Resolving basal lamiid phylogeny and the circumscription of icacinaceae with a plastome-scale data set

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 102, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1794-1813

  Stull, Gregory W ^a,b   de Stefano, Rodrigo Duno ^c   Soltis, Douglas E ^a,b   Soltis, Pamela S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA DE YUCATÁN   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Garryales; Icacinaceae; Lamiidae; Metteniusaceae; Oncothecaceae; Phylogenetic nomenclature; Phylogenomics; Plastid genome

Indexed keywords

ANCESTRY; DICOTYLEDON; DIVERGENCE; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; FRUIT; GENOME; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; TROPICAL ENVIRONMENT;

AQUIFOLIALES; ASTERIDS; GARRYALES; GENTIANALES; ICACINACEAE; LAMIALES; LAMIIDS; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; ONCOTHECACEAE; SOLANALES; VAHLIA;

PLANT DNA;

ANGIOSPERM; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID; PLASTID GENOME;

ANGIOSPERMS; DNA, PLANT; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME, PLASTID; PHYLOGENY; PLASTIDS;

EID: 84947087653     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1500298     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. Airy Shaw, H. K. 1965. Diagnoses of new families, new names, etc. for the seventh edition of Willis’s Dictionary. Kew Bulletin 18: 249–273.
2. Albach, D. C., P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and R. G. Olmstead. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of asterids based on sequences of four genes. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 88: 163–212.
3. Angulo, D. F., R. Duno de Stefano, and G. W. Stull. 2013. Systematics of Mappia (Icacinaceae), an endemic genus of tropical America. Phytotaxa 116: 1–18.
4. APG [Angiosperm Phylogeny Group]. 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of the flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531–553.
5. APG II [Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II]. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399–436.
6. APG III [Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III]. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 105–121.
7. Bailey, I. W., and R. A. Howard. 1941a. The comparative morphology of the Icacinaceae I. Anatomy of the node and internode. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 22: 125–132.
8. Bailey, I. W., and R. A. Howard. 1941b. The comparative morphology of the Icacinaceae II. Vessels. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 22: 171–187.
9. Bailey, I. W., and R. A. Howard. 1941c. The comparative morphology of the Icacinaceae III. Imperforate tracheary elements and xylem parenchyma. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 22: 432–442.
10. Bailey, I. W., and R. A. Howard. 1941d. The comparative morphology of the Icacinaceae IV. Rays and the secondary xylem. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 22: 556–568.
11. Baillon, H. E. 1891. Sur le nouveau genre Oncotheca. Bulletin Mensuel de la Société Linnéenne de Paris 2: 931–932.
12. Baillon, H. E. 1892. Histoire des plantes, vol. 11. Hachette, Paris, France.
13. Bentham, G. 1841. Account of two new genera allied to Olacineae. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 18: 671–685.
14. Bentham, G. 1862. Olacineae. In G. Bentham and J. D. Hooker [eds.], Genera plantarum, vol. I, part 1, 342–355. Lovell Reeve, London, UK.
15. Bremer, B., K. Bremer, N. Heidari, P. Erixon, R. G. Olmstead, A. A. Anderberg, M. Källersjö and E. Barkhordarian. 2002. Phylogenetics of asterids based on 3 coding and 3 non-coding chloroplast DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxonomic levels. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24: 274–301.
16. Bremer, K., E. M. Friis, and B. Bremer. 2004. Molecular phylogenetic dating of asterid flowering plants shows early Cretaceous diversification. Systematic Biology 53: 496–505.
17. Burge, D. O. 2011. Molecular phylogenetics of Garrya (Garryaceae). Madrono 58: 249–255.
18. Byng, J. W., B. Bernardini, J. A. Joseph, M. W. Chase, and T. M. A. Utteridge. 2014. Phylogenetic relationships of Icacianceae focusing on the vining genera. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 176: 277–294.
19. Cameron, K. M. 2003. On the phylogenetic position of the New Caledonian endemic families Paracryphiaceae, Oncothecaceae, and Strasburgeriaceae: A comparison of molecules and morphology. Botanical Review 68: 428–443.
