Cellobiohydrolase 1 from Trichoderma reesei degrades cellulose in single cellobiose steps

Nature Communications

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Brady, Sonia K ^a   Sreelatha, Sarangapani ^b   Feng, Yinnian ^a   Chundawat, Shishir P S ^c   Lang, Matthew J ^a,b,d  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c The State University of New Jersey   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLOBIOHYDROLASE 1; CELLOBIOSE; CELLULOSE 1,4 BETA CELLOBIOSIDASE; FUNGAL DNA; FUNGAL ENZYME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CELLULOSE;

BIODEGRADATION; CATALYSIS; CELLULOSE; FUNGUS; HYDROLYSIS; REACTION KINETICS;

ACCURACY; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MOTILITY; CELL TRACKING; ENZYMATIC DEGRADATION; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME SYNTHESIS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FIDUCIAL MARKER; HETEROLOGOUS EXPRESSION; HYPOCREA JECORINA; ION EXCHANGE CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; OPTICAL TWEEZERS; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; VELOCITY; CHEMISTRY; ENZYMOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GREEN ALGA; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; TRICHODERMA;

HYPOCREA JECORINA;

CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE 1,4-BETA-CELLOBIOSIDASE; CHLOROPHYTA; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, ENZYMOLOGIC; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; TRICHODERMA;

