Political communication and deliberation

Political Communication and Deliberation

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-325

  Gastil, John W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949945666     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781483329208     Document Type: Book

References (439)

1. Abelson, Jenn. 2004. Uncivil discourse blights online debates. The Boston Globe, January 5, 2004. http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2004/01/05/uncivil_discourse_blights_online_debates/(acessed Accessed online October 21, 2006).
2. Abramowitz, Alan I., and Kyle L.Saunders. 1998. Ideological realignment in the U.S. electorate. Journal of Politics 60:634-52. doi:10.2307/2647642 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2647642
3. Ackerman, Bruce, and James S.Fishkin. 2004. Deliberation day. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4. Adams, Bruce. 1995. Building a new political environment. Kettering Review (Fall):16-21.
5. Adler, Stephan J. 1994. The jury: Trial and error in the American courtroom. New York: New York Times Books.
6. Albright, Madeline. 2003. Think again: The United Nations. Foreign Policy (September/October). http://foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=34 (accessed October 24, 2006).
7. Alford, John R., & Brady, David W. 1993. Personal and partisan advantage in U.S. congressional elections, 1846-1990. In Congress reconsidered, ed. L. C.Dodd and B. I.Openheimer, 141-57. 5th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
8. Almond, Gabriel, and SidneyVerba. 1989. The civic culture. 2nd ed.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Alterman, Eric. 2003. What liberal media? The truth about bias and the news. New York: HarperCollins.
10. Amar, Vikram David. 1995. Jury service as political participation akin to voting. Cornell Law Review 80:203-59.
11. Ansolabehere, Stephen, ShantoIyengar, Adam F.Simon, and NicholasValentino. 1997. Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate? In Do the media govern? Politicians, voters, and reporters in America, ed. I.Shanto and R.Reeves, 195-204. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Aristotle. 1988. Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://www.constitution.org/ari/polit_04.htm (accessed October 21, 2006).
13. Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The logic of congressional action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14. Bacci, Chiara, MichaelDollinger, and JohnGastil. 2006. Does deliberation yield a consistent pattern of attitude change? Testing the underlying value dimensions of opinion shifts during Deliberative Polls. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
15. Baird, A. Craig. 1928. Public discussion and debate. Boston: Ginn and Co.
16. Baker, C. Edwin. 2001. Implications of rival visions of electoral campaigns. In Mediated politics: communication in the future of democracy, ed. W. L.Bennett and R. M.Entman, 342-61. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Bandura, Albert. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. New York: Prentice-Hall.
18. Barber, Benjamin R. 1984. Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19. Barton, John H., Judith L.Goldstein, Timothy E.Josling, and Richard H.Steinberg. 2006. The evolution of the trade regime: Politics, law, and economics of the GATT and the WTO. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Baym, Geoffrey. 2005. The Daily Show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication 22:259-76. doi:10.1080/10584600591006492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584600591006492
21. Becker, Ted, and ChristaDaryl Slaton. 2000. The future of teledemocracy. New York: Praeger.
22. Beckham, B., and Aronson, H. 1978. Selection of jury foremen as a measure of the social status of women. Psychological Reports 43:475-78. doi:10.2466/pr0.1978.43.2.475 http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1978.43.2.475
23. Bennett, W. Lance. 1994. Inside the system: Culture, institutions, and power in American politics. New York: Harcourt Brace.
24. Bennett, W. Lance. 1998. The uncivic culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics. PS: Political Science and Politics 31:741-61. doi:10.1017/S1049096500053270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096500053270
25. Bennett, W. Lance. 2003. Communicating global activism. Information, Communication and Society 6:144. doi:10.1080/1369118032000093860a http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118032000093860a
26. Bennett, W. Lance, Regina G.Lawrence, and StevenLivingston. In press. When the press fails: Political Power and the news media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226042862.001.0001 http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226042862.001.0001
27. Besley, John C., and Katherine A.McComas. 2005. Framing justice: Using the concept of procedural justice to advance political communication research. Communication Theory 15:414-36. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00342.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00342.x
28. Bessette, Joseph M. 1994. The mild voice of reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Black, Laura. 2006. Deliberation, difference, and the story: How storytelling manages identity and conflict in deliberative groups. PhD diss., University of Washington.
30. Blanchard, Margaret A. ed. 1998. History of the mass media in the United States: An encyclopedia. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn.
31. Bohman, James. 2003. Deliberative toleration. Political Theory 31:757-79. doi:10.1177/0090591703252379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0090591703252379
32. Bohman, James F. 1996. Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Bormann, Ernest G. 1996. Symbolic Convergence theory and communication in group decision making. In Communication and group decision-making, ed. R. Y.Hirokawa and M. S.Poole, 81-113. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Boster, Franklin J., John E.Hunter, and Jerold L.Hale. 1991. An information-processing model of jury decision making. Small Group Research 18:524-47.
35. Boyte, Harry. 2005. Reframing democracy: Governance, civic agency, and politics. Public Administration Review 65:536-46. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00481.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00481.x
36. Brecher, Jeremy. 2000. Globalization from below. The Nation, November 16, 2000. http://www.thenation.com/doc/20001204/brecher (accessed October 24, 2006).
37. Briand, Michael. 1999. Practical politics: Five principles for a community that works. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
38. Bruner, M. Lane. 2002. Global constitutionalism and the arguments over free trade. Communication Studies 53:25-39. doi:10.1080/10510970209388572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510970209388572
39. Brunkhorst, Hauke. 2002. Globalising democracy without a state: Weak public, strong public, global constitutionalism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31:675-90. doi:10.1177/03058298020310030301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310030301
40. Bryan, Frank. 2004. Real democracy: The New England town meeting and how it works. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Bryan, Frank, and JohnMcClaughry. 1989. The Vermont Papers: Recreating democracy on a human scale. Port Mills, VT: Chelsea Green.
42. Buchanan, B. I. 2001. Mediated electoral democracy: Campaigns, incentives, and reform. In Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy, ed. W. L.Bennett and R. M.Entman, 362-79. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Budesheim, Thomas Lee, David A.Houston, and Stephen J.DePaola. 1996. Persuasiveness of in-group and out-group political messages: The case of negative political campaigning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70:523-34. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.523
44. Burkhalter, Stephanie. 1997. "The poor are not like the rest of us": The social construction of welfare mothers in congressional policy discourse. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Tucson, AZ.
45. Burkhalter, Stephanie. 2006. Talking points: Message strategies and deliberation in the U.S. Congress. PhD diss., University of Washington.
46. Burkhalter, Stephanie, JohnGastil, and ToddKelshaw. 2002. A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Communication Theory 12:398-422.
47. Burnett, D. Graham. 2001. A trial by jury. New York: Vintage.
48. Burnheim, John. 1989. Is democracy possible? The alternative to electoral politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
49. Burns, James M., J. W.Peltason, Thomas E.Cronin, and David B.Magleby. 1996. State and local politics: Government by the people. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
50. Button, Mark, and KevinMattson. 1999. Deliberative democracy in practice: Challenges and prospects for civic deliberation. Polity, 31:609-37. doi:10.2307/3235238 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3235238
51. Button, Mark, and David M.Ryfe. 2005. What can we learn from the practice of deliberative democracy? In The deliberative democracy handbook, ed. JohnGastil and PeterLevine, 20-33. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52. Cain, Bruce, JohnFerejohn, and MorrisFiorina. 1987. The personal vote: Constituency service and electoral independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53. Campbell, Angus, Philip E.Converse, Warren E.Miller, and Donald E.Stokes. 1960. The American voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
54. Cappella, Joseph N., and KathleenHall Jamieson. 1997. Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
55. Carson, Lyn, and JanetteHartz-Karp. 2005. Adapting and combining deliberative designs: Juries, polls, and forums. In The deliberative democracy handbook, ed. JohnGastil and PeterLevine, 120-38. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
