Team Performance in Dynamic Task Environments

International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009

Volumn 24, Issue , 2012, Pages 183-216

  Hinsz, Verlin B ^a   Wallace, Dana M ^a   Ladbury, Jared L ^a  

^a North Dakota StateUniversity ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Conceptualization; Dynamic task environments; Individual level performance; Team performance; Uninhabited aerial vehicle

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948955150     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470745267.ch6     Document Type: Chapter

References (134)

1. Abrams, D. & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances, London and New York: Harvester, Wheatsheaf & Springer.
2. Araujo, D., Davids, K. & Serpa, S. (2005). An ecological approach to expertise effects in decision-making in a simulated sailing regatta. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6, 671-92.
3. Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E. & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small Groups as Complex Systems, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Artman, H. (2000). Team situation assessment and information distribution. Ergonomics, 43, 1111-28.
5. Barry, J. (2001). A new breed of soldier. Newsweek (December 10), 24-31.
6. Brehmer, B. (1992). Dynamic decision making: human control of complex systems. Acta Psychologica, 81, 211-41.
7. Brodbeck, F. C. (1996). Criteria for the study of work group functioning. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology (pp. 285-315). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
8. Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Salas, E. et al. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1189-1207.
9. Cannon-Bowers, J. A. & Salas, E. (2001). Reflections on shared cognition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 195-202.
10. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E. & Converse, S. A. (1993). Shared mental models in team decision making. In N. J. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Individual and Group Decision Making (pp. 221-46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control Theory Approach to Human Behavior, New York: Springer.
12. Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the Self-Regulation of Behavior. New York: Cambridge.
13. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: a typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-46.
14. Chen, G., Bliese, P. D. & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). Conceptual framework and statistical procedures for delineating and testing multilevel theories of homology. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 375-409.
15. Chen, G. & Kanfer, R. (2006). Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 223-67.
16. Clancy, J. M., Elliott, G. C., Ley, T. et al. (2003). Command style and team performance in a dynamic decision making task. In S. Schneider & J. Shanteau (Eds), Emerging Perspectives in Decision Research (pp. 586-619). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Cohen, S. G. & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-90.
18. Cooke, N. J., Gorman, J. C., Duran, J. L. et al. (2007). Team cognition in experienced command-and-control teams. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 146-57.
19. Cooke, N. J., Gorman, J. C. & Kiekel, P. A. (2008). Communication as team-level cognitive processing. In M. P. Letsky, N. W. Warner, S. M. Fiore & C. A. P. Smith (Eds), Macrocognition in Teams: Theories and Methodologies (pp. 51-64). Hampshire: Ashgate.
20. Cooke, N. J., Kiekel, P. A., Salas, E. et al. (2003). Measuring team knowledge: a window to the cognitive underpinnings of team performance. Group Dynamics, 7, 179-99.
21. Cooke, N. J., Pedersen, H. K., Gorman, J. C. et al. (2006). Acquiring team-level command and control skill forUAV operation. InN. J. Cooke, H. Pringle, H. Pedersen & O. Connor (Eds), Human Factors of Remotely Operated Vehicles (pp. 287-300). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. Crown, D. F. & Rosse, J. G. (1995). Yours, mine, and ours: facilitating group productivity through the integration of individual and group goals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 138-50.
23. DeChurch, L. A. & Marks, M. A. (2006). Leadership in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 311-29.
24. DeShon, R. P., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Schmidt, A. M. et al. (2004). A multi-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1035-56.
25. Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Philips, J. L. et al. (1999). Teams in organizations: prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 678-711.
26. Diehl, E. & Sterman, J. D. (1995). Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 198-215.
27. Edmondson, A. C., Roberto, M. A. & Watkins, M. D. (2003). A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: managing unstructured task streams. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 297-325.
28. Edwards, W. (1962). Dynamic decision theory and probabilistic information processing. Human Factors, 4, 59-73.
29. Endsley, M. R. (1995). Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 65-84.
30. Endsley, M. R. & Jones, W. M. (2001). A model of inter- and intrateam situation awareness: implications for design, training and measurement. In M. McNeese, E. Salas & M. Endsley (Eds), New Trends in Cooperative Activities: Understanding System Dynamics in Complex Environments (pp. 46-67). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
31. Fahey, R. P., Rowe, A. L., Dunlap, K. L. et al. (1997). Synthetic Task Design I: Preliminary Cognitive Task Analysis of AWACS Weapons Director Teams. Report for the Air Force Research Laboratory (HEJC), Brooks AFB, Texas.
32. Feltz,D. L. & Lirgg, C.D. (1998). Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 557-64.
33. Feltz, D. L. & Lirgg, C. D. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs of athletes, teams, and coaches. In R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas & C. M. Janelle (Eds), Handbook of Sport Psychology, 2nd edn (pp. 340-61). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
