The Daily Show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism

Political Communication

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 259-276

  Baym, Geoffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

Broadcast journalism; Discursive integration; Jon Stewart; News and entertainment; The Daily Show

Indexed keywords

EID: 23944463924     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: 10917675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584600591006492     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Baym, G. (2003). Strategies of illumination: U.S. network news, Watergate, and the Clinton affair. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 6, 633-656.
2. Baym, G. (2004). Packaging reality: Structures of form in U.S. network news coverage of Watergate and the Clinton impeachment. Journalism, 5, 279-299.
3. Bennett, W. L., & Entman, R.M. (2001). Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bishop, R. (2004). The accidental journalist: Shifting professional boundaries in the wake of Leonardo DiCaprio's interview with former President Clinton. Journalism Studies, 5, 31-43.
5. Bohman, J., & Rehg, W. (1997). Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. CBC. (2004, February 10). CBC News: Disclosure. Retrieved April 8, 2004, from http://www.cbc.ca/ disclosure/archives/040210_pop/stewart.html
7. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Williams, B. A. (2001). Let us infotain you: Politics in the new media environment. In W.L. Bennett & R.M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 160-181). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Dentith, S. (2000). Parody. New York: Routledge.
9. Douglas, S. (2003, May 5). Daily Show does Bush. The Nation. Retrieved April 8, 2004, from http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml%3Fi=20030505&s=Douglas
10. Elster, J. (1997). The market and the forum: Three varieties of political theory. In J. Bohmanm & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 3-34). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Fritz, B., Keefer, B., & Nyhan, B. (2004). All the president's spin: George W. Bush, the media, and the truth. New York: Touchstone.
12. Gandy, O. H., Jr. (2001). Dividing practices: Segmentation and targeting in the emerging public sphere. In W. L. Bennett & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 141-159). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Gay, V. (2004, January 19). Not necessarily the news: Meet the players who will influence coverage of the 2004 campaign. You might be surprised. Newsday, p. B6.
14. Graber, D. (2001). Adapting political news to the needs of twenty-first century Americans. In W. L. Bennett & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 433-452). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Griffin, D. (1994). Satire: A critical reintroduction. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.
16. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Habermas, J. (1996). Three normative models of democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 21-30). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Hutcheson, J., Domke, D., Billeaudeaux, A., & Garland, P. (2004). U.S. national identity, political elites, and a patriotic press following September 11. Political Communication, 21, 27-51.
19. Jones, N. (1995). Soundbites and spin doctors. London: Cassell.
20. Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (1999). Warp speed: America in the age of mixed media. New York: Century Foundation Press.
21. McChesney, R. W. (1999). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. New York: New Press.
22. McNair, B. (2000). Journalism, and democracy: An evaluation of the political public sphere. New York: Routledge.
23. Murdock, G. (1990). Redrawing the map of the communications industries: Concentration and ownership in the era of privitization. In M. Ferguson (Ed.), Public communication - The new imperatives: Future directions for media research (pp. 1-15). London: Sage.
24. National Annenberg Election Survey. (2004). Daily Show viewers knowledgeable about presidential campaign. Retrieved February 24, 2005, from http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/ naes/2004_03_late-night-knowledge-2_9-21_pr.pdf
25. Neuman, W. R. (1996). Political communications infrastructure. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 9-21.
26. Niven, D. S., Lichter, R., & Amundson, D. (2003). The political content of late night comedy. Press/Politics, 8, 118-133.
27. Paletz, D. (2002). The media in American politics: Contents and consequences. New York: Longman.
28. PBS. (2003, July 11). NOW with Bill Moyers. Retrieved April 8, 2004 from http://www.pbs.org/ now/transcript/transcript_stewart.html
29. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2002). Public's news habits little changed since September 11. Retrieved April 8, 2004, from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3? ReportID=156
30. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2004). Cable and Internet loom large in fragmented political news universe. Retrieved April 8, 2004, from http://people-press.org/ reports/display.php3?ReportID=200
31. Postman, N. (1986). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Penguin Books.
32. Schlosser, E. (2003). The kids are alright. Columbia Journalism Review, 41, 27-30.
33. Street, J. (2001). Mass media, politics, and democracy. London: Palgrave.
34. Timberg, B.M. (2002). Television talk: A history of the TV talk show. Austin: University of Texas Press.
35. Underwood, D. (1993). When MBAs rule the newsroom: How the marketers and managers are reshaping today's media. New York: Columbia University Press.
36. Underwood, D. (2001). Reporting and the push for market-oriented journalism: Media organizations as business. In W.L. Bennett & R.M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 99-116). New York: Cambridge University Press.