The evolution of the trade regime: Politics, law, and economics of the GATT and the WTO

The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and Economics of the GATT and the WTO

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Barton, John H ^a   Goldstein, Judith L ^a   Josling, Timothy E ^a   Steinberg, Richard H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883919192     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (241)

1. Abbott, Kenneth W., Robert O. Keohane, Andrew Moravcsik, Anne-Marie Slaughter, and Duncan Snidal. 2000. "The Concept of Legalization." International Organization. 54:401.
2. African Group. 2002. "Negotiations on the Dispute Settlement Understanding, Proposal of the Africa Group in the WTO." October. (On file with authors.)
3. Alt, James, and Michael Gilligan. 1994. "Survey Article: The Political Economy of Trading States: Factor Specificity, Collective Action Problems and Domestic Political Institutions." Journal of Political Philosophy 2:165.
4. Alter, Karen J. 2000. "The European Union's Legal System and Domestic Policy: Spillover or Backlash?" International Organization 54:489.
5. Atik, Jeffery. 2001. "Democratizing the WTO." George Washington Internation Law Review 33:451.
6. Bagwell, Kyle, and RobertW. Staiger. 2002. The Economics of theWorld Trading System. Cambridge: MIT Press.
7. Bailey, Michael A., Judith Goldstein, and Barry R. Weingast. 1997. "The Origins of American Trade Policy: Rules, Coalitions, and International Politics."World Politics 49:309-38.
8. Baldwin, Richard E. 1995. "A Domino Theory of Regionalism." In Richard Baldwin, Pertti Haaparanta, and Jaakko Kiander, eds. Expanding Membership of the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 25-48.
9. Barfield, Claude. 2001. Free Trade, Sovereignty, Democracy: The Future of the World Trade Organization. Washington, D.C.: AEI Press.
10. Barton, John H. 2001. "The Economics of TRIPS: International Trade in Information- Intensive Products." George Washington International Law Review 33:473.
11. Bauer, Raymond A., Ithiel de Sola Pool, and Lewis Anthony Dexter. 1963. American Business and Public Policy: The Politics of Foreign Trade. New York: Atherton Press.
12. Beier, Friedrich-Karl, and Gerhard Schricker, eds. 1989. GATT or WIPO? New Ways in the International Protection of Intellectual Property. New York: VCH Publishers.
13. Bello, Judith Hippler. 1996. "The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less is More." American Journal of International Law 90:416.
14. Bhala, Raj. 1999a. "The Myth About Stare Decisis and International Trade Law (Part I of a Trilogy)." American University Law Review 14:845.
15. Bhala, Raj. 1999b. "The Precedent Setters: De Facto Stare Decisis in WTO Adjudication (Part Two of a Trilogy)." Journal of Transnational Law and Policy 9:1.
16. Bhala, Raj. 2001. "The Power of the Past: Towards De Jure Stare Decisis in WTO Adjudication (Part Three of a Trilogy)." GeorgeWashington Journal of International Law 33:837.
17. Bidwell, P.W., andW. Diebold Jr. 1949. "The United States and the International Trade Organization." International Conciliation 49:187.
18. Blackhurst, Richard. 1998. "The Capacity of the WTO to Fill Its Mandate." In The WTO as an International Organization, ed. Anne O. Krueger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 31-58.
19. Blackhurst, Richard. 2001. "Reforming WTO Decision-Making: Lessons from Singapore and Seattle." In Klaus Gunter Deutsch and Bernhard Speyer, eds., Freer Trade in the Next Decade: Issues in the Millennium Round in the World Trade Organization. New York: Routledge. 295-310.
20. Boddez, T., and M. Trebilcock. 1993. Unfinished Business: Reforming Trade Remedy Laws in North America. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.
21. Borrus, Michael, and Stephen Cohen. 1997. "Completing the Circuit: The Transatlantic Initiative in Information Technology." In Richard H. Steinberg and Bruce Stokes, eds., Partners or Competitors? The Prospects for U.S.-European Cooperation on Asian Trade. Boulder, Colo.: Rowman and Littlefield.
22. Bruce Stokes, eds. 1998. "Why Now? A Transatlantic Initiative in Information Technology." BRIEWorking Paper No. 119, Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Berkeley, Calif.