34. Gonzalez, C. (2005). Decision support for real-time, dynamic decision-making tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 142-54.
35. Gonzalez, C., Thomas, R. P. & Vanyukov, P. (2005). The relationships between cognitive ability and dynamic decision making. Intelligence, 33, 169-86.
36. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior (pp. 315-42). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
37. Hall, E. & Gugerty, L. (1997). Predator Operations Cognitive Task Analysis Results, Briefing prepared by theTexas: Air Force Research Laboratory, Brooks AFB.
38. Harris, T. D. & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (1997). Components of teamwork: impact on evaluation of contributions to work team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1694-1715.
39. Hedlund, J., Ilgen, D. R. & Hollenbeck, J. R. (1998). The effect of computer-mediated versus face-to-face communication on decision making in hierarchical teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 30-47.
40. Helmreich R. L. & Schaefer, H. G. (1994). Team performance in the operating room. In M. S. Bogner (Ed.), Human Error in Medicine (pp. 225-53). Hillside: Erlbaum.
41. Hinsz, V. B. (1995a). Group and individual decision making for task performance goals: processes in the establishment of goals in groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 353-70.
42. Hinsz, V. B. (1995b). Mental models of groups as social systems: considerations of specification and assessment. Small Group Research, 26, 200-233.
43. Hinsz, V. B. (1999). Group decision making with responses of a quantitative nature: the theory of social decision schemes for quantities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 28-49.
44. Hinsz, V. B. (2001). A groups-as-information-processors perspective for technological support of intellectual teamwork. In M. D. McNeese, E. Salas & M. R. Endsley (Eds), New Trends in Collaborative Activities: Understanding System Dynamics in Complex Settings (pp. 22-45). Santa Monica: Human Factors & Ergonomics Society.
45. Hinsz, V. B. (2004). Metacognition and mental models in groups: an illustration with metamemory of group recognition memory. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds), Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors That Drive Process and Performance (pp. 33-58). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
46. Hinsz, V. B., Ladbury, J. L. & Park, E. S. (2008). Team Performance in a Simulated UAV: Combinations-of-Contributions Theory. Presented at the 23rd annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco.
47. Hinsz, V. B. & Magnan, R. E. (2006). Metacognition Contributes to Superior Group Performance on Cognitive Tasks. In T. Reimer & V. B. Hinsz (Chairs). Symposium Metacognition in Groups: How Metacognitive Beliefs Facilitate Group Interaction and Performance at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Palm Springs, CA.
48. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S. & Nagao, D. H. (2008). The accentuation of information processes and biases in group judgments integrating base-rate and case-specific information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 116-26.
49. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S. & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.
50. Hinsz, V. B. & Wallace, D. M. (in press). Comparing individual and team judgment accuracy for target identification under heavy cognitive demand. In D. H. Andrews & T. Hull (Eds), Human Factors Issues in Combat Identification. Hampshire: Ashgate.
51. Hirokowa, R. Y., DeGroyer, D. & Vaide, K. (2007). Characteristics of effective health care teams. In R. Y. Hirokowa, R. S. Cathcart, L. A. Samovar & L. D. Henman (Eds), Small Group Communication: Theory and Practice, 8th edn (pp. 148-57). New York: Oxford University Press.
52. Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P.W., Jackson, S. E. et al. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1385-99.
53. Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Sego, D. J. et al. (1995). Multilevel theory of team decision-making: decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 292-316.
54. Hollenbeck, J. R., Moon, H., Illis, A. P. J. et al. (2002). Structural contingency theory and individual differences: examination of external and internal person-fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 599-606.
55. Humphrey, S. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R. et al. (2004). The changing shape of large-scale programs of research: the MSU-DDD as an illustrative example. In S. G. Schiflett, L. R. Elliott, E. Salas & M. D. Coovert (Eds), Scaled Worlds: Development, Validation, and Applications (pp. 220-39). Hampshire: Ashgate.
56. Ilgen, D. R., Major, D. A., Hollenbeck, J. R. et al. (1995). Decision making in teams: raising an individual decision making model to the team level. In R. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds), Team Decision Making in Organizations (pp. 113-48). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
57. Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M. et al. (2005). Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-43.
58. Judge, W. Q. & Miller, A. (1991). Antecedents and outcomes of decision speed in different environmental contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 449-63.
59. Kanfer, R. (1992). Work motivation: new directions in theory and research. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 7 (pp. 1-53). London: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
60. Karau, S. J. & Kelly, J. R. (1992). The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 542-71.
61. Karoly, P. (1993). Mechanisms of self-regulation: a systems view. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 23-52.
62. Kelly, J. R. & Karau, S. J. (1999). Group decision making: the effects of initial preferences and time pressure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1342-54.