56. Carson, Lyn, and BrianMartin. 1999. Random selection in politics. Westport, CT: Praeger.
57. Casper, Gerald, and HansZeisel. 1972. Lay judges in the German criminal courts. Journal of Legal Studies 1:135-91. doi:10.1086/467481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467481
58. Chambers, Simone. 2003. Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science 6:307-26. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538
59. Chambers, Simone. 2004. Behind closed doors: Publicity, secrecy, and the quality of deliberation. Journal of Political Philosophy 12:389-410. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00206.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00206.x
60. Charles, Michelle, HarrisSokoloff, and ChrisSatullo. 2005. Electoral deliberation and public journalism. In The deliberative democracy handbook, ed. JohnGastil and PeterLevine, 59-67. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
61. Chasin, Richard, MargaretHerzig, SallyannRoth, LauraChasin, CarolBecker, and RobertStains, Jr. 1996. From diatribe to dialogue on divisive public issues: Approaches drawn from family therapy. Mediation Quarterly 13:323-44. doi:10.1002/crq.3900130408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/crq.3900130408
62. Checkoway, Barry. 1981. The politics of public hearings. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 17:567-82. doi:10.1177/002188638101700411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002188638101700411
63. Chikwanha-Dzenga, Annie B., EldredMasunungure, and NyashaMadingira. 2001. Democracy and national governance in Zimbabwe: A country survey report. Afrobarometer Paper No. 12. http://www.afrobarometer.org/papers/AfropaperNo12.pdf (accessed August 22, 2006).
64. Chilton, Paul A. ed. 1985. Language and the nuclear arms debate: Nukespeak today. London: Frances Pinter.
65. Churchill, John. 2006. A liberating education. Seattle Times, August 20, 2006. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2003209223_sunchurchill20.html (accessed October 23, 2006).
66. Clark, Ann Marie. 2001. Diplomacy of conscience: Amnesty International and changing human rights norms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67. Coelho, Vera Schattan P., Ilza Araujo L.de Andrade, and MarianaCifuentes Montoya. 2002. Deliberative fora and the democratisation of social policies in Brazil. IDS Bulletin 33:65-73. doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2002.tb00022.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2002.tb00022.x
68. Coelho, Vera Schattan P., BarbaraPozzoni, and MarianaCifuentes Montoya. 2005. Participation and public policies in Brazil. In The deliberative democracy handbook, ed. JohnGastil and PeterLevine, 174-84. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
69. Cohen, Joshua. 1989. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In The good polity, ed. PhilipPettit and AlanHamlin, 17-34. New York: Basil Blackwell.
70. Converse, Philip E. 1964. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Ideology and discontent, ed. David E.Apter, 206-61. New York: Free Press.
71. Cook, Fay Lomax, Michael X. DelliCarpini, and Lawrence R.Jacobs. 2003. Who deliberates? Discursive capital in America. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
72. Craib, Ian. 1992. Anthony Giddens. London: Routledge.
73. Crosby, Ned. 1995. Citizen juries: One solution for difficult environmental questions. In Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse, ed. OrtwinRenn, ThomasWebler, and PeterWiedemann, 157-74. Boston: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8_8
74. Crosby, Ned. 2003. Healthy democracy: Bringing trustworthy information to the voters of America. Minneapolis, MN: Beaver's Pond.
75. Crosby, Ned, and DougNethercutt. 2005. Citizens' juries: Creating a trustworthy voice of the people. In The deliberative democracy handbook, ed. JohnGastil and PeterLevine, 111-19. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
76. Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
77. Dahl, Robert A. 1998. On democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
78. Dahl, Robert. 1999. Can international organizations be democratic? In Democracy's edges, ed. IanShapiro and CasianoHacker-Cordon, 19-36. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511586361.003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586361.003
79. Dahlgren, Peter. 2002. In search of the talkative public: Media, deliberative democracy and civic culture. Javnost The Public 9:5-26.
80. Daugherty, Renee A., and Sue E.Williams. 2007. Applications of public deliberation: Themes emerging from twelve personal experiences emanating from National Issues Forums Training. Journal of Public Deliberation 3. http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol3/iss1/art10 (accessed July 5, 2007).
81. DeConto, Jesse J. 2003. Planning board approves plan for Sagamore Creek conservation land. Portsmouth Herald, May 16, 2003. http://www.seacoastonline.com/2003 news/05162003/news/28861.htm (accessed July 16, 2007).
82. Dees, Tom M. 2001. Juries: On the verge of extinction? A discussion of jury reform. SMU Law Review 54:1755-812.
83. Delli Carpini, Michael X., and ScottKeeter. 1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
84. Delli Carpini, Michael X., FayLomax Cook, and Lawrence R.Jacobs. 2004. Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science 7:315-44. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
85. Denver, David, GordonHands, and BillJones. 1995. Fishkin and the deliberative opinion poll: Lessons from a study of the Granada 500 television program. Political Communication 12:147-56. doi:10.1080/10584609.1995.9963062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1995.9963062
86. de Tocqueville, Alexis. 1961. Democracy in America. New York: Schocken. (Originally published 1835)
87. Devine, Dennis J., Laura D.Clayton, Benjamin B.Dunford, RasmySeying, and JenniferPryce. 2001. Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy and Law 7:622-727. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.7.3.622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.3.622
88. Dewey, John. 1910. How we think. New York: Heath. doi:10.1037/10903-000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10903-000
89. Domke, David, Mark D.Watts, Dhavan V.Fan, and David P.Shah. 1999. The politics of conservative elites and the "liberal media" argument. Journal of Communication 49:35-58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02816.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02816.x
90. Dorroh, Jennifer. 2005. Eye on CBS: Network launches a blog to scrutinize its news operation. American Journalism Review 27 (5): 14.
91. Drucker, Susan J., and GaryGumpert. 1996. The regulation of public social life: Communication law revisited. Communication Quarterly 44:280-96. doi:10.1080/01463379609370018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463379609370018
92. Dryzek, John S. 1990. Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
93. Dryzek, John S. 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, and contestations. New York: Oxford University Press.
94. Dryzek, John S. 2001. Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Political Theory 29:651-69. doi:10.1177/0090591701029005003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0090591701029005003
95. Dubois, P. L. 1984. Voting cues in nonpartisan trial court elections: A multivariate assessment. Law and Society Review 18:395-436. doi:10.2307/3053430 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3053430
96. Dwyer, William L. 2002. In the hands of the people. New York: St. Martin's Press.
97. Dzur, Albert W. 2002. Public journalism and deliberative democracy. Polity 34:313-36.
98. Eakin, Beth A. 1975. An empirical study of the effect of leadership influence on decision outcomes in different sized jury panels. Kansas Journal of Sociology 11:109-26.
99. Edelman, Murray. 1977. Political language. New York: Academic Press.
100. Edelman, Murray. 1988. Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
101. Eliasoph, Nina. 1996. Making a fragile public: A talk-centered study of citizenship and power. Sociological Theory 14:262-89. doi:10.2307/3045389 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3045389
102. Eliasoph, Nina. 1998. Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511583391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511583391
103. Elkin, Stephen L. 2004. Thinking constitutionally: The problem of deliberative democracy. Social Philosophy and Policy 21:39-75.
104. Elster, Jon. 1998. Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139175005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175005
105. Elving, Ronald D. 1995. C-SPAN gets pushy. Columbia Journalism Review 34:38-42.
106. Eriksen, Erik Oddvar, and John ErikFossom. eds. 2000. Democracy in the European Union: Integration through deliberation?New York: Routledge.
107. Erikson, Robert S., and Thomas R.Palfrey. 1998. Campaign spending and incumbency: An alternative simultaneous equations approach. Journal of Politics 60:355-73. doi:10.2307/2647913 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2647913
108. Ettema, James S. 2007. Journalism as reason-giving: Deliberative democracy, institutional accountability, and the news media's mission. Political Communication 24:143-60. doi:10.1080/10584600701312860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584600701312860
109. Etzioni, Amatai. 1993. The spirit of community: The reinvention of American society. New York: Crown.
110. Evans, Sara M., and Harry C.Boyte. 1992. Free spaces: The sources of democratic change in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
111. Fagotto, Elena, and ArchonFung. 2006. Embedded deliberation: Entrepreneurs, organizations, and public action. Boston: Taubman Center for State and Local Government.
