Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei) Cel7A as a molecular machine: A docking study

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 598-605

  Mulakala, Chandrika ^a   Reilly, Peter J ^a  

^a Iowa State University of Science and Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

AutoDock; Brownian ratchet; Cel7a; Cellobiohydrolase; Cellulose binding domain; Docking; Hypocrea jecorina; Molecular machine; Trichoderma reesei

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; FUNGAL ENZYME; OLIGOSACCHARIDE; PROTEIN CEL7A; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BOND; ENERGY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME ANALYSIS; ENZYME GLYCOSYLATION; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; FORCE; HYDROLYSIS; HYPOCREA; HYPOCREA JECORINA; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; TRICHODERMA REESEI;

BINDING SITES; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; FUNGAL PROTEINS; HYDROGEN BONDING; KINETICS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; THERMODYNAMICS; TRICHODERMA;

HYPOCREA JECORINA;

EID: 24644500001     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20547     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes server; 1999. http://afmb.cnrs-mrs.fr/CAZY/.
2. Divne C, Ståhlberg J, Reinikainen T, Ruohonen L, Pettersson G, Knowles JK, Teeri TT, Jones TA. The three-dimensional crystal structure of the catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. Science 1994;265:524-528.
3. Divne C, Ståhlberg J, Teeri TT, Jones TA. High-resolution crystal structures reveal how a cellulose chain is bound in the 50 Å long tunnel of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. J Mol Biol 1998;275:309-325.
4. Kraulis J, Clore GM, Nilges M, Jones TA, Pettersson G, Knowles J, Gronenborn AM. Determination of the three-dimensional solution structure of the C-terminal domain of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei: a study using nuclear magnetic resonance and hybrid distance geometry-dynamical simulated annealing. Biochemistry 1989;28:7241-7257.
5. Mattinen ML, Kontteli M, Kerovuo J, Linder M, Annila A, Lindeberg G, Reinikainen T, Drakenberg T. Three-dimensional structures of three engineered cellulose-binding domains of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. Protein Sci 1997;6:294-303.
6. Ståhlberg J, Divne C, Koivula A, Piens K, Claeyssens M, Teeri TT, Jones TA. Activity studies and crystal structures of catalytically deficient mutants of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. J Mol Biol 1996;264:337-349.
7. Linder M, Teeri TT. The roles and function of cellulose-binding domains. J Biotechnol 1997;57:15-28.
8. Carrard G, Linder M. Widely different off rates of two closely related cellulose-binding domains from Trichoderma reesei. Eur J Biochem 1999;262:637-643.
9. Carrard G, Koivula A, Söderlund H, Béguin P. Cellulose-binding domains promote hydrolysis of different sites on crystalline cellulose. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:10342-10347.
10. Ståhlberg J, Johansson G, Pettersson G. A new model for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose based on the two-domain structure of cellobiohydrolase I. Bio/Technology 1991;9:286-290.
11. Din N, Damude HG, Gilkes NR, Miller RC, Warren RAJ, Kilburn DG. C1-Cx revisited: intramolecular synergism in a cellulase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:11383-11387.
12. Medve J, Karlsson J, Lee D, Tjerneld F. Hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose by cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase II from Trichoderma reesei: adsorption, sugar production pattern, and synergism of the enzymes. Biotechnol Bioeng 1998;59:621-634.
13. Sinnott ML. The cellobiohydrolases of Trichoderma reesei: a review of indirect and direct evidence that their function is not just glycosidic bond hydrolysis. Biochem Soc Trans 1998;26:160-164.
14. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, Olson AJ. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem 1998;19:1639-1662.
15. Coutinho PM, Dowd MK, Reilly PJ. Automated docking of monosaccharide substrates and analogues and methyl α-acarviosinide in the glucoamylase active site. Proteins 1997;27:235-248.
16. Laederach A, Dowd MK, Coutinho PM, Reilly PJ. Automated docking of maltose, 2-deoxymaltose and maltotetraose into the soybean β-amylase active site. Proteins 1999;37:166-175.
17. Mulakala C, Reilly PJ. Understanding protein structure-function relationships in Family 47 α-1,2-mannosidases through computational docking of ligands. Proteins 2002;49:125-134.
18. Allen MJ, Laederach A, Reilly PJ, Mason RJ, Voelker DR. Arg343 in human surfactant protein D governs discrimination between glucose and N-acetylglucosamine ligands. Glycobiology 2004;14:693-700.