63. Kelly, J. R. & Loving, T. J. (2004). Time pressure and group performance: exploring underlying processes in the attentional focus model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 185-98.
64. Kerr, N. & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623-55.
65. Klein, H. J. (1989). An integrated control theory model of work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 150-72.
66. Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
67. Klimoski, R. & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403-37.
68. Kozlowski, S. W. J. & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen & R. J. Klimoski (Eds), Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 12 (pp. 333-75). London: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
69. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R. et al. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: a theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds), The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation, and Development (pp. 240-92). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
70. Kozlowski, S. W. J. & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77-124.
71. Kozlowski, S.W. J., Toney, R. J., Mullins, M. E. et al. (2001). Developing adaptability: a theory for the design of integrated-embedded training systems. Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research, 1, 59-122.
72. Ladbury, J. L., Hinsz, V. B. & Park, E. S. (2007). Combining Individual Efforts into Team Execution: The Effect of Multiple Team Members' Spatial Ability on Performance in an Interdependent Task. Presented at the meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Memphis, TN.
73. Langan-Fox, J., Code, S. & Langfield-Smith, K. (2000). Team mental models: techniques, methods, and analytic approaches. Human Factors, 42, 242-71.
74. Laughlin, P. R. & Hollingshead, A. B. (1995). A theory of collective induction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 94-107.
75. Letsky M. P., Warner N.W., Fiore S. M. et al. (2008). Macrocognition in Teams: Theories and Methodologies, Hampshire: Ashgate.
76. Levine, S. (1998). Getting to Resolution: Turning Conflict into Collaboration, San Francisco: Berret-Koehler.
77. Levine, J. M. & Choi, H. S. (2004). Impact of personnel turnover on team performance and cognition. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds), Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors That Drive Process and Performance (pp. 153-177). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
78. Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57, 705-17.
79. Lord, R. G. & Kernan, M. C. (1989). Application of control theory to work settings. In W. A. Herschberger (Ed.), Volitional Action (pp. 493-514). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
80. Majchrzak, A., Jarvenpaa, S. L. & Hollingshead, A. B. (2007). Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organization Science, 18, 147-61.
81. Marks, M. A., DeChurch, L. A., Mathieu, J. E. et al. (2005). Teamwork in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 964-71.
82. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E. & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-76.
83. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E. & Zaccaro, S. J. (2004). Using scaled worlds to study multi-team systems. In S.G. Schiflett, L. R., Elliott, E. Salas & M.D. Coovert (Eds), Scaled Worlds: Development, Validation, and Applications (pp. 279-96). Hampshire: Ashgate.
84. Marks, M. A., Sabella, M. J., Burke, C. S. et al. (2002). The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 3-13.
85. Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F. et al. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273-83.
86. Mathieu, J. E., Marks, M. A. & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). Multiteam systems. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinagil & C. Viswesvaran (Eds), Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology - Volume 2: Organizational Psychology (pp. 289-313). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
87. McGrath, J. E. & Argote, L. (2001). Group processes in organizational contexts. In M. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds), Blackwell's Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 3 Group Processes (pp. 603-27). London: Blackwell.
88. McNeese, M. D., Salas, E. & Endsley M. R. (2001). New Trends in Collaborative Activities: Understanding System Dynamics in Complex Settings, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors & Ergonomics Society.
89. Meier, B. P. & Hinsz, V. B. (2004). A comparison of human aggression committed by groups and individuals: an interindividual-intergroup discontinuity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 551-59.
90. Mitchell, T. R. & Silver, W. S. (1990). Individual and group goals when workers are interdependent: effects on task strategies and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 185-93.
91. Moon, H., Hollenbeck, J., Humphrey, S. et al. (2004). Asymmetric adaptability: dynamic team structures as one-way streets. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (5), 681-95.
92. Mullen, B. (1987). Self-attention theory: the effects of group composition on the individual. In B. Mullen & G. Goethals (Eds), Theories of Group Behavior (pp. 125-46). New York: Springer.
93. Myers, N. D., Feltz, D. L. & Short, S. E. (2004). Collective efficacy and team performance: a longitudinal study of collegiate football teams. Group Dynamics, 8, 126-38.
94. O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., Martocchio, J. J. & Frink, D. D. (1994). A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1285-1301.
95. Omodei, M., Taranto, P. & Wearing, A. (1999). Networked Fire Chief (Version 1.4) [Computer Program]: LaTrobe University.
96. Paich, M. & Sterman, J. D. (1993). Boom, bust, and failures to learn in experimental markets. Management Science, 39, 1439-58.
97. Park, E. S., Hinsz, V. B. & Ladbury, J. L. (2006). Enhancing coordination and collaboration in remotely operated vehicle (ROV) teams. In N. J. Cooke, H. Pringle, H. Pederson & O. Connor (Eds), Human Factors of Remotely Operated Vehicles (pp. 301-12). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