23. Borrus, Michael, and John Zysman. 1997. "Globalization with Borders: The Rise of Wintelism as the Future of Industrial Competition." BRIE Working Paper No. 97, Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Berkeley, Calif.
24. Bradley, A. Jane. 2003. Former Assistant United States Trade Representative for Dispute Settlement, telephone interview by Richard Steinberg, January 14.
25. Bridges. 2002a. "GATS: Leaked EC Draft Requests Bring Mixed Reactions." Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest, April 23, 5.
26. Bridges. 2002b. "Native Canadian Group to be Heard in Lumber Dispute." Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest, May 2, 13.
27. Bridges. 2002c. "U.S. DSU Proposal Receives Mixed Reactions." BridgesWeekly Trade News Digest, December 20, 10.
28. Brown,William Adams, Jr. 1950. The United States and the Restoration ofWorld Trade: An Analysis and Appraisal of the ITO Charter and the General Agreements on Tariff and Trade. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
29. Burley (Slaughter), Anne-Marie, and Walter Mattli. 1993. "Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration." International Organization 47:41.
30. Busch, Marc L., and Eric Reinhardt. 2002. "Testing International Trade Law: Empirical Studies of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement." In Daniel Kennedy and James Southwick, eds., The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 457-81.
31. Cable, Vincent. 1987. "Textiles and Clothing." In J. Michael Finger and Andrzej Olechowski, eds. The Uruguay Round: A Handbook on the Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. 180-90.
32. Calabresi, Guido, and Douglas Melamed. 1972. "Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral." Harvard Law Review 85: 1089.
33. Cameron, James, and Kevin R. Gray. 2001. "Principles of International Law in the WTO Dispute Settlement Body." International and Comparative Law Quarterly 50:248.
34. Charnovitz, Steve. 2000. "Opening the WTO to Non-Governmental Interests." Fordham International Law Journal 24:173.
35. Charnovitz, Steve. 2002. "WTO Cosmopolitics." New York University Journal of International Law and Policy 34:299.
36. Cleveland, Sarah H. 2002. "Human Rights Sanctions and International Trade: A Theory of Compatibility." Journal of International Economic Law 5:1.
37. Cleveland, Sarah H. 2003. "Why International Labor Standards?" In Robert J. Flanagan and William J. Gould IV, eds., International Labor Standards: Globalization, Trade and Public Policy. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 129-78.
38. Coase, Ronald. 1960. "The Problem of Social Cost." Journal of Law and Economics 3, p. 1.
39. Cohen, Stephen S. 1998. "Form, Scale and Limits in China's Trade and Development." Journal of Asian Economics 8:615.
40. Cohen, Stephen S., and John Zysman. 1987. Manufacturing Matters: The Myth of the Post-Industrial Economy. New York: Basic Books.
41. Coleman, William, and Stefan Tangermann. 1999. "The 1992 CAP Reform, the Uruguay Round and the Commission: Conceptualizing Linked Policy Games." Journal of Common Market Studies 37:385.
42. Compa, Lance. 2002. "Pursuing International Labour Rights in U.S. Courts." Industrial Relations 49:5.
43. Cowhey, Peter, and Laura Sherman. 1998. "The FCC and the Reform of the International Telecommunications Services Market." Euromoney, winter.
44. Croley, Stephen P., and John H. Jackson. 1996. "WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments." American Journal of International Law 90:193.
45. Croome, John. 1995. Reshaping theWorld Trading System: A History of the Uruguay Round. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
46. Curzon, Gerard, and Victoria Curzon. 1973. "GATT: Traders' Club." In Robert W. Cox and Harold K. Jacobson, eds., The Anatomy of Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press. 298-333.
47. Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
48. Dahl, Robert A. 1999. "Can International Organizations Be Democratic? A Skeptic's View." In Ian Shapiro and Casiano Hacker-Cordon, eds., Democracy's Edges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19-36.
49. Dam, Kenneth W. 1970. The GATT: Law and International Economic Organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. Davey, William J. 2001. "Has the WTO Dispute Settlement System Exceeded Its Authority?" Journal of International Economic Law 4:79.
51. Davis, Christina. 2003. Food Fights over Free Trade: How International Institutions Promote Agricultural Trade Liberalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
52. DeSombre, Elizabeth. 2000. Domestic Sources of International Environmental Policy: Industry, Environmentalists and U.S. Power. Cambridge: MIT Press.