112. Fairchild, Amy L. 2004. Policies of inclusion: Immigrants, disease, dependency, and American immigration policy at the dawn and dusk of the 20th century. American Journal of Public Health 94:528-39. doi:10.2105/AJPH.94.4.528 http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.4.528
113. Farhi, Paul. 2003. Everybody wins. American Journalism Review 25:32-36.
114. Farrell, David M. 2001. Electoral systems: A comparative introduction. New York: St. Martin's Press.
115. Fasulo, Linda. 2005. An insider's guide to the UN. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
116. Faux, Jeff. 2000. Do the "Seattle protestors" have a point? International Economy 14 (4): 42-47.
117. Filner, Matthew F. 2002. Grassroots harvest: Assessing the "post-ideology" of pragmatic communitarianism. Polity 35:311-23.
118. Finkel, Steven E. 1985. Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science 29:891-913. doi:10.2307/2111186 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111186
119. Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
120. Fiorino, Daniel J. 1990. Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, and Human Values 15:226-43. doi:10.1177/016224399001500204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224399001500204
121. Fisher, Roger, and WilliamUry. 1981. Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
122. Fishkin, James S. 1988. The case for a national caucus: Taking democracy seriously. Atlantic (August): 16-18.
123. Fishkin, James S. 1991. Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
124. Fishkin, James S. 1995. The voice of the people. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
125. Fishkin, James, and CynthiaFarrar. 2005. Deliberative polling: From experiment to community resource. In The deliberative democracy handbook, ed. JohnGastil and PeterLevine, 68-79. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
126. Fishkin, James S., and Robert C.Luskin. 1999. Bringing deliberation to the democratic dialogue: The NIC and beyond. In The poll with a human face: The National Issues Convention experiment in political communication, ed. MaxwellMcCombs and AmyReynolds, 3-38. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
127. Fletcher, Michael A. 1998. The color of campaign finance. Washington Post National Weekly Edition, September 28.
128. Foley, Michael W., and BobEdwards. 1996. The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7:38-52. doi:10.1353/jod.1996.0048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.1996.0048
129. Forde, Susan, MichaelMeadows, and KerrieFoxwell. 2003. Experiencing radio: Training, education and the community radio sector. Australian Studies in Journalism 12:83-103.
130. Forgette, Richard, and GlennPlatt. 2005. Redistricting principles and incumbency protection in the U.S. Congress. Political Geography 24:934-51. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.05.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.05.002
131. Freeman, Samuel. 2000. Deliberative democracy: A sympathetic comment. Philosophy and Public Affairs 29:371-418. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00371.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00371.x
132. Galston, William A., and PeterLevine. 1998. America's civic condition: A glance at the evidence. In Community works: The revival of civil society in America, ed. E. J.Dionne, 30-36. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
133. Gamson, William A. 1992. Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
134. Gans, Herbert J. 2007. Everyday news, newsworkers, and professional journalism. Political Communication 24:161-66. doi:10.1080/10584600701312878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584600701312878
135. Gastil, John. 1992. Undemocratic discourse: A review of theory and research on political discourse. Discourse and Society 4:469-500. doi:10.1177/0957926592003004003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003004003
136. Gastil, John. 1993. Democracy in small groups: Participation, decision-making, and communication. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.
137. Gastil, John. 1994. A definition and illustration of democratic leadership. Human Relations 47:953-75. doi:10.1177/001872679404700805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679404700805
138. Gastil, John. 2000. By popular demand: Revitalizing representative democracy through deliberative elections. Berkeley: University of California Press.
139. Gastil, John. 2004. Adult civic education through the National Issues Forums: Developing democratic habits and dispositions through public deliberation. Adult Education Quarterly 54:308-28. doi:10.1177/0741713604266142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741713604266142
140. Gastil, John, LauraBlack, and KaraMoscovitz. Forthcoming. Group and individual differences in deliberative experience: A study of ideology, attitude change, and deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Political Communication.
141. Gastil, John, StephanieBurkhalter, and LauraBlack. 2007. Group deliberation in the courthouse: Predicting deliberation, participation, and satisfaction in municipal juries. Small Group Research 38:337-59. doi:10.1177/1046496407301967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496407301967
142. Gastil, John, and NedCrosby. 2003. Voters need more reliable information. Seattle Post-Intelligencer, November 6, 2003. http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/147013_uninformed06.html (accessed October 21, 2006).
143. Gastil, John, and NedCrosby. 2006. Taking the initiative. Seattle Times, November 26, 2006. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/PrintStory.pl?document_id=2003448042&slug=sungastil26&date=20061126 (accessed online December 5, 2006).
144. Gastil, John, Eugene P.Deess, and PhilWeiser. 2002. Civic awakening in the jury room: A test of the connection between jury deliberation and political participation. Journal of Politics 64:585-95. doi:10.1111/1468-2508.00141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00141
145. Gastil, John, Eugene P.Deess, PhilWeiser, and JordanLarner. Forthcoming. Jury service and electoral participation: A strong test of the participation hypothesis. Journal of Politics.
146. Gastil, John, and JamesPrice Dillard. 1999a. The aims, methods, and effects of deliberative civic education through the National Issues Forums. Communication Education 48:1-14. doi:10.1080/03634529909379168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379168
147. Gastil, John, and JamesPrice Dillard. 1999b. Increasing political sophistication through public deliberation. Political Communication 16:3-23. doi:10.1080/105846099198749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/105846099198749
148. Gastil, John, DanielKahan, and Donald Braman, D. 2005. The cultural resonance model: Integrating culture, ideology, partisanship, and knowledge in theories of political communication and public opinion. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, Boston.
149. Gastil, John, and William M.Keith. 2005. A nation that (sometimes) likes to talk: A brief history of public deliberation in the United States. In The deliberative democracy handbook, ed. JohnGastil and PeterLevine, 3-19. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
150. Gastil, John, and Peter Levine.eds. 2005. The deliberative democracy handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
151. Gastil, John, and PhilWeiser. 2006. Jury service as an invitation to citizenship: Assessing the civic value of institutionalized deliberation. Policy Studies Journal 34:605-27. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00194.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00194.x
152. Gastil, Raymond. 2002. Beyond the edge: New York's new waterfront. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press.
153. Gerber, Alan. 1998. Estimating the effect of campaign spending on senate election outcomes using instrumental variables. American Political Science Review 92:401-11. doi:10.2307/2585672 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2585672
154. Gergen, Kenneth J., SheilaMcNamee, and Frank J.Barrett. 2001. Toward transformative dialogue. International Journal of Public Administration 24:679-707. doi:10.1081/PAD-100104770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/PAD-100104770
155. Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
156. Glaberson, William. 2001. Juries, their powers under siege, find their role is being eroded. New York Times, March 2.
157. Glendon, Mary Ann. 1991. Rights talk: The impoverishment of political discourse. New York: Free Press.
158. Glendon, Michael J. 2003. Why the security council failed. Foreign Affairs. http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20030501faessay11217/michael-j-glennon/why-the-security-council-failed.html (accessed online October 24, 2006).
