiley, Chichester. in press.
43. Nitecki M. Evolutionary Innovations. 1989;University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
44. Müller GB, Wagner GP. Novelty in evolution: restructuring the concept. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 22:1991;229-256.
45. Carroll SB, Gates J, Keys DN, Paddock SW, Panganiban G, Selegue JE, Williams JA. Pattern formation and eyespot determination in butterfly wings. Science. 265:1994;109-114.
46. Panganiban G, Irvine SM, Lowe C, Roehl H, Corley LS, Sherbon B, Grenier JK, Fallon JF, Kimble J, Walker M, et al. The origin and evolution of animal appendages. of special interest Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:1997;5162-5166 Apparent cases of parallel recruitment of Distal-less into the development of appendages that are not themselves homologous are documented in this paper. The data illustrate one of the pitfalls of using regulatory gene expression to infer homology of structures.
47. Bharathan G, Janssen B-J, Kellogg EA, Sinha A. Did homeodomain proteins duplicate before the origin of angiosperms, fungi, and metazoa? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:1997;13749-13753.