Dynamic evolution of mitochondrial ribosomal proteins in Holozoa

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 67-74

  Scheel, Bettina M ^a   Hausdorf, Bernhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coevolution; Ctenophora; Holozoa; Horizontal gene transfer; Mitochondrial ribosomal proteins; Placozoa

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEIN; RIBOSOME PROTEIN; RIBOSOME RNA;

AMOEBA (LIFE CYCLE STAGE); ANIMAL; CTENOPHORA; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; GENOMICS; HORIZONTAL GENE TRANSFER; METABOLISM; MITOCHONDRIAL GENOME; MITOCHONDRION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; RIBOSOME;

AMOEBA; ANIMALS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CTENOPHORA; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE TRANSFER, HORIZONTAL; GENOME, MITOCHONDRIAL; GENOMICS; MITOCHONDRIA; MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEINS; PHYLOGENY; RIBOSOMAL PROTEINS; RIBOSOMES; RNA, RIBOSOMAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84896665488     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ax P. Das System der Metazoa I 1995, G. Fischer, Stuttgart.
2. Boore J.L. The use of genome-level characters for phylogenetic reconstruction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21:439-446.
3. Boratyn G.M., Schäffer A.A., Agarwala R., Altschul S.F., Lipman D.J., Madden T.L. Domain enhanced lookup time accelerated BLAST. Biology Direct 2012, 7:12.
4. Burger G., Forget L., Zhu Y., Gray M.W., Lang B.F. Unique mitochondrial genome architecture in unicellular relatives of animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100:892-897.
5. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000, 17:540-552.
6. Dayraud C., Alié A., Jager M., Chang P., Le Guyader H., Manuel M., Quéinnec E. Independent specialisation of myosin II paralogues in muscle vs. non-muscle functions during early animal evolution: a ctenophore perspective. BMC Evol. Biol. 2012, 12:107.
7. De Mendoza A., Ruiz-Trillo I. The mysterious evolutionary origin for the GNE gene and the root of Bilateria. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28:2987-2991.
8. Desmond E., Brochier-Armanet C., Forterre P., Gribaldo S. On the last common ancestor and early evolution of eukaryotes: reconstructing the history of mitochondrial ribosomes. Res. Microbiol. 2011, 162:53-70.
9. Dumollard R., Duchen M., Sardet C. Calcium signals and mitochondria at fertilisation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2006, 17:314-324.
10. Dutheil J.Y. Detecting coevolving positions in a molecule: why and how to account for phylogeny. Briefings Bioinformatics 2012, 13:228-243.
11. Eddy S.R. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 1998, 14:755-763.
12. Edgar R.C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32:1792-1797.
13. Eichinger, L., Pachebat, J.A., Glöckner, G., et al. (97 co-authors). 2005. The genome of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Nature 435, 43-57.
14. Eitel M., Guidi L., Hadrys H., Balsamo M., Schierwater B. New insights into placozoan sexual reproduction and development. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e19639.
15. Hausdorf B., Helmkampf M., Meyer A., Witek A., Herlyn H., Bruchhaus I., Hankeln T., Struck T.H., Lieb B. Spiralian phylogenomics supports the resurrection of Bryozoa comprising Ectoprocta and Entoprocta. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:2723-2729.
16. Heidel A.J., Lawal H.M., Felder M., Schilde C., Helps N.R., Tunggal B., Rivero F., John U., Schleicher M., Eichinger L., Platzer M., Noegel A.A., Schaap P., Glöckner G. Phylogeny-wide analysis of social amoeba genomes highlights ancient origins for complex intercellular communication. Genome Res. 2011, 21:1882-1891.
17. Hejnol A., Obst M., Stamatakis A., Ott M., Rouse G.W., Edgecombe G.D., Martinez P., Baguñà J., Bailly X., Jondelius U., Wiens M., Müller W.E.G., Seaver E., Wheeler W.C., Martindale M.Q., Giribet G., Dunn C.W. Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. P Roy. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 2009, 276:4261-4270.