159. Goldberg, Bernard. 2003. Bias: A CBS insider exposes how the media distort the news. New York: HarperCollins.
160. Goldfarb, Jeffrey C. 1998. Civility and subversion: The intellectual in democratic society. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511581717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581717
161. Goodin, Robert E. 2000. Democratic deliberation within. Philosophy and Public Affairs 29:81-109. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00081.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00081.x
162. Goodin, Robert E. 2003. Reflective democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0199256179.001.0001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199256179.001.0001
163. Goodin, Robert E., and Simon J.Niemeyer. 2003. When does deliberation begin? Internal reflection versus public discussion in deliberative democracy. Political Studies 51:627-49. doi:10.1111/j.0032-3217.2003.00450.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0032-3217.2003.00450.x
164. Gore, Al. 2007. The assault on reason. New York: Penguin Press.
165. Gould, Carol C. 2004. Globalizing democracy and human rights. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511617096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617096
166. Gouran, Dennis S., & Hirokawa, Randy Y. (1996). Functional theory and communication in decision-making and problem-solving groups: An expanded view. In Communication and group decision-making, ed. Randy Y.Hirokawa and Marshall S.Poole, 55-80. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
167. Green, Donald P., and Alan S.Gerber. 2004. Get Out the Vote: How to increase voter turnout. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
168. Green, Donald P., and BradleyPalmquist. 1994. How stable is party identification? Political Behavior 16:437-66. doi:10.1007/BF01498826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01498826
169. Green, Donald P., and R.Shachar. 2000. Habit formation and political behaviour: Evidence of consuetude in voter turnout. British Journal of Political Science 30:561-73. doi:10.1017/S0007123400000247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400000247
170. Greenwald, Marilyn, and Joseph Bernt.eds. 2000. The big chill: Investigative reporting in the current media environment. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
171. Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Speech acts, ed. PeterCole and JerryMorgan, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
172. Grossberg, Joshua. 2005. Carlson out: Crossfire canned at CNN. E!Online, January 6.
173. Gulati, Girish J., Marion R.Just, and Ann N.Crigler. 2004. News coverage of political campaigns. In Handbook of political communication research, ed. Lynda LeeKaid, 237-56. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
174. Gutmann, Amy and Dennis F.Thompson. 1996. Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
175. Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis F.Thompson. 2004. Why deliberative democracy?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
176. Habermas, Jurgen. 1975. Legitimation crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.
177. Habermas, Jurgen. 1979. Communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon Press.
178. Habermas, Jurgen. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
179. Habermas, Jurgen. 2006. Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? Communication Theory 16:411-26. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x
180. Hallin, Daniel C. 1992. Sound bite news: Television coverage of elections, 1968-1988. Journal of Communication 42:5-23. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00775.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00775.x
181. Halvorsen, Kathleen E. 2003. Assessing the effects of public participation. Public Administration Review 63:535-43. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00317
182. Hans, Valerie P. 2000. Business on trial: The civil jury and corporate responsibility. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
183. Hans, Valerie P. 2002. U.S. jury reform: The active jury and the adversarial ideal. Saint Louis University Public Law Review 21:85-97.
184. Hans, Valerie P., and NeilVidmar. 1986. Judging the jury. New York: Plenum. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-6463-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6463-2
185. Harrison, Elliott. 1928. The process of group thinking. New York: Association Press.
186. Hart, Roderick, and SharonJarvis. 1999. We the people: The contours of lay political discourse. In The poll with a human face: The National Issues Convention experiment in political communication, ed. MaxwellMcCombs and AmyReynolds, 59-84. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
187. Hastie, Reid, and NancyPennington. 1996. The O.J. Simpson stories: Behavioral scientists' reflections on The People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson. University of Colorado Law Review 67:958.
188. Hastie, Reid, Steven D.Penrod, and NancyPennington. 1983. Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
189. Hastie, Reid, David A.Schkade, and John W.Payne. 1998. A study of juror and jury judgments in civil cases: Deciding liability for punitive damages. Law and Human Behavior 22:287-314. doi:10.1023/A:1025754422703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025754422703
190. Hawley, Willis D. 1973. Nonpartisan elections and the case for party politics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
191. Held, David. 1998. Democracy and globalization. In Re-imagining political community: Studies in cosmopolitan democracy, ed. DanieleArchibugi, 11-27. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
192. Hendriks, Carolyn M. 2005. Consensus conferences and planning cells: Lay citizen deliberations. In The deliberative democracy handbook, ed. JohnGastil and PeterLevine, 80-110. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
193. Herbst, Susan. 1993. Numbered voices: How opinion polling has shaped American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
194. Herbst, Susan. 1999. The cultivation of conversation. In The poll with a human face: The National Issues Convention experiment in political communication, ed. MaxwellMcCombs and AmyReynolds, 187-209. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
195. Herman, Edward S., and NoamChomsky. 1988. Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon.
196. Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 2002. Stealth democracy: Americans' beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511613722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613722
197. Hilberg, Raul. 2003. The destruction of the European Jews. 3rd ed.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
198. Hing, Bill O. 2004. Defining America through immigration policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
199. Hofstetter, C. Richard, Mark C.Donovan, Melville R.Klauber, AlexandraCole, Carolyn J.Huie, and ToshiyukiYuasa. 1994. Political talk radio: A stereotype reconsidered. Political Research Quarterly 47:467-79.
200. Hollander, Barry A. 1997. Fuel to the fire: Talk radio and the Gamson hypothesis. Political Communication 14:355-69. doi:10.1080/105846097199371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/105846097199371
201. Holt, Jim. 2006. Export this? New York Times Magazine, April 23.
202. Howarth, Richard B., and Matthew A.Wilson. 2006. A theoretical approach to deliberative valuation: Aggregation by mutual consent. Land Economics 82:1-16.
203. Huckfeldt, Robert, Paul E.Johnson, and JohnSprague. 2004. Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511617102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617102
204. Huckfeldt, Robert, JeanetteMorehouse Mendez, and TracyOsborn. 2004. Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology 25:65-95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x
205. Huckfeldt, Robert, and JohnSprague. 1995. Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511664113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664113
206. Isbell, Linda M., and Victor C.Ottati. 2002. The emotional voter: Effects of episodic affective reactions on candidate evaluation. In The social psychology of politics, ed. Victor C.Ottai, VictorC., ScottTindale, JohnEdwards, Fred B.Bryant, LindaHealth, Daniel C.O'Connell, YolandaSuarez-Balzacar, and Emil J.Posavac, 55-74. New York: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0569-3_3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0569-3_3
207. Ivins, Molly. 2004. Clueless people love Bush: Studies show Bush supporters are misled on Bush policies and the news. Common Dreams Newscenter, October 27, 2004. http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1027-34.htm (accessed October 21, 2006).
208. Jackman, Robert W., and Ross A.Miller. 2004. Before norms: Institutions and civic culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
209. Jacobs, Lawrence R., Michael X.Delli-Carpini, and FayeLomax Cook. 2004. How do Americans deliberate? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
210. Jacobson, Gary C. 1993. The misallocation of resources in house campaigns. In Congress reconsidered, ed. Lawrence C.Dodd and Bruce I.Openheimer, 115-39. 5th ed.Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
211. Jacobson, Gary C. 1997. The politics of congressional elections. 4th ed.New York: Longman.
212. Jacobson, Gary C., and SamuelKernell. 1981. Strategy and choice in congressional elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
213. Jacoby, William G. 1991. Ideological identification and issue attitudes. American Journal of Political Science 35:178-205. doi:10.2307/2111443 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111443
214. Jacoby, William G. 1995. The structure of ideological thinking in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science 39:314-35. doi:10.2307/2111615 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111615
215. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1992. Dirty politics: Deception, distraction, and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
216. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1996. Packaging the presidency: A history and criticism of presidential campaign advertising. New York: Oxford University Press.
217. Janis, Irving L. 1982. Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decision and fiascoes. 2nd ed.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
218. Jerome, Lee, and BhaviniAlgarra. 2005. Debating debating: A reflection on the place of debate within secondary schools. Curriculum Journal 16:493-508. doi:10.1080/09585170500384610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585170500384610
219. Johnson, Thomas J., and Barbara K.Kaye. 2004. Wag the blog: How reliance on traditional media and the Internet influence credibility perceptions of weblogs among blog users. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 81:622-42. doi:10.1177/107769900408100310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100310
220. Jonakait, Randolph N. 2003. The American jury system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
221. Jones, David A. 2004. Why Americans don't trust the media-A preliminary analysis. Harvard International Journal of Press-Politics 9:60-75. doi:10.1177/1081180X04263461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1081180X04263461
222. Just, Marion, RosalindLevine, and KathleenRegan. 2002. Investigative journalism despite the odds: Watchdog reporting continues to decline. Columbia Journalism Review 41:102-103.