20. Cantino, P. D., and K de Queiroz. 2010. International code of phylogenetic nomenclature. Website http://www.ohio.edu/phylocode/ [accessed 22 June 2015].
21. Cantino, P. D., J. A. Doyle, S. W. Graham, W. S. Judd, R. G. Olmstead, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and M. J. Donoghue. 2007. Towards a phylogenetic nomenclature of Tracheophyta. Taxon 56: 822–846.
22. Carpenter, C. S., and W. C. Dickison. 1976. The morphology and relationships of Oncotheca balansae. Botanical Gazette 137: 141–153.
23. Chase, M. W., D. E. Soltis, R. G. Olmstead, D. H. Les, B. D. Mishler, M. R. Duvall, R. A. Price, et al. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequencings from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528–581.
24. Cronquist, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
25. Cummings, M. P., S. A. Handley, D. S. Myers, D. L. Reed, A. Rokas, and K. Winka. 2003. Comparing bootstrap and posterior probability values in the four-taxon case. Systematic Biology 52: 477–487.
26. Dahl, O. 1952. The comparative morphology of the Icacinaceae, VI. The pollen. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 33: 252–286.
27. de Candolle, A. P. 1824. Olacineae. In A. P. de Candolle [ed.], Prodrumus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, vol. I, 531–534. Treuttel et Würtz, Paris, France.
28. Dickison, W. C. 1986. Further observations on the floral anatomy and pollen morphology of Oncotheca (Oncothecaceae). Brittonia 38: 249–259.
29. Doyle, J. J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: Molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Systematic Biology 17: 144–163.
30. Doyle, J. J., and J. L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemistry Bulletin 19: 11–15.
31. Duno de Stefano, R., D. F. Angulo, and F. W. Stauffer. 2007. Emmotum harleyi, a new species from Bahia, Brazil, and lectotypification of other Icacinaceae. Novon 17: 306–309.
32. Duno de Stefano, R., and G. C. Fernández-Concha. 2011. Morphology-inferred phylogeny and a revision of the genus Emmotum (Icacinaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 98: 1–27.
33. Endress, P. K., and A. Rapini. 2014. Floral structure of Emmotum (Icacinaceae sensu stricto or Emmotaceae), a phylogenetically isolated genus of lamiids with a unique pseudotrimerous gynoecium, bitegmic ovules and monosporangiate thecae. Annals of Botany 114: 945–959.
34. Engler, A. 1893. Icacinaceae. In A. Engler and K. Prantl [eds.], 1896. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. III, 5, 233–257. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
35. Erbar, C., and P. Leins. 1996. Distribution of the character states “early sympetaly” and “late sympetaly” within the “Sympetalae Tetracyclicae” and presumably allied groups. Botanica Acta 109: 427–440.
36. Erixon, P., B. Svennblad, T. Britton, and B. Oxelman. 2003. Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 52: 665–673.
37. González, F. A., J. Betancur, O. Maurin, J. V. Freudenstein, and M. W. Chase. 2007. Metteniusaceae, an early-diverging family in the lamiid clade. Taxon 56: 795–800.
38. González, F. A., and P. J. Rudall. 2010. Flower and fruit characters in the early-divergent lamiid family Metteniusaceae, with particular reference to the evolution of pseudomonomery. American Journal of Botany 97: 191–206.
39. Guillaumin, A. 1938. Observations morphologiques et anatomiques sur le genre Oncotheca. Revue Générale de Botanique 50: 629–635.
40. Guillaumin, A. 1948. Flore analytique et synoptique de la Nouvelle-Calédonie (Phanérogames). Office de la Recherche Scientifique Coloniale, Paris, France.
41. Howard, R. A. 1940. Studies of the Icacinaceae. I. Preliminary taxonomic notes. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 21: 461–489.
42. Howard, R. A. 1942a. Studies of the Icacinaceae. II. Humirianthera, Leretia, Mappia, and Nothapodytes, valid genera of the Icacineae. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 23: 55–78.
43. Howard, R. A. 1942b. Studies of the Icacinaceae. III. A revision of Emmotum. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 23: 479–494.
44. Howard, R. A. 1942c. Studies of the Icacinaceae. IV. Considerations of the New World genera. Contributions from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University 142: 3–60.
45. Howard, R. A. 1942d. Studies of the Icacinaceae. V. A revision of the genus Citronella D. Don. Contributions from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University 142: 60–89.