53. Drache, Daniel, and Sylvia Ostry. 2002. "From Doha to Kananaskis: The Future of the World Trading System and the Crisis of Governance." In Trade Policy Research 2002. Ottawa: Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade.
54. Esty, Daniel, and Damien Gerardin. 2001. "Regulatory Co-Option." In Daniel Esty and Damien Gerardin, eds. Regulatory Competition and Economic Regulation: Comparative Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press. 30-46.
55. Evans, John W. 1971. The Kennedy Round in American Trade Policy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
56. Feketekuty, Geza. 1998. "Setting the Agenda for the Next Round of Negotiations on Trade in Services." In Jeffrey J. Schott, ed., Launching New Global Trade Talks: An Action Agenda. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics. 91-110.
57. Finger, J. Michael. 1993. Antidumping: How It Works and Who Gets Hurt. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
58. Finger, J. Michael. 2000. "Implementation and the Integrated Framework."www.worldbank .org/research/trade/finger.htm.
59. Finger, J. Michael, and Julio J. Nogués. 2001. "The Unbalanced Uruguay Round Outcome: The New Areas in Future WTO Negotiations." World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2732, December.
60. Finger, J. Michael, Ulrich Reincke, and Adriana Castro. 1999. "Market Access Bargaining in the Uruguay Round: Rigid or Relaxed Reciprocity?"World Bank Paper No. 2258.
61. Finger, J. Michael, and Ludger Schurknecht. 1999. "Market Access Advances and Retreats since the Uruguay Round Agreement." September. www-wds .worldbank.org.
62. Flanigan, Robert J. 2002. "Labor Standards and International Competitive Advantage." Paper prepared for delivery at the Conference on Labor Standards, Stanford Law School, May 21.
63. Ford, Christopher. 1994. "Judicial Discretion in International Jurisprudence: Article 381c and General Principles of Law." Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 5:35.
64. Frankel, Jeffrey. 1997. Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
65. Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). 1958. Trends in International Trade: A Report by a Panel of Experts, October. (Harberler Report)
67. GATT Legal Affairs. 1968. Selection of Executive Secretary. GATT Archive, Stanford University.
68. GATT Legal Affairs. 1989. The Drafting of GATT Panel Reports: Internal Note by the Legal Affairs Division, 14.9.1989. GATT Archive, Stanford University.
69. Gervais, Daniel J. 1998. The TRIPS Agreement: Drafting History and Analysis. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
70. Gibson, Paul, John Wainio, David Whitley, and Mary Bohman. 2001. "Profiles of Tariffs in Global Agricultural Markets." Agricultural Economic Report No. 796, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, January.
71. Gilligan, Michael J. 1997. Empowering Exporters: Reciprocity, Delegation, and Collective Action in American Trade Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
72. Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Goldin, Ian, Olin Knudsen, and Domininc van der Mensbrugghe. 1993. Trade Liberalization: Global Economic Implications.Washington, D.C.:World Bank.
74. Goldstein, Judith. 1993. Ideas, Interests, and American Trade Policy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
75. Goldstein, Judith. 1996. "International Law and Domestic Institutions: Reconciling North American 'Unfair' Trade Laws." International Organization 50:641.
76. Goldstein, Judith, and Joanne Gowa. 2002. "US National Power and the Post- War Trading Regime." World Trade Review 1:153.
77. Goldstein, Judith, and Lisa Martin. 2000. "Legalization, Trade Liberalization, and Domestic Politics: A Cautionary Note." International Organization 54:603.
78. Goldstein, Judith, Douglas Rivers, and Michael Tomz. 2005. "International Relations: Understanding the Effects of GATT and the WTO on World Trade." Stanford University. Typescript.
79. Graham, Edward M. 1998. "Contestability, Competition, and Investment in the New World Trade Order." In Geza Feketekuty with Bruce Stokes, eds., Trade Strategies for a New Era: Ensuring U.S. Leadership in a Global Economy. New York: Council on Foreign Relations. 204-22.
80. Graham, Edward M., and J. David Richardson. 1997. Global Competition Policy. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
81. Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman. 2002. Interest Groups and Trade Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
82. Grossman, Gene M., and Alan B. Krueger. 1994. "Economic Growth and the Environment." National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 4634.