223. Kahan, Daniel, Paul Slovic, Don Braman, and JohnGastil. 2006. Fear of democracy: A cultural evaluation of Sunstein on risk. Harvard Law Review 119:1071-109.
224. Kaid, Lynda Lee. 2004. Handbook of political communication research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
225. Kalven, Harry, and HansZeisel. 1966. The American jury. Boston: Little, Brown.
226. Kang, John M. 2004. The irrelevance of sincerity: Deliberative democracy in the Supreme Court. Saint Louis University Law Review 48:305-25.
227. Kapoor, Ilan. 2004. Deliberative democracy and the WTO. Review of International Political Economy, 11:522-41. doi:10.1080/0969229042000252882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969229042000252882
228. Kay, Alan F. 1998. Locating consensus for democracy. St. Augustine, FL: Americans Talk Issues Foundation.
229. Keane, John. 1984. Public life and late capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
230. Keith, Bruce E., David B.Magleby, Candice J.Nelson, ElizabethOrr, Mark C.Westlye, and Raymond E.Wolfinger. 1992. The myth of the independent voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.
231. Kelshaw, Todd Spencer. 2003. Public meetings and public officials: Officeholders' accounts of participatory and deliberative democratic encounters with citizens. PhD diss., University of Washington.
232. Kettering Foundation. 1989. The public's role in the policy process: A view from state and local policymakers. Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation.
233. Kim, Joohan, Robert O.Wyatt, and ElihuKatz. 1999. News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication 16:361-85. doi:10.1080/105846099198541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/105846099198541
234. Kirp, David L. 1992. Two cheers for the electronic town hall: Or Ross Perot, meet Alexis De Tocqueville. The Responsive Community 2 (4): 48-52.
235. Klein, Gary. 2001. When the news doesn't fit: The New York Times and Hitler's first two months in office, February/March 1933. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 78:127-49.
236. Knock, Thomas J. 1995. To end all wars: Woodrow Wilson and the quest for a new world order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
237. Kraig, Robert A. 2004. Woodrow Wilson and the lost world of the oratorical statesman. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
238. Krueger, Brian S. 2002. Assessing the potential of Internet political participation in the United States: A resource approach. American Politics Research 30:476-98. doi:10.1177/1532673X02030005002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X02030005002
239. Kuklinski, James H., and Norman L.Hurley. 1996. It's a matter of interpretation. In Political persuasion and attitude change, ed. Diana C.Mutz, Paul M.Sniderman, and Richard A.Brody, 125-44. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
240. Lange, Lynda. 2002. Feminist interpretations of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
241. Lau, Richard R., and Gerald M.Pomper. 2004. Negative campaigning: An analysis of U.S. Senate elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
242. League of Women Voters. 1997. Charting the health of American democracy. http://www.lwv.org/report.html (accessed July 16, 2007).
243. Lee, Eugene C. 1960. The politics of nonpartisanship. Berkeley: University of California Press.
244. Lee, Tien-Tsung. 2005. The liberal media myth revisited: An examination of factors influencing perceptions of media bias. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 49:43-64. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4901_4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4901_4
245. Leib, Ethan J. 2004. Deliberative democracy in America: A proposal for a popular branch of government. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
246. Leigh, Lawrence J. 1984. A theory of jury trial advocacy. Utah Law Review 763-806.
247. Levi, Margaret, and DavidOlson. 2000. The battles in Seattle. Politics and Society 28:309-29. doi:10.1177/0032329200028003002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0032329200028003002
248. Levine, Peter. 1990. The new progressive era. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
249. Levine, Peter, ArchonFung, and JohnGastil. 2005. Future directions for public deliberation. In The deliberative democracy handbook, ed. JohnGastil and PeterLevine, 271-88. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
250. Levine, Peter, and RoseMarie Nierras. 2007. Activists' views of deliberation. Journal of Public Deliberation 3. http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol3/iss1/art4 (accessed July 26, 2007).
251. Lewis, Charles. 1998. The buying of Congress. New York: Avon Books.
252. Lipsitz, Keena, ChristineTrost, and MatthewGrossmann. 2005. What voters want from political campaign communication. Political Communication 22:337-54. doi:10.1080/10584600591006609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584600591006609
253. Lukensmeyer, Carolyn J., JoeGoldman, and StevenBrigham. 2005. A town meeting for the twenty-first century. In The deliberative democracy handbook, ed. JohnGastil and PeterLevine, 154-63. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
254. Lunt, Peter, and PaulStenner. 2005. The Jerry Springer show as an emotional public sphere. Media, Culture and Society, 27:59-81. doi:10.1177/0163443705049058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0163443705049058
255. Luskin, Robert C., James S.Fishkin, and RogerJowell. 2002. Considered opinions: Deliberative polling in Britain. British Journal of Political Science 32:455-87. doi:10.1017/S0007123402000194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123402000194
256. Lyons, W. E., DavidLowery, and RuthDeHoog. 1993. The politics of dissatisfaction: Citizens, services, and urban institutions. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
257. MacCoun, Robert J., & Kerr, Norbert L. 1988. Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54:21-33. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.21 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.21
258. MacMillan, Margaret. 2003. Paris 1919: Six months that changed the world. New York: Random House.
259. Macoubrie, Jane. 2003. Logical argument structures in decision-making. Argumentation 17:291-313. doi:10.1023/A:1025117226851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025117226851
260. Madison, James. n.d. The Federalist, No. 42. http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/funddocs/fed/federa42.htm (accessed October 21, 2006).
261. Magleby, David B. 1984. Direct legislation: Voting on ballot propositions in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
262. Mahtesian, Charles. 1997. The politics of ugliness. Governing Magazine 10:18-22.
263. Makinson, Larry, and JoshuaGoldstein. 1996. Open secrets: The encyclopedia of congressional money and politics. 4th ed.Washington, DC: Center for Responsive Politics.
264. Maltzman, Forrest, and LeeSigelman. 1996. The politics of talk: Unconstrained floor time in the U.S. House of Representatives. Journal of Politics 58:819-30. doi:10.2307/2960448 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2960448
265. Mansbridge, Jane J. 1983. Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
266. Mansbridge, Jane J. 1992. A deliberative perspective on neocorporatism. Politics and Society 20:493-505. doi:10.1177/0032329292020004007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0032329292020004007
267. Mansbridge, Jane J., Janette Hartz-Karp, Matthew Amengual, and JohnGastil. 2006. Norms of deliberation: An inductive study. Journal of Public Deliberation 2. http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol2/iss1/art7 (accessed July 5, 2007).
268. Manzo, John F. 1996. Taking turns and taking sides: Opening scenes from two jury deliberations. Social Psychology Quarterly 59:107-25. doi:10.2307/2787046 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2787046
269. Mathews, David. 1994. Politics for people: Finding a responsible public voice. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
270. Matsusaka, John G. 2004. For the many or the few: The initiative, public policy, and American democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226510873.001.0001 http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226510873.001.0001
271. Mattson, Kevin. 1998. Creating a democratic public: The struggle for urban participatory democracy during the progressive era. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
272. McAfee, Noelle, RobertMcKenzie, and DavidMathews. 1990. Hard choices. Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation.