18. International Aphid Genomics Consortium Genome sequence of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Plos Biol. 2010, 8:e1000313.
19. Ishiwata K., Sasaki G., Ogawa J., Miyata T., Su Z. Phylogenetic relationships among insect orders based on three nuclear protein coding gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2011, 58:169-180.
20. Jobb, G., 2011. TREEFINDER version of March 2011. Munich. http://www.treefinder.de.
21. Jobb G., von Haeseler A., Strimmer K. TREEFINDER: a powerful graphical analysis environment for molecular phylogenetics. BMC Evol. Biol. 2004, 4:18.
22. Kjer K.M., Carle F.L., Litman J., Ware J. A molecular phylogeny of Hexapoda. Arthropod Syst. Phylogeny 2006, 64:35-44.
23. Kück P., Meusemann K. FASconCAT: convenient handling of data matrices. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 56:1115-1118.
24. Lahr D.J.G., Grant J., Nguyen T., Lin J.H., Katz L.A. Comprehensive phylogenetic reconstruction of Amoebozoa based on concatenated analyses of SSU-rDNA and actin genes. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e22780.
25. Lartillot N., Philippe H. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004, 21:1095-1109.
26. Lartillot N., Rodrigue N., Stubbs D., Richer J. PhyloBayes MPI. Phylogenetic reconstruction with infinite mixtures of profiles in parallel environment. Syst. Biol. 2013, 62:611-615.
27. Marchler-Bauer A., Lu S., Anderson J.B., Chitsaz F., Derbyshire M.K., DeWeese-Scott C., Fong J.H., Geer L.Y., Geer R.C., Gonzales N.R., Gwadz M., Hurwitz D.I., Jackson J.D., Ke Z., Lanczycki C.J., Lu F., Marchler G.H., Mullokandov M., Omelchenko M.V., Robertson C.L., Song J.S., Thanki N., Yamashita R.A., Zhang D., Zhang N., Zheng C., Bryant S.H. CDD: a conserved domain database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D225-D229.
28. Maxwell E.K., Ryan J.F., Schnitzler C.E., Browne W.E., Baxevanis A.D. MicroRNAs and essential components of the microRNA processing machinery are not encoded in the genome of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi. BMC Genomics 2012, 13:714.
29. Mears J.A., Sharma M.R., Gutell R.R., McCook A.S., Richardson P.E., Caulfield T.R., Agrawal R.K., Harvey S.C. A structural model for the large subunit of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 358:193-212.
30. Miller, M.A., Pfeiffer, W., Schwartz, T., 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proc Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 November 2010, New Orleans, LA, pp. 1-7.
31. Nesnidal M.P., Helmkampf M., Bruchhaus I., El-Matbouli M., Hausdorf B. Agent of whirling disease meets orphan worm: phylogenomic analyses firmly place Myxozoa in Cnidaria. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e54576.
32. Nosenko T., Schreiber F., Adamska M., Adamski M., Eitel M., Hammel J., Maldonado M., Müller W.E.G., Nickel M., Schierwater B., Vacelet M., Wiens M., Wörheide G. Deep metazoan phylogeny: when different genes tell different stories. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2013, 67:223-233.
33. O'Brien T.W. Properties of human mitochondrial ribosomes. IUBMB Life 2003, 55:505-513.
34. Pagel M. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zoolog. Scr. 1997, 26:331-348.
35. Pagel M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 1999, 401:877-884.
36. Pagel, M., Meade, A., 2013. BayesTraits, version 2. University of Reading. http://www.evolution.rdg.ac.uk.
37. Pattengale N.D., Alipour M., Bininda-Emonds O.R.P., Moret B.M.E., Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary?. J. Comput. Biol. 2010, 17:337-354.
38. Philippe, H., Derille, R., Lopez, P., et al. (20 co-authors). 2009. Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships. Current Biol. 19, 706-712.
39. Pick K.S., Philippe H., Schreiber F., Erpenbeck D., Jackson D.J., Wrede P., Wiens M., Alié A., Morgenstern B., Manuel M., Wörheide G. Improved phylogenomic taxon sampling noticeably affects nonbilaterian relationships. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27:1983-1987.