19. Aikens CL, Laederach A, Reilly PJ. Automated docking of phospholipids to the phospholipase D active site: insight into the catalytic mechanism. Proteins 2004;57:27-35.
20. Rodriguez R, Chinea G, Lopez N, Pons T, Vriend G. Homology modeling, model and software evaluation: three related resources. Bioinformatics 1998;14:523-528.
21. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM Jr, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 1995;117:5179-5197.
22. Walters P, Stahl M. Department of Chemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. http://smog.com/chem/babel/; 1992-1996.
23. Stewart JJP. MOPAC: a semiempirical molecular-orbital program. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 1990;4:1-105. Available online at http://www.webmo.net/ support/linux_binaries.html.
24. Atalla RH, Vanderhart DL. Native cellulose - a composite of two distinct crystalline forms. Science 1984;223:283-285.
25. Viëtor RJ, Newman RH, Ha MA, Apperley DC, Jarvis MC. Conformational features of crystal-surface cellulose from higher plants. Plant J 2002;30:721-731.
26. Newman RH, Davidson TC. Molecular conformations at the cellulose-water interface. Cellulose 2004;11:23-32.
27. Sulzenbacher G, Driguez H, Henrissat B, Schülein M, Davies GJ. Structure of the Fusarium oxysporum endoglucanase I with a nonhydrolyzable substrate analogue: substrate distortion gives rise to the preferred axial orientation for the leaving group. Biochemistry 1996;35:15280-15287.
28. Dowd MK, French AD, Reilly PJ. Modeling of aldopyranosyl ring puckering with MM3(92). Carbohyd Res 1994;264:1-19.
29. von Ossowski I, Ståhlberg J, Koivula A, Piens K, Becker D, Boer H, Harle R, Harris M, Divne C, Mahdi S, Zhao YX, Driguez H, Claeyssens M, Sinnott ML, Teeri TT. Engineering the exo-loop of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase, Cel7A: a comparison with Phanerochaete chrysosporium Cel7D. J Mol Biol 2003;333:817-829.
30. Vyas N. Atomic features of protein-carbohydrate interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1991;1:732-740.
31. Reinikainen T, Ruohonen L, Nevanen T, Laaksonen L, Kraulis P, Jones TA, Knowles JK, Teeri TT. Investigation of the function of mutated cellulose-binding domains of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I. Proteins 1992;14:475-482.
32. Linder M, Mattinen ML, Kontteli M, Lindeberg G, Ståhlberg J, Drakenberg T, Reinikainen T, Pettersson G, Annila A. Identification of functionally important amino acids in the cellulose-binding domain of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I. Protein Sci 1995;4:1056-1064.
33. Lee I, Evans BR, Woodward J. The mechanism of cellulase action on cotton fibers: evidence from atomic force microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 2000;82:213-221.
34. Jervis EJ, Haynes CA, Kilburn DG. Surface diffusion of cellulases and their isolated binding domains on cellulose. J Biol Chem 1997;272:24016-24023.
35. Gao PJ, Chen GJ, Wang TH, Zhang YS, Liu J. Non-hydrolytic disruption of crystalline structure of cellulose by cellulose binding domain and linker sequence of cellobiohydrolase I from Penicillium janthinellum. Acta Biochim Biophys Sinica 2001;33:13-18.
36. Gabrys BJ, Pesz K, Bartkiewicz SJ. Brownian motion, molecular motors and ratchets. Physica A 2004;336:112-122.
37. Srisodsuk M, Reinikainen T, Penttila M, Teeri TT. Role of the interdomain linker peptide of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I in its interaction with crystalline cellulose. J Biol Chem 1993;268:20756-20761.
38. Abuja PM, Schmuck M, Pilz I, Tomme P, Claeyssens M, Esterbauer H. Structural and functional domains of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei: a small-angle X-ray scattering study of the intact enzyme and its core. Eur Biophys J Biophys Lett 1988;15:339-342.
39. Shen H, Schmuck M, Pilz I, Gilkes NR, Kilburn DG, Miller RC, Warren RAJ. Deletion of the linker connecting the catalytic and cellulose-binding domains of endoglucanase A (CenA) of Cellulomonas fimi alters its conformation and catalytic activity. J Biol Chem 1991;266:11335-11340.
40. Tewari YB, Goldberg RN. Thermodynamics of hydrolysis of disaccharides-cellobiose, gentiobiose, isomaltose, and maltose. J Biol Chem 1989;264:3966-3971.
41. Kammermeier H. Meaning of energetic parameters. Basic Res Cardiol 1993;88:380-384.
42. Nidetzky B, Steiner W, Claeyssens M. Cellulose hydrolysis by the cellulases from Trichoderma reesei: adsorptions of two cellobiohydrolases, two endocellulases and their core proteins on filter-paper and their relation to hydrolysis. Biochem J 1994;303:817-823.
43. Delagoutte E, von Hippel PH. Helicase mechanisms and the coupling of helicases within macromolecular machines: Part I. Structures and properties of isolated helicases. Quart Rev Biophys 2002;35:431-478.