273. McBride, Cillian. 2005. Deliberative democracy and the politics of recognition. Political Studies, 53:497-515. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00541.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00541.x
274. McCombs, Maxwell, and Amy Reynolds.eds. 1999. The poll with a human face: The National Issues Convention experiment in political communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
275. McCombs, Maxwell, and Donald L.Shaw. 1972. The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36:176-85. doi:10.1086/267990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/267990
276. McDevitt, Michael. 2003. In defense of autonomy: A critique of the public journalism critique. Journal of Communication 53:155-64. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb03011.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb03011.x
277. McDevitt, Michael, SpiroKiousis, and KarinWahl-Jorgensen. 2003. Spiral of moderation: Opinion expression in computer-mediated discussion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 15:454-70. doi:10.1093/ijpor/15.4.454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/15.4.454
278. McKinley, Jesse. 2005. Admiration for a comedian who knew no limits. New York Times, December 13.
279. McLeod, Jack M., KatieDaily, ZhongshiGuo, William P.Eveland, JanBayer, SeungchanYang, and HsuWang. 1996. Community integration, local media use, and democratic processes. Communication Research 23:179-209. doi:10.1177/009365096023002002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365096023002002
280. McLeod, Jack M., Dietram A.Scheufele, and PatriciaMoy. 1999. Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication 16:315-36. doi:10.1080/105846099198659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/105846099198659
281. Melville, Keith, Taylor L.Willingham, and John R.Dedrick. 2005. National Issues Forums: A network of communities. In The deliberative democracy handbook, ed. JohnGastil and PeterLevine, 37-58. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
282. Mendelberg, Tali. 2002. The deliberative citizen: Theory and evidence. Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation 6: 151-93.
283. Mengual, Gloria F. 2003. Portsmouth, N.H.: Where public dialogue is a hallmark of community life. http://www.studycircles.org/en/Article.141.aspx (accessed October 23, 2006).
284. Merkle, Daniel M. 1996. The National Issues Convention deliberative poll. Public Opinion Quarterly 60:588-619. doi:10.1086/297775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/297775
285. Miller, Warren E., and J.Merrill Shanks. 1996. The new American voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
286. Mitzen, Jennifer. 2005. Reading Habermas in anarchy: Multilaterial diplomacy and global public spheres. American Political Science Review 99:401-17. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051749
287. Mooney, Chris. 2005. The Republican war on science. New York: Basic Books.
288. Morrell, Michael E. 2005. Deliberation, democratic decision making and internal political efficacy. Political Behavior 27:49-69. doi:10.1007/s11109-005-3076-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-3076-7
289. Moy, Patricia, DavidDomke, and KeithStamm. 2001. The spiral of silence and public opinion on affirmative action. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 78:7-25. doi:10.1177/107769900107800102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800102
290. Moy, Patricia, and JohnGastil. 2006. Discussion networks, media use, and deliberative conversation. Political Communication 23:443-460. doi:10.1080/10584600600977003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584600600977003
291. Moy, Patricia, and MichaelPfau. 2000. With malice toward all: The media and public confidence in democratic institutions. New York: Praeger.
292. Muhlberger, Peter and LoriWeber. 2006. Lessons from the Virtual Agora Project: The effects of agency, identity, information, and deliberation on political knowledge. Journal of Public Deliberation 2. http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol2/iss1/art13 (accessed July 5, 2007).
293. Mutz, Diana C. 1998. Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139175074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175074
294. Mutz, Diana C. 2006. Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511617201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617201
295. Mutz, Diana C., and Paul S.Martin. 2001. Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. American Political Science Review 95:97-114.
296. Mutz, Diana C., and ByronReeves. 2005. The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review 99:1-15. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051452
297. Nanz, Patrizia, and JensSteffek. 2005. Assessing the democratic quality of deliberation in international governance: Criteria and research strategies. Acta Politica 40:368-83. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500118
298. National Issues Forums. 1990. For convenors and moderators: Organizing your first forum/study circle. Dayton, OH: National Issues Forums Institute.
299. National Issues Forums. 1992. National Issues Forums leadership handbook, 1991-1992. Dayton, OH: National Issues Forums Institute.
300. Navarrette, Ruben. 2006. Commentary: Immigration hearings "cynical and cowardly."http://CNN.com, July 6, 2006. http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/07/06/navarrette.immigration (accessed October 21, 2006).
301. Newhagen, John E. 1994. Self-efficacy and call-in political television show use. Communication Research 21:366-79. doi:10.1177/009365094021003007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365094021003007
302. Newman, Andy. 1993. Is it opinion, or is it expertise? American Journalism Review 15 (March): 2, 12-13.
303. Nie, Norman H., JaneJunn, and KennethStehlik-Barry. 1996. Education and democratic citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
304. Nimmo, Dan, and James E.Combs. 1990. Mediated political realities. 2nd ed.New York: Longman.
305. Nino, Carlos Santiago. 1996. The constitution of deliberative democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
306. Nishizawa, Mariko. 2005. Citizen deliberations on science and technology and their social environments: Case study on the Japanese consensus conference on GM crops. Science and Public Policy 32:479-89. doi:10.3152/147154305781779236 http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154305781779236
307. Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth. 1991. The theory of public opinion: The concept of the spiral of silence. In Communication Yearbook 14, ed. James A.Anderson, 256-87. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
308. Nye, Joseph S. 2001. Globalization's democratic deficit: How to make international institutions more accountable. Foreign Affairs 80 (4). http://www.foreignaffairs.org/2001/4.html (accessed June 21, 2007). doi:10.2307/20050221 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20050221
309. Ober, Josiah. 1989. Mass and elite in democratic Athens: Rhetoric, ideology, and the power of the people. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
310. Oldenburg, Ray. 1997. The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day. 2nd ed.New York: Marlowe.
311. Oliver, J. Eric, and Raymond E.Wolfinger. 1999. Jury aversion and voter registration. American Political Science Review 93:147-52. doi:10.2307/2585766 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2585766
312. Oliver, Leonard P. 1987. Study circles. Washington, DC: Seven Locks Press.
313. Orwell, George. 1956. The Orwell reader. New York: Harcourt Brace.
314. Ottati, Victor C., and MeganDeiger. 2002. Visual cues and the candidate evaluation process. In The social psychology of politics, ed. Victor C.Ottati, 75-87. New York: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0569-3_4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0569-3_4
315. Page, Benjamin I. 1996. Who deliberates? Mass media in modern democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
316. Page, Benjamin I. and Robert Y.Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226644806.001.0001 http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226644806.001.0001
317. Parenti, Michael. 1995. Democracy for the few. 6th ed.New York: St. Martin's Press.
318. Park, Won-Woo. 1990. A review of research on groupthink. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 3:229-45. doi:10.1002/bdm.3960030402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960030402
319. Parker, Walter C. 2003. Teaching democracy: Unity and diversity in public life. New York: Teachers College Press.
320. Parkinson, John. 2003. Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy. Political Studies 51:180-96. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00419
321. Passel, Jeffrey. 2004. Mexican immigration to the US: The latest estimates. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
322. Pearce, W. Barnett, and Stephen W.Littlejohn. 1997. Moral conflict: When social worlds collide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
323. Pein, Corey. 2005. Blog-gate. Columbia Journalism Review 43:30-35.
324. Perrin, Andrew J. 2005. Political microcultures: Linking civic life and democratic discourse. Social Forces 84:1049-82. doi:10.1353/sof.2006.0028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0028
325. Peters, John Durham. 2001. Speaking into the air: A history of the idea of communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
326. Pettus, Ann Burnett. 1990. The verdict is in: A study of jury decision making factors, moment of personal decision, and jury deliberations-From the juror's point of view. Communication Quarterly 38:83-97. doi:10.1080/01463379009369743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463379009369743
327. Petty, Richard E., and John T.Cacioppo. 1981. Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Brown and Benchmark.
328. Pfau, Michael, and AllanLouden. 1994. Effectiveness of adwatch formats in deflecting political attack ads. Communication Research 21:325-41. doi:10.1177/009365094021003005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365094021003005
329. Phelan, Jo, Bruce G.Link, AnnStueve, and Robert E.Moore. 1995. Education, social liberalism, and economic conservativism: Attitudes toward homeless people. American Sociological Review 60:126-40. doi:10.2307/2096349 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2096349
330. Pollack, Mark A. 2003. Control mechanism or deliberative democracy? Two images of comitology. Comparative Political Studies 36:125-55. doi:10.1177/0010414002239374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414002239374
331. Polletta, Francesca. 2002. Freedom is an endless meeting: Democracy in American social movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226924281.001.0001 http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924281.001.0001
332. Potapchuk, William R., CindyCarlson, and JoanKennedy. 2005. Growing governance deliberatively: Lessons and inspiration from Hampton, Virginia. In The deliberative democracy handbook, ed. JohnGastil and PeterLevine, 254-70. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
333. Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400, 407 (1991).