46. Howard, R. A. 1943a. Studies of the Icacinaceae. VI. Irvingbaileya and Codiocarpus, two new genera of the Icacineae. Brittonia 5: 47–57.
47. Howard, R. A. 1943b. Studies of the Icacinaceae. VII. A revision of the genus Medusanthera Seeman. Lloydia 6: 133–143.
48. Howard, R. A. 1943c. Studies of the Icacinaceae. VIII. Brief notes of some Old World genera. Lloydia 6: 144–154.
49. Howard, R. A. 1992. A revision of Casimirella, including Humirianthera (Icacinaceae). Brittonia 44: 166–172.
50. Hua, P., and R. A. Howard. 2008. Icacinaceae. In Z. Y. Wu, P. H. Raven, and D. Y. Hong [eds.], Flora of China, vol. 11, 505–514. Science Press, Beijing, and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
51. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. R. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Biometrics 17: 754–755.
52. Hunter, S. S., R. T. Lyon, B. A. J. Sarver, K. Hardwick, L. J. Forney, M. L. Settles. 2015. Assembly by Reduced Complexity (ARC): A hybrid approach for targeted assembly of homologous sequences. bioRxiv.
53. Hutchinson, J., and J. M. Dalziel. 1958. Icacinaceae. In R. W. J. Keay [ed.], Flora of west tropical Africa, 2nd ed., vol. 1, 636–644. Crown Agents for Overseas Governments and Administrations, London, UK.
54. Jansen, R. K., Z. Cai, L. A. Raubeson, H. Daniell, C. W. dePamphilis, J. Leebens- Mack, K. F. Müller, et al. 2007. Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 19369–19374.
55. Jian, S., P. S. Soltis, M. A. Gitzendanner, M. J. Moore, R. Li, T. A. Hendry, Y. L. Qui, et al. 2008. Resolving an ancient, rapid radiation in Saxifragales. Systematic Biology 57: 38–57.
56. Joshi, N. A., and J. N. Fass. 2011. Sickle: A sliding-window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files (Version 1.33) [software]. Available at https://github.com/najoshi/sickle.
57. Judd, W. S., C. S. Campbell, E. A. Kellogg, P. F. Stevens, and M. J. Donoghue. 2008. Plant systematics: A phylogenetic approach, 3rd ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
58. Judd, W. S., and R. G. Olmstead. 2004. A survey of tricolpate (eudicot) phylogenetic relationships. American Journal of Botany 91: 1627–1644.
59. Jussieu, A. H. L. 1823. Description d’un genre nouveae nommé Icacina. Mémoires de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle de Paris 1: 174–178.
60. Kårehed, J. 2001. Multiple origins of the tropical forest tree family Icacinaceae. American Journal of Botany 88: 2259–2274.
61. Karsten, H. 1860. Metteniusa edulis Karst. In H. Karsten, Florae colombiae, vol. I, part 2, 79–80. Ferdinandi Duemmleri successores, Berlin, Germany.
62. Katoh, K., and D. M. Standley. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780.
63. Lens, F., J. Kårehed, P. Baas, S. Jansen, D. Rabaey, S. Huysmans, T. Hamann, and E. Smets. 2008. The wood anatomy of the polyphyletic Icacinaceae s.l., and their relationships within asterids. Taxon 57: 525–552.
64. Lobreau-Callen, D. 1972. Pollen des Icacinaceae. I. Atlas. Pollen et Spores 14: 345–388.
65. Lobreau-Callen, D. 1973. Le pollen des Icacinaceae: II. Observations en microscopie électronique, corrélations, conclusions. Pollen et Spores 15: 47–89.
66. Lozano-Contreras, G., and N. B. de Lozano. 1988. Metteniusaceae. In P. Pinto and G. Lozano [eds.], Flora de Colombia, vol. 11. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
67. Lucas, G. 1968. Icacinaceae. In E. Milne-Redhead and R. M. Polhill [eds.], Flora of tropical East Africa. Crown Agents for Overseas Government, London, UK.
68. McNeill, J., F. R. Barrie, W. R. Buck, V. Demoulin, W. Greuter, D. L. Hawksworth, P. S. Herendeen, et al. [eds.] 2012. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants (Melbourne code). Regnum vegetabile 154. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, Germany.
69. McPherson, G., P. Morat, and J. M. Veillon. 1981. Existence d’une deuxième espèce appartenant au genre Oncotheca endémique de la Nouvelle-Calédonie et nouvelles données concernant les Oncothécacées. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (Paris), ser. 4, misc. 3: 305–311.
70. Miers, J. 1851. Observations on the affinities of the Olacaceae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, second series 8: 11–184.
71. Miers, J. 1852. Observations on the affinities of the Icacinaceae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, second series 9: 218–226.
72. Miers, J. 1864. On the genus Villaresia, with a description of a new species. Le Journal de Botanique 11: 257–266.