83. Gruber, Lloyd. 2000. Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
84. Grunbaum, Gustavo. 2002. "Dispute Settlement and U.S. Environmental Laws." In Richard H. Steinberg, ed. The Greening of Trade Law: International Trade Organizations and Environmental Issues. Boulder, Colo.: Rowman and Littlefield. 51-80.
85. Haas, Ernst. 1958. The Uniting of Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
86. Harrison, GlennW., Thomas F. Rutherford, and David G. Tarr. 1996. "Quantifying the Uruguay Round." In Will Martin and L. Alan Winters, eds., The Uruguay Round and Developing Countries. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 216-52.
87. Hart, H.L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
88. Heumeuller, Dirk, and Timothy E. Josling. 2001. "Trade Restrictions on Genetically Engineered Foods: The Application of the TBT Agreement." Paper presented at "Biotechnology, Science and Modern Agriculture: A New Industry at the Dawn of the Century," Ravello, Italy, June 15-18.
89. Hirschman, Albert O. 1945. National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
90. Hoekman, Bernard M., and Michel M. Kostecki. 2001. The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
91. Howse, Robert. 2002a. "The Appellate Body Rulings in the Shrimp/Turtle Case: A New Legal Baseline for the Trade and Environment Debate." Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 27:489.
92. Howse, Robert. 2002b. "From Politics to Technocracy-and Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trading Regime." American Journal of International Law 96:94.
93. Howse, Robert. 2003. "How to Begin to Think About the 'Democratic Deficit' at the WTO." University of Michigan. Typescript.
94. Hudec, R.E. 1991. Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System. Salem, N.H.: Butterworth.
95. Hudec, R.E. 1992. "Judicialization of GATT Dispute Settlement." In Michael Hart and Debra P. Steger, eds., In Whose Interest? Due Process and Transparency in International Trade. Ottawa: Centre for Trade Policy and Law. 1-53.
96. Hudec, R.E. 1999. "The New WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure: An Overview of the First Three Years." Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 8:1.
97. Hughes, Layla. 1998. "Limiting the Jurisdiction of Dispute Settlement Panels: TheWTOAppellate Body Beef Hormone Decision." Georgetown International Environment Law Review 10:915.
98. Huntington, Samuel. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
99. International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium. 2001. "The Current WTO Agricultural Negotiations: Options for Progress." Commissioned Paper No. 18, September.
100. International Monetary Fund. 1977. International Financial Statistics Yearbook. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
101. Irwin, Douglas. 2002. Free Trade under Fire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
102. Jackson, John H. 1969. World Trade and the Law of GATT. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Michie Press.
103. Jackson, John H. 1990. Restructuring the GATT System. London: Royal Institute for International Affairs.
104. Jackson, John H. 1997a. The World Trading System. 2nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.
105. Jackson, John H. 1997b. "The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding-Misunderstandings on the Nature of Legal Obligation." American Journal of International Law 91:60.
106. Jackson, John H. 2000. The Jurisprudence of the GATT and the WTO. London: Cambridge University Press.
107. Josling, Timothy E. 1998. Agricultural Trade Policy: Completing the Reform. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
108. Josling, Timothy E., and Allan Rae. 2003. "Processed Food Trade and Developing Countries: Protection and Trade Reform." Food Policy, June.
109. Josling, Timothy E., and Stefan Tangermann. 2003. "Production and Export Subsidies in Agriculture: Lessons from GATT and WTO Disputes Involving the US and the EC." In Mark Pollack and Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, eds., Transatlantic Economic Disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 207-32.
110. Josling, Timothy E., Donna Roberts, and David Orden. 2004. Food Regulation and Trade: Toward a Safe and Open Global System. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
111. Josling, Timothy E., Stefan Tangermann, and Thorald K. Warley. 1996. Agriculture in the GATT. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
112. Kahler, Miles. 2001. Leadership Selection in the Major Multilaterals.Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Studies.
113. Keesing, Don, and Martin Wolfe. 1980. Textile Quotas against Developing Countries, London: Trade Policy Research Center.
114. Kellow, Aynsle. 2002. "Comparing Business and Public Interest Associability at the International Level." International Political Science Review 23:175.