334. Price, Vincent, and ClarissaDavid. 2005. Talking about elections: A study of patterns in citizen deliberation online. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York.
335. Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
336. Putnam, Robert D. 1995a. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6 (1): 65-78. doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002
337. Putnam, Robert D. 1995b. Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science and Politics 28:664-83.
338. Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
339. Rakove, Jack N. 1996. Original meanings: Politics and ideas in the making of the Constitution. New York: Vintage Books.
340. Ratner, R. S. 2004a. British Columbia's Citizens' Assembly: The Learning Phase. Canadian Parliamentary Review 27:20-26.
341. Ratner, R. S. 2004b. The B.C. Citizens' Assembly: The public hearings and deliberations stage. Canadian Parliamentary Review 28:24-33.
342. Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
343. Rawls, John. 1995. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
344. Rawls, John. 1999. The law of peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
345. Reich, Robert B. 1985. Public administration and public deliberation: An interpretive essay. The Yale Law Journal 94:1617-41. doi:10.2307/796213 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/796213
346. Renn, Ortwin, ThomasWebler, HorstRakel, PeterDienel, and BrandenJohnson. 1993. Public participation in decision making: A three-step procedure. Policy Sciences 26:189-214. doi:10.1007/BF00999716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00999716
347. Reynolds, Amy. 1999. Local television coverage of the NIC. In The poll with a human face: The National Issues Convention experiment in political communication, ed. MaxwellMcCombs and AmyReynolds, 113-32. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
348. Risse, Thomas, and KathrynSikkink. 1999. The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: Introduction. In The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change, ed. ThomasRisse and KathrynSikkink, 1-38. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511598777.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598777.002
349. Robert, Henry M. 1990. Robert's rules of order. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
350. Rojas, Hernando, Dhavan V.Shah, JaehoCho, MichaelSchmierbach, HeejoKeun, and HomeroGil-De-Zuniga. 2005. Media dialogue: Perceiving and addressing community problems. Mass Communication and Society, 8:93-110. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0802_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0802_2
351. Rosen, Jay. 2001. What are journalists for?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
352. Rosen, Jay, and DavisMerritt. 1994. Public journalism: Theory and practice. Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation.
353. Rosenau, James N. 1998. Governance and democracy in a globalizing world. In Re-imagining political community: Studies in cosmopolitan democracy, ed. DanieleArchibugi, DavidHeld, and MartinKohler, 28-57. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
354. Rosenberg, Shawn W., DanaWard, and StephenChilton. 1988. Political reasoning and cognition: A Piagetian view. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
355. Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2005. Stability and rigidity: Politics and design of the WTO's dispute settlement procedure. American Political Science Review 99:389-400. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051737
356. Rosenstone, Steven J., and John M.Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
357. Rostboll, Christian F. 2005. Preferences and paternalism-On freedom and deliberative democracy. Political Theory 33:370-96. doi:10.1177/0090591704272351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0090591704272351
358. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1950. The social contract and discourses. New York: E. Dutton. (Original work published 1762)
359. Ryan, Joal. 1998. "Seinfeld" goes directly to jail. E!Online. http://cache-origin.eonline.com/News/Items/0,1,3006,00.html (accessed June 21, 2007).
360. Ryfe, David Michael. 1999. Franklin Roosevelt and the fireside chats. Journal of Communication 49:80-103. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02818.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02818.x
361. Ryfe, David Michael. 2002. The practice of deliberative democracy: A study of 16 deliberative organizations. Political Communication 19:359-77. doi:10.1080/01957470290055547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01957470290055547
362. Ryfe, David Michael. 2005. Does deliberative democracy work? Annual Review of Political Science 8:49-71. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.032904.154633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.032904.154633
363. Ryfe, David M. 2006. Narrative and deliberation in small group forums. Journal of Applied Communication Research 34:72-93. doi:10.1080/00909880500420226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909880500420226
364. Ryfe, David M.2007 Toward a sociology of deliberation. Journal of Public Deliberation 3. http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol3/iss1/art3 (accessed July 26, 2007).
365. Salisbury, Robert H. 1986. Washington lobbyists: A collective portrait. In Interest group politics, ed. Allan J.Cigler and Burdett A.Loomis, 146-61. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
366. Samuels, Suzanne U. 2004. First among friends: Interest groups, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the right to privacy. Westport, CT: Praeger.
367. Sanders, Lynn M. 1997. Against deliberation. Political Theory 25:347-76. doi:10.1177/0090591797025003002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0090591797025003002
368. Sandys, Marla, & Dillehay, Ronald C. 1995. First-ballot votes, predeliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trials. Law and Human Behavior 19:175-95. doi:10.1007/BF01499324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01499324
369. Scher, Richard K. 1997. The modern political campaign: Mudslinging, bombast, and the vitality of American politics. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
370. Scheufele, Dietram A. 1999. Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication 49:103-22. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
371. Scheufele, Dietram A., Bruce W.Hardy, DominiqueBrossard, Israel S.Waismel-Manor, and ErikNisbet. 2006. Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship. Journal of Communication 56:728-53. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00317.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00317.x
372. Scheufele, Dietram A., and PatriciaMoy. 2000. Twenty-five years of the spiral of silence: A conceptual review and empirical outlook. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 12:3-28. doi:10.1093/ijpor/12.1.3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/12.1.3
373. Scheufele, Dietram A., JamesShanahan, and Sei-HillKim. 2002. Who cares about local politics? Media influences on local political involvement, issue awareness, and attitude strength. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 79:427-44. doi:10.1177/107769900207900211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107769900207900211
374. Schkade, David, Cass R.Sunstein, and ReidHastie. 2006. What happened on deliberation day? University of Chicago Law and Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 298. http://ssrn.com/abstract=911646 (accessed June 21, 2007).
375. Schmitt-Beck, Rudiger. 2004. Political communication effects: The impact of mass media and personal conversations on voting. In Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges, ed. FrankEsser and BarbaraPfetsch, 293-392. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511606991.014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606991.014
376. Schudson, Michael. 1997. Why conversation is not the soul of democracy. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 14:1-13. doi:10.1080/15295039709367020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295039709367020
377. Schudson, Michael. 1998. The good citizen: A history of American civic life. New York: Free Press.
378. Schudson, Michael. 2001. Politics as cultural practice. Political Communication 18:421-31. doi:10.1080/10584600152647128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584600152647128
379. Scully, Patrick L., and Martha L.McCoy. 2005. Study circles: Local deliberation as the cornerstone of deliberative democracy. In The deliberative democracy handbook, ed. JohnGastil and PeterLevine, 199-212. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
380. Segall, Shlomi. 2005. Political participation as an engine of social solidarity: A skeptical view. Political Studies 53:362-78. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00533.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00533.x
381. Shah, Dhavan V., NojinKwak, and R.Lance Holbert. 2001. "Connecting" and "disconnecting" with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication 18:141-62. doi:10.1080/105846001750322952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/105846001750322952
382. Shultz, Jim. 2002. The democracy owner's manual: A practical guide to changing the world. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
383. Simon, Rita J. 1967. The jury and the defense of insanity. Boston: Little, Brown.
384. Sirianni, Carmen, and LewisFriedland. 2001. Civic innovation in America: Community empowerment, public policy, and the movement for civic renewal. Berkeley: University of California Press.
385. Skocpol, Theda. 2003. Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civic life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
386. Skocpol, Theda, and Morris P.Fiorina. 1999. Civic engagement in American democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
387. Smith, Robert C. 2003. Migrant membership as an instituted process: Transnationalization, the state and the extra-territorial conduct of Mexican politics. International Migration Review 37:297-343. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00140.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00140.x
388. Smith, Tom A. 1999. The delegates' experience. In The poll with a human face: The National Issues Convention experiment in political communication, ed. MaxwellMcCombs and AmyReynolds, 39-58. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
389. Sniderman, Paul M., Richard A.Brody, and Philip E.Tetlock. 1991. Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511720468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720468
390. Sprain, Leah, and JohnGastil. 2007. What does it mean to deliberate? An interpretative account of the norms and rules of deliberation expressed by jurors. Unpublished manuscript prepared for the University of Washington, Seattle.