73. Moore, M. J., C. D. Bell, P. S. Soltis, and D. E. Soltis. 2007. Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 19363–19368.
74. Moore, M. J., P. S. Soltis, C. D. Bell, J. G. Burleigh, and D. E. Soltis. 2010. Phylogenetic analysis of 83 plastid genes further resolves the early diversification of eudicots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107: 4623–4628.
75. Olmstead, R. G., B. Bremer, K. Scott, and J. D. Palmer. 1993. A parsimony analysis of the Asteridae sensu lato based on rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 700–722.
76. Olmstead, R. G., K.-J. Kim, R. K. Jansen, and S. J. Wagstaff. 2000. The phylogeny of the Asteridae sensu lato based on chloroplast ndhF gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16: 96–112.
77. Olmstead, R. G., H. J. Michaels, K. M. Scott, and J. D. Palmer. 1992. Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 249–265.
78. Olmstead, R. G., P. A. Reeves, and A. C. Yen. 1998. Patterns of sequence evolution and implications for parsimony analysis of chloroplast DNA. In D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle [eds.], Molecular systematics of plants II: DNA sequencing, 164–187. Klumer, Norwell, Massachusetts.
79. Olmstead, R. G., and J. A. Sweere. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: An empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Systematic Biology 43: 467–481.
80. Qiu, Y.-L., L. Li, B. Wang, J.-Y. Xue, T. A. Hendry, R.-Q. Li, J. W. Brown, et al. 2010. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from sequences of four mitochondrial genes. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 48: 391–425.
81. Rambaut, A., and A. J. Drummond. 2009. Tracer, version 1.5 for Macintosh. Computer program and documentation distributed by the author, website http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
82. Refulio-Rodriguez, N. F., and R. G. Olmstead. 2014. Phylogeny of Lamiidae. American Journal of Botany 101: 287–299.
83. Reveal, J. L. 1993. New ordinal names for extant vascular plants. Phytologia 74: 173–177.
84. Ronquist, F., M. Teslenko, P. van der Mark, D. Ayres, A. Darling, S. Höhna, B. Larget, et al. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542.
85. Ruhfel, B. R., M. A. Gitzendanner, P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. G. Burleigh. 2014. From algae to angiosperms—Inferring the phylogeny of green plants (Viridiplantae) from 360 plastid genomes. BMC Evolutionary Biology 14: 23.
86. Savolainen, V., M. W. Chase, S. B. Hoot, C. M. Morton, D. E. Soltis, C. Bayer, M. F. Fay, et al. 2000a. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based upon a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Systematic Biology 49: 306–362.
87. Savolainen, V., M. F. Fay, D. C. Albach, A. Backlund, M. van der Bank, K. M. Cameron, S. A. Johnson, et al. 2000b. Phylogeny of the eudicots: A nearly complete familial analysis based on rbcL gene sequences. Kew Bulletin 55: 257–309.
88. Sleumer, H. 1934. Eine neue Art der Gattung Aveledoa Pittier. Notizblatt des Botanischen Gartens und Museums zu Berlin-Dahlem 12: 148–150.
89. Sleumer, H. 1936. Über die Gattung Metteniusa Karsten (=Aveledoa Pittier). Notizblatt des Königlichen Botanischen Gartens und Museums Berlin-Dahlem 13: 359–361.
90. Sleumer, H. 1942. Icacinaceae. In A. Engler [ed.], Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd ed., vol. 20b, 322–396. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
91. Sleumer, H. 1969. Materials towards the knowledge of the Icacinaceae of Asia, Malesia, and adjacent areas. Blumea 17: 181–264.
92. Sleumer, H. 1971. Icacinaceae. In C. G. G. J. van Steenis [ed.], Flora Malesiana, series I, vol. 7, 1–87. Noordhoff, Leyden, Netherlands.
93. Soltis, D. E., S. A. Smith, N. Cellinese, K. J. Wurdack, D. C. Tank, S. F. Brockington, N. F. Refulio-Rodriguez, et al. 2011. Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. American Journal of Botany 98: 704–730.
94. Soltis, D. E., and P. S. Soltis. 1998. Choosing and approach and an appropriate gene for phylogenetic analysis. In D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle [eds.], Molecular systematics of plants II: DNA sequencing, 1–42. Klumer, Norwell, Massachusetts.
95. Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, M. W. Chase, M. E. Mort, D. C. Albach, M. Zanis, V. Savolainen, et al. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 381–461.