98. Porter, C. O., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R. et al. (2003). Backing up behaviors in teams: the role of personality and legitimacy of need. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 391-403.
99. Powers, W. T. (1973). Feedback: beyond behaviorism. Science, 179, 351-56.
100. Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2007). Debriefing can reduce misperceptions of feedback: the case of renewable resource management. Simulation & Gaming, 38, 382-97.
101. Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M. & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive Systems Engineering, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
102. Reimer, T., Park, E. S. & Hinsz, V. B. (2006). Shared and coordinated cognition in competitive and dynamic task environments: an information-processing perspective for team sports. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 376-400.
103. Rentsch, J. R. & Hall, R. J. (1994). Members of great teams think alike: a model of team effectiveness and schema similarity among team members. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, 1, 223-61.
104. Rico, R., Sanchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F. et al. (2008). Team implicit coordination processes: a team knowledge-based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33, 163-84.
105. Robinson, S. & Weldon, E. (1993). Feedback seeking in groups: a theoretical perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 71-86.
106. Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C. & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in taskperforming groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61-72.
107. Salas, E. & Fiore, S. M. (2004). Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors That Drive Process and Performance, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
108. Schiflett, S. G., Elliott, L. R., Salas, E. et al. (2004). Scaled Worlds: Development, Validation, and Applications, Hampshire: Ashgate.
109. Shebilske,W. L., Jordan, J. A., Goettl, B. P. et al. (1999). Cognitive and social influences in training teams for complex skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 227-49.
110. Shebilske, W. L., Levchuk, G. & Freeman, F. (in press). Team training paradigm for better combat identification. In D. H. Andrews & T. Hull (Eds), Human Factors Issues in Combat Identification Hampshire: Ashgate.
111. Shepperd, J. A. (1993). Productivity loss in performance groups: a motivation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 67-81.
112. Sherif, M. (1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 43, 349-56.
113. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and Productivity, New York: Academic Press.
114. Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A. & Salas, E. (1996). The role of shared mental models in developing team situation awareness: implications for training. Training Research Journal, 2, 85-116.
115. Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E. et al. (1999). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: an empirical link is established. Human Factors, 41, 61-71.
116. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. InW. G. Austin & S.Worchel (Eds), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks Cole.
117. Tindale, R. S., Kameda, T. & Hinsz, V. B. (2003). Group decision making. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds), Sage Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 381-403). London: Sage.
118. Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Gautschi, D. et al. (2006). Leading to recovery: group performance and coordinating activities in Medical Emergency Driven Groups. Human Performance, 19, 277-304.
119. Tschan, F., Semmer, N., Bizzari, L. et al. (2008). Diagnostic Errors in Medical Emergency Driven Teams. Paper presented at the 3rd annual meeting of the Interdisciplinary Network for Group Research (INGRoup), Kansas City, MO.
120. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social Influence, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
121. Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap (2005). Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Roadmap 2005-2030. Downloaded from http://www.uavforum.com/library/uavroadmap2005.pdf on 25August 2006.
122. Useem, M., Cook, J. & Sutton, L. (2005). Developing leaders for decision making under stress: Wildland firefighters in the South Canyon Fire and its aftermath. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 461-85.
123. Vroom, V. H. (1969). Industrial social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds), Handbook of Social Psychology, 2nd edn, Vol. 5 (pp. 227-40). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
124. Wallace, D. M. & Hinsz, V. B. (in press). Teams as technology: applying theory and research to model macrocognition processes in teams. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science.
125. Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6, 280-321.
126. Weldon, E. & Weingart, L. R. (1993). Group goals and group performance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 307-34.
127. Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, 2nd edn, New York: HarperCollins.
128. Wildschut, T., Pinter, B., Vevea, J. L. et al. (2003). Beyond the group mind: a quantitative review of the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 698-722.
129. Wittenbaum, G. M., Hollingshead, A. B. & Botero, I. C. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71, 286-310.
130. Wittenbaum, G. M., Merry, C. J. & Stasser, G. (1996). Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 129-52.
131. Worchel, S. (1986). The role of cooperation in reducing intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 288-304). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
132. Worchel, S. & Austin,W.G. (1986). Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
133. Zander, A. (1971). Motives and Goals in Groups, New York: Academic Press.
134. Zsambok, C. E. & Klein, G. A. (1997). Naturalistic Decision Making, Mahwah: Erlbaum.