391. Stauber, John, and SheldonRampton. 1995. Toxic sludge is good for you: Lies, damn lies and the public relations industry. Monroe, ME: Common Courage.
392. Stavistsky, Alan G. 1994. The changing conception of localism in U.S. public radio. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic and Media 38:19-33. doi:10.1080/08838159409364243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08838159409364243
393. Street, Marc D. 1997. Groupthink: An examination of theoretical issues, implications, and future research suggestions. Small Group Research 28:72-93. doi:10.1177/1046496497281003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496497281003
394. Strodtbeck, F. L., & Lipinski, R. M. (1985). Becoming first among equals: Moral considerations in jury foreman selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49:927-36. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.4.927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.4.927
395. Sturgis, Alice. 1988. Standard code of parliamentary procedure. 3rd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.
396. Sturgis, Patrick, CarolineRoberts, and NickAllum. 2005. A different take on the deliberative poll: Information, deliberation, and attitude constraint. Public Opinion Quarterly 69:30-65. doi:10.1093/poq/nfi005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi005
397. Sunstein, Cass R. 2002. The law of group polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy 10:175-95. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00148
398. Surian, Luca. 1996. Are children with autism deaf to gricean maxims? Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 1:55-72. doi:10.1080/135468096396703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135468096396703
399. Svoboda, Craig J. 1995. Retrospective voting in gubernatorial elections: 1982 and 1986. Political Research Quarterly 48:135-50.
400. Tarrance, V. Lance, TarranceDe Vries, and Donna L.Mosher. 1998. Checked and balanced: How ticket-splitters are shaping the new balance of power in American politics. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.
401. Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, and John R.Hibbing. 2005. Citizenship and civic engagement. Annual Review of Political Science 8:227-49. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104829
402. Thompson, Michael, Richard J.Ellis, and AaronWildavsky. 1990. Cultural theory. Boulder, CO: Westview.
403. Thornton, Russell. 1987. American Indian holocaust and survival: A population history since 1492. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
404. Tilly, Charles. 2004. Social movements, 1768-2004. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
405. Tonn, Mari B. 2005. Taking conversation, dialogue, and therapy public. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 8:405-30. doi:10.1353/rap.2005.0072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rap.2005.0072
406. Townsend, Rebecca. 2006. Widening the circumference of scene: Local, politics, local metaphysics. K.B. Journal 3. http://kbjournal.org/townsend (accessed June 21, 2007).
407. Tracy, Karen, and HeidiMuller. 2001. Diagnosing a school board's interactional trouble: Theorizing problem formulating. Communication Theory 11:84-104. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00234.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00234.x
408. Tuchman, Barbara. 1994. The guns of August. New York: Ballantine.
409. Uleman, Gerald F. 1996. The five hardest lessons from the O.J. trial. Issues in Ethics 7:1. http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/iie/v7n1/lessons.html (accessed October 21, 2006).
410. Underwood, Doug. 2001. Reporting and the push for market-oriented journalism: Media organizations as businesses. In Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy, ed. W. LanceBennett and Robert M.Entman, 99-116. New York: Cambridge University Press.
411. Uslaner, Eric M. 2000. Is the Senate more civil than the House? In Esteemed colleagues: Civility and deliberation in the U.S. Senate, ed. Burdett A.Loomis, 33-55. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
412. Verba, Sidney, Kay L.Schlozman, and Henry E.Brady. 1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
413. Vidmar, Hans. 2000. A historical and comparative perspective on the common law jury. In World jury systems, ed. HansVidmar, 1-52. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298564.003.0001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298564.003.0001
414. Walsh, Katherine Cramer. 2004. Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
415. Walsh, Katherine Cramer. 2007. Talking about race: Community dialogues and the politics of difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226869087.001.0001 http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226869087.001.0001
416. Walzer, Michael. 1991. The idea of civil society. Dissent 38:293-304.
417. Warren, Mark E. 1992. Democratic theory and self-transformation. American Political Science Review 86:8-23. doi:10.2307/1964012 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1964012
418. Warren, Mark, and HilaryPearse. Forthcoming. Designing democratic renewal. New York: Cambridge University Press.
419. Watkins, Ralph. 1998. Report on an experiment in direct-mail distribution of the voters guide. Unpublished manuscript prepared for the League of Women Voters of Montgomery County, MD.
420. Wattenberg, Martin P. 1994. The decline of American political parties, 1952-1992. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
421. Watts, Mark D., DavidDomke, Dhavan V.Shah, and David P.Fan. 1999. Elite cues and media bias in presidential campaigns: Explaining public perceptions of a liberal press. Communication Research 26:144-75. doi:10.1177/009365099026002003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009365099026002003
422. Weaver, David, MaxwellMcCombs, and Donald L.Shaw. 2004. Agenda-setting research: Issues, attributes, and influences. In Handbook of political communication research, ed. Lynda LeeKaid, 257-82. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
423. Webler, Thomas, and OrtwinRenn. 1995. A brief primer on participation: Philosophy and practice. In Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse, ed. OrtwinRenn, ThomasWebler, and PeterWiedemann. Boston: Kluwer.
424. Weiksner, G. Michael. 2005. http://E-ThePeople.Org: Large scale, ongoing deliberation. In The deliberative democracy handbook, ed. JohnGastil and PeterLevine, 213-37. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
425. Weithman, Paul J. 1995. Contractualist liberalism and deliberative democracy. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24:314-43. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00034.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00034.x
426. Weithman, Paul J. 2005. Deliberative character. Journal of Political Philosophy, 13:263-83. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00223.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00223.x
427. Wells, Chris, Justin Reedy, John Gastil, and CarolynLee. 2006. Deliberation during initiative elections: What (little) we know and why it (still) matters. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
428. Wildavsky, Aaron. 1987. Choosing preferences by constructing institutions: A cultural theory of preference formation. American Political Science Review 81:3-21. doi:10.2307/1960776 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1960776
429. Wildavsky, Aaron, and MaryDouglas. 1982. Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
430. Williamson, Abigail, and ArchonFung. 2004. Public deliberation: Where are we and where can we go? National Civic Review 93 (4): 3-15. doi:10.1002/ncr.66 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ncr.66
431. Wilson, James Q. 1990. Interests and deliberation in the American republic, or, why James Madison would never have received the James Madison award. PS: Political Science and Politics 23:559-62.
432. Wiseman, Virginia, Gavin Mooney, Geoffrey Berry, & Kwok-ChoTang. 2003. Involving the general public in priority setting: Experiences from Australia. Social Science and Medicine 56:1001-12. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00091-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536%2802%2900091-6
433. Wodak, Ruth. 1989. The power of political jargon-A "Club 2" discussion. In Language, power, and ideology, ed. RuthWodak, 137-63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/ct.7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ct.7
434. Woodward, Bob, and ScottArmstrong. 1979. The brethren: Inside the Supreme Court. New York: Simon & Schuster.
435. Wyatt, Robert O., ElihuKatz, and JoohanKim. 2000. Bridging the spheres: Political and personal conversation in public and private spaces. Journal of Communication 50:71-92. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02834.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02834.x
436. Yankelovich, Daniel. 1991. Coming to public judgment. New York: Syracuse University Press.
437. Zaller, John R. 1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511818691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818691
438. Zimmerman, Joseph. 1989. The New England town meeting: Democracy in action. Westport, CT: Praeger.
439. Zunes, Stephen. 2004. Implications of the U.S. reaction to the world court ruling against Israel's "separation barrier." Middle East Policy 11:73. doi:10.1111/j.1061-1924.2004.00167.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1061-1924.2004.00167.x