Phylogenomics and a posteriori data partitioning resolve the Cretaceous angiosperm radiation Malpighiales

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 43, 2012, Pages 17519-17524

  Xi, Zhenxiang ^a   Ruhfel, Brad R ^a,b   Schaefer, Hanno ^a,c   Amorim, André M ^d   Sugumaran, M ^e   Wurdack, Kenneth J ^f   Endress, Peter K ^g   Matthews, Merran L ^g   Stevens, Peter F ^h   Mathews, Sarah ^a   Davis, Charles C ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^d DEPARTAMENTO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS   (Brazil)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

^f SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHERRY; CLADISTICS; CODON; CRETACEOUS; ERYTHROXYLACEAE; FLOWER; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE LOCATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MALPIGHIACEAE; MALPIGHIALES; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PASSIFLORACEAE; PHYLOGENOMICS; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID GENOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TAXON;

GENOME, PLANT; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALPIGHIACEAE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84867919296     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1205818109     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Chase MW, et al. (1993) Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann Mo Bot Gard 80:528-580.
2. APG (2003) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot J Linn Soc 141:399-436.
3. Wurdack KJ, Davis CC (2009) Malpighiales phylogenetics: Gaining ground on one of the most recalcitrant clades in the angiosperm tree of life. Am J Bot 96(8):1551-1570.
4. Davis CC, Webb CO, Wurdack KJ, Jaramillo CA, Donoghue MJ (2005) Explosive radiation of Malpighiales supports a mid-cretaceous origin of modern tropical rain forests. Am Nat 165(3):E36-E65.
5. Sato S, et al. (2011) Sequence analysis of the genome of an oil-bearing tree, Jatropha curcas L. DNA Res 18(1):65-76.
6. Chan AP, et al. (2010) Draft genome sequence of the oilseed species Ricinus communis. Nat Biotechnol 28(9):951-956.
7. Tuskan GA, et al. (2006) The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313(5793):1596-1604.
8. Jansen RK, et al. (2007) Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(49):19369-19374.
9. Moore MJ, Bell CD, Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2007) Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104 (49):19363-19368.
10. Wang H, et al. (2009) Rosid radiation and the rapid rise of angiosperm-dominated forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(10):3853-3858.
11. Moore MJ, Soltis PS, Bell CD, Burleigh JG, Soltis DE (2010) Phylogenetic analysis of 83 plastid genes further resolves the early diversification of eudicots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(10):4623-4628.
12. Soltis DE, et al. (2011) Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. Am J Bot 98(4): 704-730.
13. Cronquist A (1988) The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants (New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY), 2nd Ed.
14. Webster GL (1994) Classification of the Euphorbiaceae. Ann Mo Bot Gard 81:3-32.
15. Ruhfel BR, et al. (2011) Phylogeny of the clusioid clade (Malpighiales): Evidence from the plastid and mitochondrial genomes. Am J Bot 98(2):306-325.
16. Cai ZQ, et al. (2006) Complete plastid genome sequences of Drimys, Liriodendron, and Piper: Implications for the phylogenetic relationships of magnoliids. BMC Evol Biol 6: 77.
17. Hansen DR, et al. (2007) Phylogenetic and evolutionary implications of complete chloroplast genome sequences of four early-diverging angiosperms: Buxus (Buxaceae), Chloranthus (Chloranthaceae), Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae), and Illicium (Schisandraceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 45(2):547-563. (Pubitemid 47542450)
18. Moore MJ, et al. (2011) Phylogenetic analysis of the plastid inverted repeat for 244 species: Insights into deeper-level angiosperm relationships from a long, slowly evolving sequence region. Int J Plant Sci 172:541-558.
19. Pagel M, Meade A (2004) A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting pattern-heterogeneity in gene sequence or character-state data. Syst Biol 53(4):571-581. (Pubitemid 39290200)
20. Venditti C, Meade A, Pagel M (2008) Phylogenetic mixture models can reduce node-density artifacts. Syst Biol 57(2):286-293.
21. Hurvich CM, Tsai CL (1989) Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297-307.
22. Pollock DD, Zwickl DJ, McGuire JA, Hillis DM (2002) Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference. Syst Biol 51(4):664-671. (Pubitemid 35180695)
23. Zwickl DJ, Hillis DM (2002) Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. Syst Biol 51(4):588-598. (Pubitemid 35180690)
24. Hedtke SM, Townsend TM, Hillis DM (2006) Resolution of phylogenetic con flict in large data sets by increased taxon sampling. Syst Biol 55(3):522-529.
25. McMahon MM, Sanderson MJ (2006) Phylogenetic supermatrix analysis of GenBank sequences from 2228 papilionoid legumes. Syst Biol 55(5):818-836.
26. Heath TA, Hedtke SM, Hillis DM (2008) Taxon sampling and the accuracy of phylogenetic analyses. J Syst Evol 46:239-257.
27. Burleigh JG, Hilu KW, Soltis DE (2009) Inferring phylogenies with incomplete data sets: a 5-gene, 567-taxon analysis of angiosperms. BMC Evol Biol 9:61.
28. Wiens JJ (2003) Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst Biol 52 (4):528-538.
29. Wiens JJ (2005) Can incomplete taxa rescue phylogenetic analyses from long-branch attraction? Syst Biol 54(5):731-742.
30. Wiens JJ, Fetzner JW, Parkinson CL, Reeder TW (2005) Hylid frog phylogeny and sampling strategies for speciose clades. Syst Biol 54(5):778-807.
31. Cho S, et al. (2011) Can deliberately incomplete gene sample augmentation improve a phylogeny estimate for the advanced moths and butterflies (Hexapoda: Lepidoptera)? Syst Biol 60(6):782-796.
32. Sanderson MJ, McMahon MM, Steel M (2010) Phylogenomics with incomplete taxon coverage: The limits to inference. BMC Evol Biol 10:155.
33. Sanderson MJ, McMahon MM, Steel M (2011) Terraces in phylogenetic tree space. Science 333(6041):448-450.
34. Magallón S, Sanderson MJ (2001) Absolute diversification rates in angiosperm clades. Evolution 55(9):1762-1780. (Pubitemid 32983995)
35. Smith SA, Beaulieu JM, Stamatakis A, Donoghue MJ (2011) Understanding angiosperm diversification using small and large phylogenetic trees. Am J Bot 98(3): 404-414.
36. Alfaro ME, et al. (2009) Nine exceptional radiations plus high turnover explain species diversity in jawed vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(32):13410-13414.
37. Anderson WR (1979) Floral conservatism in neotropical Malpighiaceae. Biotropica 11: 219-223.
38. Neff JL (2003) The passionflower bee: Anthemurgus passiflorae. J Newsl Passiflora Soc Int 13:7-9.
39. Zhang W, Kramer EM, Davis CC (2010) Floral symmetry genes and the origin and maintenance of zygomorphy in a plant-pollinator mutualism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(14):6388-6393.
40. Graybeal A (1998) Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst Biol 47(1):9-17.
41. Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22(21):2688-2690.
42. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J (2008) A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst Biol 57(5):758-771.