96. Soltis, P. S., and D. E. Soltis. 1998. Molecular evolution of 18S ribosomal DNA in angiosperms: Implications for character weighting in phylogenetic analysis. In D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle [eds.], Molecular systematics of plants II: DNA sequencing, 188–210. Klumer, Norwell, Massachusetts, USA.
97. Soltis, P. S., D. E. Soltis, and M. W. Chase. 1999a. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402: 402–404.
98. Soltis, P. S., D. E. Soltis, P. G. Wolf, D. L. Nickrent, S.-M. Chaw, and R. L. Chapman. 1999b. Land plant phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA sequences: Pushing the limits of rDNA sequences? Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1774–1784.
99. Stamatakis, A. 2014. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics.
100. Stevens, P. F. 2001 onward. Angiosperm phylogeny website, version 12, July 2012 [more or less continuously updated]. Website http://www.mobot.org/ MOBOT/research/APweb/ [accessed 21 May 2015].
101. Stull, G. W., F. Herrera, S. R. Manchester, C. Jaramillo, and B. H. Tiffney. 2012. Fruits of an “Old World” tribe (Phytocreneae; Icacinaceae) from the Paleogene of North and South America. Systematic Botany 37: 784–794.
102. Stull, G. W., M. J. Moore, V. S. Mandala, N. A. Douglas, H.-R. Kates, X. Qi, S. F. Brockington, et al. 2013. A targeted enrichment strategy for massively parallel sequencing of angiosperm plastid genomes. Applications in Plant Sciences 1: 1200497.
103. Sun, M., D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, X. Zhu, J. G. Burleigh, and Z. Chen. 2015. Deep phylogenetic incongruence in the angiosperm clade Rosidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 83: 156–166.
104. Suzuki, Y., G. V. Glazko, and M. Nei. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 16138–16143.
105. Takhtajan, A. 1969. Flowering plants: Origin and dispersal. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
106. Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
107. Thorne, R. F. 2000. The classification and geography of the flowering plants: dicotyledons of the class Angiospermae. Botanical Review 66: 441–647.
108. Utteridge, T. M. A., H. Nagasamu, S. P. Teo, L. C. White, and P. Gasson. 2005. Sleumeria (Icacinaceae): A new genus from northern Borneo. Systematic Botany 30: 635–643.
109. van Staveren, M. G. C., and P. Baas. 1973. Epidermal leaf characters of the Malesian Icacinaceae. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 22: 329–359.
110. van Tieghem, P. 1897. Sur les Phanérogams sans graines, format la divisions des Inseminées. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 44: 99–139.
111. Villiers, J.-F. 1973. Icacinaceae. In A. Aubréville and J.-F. Leroy [eds.], Flore de Gabon, vol. 20, 3–100. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
112. Wang, H., M. J. Moore, P. S. Soltis, C. D. Bell, S. F. Brockington, R. Alexandre, and C. C. Davis. 2009. Rosid radiation and the rapid rise of angiosperm-dominated forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 3853–3858.
113. Watson, L., and M. J. Dallwitz. 1992 onward. The families of flowering plants: Descriptions, illustrations, identification, and information retrieval, version 19 August 2014. Website http://delta-intkey.com.
114. Whitfield, J. B., and P. J. Lockhart. 2007. Deciphering ancient rapid radiations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22: 258–265.
115. Wickett, N. J., S. Mirarab, N. Nguyen, T. Warnow, E. Carpenter, N. Matasci, S. Ayyampalayam, et al. 2014. A phylotranscriptomics analysis of the origin and diversification of land plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 111: E4859–E4868.
116. Wortley, A. H., P. J. Rudall, D. J. Harris, and R. W. Scotland. 2005. How much data are needed to resolve a difficult phylogeny? Case study in Lamiales. Systematic Biology 54: 697–709.
117. Wyman, S. K., R. K. Jansen, and J. L. Boore. 2004. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics 20: 3252–3255.
118. Xi, Z., L. Liu, J. S. Rest, and C. C. Davis. 2014. Coalescent versus concatenation methods and the placement of Amborella as sister to water lilies. Systematic Biology 63: 919–932.
119. Xi, Z., B. R. Ruhfel, H. Schaefer, A. M. Amorim, M. Sugumaran, K. J. Wurdack, P. K. Endress, et al. 2012. Phylogenomics and a posteriori data partitioning resolve the Cretaceous angiosperm radiation Malpighiales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 17519–17524.
120. Zerbino, D. R., and E. Birney. 2008. Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Research 18: 821–829.