115. Keohane, Robert O. 1982. "The Demand for International Regimes." International Organization 36:325.
116. Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
117. Keohane, Robert O., Andrew Moravcsik, and Anne-Marie Slaughter. 2000. "Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational." International Organization 54:(457).
118. Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye Jr. 1977. Power and Interdependence. Boston: Little Brown.
119. Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye Jr. 2003. "Democracy, Accountability and Global Governance." In Miles Kahler and David Lake, eds., Governance in a Global Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press. 386-411.
120. Kock, Karin. 1969. International Trade Policy and the GATT 1947-1967. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
121. Koh, Harold H. 1991. "Transnational Public Law Litigation." Yale Law Journal 100:2347.
122. Koremenos, Barbara. 2002. "Open Covenants, Clandestinely Arrived At." October. Unpublished manuscript.
123. Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal. 2001. "The Rational Design of International Institutions." International Organization 55:761.
124. Krasner, Stephen D. 1976. "State Power and the Structure of International Trade." World Politics 28:317.
125. Krasner, Stephen D. 1979. "The Tokyo Round: Particularistic Interests and Prospects for Stability in the Global Trading System." International Studies Quarterly. 23:491.
126. Krasner, Stephen D. 1983. "Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables." In Stephen D. Krasner, ed., International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1-22.
127. Krasner, Stephen D. 1991. "Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier." World Politics 43:336.
128. Krugman, Paul. 1991. Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
129. Lanoszka, Anna. 2001. "TheWTOAccession Process-Negotiating Participation in a Globalizing Economy." Journal of World Trade Law 35:575.
130. Lavorel, Warren. 1995. Telephone interview by Richard Steinberg, March.
131. Lawrence, Robert Z. 2004. Crimes and Punishments? An Analysis of Retaliation Under the WTO. Washington, D.C.: Institute of International Economics.
132. Leitner, Kara, and Simon Lester. 2004. "WTO Dispute Settlement 1995-2003: A Statistical Analysis." Journal of International Economic Law 7:169.
133. Leopold, Aldo. 1990. A Sand County Almanac. New York: Ballantine.
134. Lindsey, Brink, and Dan Ikenson. 2002. "Reforming the Antidumping Agreement: A Road Map for WTO Negotiations." CATO Institute Trade Policy Analysis 21, CATO Institute Center for Trade Policy Analysis, Washington, D.C.
135. Mansfield, Edward. 1993. "Concentration, Polarity, and the Distribution of Power." International Studies Quarterly 37:105.
136. Mansfield, Edward, and Helen Milner. 1999. "NewWave of Regionalism." International Organization 53:589.
137. Marceau, Gabrielle. 1999. "A Call for Coherence in International Law: Praises for the Prohibition Against 'Clinical Isolation' in WTO Dispute Settlement." Journal of World Trade 33:87.
138. March, James, and Johan Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.
139. Martin, Lisa L. 1992. Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
140. Martin, Lisa L. 2000. Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
141. Maskus, Keith. 2000. Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy.Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
142. Matthews, Duncan. 2002. Globalizing Intellectual Property Rights: The TRIPS Agreement. London: Routledge.
143. McCubbins, Mathew D., and Thomas Schwartz. 1984. "Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms." American Journal of Political Science 28:165.
144. McRae, Donald. 2003. "Claus-Dieter Ehlermann's Presentation on the Role and Record of Dispute Settlement Panels and the Appellate body of the WTO: Comment by Professor Donald McRae." Journal of International Economic Law 6:709.
145. Michalopoulos, Constantine. 2000. "The Role of Special and Differential Treatment for Developing Countries in GATT and the World Trade Association." Typescript.
146. Milgrom, Paul R., Douglass C. North, and Barry Weingast. 1990. "The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champagne Fairs." Economics and Politics 2:1.
147. Moravcsik, Andrew. 1991. "Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community." International Organization 45:19.
148. Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. "Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics." International Organization 51:513.
149. Narlikar, Amrita. 2001. "WTO Decision-Making and Developing Countries." South Centre, Trade-Related Agenda, Development and Equity, Working Papers 12 November.
150. Odell, John, and Barry Eichengreen. 1998. "The United States, the ITO, and the WTO: Exit Options, Agent Slack, and Presidential Leadership." In Anne O. Krueger, ed., The WTO as an International Organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 181-209.