40. Poulton J., Marchington D.R. Segregation of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in human oocytes and in animal models of mtDNA disease: clinical implications. Reproduction 2002, 123:751-755.
41. Rokas A., Holland P.W.H. Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2000, 15:454-459.
42. Ruiz-Trillo I., Roger A.J., Burger G., Gray M.W., Lang B.F. A phylogenomic investigation into the origin of Metazoa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25:664-672.
43. Ryan, J.F., Pang, K., Schnitzler, C.E., Nguyen, A.-D., Moreland, R.T., Simmons, D.K., Koch, B.J., Francis, W.R., Havlak, P., NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Smith, S.A., Putnam, N.H., Haddock, S.H.D., Dunn, C.W., Wolfsberg, T.G., Mullikin, J.C., Martindale, M.Q., Baxevanis, A.D., 2013. The genome of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and its implications for cell type evolution. Science 342, 1242592.
44. Schierwater B., Eitel M., Jakob W., Osigus H.-J., Hadrys H., Dellaporta S.L., Kolokotronis S.O., DeSalle R. Concatenated analysis sheds light on early metazoan evolution and fuels a modern "urmetazoon" hypothesis. Plos Biol. 2009, 7:e1000020.
45. Shalchian-Tabrizi K., Minge M.A., Espelund M., Orr R., Ruden T., Jakobsen K.S., Cavalier-Smith T. Multigene phylogeny of Choanozoa and the origin of animals. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e2098.
46. Sharma M.R., Koc E.C., Datta P.P., Booth T.M., Spremulli L.L., Agrawal R.K. Structure of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome reveals an expanded functional role for its component proteins. Cell 2003, 115:97-108.
47. Signorovitch A.Y., Buss L.W., Dellaporta S.L. Comparative genomics of large mitochondria in placozoans. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3:e13.
48. Smits P., Smeitink J.A.M., van den Heuvel L.P., Huynen M.A., Ettema T.J.G. Reconstructing the evolution of the mitochondrial ribosomal proteome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35:4686-4703.
49. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2688-2690.
50. Stamatakis A., Hoover P., Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst. Biol. 2008, 57:758-771.
51. Steinmetz P.R.H., Kraus J.E.M., Larroux C., Hammel J.U., Amon-Hassenzahl A., Houliston E., Wörheide G., Nickel M., Degnan B.M., Technau U. Independent evolution of striated muscles in cnidarians and bilaterians. Nature 2012, 487:231-234.
52. Suzuki T., Terasaki M., Takemoto-Hori C., Hanada T., Ueda T., Wada A., Watanabe K. Structural compensation for the deficit of rRNA with proteins in the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome. Systematic analysis of protein components of the large ribosomal subunit from mammalian mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:21724-21736.
53. Swofford, D.L., 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony *and other methods. Version 4.0b10. Sunderland MA: Sinauer Associates.
54. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28:2731-2739.
55. Telford M.J., Copley R.R. Improving animal phylogenies with genomic data. Trends Genet. 2011, 27:186-195.
56. Templeton A.R. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and apes. Evolution 1983, 37:221-244.
57. Torruella G., Derelle R., Paps J., Lang B.F., Roger A.J., Shalchian-Tabrizi K., Ruiz-Trillo I. Phylogenetic relationships within the Opisthokonta based on phylogenomic analyses of conserved single-copy protein domains. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29:531-544.
58. Tsang W.Y., Lemire B.D. Mitochondrial genome content is regulated during nematode development. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 291:8-16.
59. Witek A., Herlyn H., Ebersberger I., Welch D.B.M., Hankeln T. Support for the monophyletic origin of Gnathifera from phylogenomics. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 53:1037-1041.
60. Yoshizawa K., Saigusa T. Phylogenetic analysis of paraneopteran orders (Insecta: Neoptera) based on forewing base structure, with comments on monophyly of Auchenorrhyncha (Hemiptera). Syst. Entomol. 2001, 26:1-13.