EID: 84949648892     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10149     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Kurasin, M. & Väljamäe, P. Processivity of cellobiohydrolases is limited by the substrate. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 169-177 (2011).
2. Sullivan, A. C. O. Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels. Cellulose 4, 173-207 (1997).
3. Costerton, J. W. i. et al. Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 41, 435-464 (1987).
4. Solano, C. et al. Genetic analysis of Salmonella enteritidis biofilm formation: critical role of cellulose. Mol. Microbiol. 43, 793-808 (2002).
5. Rosan, B. & Lamont, R. J. Dental plaque formation. Microbes Infect. 2, 1599-1607 (2000).
6. Igarashi, K. et al. High speed atomic force microscopy visualizes processive movement of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I on crystalline cellulose. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 36186-36190 (2009).
7. Igarashi, K. et al. Traffic jams reduce hydrolytic efficiency of cellulase on cellulose surface. Science 333, 1279-1282 (2011).
8. Carroll, A. & Somerville, C. Cellulosic biofuels. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 60, 165-182 (2009).
9. Jordan, D. B. et al. Plant cell walls to ethanol. Biochem. J. 442, 241-252 (2012).
10. Teeri, T. T. Crystalline cellulose degradation: New insight into the function of cellobiohydrolases. Trends Biotechnol. 15, 160-167 (1997).
11. Sinnott, M. L. The cellobiohydrolases of Trichoderma reesei: a review of indirect and direct evidence that their function is not just glycosidic bond hydrolysis. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 26, 160-164 (1998).
12. Klemm, D., Heublein, B., Fink, H. P. & Bohn, A. Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 44, 3358-3393 (2005).
13. Shibafuji, Y. et al. Single-molecule imaging analysis of elementary reaction steps of trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase i (Cel7A) hydrolyzing crystalline cellulose I? and IIII. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 14056-14065 (2014).
14. Jung, J. et al. Binding and movement of individual Cel7A cellobiohydrolases on crystalline cellulose surfaces revealed by single-molecule fluorescence imaging. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 24164-24172 (2013).
15. Cruys-Bagger, N., Tatsumi, H., Ren, G. R., Borch, K. & Westh, P. Transient kinetics and rate-limiting steps for the processive cellobiohydrolase Cel7A: Effects of substrate structure and carbohydrate binding domain. Biochemistry 52, 8938-8948 (2013).
16. Thygesen, A., Oddershede, J., Lilholt, H., Thomsen, A. B. & Ståhl, K. On the determination of crystallinity and cellulose content in plant fibres. Cellulose 12, 563-576 (2005).
17. Ye, Z. Scaled-up separation of cellobiohydolase 1 from a cellulase mixture by ion-exchange chromatography. Biotechnol. Prog. 27, 1644-1652 (2011).
18. Baneyx, F. Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 10, 411-421 (1999).
19. Dana, C. M. et al. The importance of pyroglutamate in cellulase Cel7A. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 111, 842-847 (2014).
20. Cordova, J. C. et al. Stochastic but highly coordinated protein unfolding and translocation by the ClpXP proteolytic machine. Cell 158, 647-658 (2014).
21. Nidetzky, B., Steiner, W. & Claeyssens, M. Cellulose hydrolysis by the cellulases from Trichoderma reesei: adsorptions of two cellobiohydrolases, two endocellulases and their core proteins on filter paper and their relation to hydrolysis. Biochem. J. 303(Pt 3): 817-823 (1994).
22. Boer, H., Teeri, T. T. & Koivula, A. Characterization of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase Cel7A secreted from Pichia pastoris using two different promoters. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 69, 486-494 (2000).
23. Abbondanzieri, E. a., Shaevitz, J. W. & Block, S. M. Picocalorimetry of transcription by RNA polymerase. Biophys. J. 89, L61-L63 (2005).
24. Fiore, J. L. et al. Enthalpy-driven RNA folding: single-molecule thermodynamics of tetraloop-recertor tertiary interaction. Biochemistry 48, 2550-2558 (2009).
25. Abbondanzieri, E. a., Greenleaf, W. J., Shaevitz, J. W., Landick, R. & Block, S. M. Direct observation of base-pair stepping by RNA polymerase. Nature 438, 460-465 (2005).
26. Rock, R. S. et al. Myosin VI is a processive motor with a large step size. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 13655-13659 (2001).
27. Clancy, B. E., Behnke-Parks, W. M., Andreasson, J. O. L., Rosenfeld, S. S. & Block, S. M. A universal pathway for kinesin stepping. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1020-1027 (2011).
28. Reck-Peterson, S. L. et al. Single-molecule analysis of dynein processivity and stepping behavior. Cell 126, 335-348 (2006).
29. Mallik, R., Carter, B. C., Lex, S. A., King, S. J. & Gross, S. P. Cytoplasmic dynein functions as a gear in response to load. Nature 427, 649-652 (2004).
30. Knott, B. C., Crowley, M. F., Himmel, M. E., Ståhlberg, J. & Beckham, G. T. Carbohydrate-protein interactions that drive processive polysaccharide translocation in enzymes revealed from a computational study of cellobiohydrolase processivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 8810-8819 (2014).
31. Mulakala, C. & Reilly, P. J. Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei) Cel7A as a molecular machine: a docking study. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet 60, 598-605 (2005).
32. Aubin-Tam, M.-E., Olivares, A. O., Sauer, R. T., Baker, T. A. & Lang, M. J. Single-molecule protein unfolding and translocation by an ATP-fueled proteolytic machine. Cell 145, 257-267 (2011).
33. Wang, M. D. et al. Force and velocity measured for single molecules of RNA polymerase. Science 282, 902-907 (1998).
34. Sarkar, S. K., Marmer, B., Goldberg, G. & Neuman, K. C. Single-molecule tracking of collagenase on native type I collagen fibrils reveals degradation mechanism. Curr. Biol. 22, 1047-1056 (2012).
35. Ganner, T. et al. Dissecting and reconstructing synergism: in situ visualization of cooperativity among cellulases. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 43215-43222 (2012).
36. Hall, M., Bansal, P., Lee, J. H., Realff, M. J. & Bommarius, A. S. Cellulose crystallinity - A key predictor of the enzymatic hydrolysis rate. FEBS J. 277, 1571-1582 (2010).
37. Chundawat, S. P. S. et al. Restructuring the crystalline cellulose hydrogen bond network enhances its depolymerization rate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11163-11174 (2011).
38. Das, D. K. et al. Force-dependent transition in the T-cell receptor b-subunit allosterically regulates peptide discrimination and pMHC bond lifetime. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1517-1522 (2015).
39. Zulkifly, S. B. et al. The genus Cladophora Kützing (Ulvophyceae) as a globally distributed ecological engineer. J. Phycol. 49, 1-17 (2013).
40. Mihranyan, A. Cellulose from cladophorales green algae: from environmental problem to high-tech composite materials. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 119, 2449-2460 (2011).
41. Foster, C. E., Martin, T. M. & Pauly, M. Comprehensive compositional analysis of plant cell walls (lignocellulosic biomass) part ii: carbohydrates. J. Vis. Exp 37, 10-13 (2010). doi:10.3791/1837.
42. Agarwal, U. P., Ralph, S. a., Reiner, R. S. & Baez, C. Probing crystallinity of never-dried wood cellulose with Raman spectroscopy. Cellulose 1-20 (2015). doi:10.1007/s10570-015-0788-7.
43. Chundawat, S. P. S. et al. Multi-scale visualization and characterization of lignocellulosic plant cell wall deconstruction during thermochemical pretreatment. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 973 (2011).
44. Atalla, R. H. & Vanderhart, D. L. in Cellul. Wood Chem. Technol. Proc. tenth Cellul. Conf. (ed. Schuerch, C.) 169-187 (John Wiley Sons, 1987).
45. Carter, B. C., Vershinin, M. & Gross, S. P. A comparison of step-detection methods: how well can you do? Biophys. J. 94, 306-319 (2008).
46. Ghose, T. K. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl. Chem. 59, 257-268 (1987).
47. Dashtban, M., Maki, M., Leung, K. T., Mao, C. & Qin, W. Cellulase activities in biomass conversion: measurement methods and comparison. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 30, 302-309 (2010).