151. Okun, Arthur M. 1975. Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
152. Oloka-Onyango, J., and Deepika Udagama. 2000. "The Realization of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: Globalization and Its Impact on the Full Enjoyment of Human Rights." U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2000/13, U.N. Subcommission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights.
153. Olsen, Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
154. Oppenheim, Lassa. 1992. Oppenheim's International Law. 9th ed. Ed. Robert Jennings and Arthur Watts, Harlow: Longman.
155. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1996a. Antitrust and Market Access: The Scope and Coverage of Competition Laws and Implications for Trade. Paris: OECD.
156. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 1996b. Trade, Employment and Labour Standards. Paris: OECD.
157. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2000. "Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises." http://www.oecd.org/ daf/investment/guidelines.
158. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2003. Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries: Monitoring and Evaluation. Paris: OECD, June.
159. Overseas Development Institute. 1995. "Developing Countries in the WTO." 1995 Briefing Paper No. 3.
160. Paemen, Hugo, and Alexandra Bensch. 1995. From the GATT to the WTO: The European Community and the Uruguay Round. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
161. Palmeter, David, and Petros C. Mavroidis. 1998. "The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law." American Journal of International Law 92:38.
162. Patterson, Gardner, and Eliza Patterson. 1994. "The Road From GATT to MTO." Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 3:35.
163. Patterson, Lee Ann. 1997. "Agricultural Policy Reform in the European Community: A Three-Level Game Analysis." International Organization 51:135.
164. Pauwelyn, Joost. 2001. "The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?" American Journal of International Law 95:535.
165. Permanent Court of International Justice. 1927. The Case of the S.S. "Lotus." Judgment 9, 1927, PCIJ, Series A, No. 10, p. 19.
166. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich. 1997. The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System: International Law, International Organizations, and Dispute Settlement. London: Kluwer Law International.
167. Porges, Amelia. 1995. "The New Dispute Settlement: From the GATT to the WTO." Leiden Journal of International Law 8:1.
168. Pratt, John, and Richard Zeckhauser. 1984. Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Cambridge: Harvard Business School.
169. Preeg, Ernest H. 1970. Traders and Diplomats. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
170. Preeg, Ernest H. 1995. Traders in a Brave NewWorld: The Uruguay Round and the Future of the International Trading System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
171. Preparatory Committee for the International Trade Organization. 1947. Press Release. GATT Archive, Stanford University.
172. Prestowitz, Clyde V. 1988. Trading Places: How We Allowed Japan to Take the Lead. New York: Basic Books.
173. Prusa, Thomas. 1999. "On the Spread and Impact of Anti-dumping." National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 7404.
174. Putnam, Robert. 1988. "Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two- Level Games." International Organization 42:427.
175. Raghavan, Chakravarthi. 1995. "WTO Establishes Appellate Body." November 30. http://www.sunshine.org/trade/process/followup/1995/index.htm.
176. Ragosta, John. 2002. Comments at the American Bar Association/Georgetown University Law Center 2002 International Trade Law Symposium,Washington, D.C., September 12.
177. Ragosta, John, Navin Joneja, and Mikhail Zeldovich. 2003. "WTO Dispute Settlement: The System is Flawed and Must be Fixed." http://www.dbtrade.com/ publications/wto_dispute_settlement_is_flawed.pdf.
178. Ramakrishna, Hegde. 1998. Statement Circulated by Mr. Ramakrishna, Minister of Commerce, at the second Session of the WTO Ministerial Conference, Geneva, WTO. Doc. WT/MIN (98)/ST/36 (98-2030). May 18.
179. Raustiala, Kal. 2000. "Sovereignty and Multilateralism." Chicago Journal of International Law 1:401.
180. Raustiala, Kal. 2002. "Police Patrols, Fire Alarms, and Treaty Review under the NAAEC." In John Knox and David Markell, eds. The North American Commission on Environmental Cooperation: An Assessment. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 401-19.
181. Reif, Tim. 2002. Democratic Chief Trade Counsel, U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means, interview by Richard Steinberg, Washington, D.C., April.
