An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 531-553

  Bremer, K ^a   Chase, M W ^b   Stevens, P F ^c  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b JODRELL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032442799     PISSN: 00266493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2992015     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alverson, W. S., K. G. Karol, D. A. Baum, M. W. Chase, S. M. Swensen, R. McCourt & K. J. Sytsma. 1998. Circumscription of the Malvales and relationships to other Rosidae: Evidence from rbcL sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 876-877.
2. Anderberg, A. A., B. Ståhl & M. Källersjö. 1998. Phylogenetic interrelationships in the Primulales inferred from rbcL sequence data. PI. Syst. Evol. 211: 93-102.
3. Backlund, A. & B. Bremer 1998. Phylogeny of the Asteridae s. str. based on rbcL sequences, with particular reference to the Dipsacales. Pl. Syst. Evol. 207: 225-254.
4. _ & K. Bremer 1998. To be or not to be - Principles of classification and monotypic plant families. Taxon 47: 391-400.
5. _ & N. Pyck. 1998. Diervillaceae and Linnaeaceae, two new families of caprifolioids. Taxon 47: 657-661.
6. Bakker, F. T., D. D. Vassiliades, C. Morton & V. Savolainen. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of Biebersteinia Stephan (Geraniaceae) inferred from rbcL and atpB sequence comparisons. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 127: 149-158.
7. Bayer, C., M. F. Fay, A. Y. de Bruijn, V. Savolainen, C. M. Morton, K. Kubitzki & M. W. Chase. 1999. Support for an expanded concept of Malvaceae within a recircumscribed order Malvales: A combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL DNA sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. [in press].
8. Bremer, B., R. G. Olmslead, L. Struwe & J. A. Sweere. 1994. rbcL sequences support exclusion of Retzia, Desfontainia, and Nicodemia from the Gentianales. Pl. Syst. Evol. 190: 213-230.
9. Bremer, K., B. Bremer & M. Thulin. 1995, 1996, 1997. Introduction to Phylogeny and Systematics of Flowering Plants. 1st, 2nd, 3rd eds. Compendium, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
10. _, _ & _. 1998. Classification of flowering plants. Internet http://www.systbot.uu.se/classification/overview.html.
11. Burtt, B. L. 1977. Classification above the genus, as exemplified by Gesneriaceae, with parallels from other groups. In K. Kubitzki (editor). Flowering plants: Evolution and classification of higher categories. Pl. Syst. Evol. Suppl. 1: 97-109.
12. Cantino, P. D., R. G. Olmstead & S. J. Wagstaff. 1997. A comparison of phylogenetic nomenclature with the current system: A botanical case study. Syst. Biol. 46: 313-331.
13. Chase, M. W., D. E. Soltis, R. G. Olmstead, D. Morgan, D. H. Les, B. D. Mishler, M. R. Duvall, R. A. Price, H. G. Hills, Y.-L. Qiu, K. A. Kron, J. H. Rettig, E. Conti, J. D. Palmer, J. R. Manhart, K. J. Sytsma, H. J. Michaels, W. J. Kress, K. G. Karol, W. D. Clark, M. Hedrén, B. S. Gaut, R. K. Jansen, K.-J. Kim, C. F. Wimpee, J. F. Smith, G. R. Furnier, S. H. Strauss, Q.-Y. Xiang, G. M. Plunkett, P. S. Soltis, S. M. Swensen, S. E. Williams, P. A. Gadek, C. J. Quinn, L. E. Eguiarte, E. Golenberg, G. H. Learn, Jr., S. W. Graham, S. C. H. Barrett, S. Dayanandan & V. A. Albert. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 528-580.
14. _, D. W. Stevenson, P. Wilkin & P. J. Rudall. 1995. Monocot systematics: A combined analysis. Pp. 685-730 in P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler & C. J. Humphries (editors), Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
15. Conti, E., A. Litt & K. J. Sytsma. 1996. Circumscription of Myrtales and their relationships to other rosids: Evidence from rbcL sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 83: 221-233.
16. Copeland, H. F. 1957. Forecast of a system of the dicotyledons. Madroño 14: 1-9.
17. Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
18. Dahlgren, R. M. T. 1975. A system of classification of the angiosperms to be used to demonstrate the distribution of characters. Bot. Not. 128: 119-147.
19. _, H. T. Clifford & P. F. Yeo. 1985. The Families of the Monocotyledons. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
20. Davis, P. H. 1978. The moving staircase: An analysis of taxonomic rank and affinity. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 36: 325-340.
21. De Queiroz, K. 1997. The Linnaean hierarchy and the evolutionization of taxonomy, with emphasis on the problem of nomenclature. Aliso 15: 125-144.
22. _ & J. Gauthier. 1994. Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 27-31.
23. Gadek, P. A., E. S. Fernando, C. J. Quinn, S. B. Hoot, T. Terrazas, M. C. Sheahan & M. W. Chase. 1996. Sapindales: Molecular delimitation and infraordinal groups. Amer. J. Bot. 83: 802-811.
24. _, P. G. Wilson & C. J. Quinn. 1996. Phylogenetic reconstruction in Myrtaceae using matK, with particular reference to the position of Psiloxylon and Heteropyxis. Austral. Syst. Bot. 9: 283-290.
25. Goldberg, A. 1986. Classification, evolution, and phylogeny of the families of dicotyledons. Smithsonian Contr. Bot. 58: 1-314.
26. Greuter, W., F. R. Barrie, H. M. Burdet, W. G. Chaloner, V. Demoulin, D. L. Hawksworth, P. M. Jorgensen, D. H. Nicolson, P. C. Suva, P. Trehane & J. McNeill. 1994. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. Regnum Veg. 131.
27. Gustafsson, M. H. G., A. Backlund & B. Bremer. 1996. Phylogeny of the Asterales sensu lato based on rbcL sequences with particular reference to the Goodeniaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 199: 217-242.
28. Hershkovitz, M. A. & E. A. Zimmer. 1997. On the evolutionary' origins of the cacti. Taxon 46: 217-232.
29. Heywood, V. H. 1977. Principles and concepts in the classification of higher taxa. In K. Kubitzki (editor), Flowering plants: Evolution and classification of higher categories. Pl. Syst. Evol. Suppl. 1: 1-12.