Assessing the potential of internet political participation in the United States: A resource approach

American Politics Research

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 476-498

  Krueger, Brian S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036353821     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X02030005002     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Alvarez, M. R., & Nagler, J. (2000, October). The likely consequences of Internet voting for political representation. Paper presented at the Internet Voting and Democracy Symposium, Loyola Law School, Chicago.
2. Anderson, R., Bikson, T., Law, S. A., & Mitchell, B. (1995). Universal access to e-mail: Feasibility and societal implications. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
3. Best, S., Krueger, B., Hubbard, C., & Smith, A. (2001). An assessment of the generalizability of Internet surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 131-145.
4. Bimber, B. (2000). Measuring the gender gap on the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 868-876.
5. Bucy, E. (2000). Social access to the Internet. Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics, 5, 50-61.
6. Burns, N., & Kinder, D. (2000). Social trust and democratic politics (Report to the National Election Studies Board). Available from http://www.umich.edu/̃nes/resources/psreport/abs/2000a.htm
7. Conway, M. M. (1991). Political participation in the United States (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
8. Davis, R., & Owen, D. (1998). New media and American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Delli Carpini, M. (2000). Gen.com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17, 341-349.
10. Delli Carpini, M., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11. Franzen, A. (2000). Does the Internet make us lonely? European Sociological Review, 16, 427-438.
12. Gastil, J. (2000). Is face-to-face citizen deliberation a luxury or a necessity? Political Communication, 17, 357-361.
13. Hill, K. Q., & Leighley, J. E. (1992). The policy consequences of class bias in state electorates. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 351-365.
14. Kendall, L. (2000). Oh no! I'm a nerd!: Hegemonic masculinity on an online forum. Gender & Society, 14, 256-275.
15. Kiesler, S., Zdaniuk, B., Lundmark, V., & Kraut, R. (2000). Troubles with the Internet: The dynamics of help at home. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 323-351.
16. Kling, R. (1999). What is social informatics and why does it matter? D-Lib Magazine, 5, 1-30.
17. Leigh, A., & Atkinson, R. (2001). Clear thinking on the digital divide. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
18. Lijphart, A. (1997). Unequal participation: Democracy's unresolved dilemma. American Political Science Review, 91, 1-14.
19. Murdock, G., & Golding, P. (1989). Information poverty and political inequality: Citizenship in the age of privatized communications. Journal of Communication, 39, 180-193.
20. Nagel, J. (1987). Participation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. National Telecommunications & Information Administration. (2000). Falling through the net: Toward digital inclusion. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
22. New Statesman. (2000). The digital divide. New Statesman, 129, 1-23.
23. Nie, N., & Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and society: A preliminary report. Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society.
24. Norris, P. (1999, September). Who surfs? New technology, old voters and virtual democracy in the 1996 and 1998 US elections. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association conference, Atlanta, GA.
25. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
26. Radcliff, B. (1994). Turnout and the democratic vote. American Politics Quarterly, 22, 259-276.
27. Radcliff, B. (1995). Turnout and the vote revisited: A reply to Erikson. American Politics Quarterly, 23, 397-403.
28. Sanders, L. (1997). Against deliberation. Political Theory, 25, 347-376.
29. Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. (1999). Civic participation and the equality problem. In T. Skocpol & M. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 427-459). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
30. Schwartz, E. (1995, Winter). Looking for community on the Internet. National Civic Review, pp. 37-41.
31. Sharp, C. (1981). The economics of time. Oxford, UK: Martin Robinson.
32. Solop, F. (2000, September). Digital democracy comes of age in Arizona: Participation and politics in the first binding Internet election. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association conference, Atlanta, GA.
33. Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1965). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 159-170.
34. Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J., & King, G. (1999). CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Available from http://gking.harvard.edu/
35. Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.
36. UCLA Internet Report. (2000). Surveying the digital future. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Communication Policy.
37. Verba, S. (1996). The citizen as respondent: Sample surveys and American democracy. American Political Science Review, 90, 1-7.
38. Verba, S., & Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper.
39. Verba, S., Schlozman, K., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Wolfinger, R., & Rosenstone, S. (1980). Who votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41. Zukin, C. (1997). Generation X and the news. Washington, DC: Radio and Television News Directors Foundation.