182. Riches, Cromwell A. 1940. Majority Rule in International Organization. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
183. Roberts, Donna, Laurian Unnevehr, Julie Caswell, Ian Sheldon, John Wilson, D. Otsuki, and David Orden. 2001. "Agriculture in the WTO: The Role of Product Attributes in the Agricultural Negotiations." International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, Commissioned Paper No. 17.
184. Roh, Chip. 2002. Interview by Richard Steinberg,Washington, D.C., September 11.
185. Rose, Andrew, 2004. "Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases American Trade?" American Ecomomic Review 94:94.
186. Ruggie, John Gerard. 1983. "International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order." In Stephen D. Krasner, ed., International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 195-232.
187. Sauvé, Pierre, and Robert M. Stern, eds. 2000. GATS 2000; New Directions in Services Trade Liberalization. Boston: Center for Business and Government, Harvard University; Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute Press.
188. Schattschneider, E.E. 1935. Politics, Pressures and the Tariff: A Study of Free Enterprise in Pressure Politics as Shown in the 1929-30 Revision of the Tariff. New York: Prentice-Hall.
189. Schott, Jeffery J. 1994. The Uruguay Round: An Assessment. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
190. Shaffer, Gregory C. 2002. "The Nexus of Law and Politics: The WTO's Committee on Trade and Environment." In Richard H. Steinberg, ed., The Greening of Trade Law, International Trade Organizations and Environmental Issues. Boulder, Colo.: Rowman and Littlefield. 81-114
191. Slaughter (Burley), Anne-Marie, and Walter Mattli. 1993. "Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration." International Organization 47:41.
192. Srinivasan, T.N. 1998a. Developing Countries and the Multilateral Trading System. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
193. Srinivasan, T.N. 1998b. "Regionalism and the WTO: Is Non-discrimination Passé?" In Anne O. Krueger, ed., The WTO as an International Organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 329-49.
194. Stanton, G. 1999. "Review and Implementation of the SPS and TBT Agreements." Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
195. Stein, Arthur. 1993. Why Nations Cooperate. Cambridge: MIT Press.
196. Steinberg, Richard H. 1994. "The Uruguay Round: A Legal Analysis of the Final Act." International Quarterly 6(2): 1-44.
197. Steinberg, Richard H. 1998. "Institutional Implications of WTO Accession for China." California: University of California Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation. Policy Paper No. 41.
198. Steinberg, Richard H. 1999. "The Prospects for Partnership: Overcoming Obstacles to Transatlantic Trade Policy Cooperation in Asia." In Richard H. Steinberg and Bruce Stokes, eds., Partners or Competitors? The Prospects for U.S.-E.U. Cooperation on Asian Trade. Boulder, Colo.: Rowman and Littlefield. 213-250.
199. Steinberg, Richard H. 2002a. "Explaining Similarities and Differences Across International Trade Organizations." In Richard H. Steinberg, ed., The Greening of International Trade Law: International Trade Organizations and Environmental Issues. Boulder, Colo.: Rowman and Littlefield. 277-309.
200. Steinberg, Richard H. 2002b. "In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes at the GATT/WTO." International Organization. 56:339.
201. Steinberg, Richard H. 2002c. "Understanding Trade and the Environment: Conceptual Frameworks." In Richard H. Steinberg, ed., The Greening of Trade Law: International Trade Organizations and Environmental Issues. Boulder, Colo.: Rowman and Littlefield. 1-20.
202. Steinberg, Richard H. 2004. "Judicial Law-Making at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional, and Political Constraints." American Journal of International Law 98:247.
203. Steinberg, Richard H., and Timothy E. Josling, 2003. "When the Peace Ends: The Vulnerability of EC and US Agricultural Subsidies to WTO Legal Challenge." Journal of International Economic Law. 6:369.
204. Stewart, Richard B. 1977. "Pyramids of Sacrifice? Problems of Federalism in Mandating State Implementation of National Environmental Policy." Yale Law Journal 86:1196.
205. Stokes, Bruce, and Pat Choate. 2001. Democratizing U.S. Trade Policy. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
206. Stoler, Andrew. 2002. WTO Deputy Director-General, interview by Richard Steinberg, Monterey, Calif. January.
207. Sykes, Alan O. 1989. "Countervailing Duty Law: An Economic Critique." Columbia Law Review 89:199.
208. Sykes, Alan O. 1991. "Protectionism as a 'Safeguard': A Positive Analysis of the GATT 'Escape Clause' with Normative Speculations." University of Chicago Law Review 58:255.
209. Sykes, Alan O. 1995. "Regulatory Protectionism and the Law of International Trade." University of Chicago Law Review 66:1.
210. Sykes, Alan O. 1998. "Comparative Advantage and the Normative Economics of International Trade Policy." Journal of International Economic Law 1:49.
211. Sykes, Alan O. 2003a. "The Economics of WTO Rules on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures." John M. Olin Law and Economics Working Paper No. 186 (2nd ser.).
212. Sykes, Alan O. 2003b. "The Safeguards Mess; a Critique of WTO Jurisprudence." John M. Olin Law and Economics Working Paper No. 187 (2nd ser.).
213. Tarullo, Daniel K. 2003. "The Hidden Costs of International Dispute Settlement: WTO Review of Domestic Anti-dumping Decisions." Law and Policy in International Business 34:109.
214. Trachtman, Joel P. 1999. "The Domain of WTO Dispute Resolution." Harvard International Law Journal 40:333.
215. Tullock, Gordon. 1975. "The Transitional Gains Trap." Bell Journal of Economics 6:671.
216. Tyson, Laura D'Andrea. 1992. Who's Bashing Whom? Trade Conflict in High- Technology Industries.Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
217. U.K. Commission on Intellectual Property Rights. 2002. "Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy." Intellectual Property Rights Commission, London, September.
218. United States Government. 1947. Delegation Position Paper. GATT Archive: Stanford University.
219. U.S. Secretary of Commerce. 2002. "Executive Branch Strategy Regarding WTO Dispute Settlement Panels and the Appellate Body." In Report to the Congress Transmitted by the Secretary of Commerce, December 30.
220. U.S. Tariff Commission. 1948. Operation of the Trade Agreements Program: July 1934 to April 1948. Washington: GPO.
221. Vogel, David. 1986. National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
222. Wallach, Lori. 2000. "The FP Interview: Lori's War." Foreign Policy, spring, 37.
223. Waltz, Kenneth. 1970. "The Myth of Interdependence." In Charles Kindleberger, ed., The International Corporation. Cambridge: MIT Press. 205-23.
224. Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Menlo Park, Calif.: Addison- Wesley.
225. Weil, Prosper. 1997. "The Court Cannot Conclude Definitively . . . Non Liquet Revisited." Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 36:109.
226. Weiler, J.H.H. 1991. "The Transformation of Europe." Yale Law Journal 100:2403.
227. Weiler, J.H.H. 2000a. The EU, the WTO, and the NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
228. Weiler, J.H.H. 2000b. "The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement." Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper 9/00, Harvard Law School.
229. Wilcox, Clair. 1972. A Charter for World Trade. New York: Arno Press.
230. Winham, Gilbert R. 1986. International Trade and the Tokyo Round Negotiation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
231. Woolcock, Steven. 2000. "European Trade Policy: Global Pressures and Domestic Constraints." In Helen Wallace and William Wallace, eds., Policy-Making in the European Union. (2nd ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press, 373-399.
232. World Bank. 1972. World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
233. World Bank. 1997. World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
234. World Bank. 2001. World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
235. World Trade Organization (WTO). 1991. "Report of the Panel, United States- Restrictions on Imports of Tuna." Reprinted in International Legal Materials 30:1594.
236. World Trade Organization (WTO). 1994. "Report of the Panel, United States-Restrictions on Imports of Tuna." Reprinted in International Legal Materials 33:839.
237. World Trade Organization (WTO). 1995. The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
238. World Trade Organization (WTO). 1998a. "Report of the Appellate Body, European Communities-Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones)." WT/DS26/AB/R, WT/DS48/AB/R. World Trade Organization, Geneva.
239. World Trade Organization (WTO). 1998b. "Report of the Appellate Body, United States-Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products." WT/DS58/AB/R.World Trade Organization, Geneva.
240. World Trade Organization (WTO). 2001. "Report of the Panel, United States-Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, Recourse to Article 21.5 by Malaysia." WT/DS58/RW. World Trade Organization, Geneva.
241. World Wildlife Fund et al. 2001. "Open Letter on Institutional Reforms in the WTO." October.