Can we identify genes with increased phylogenetic reliability?

Systematic Biology

Volumn 64, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 824-837

  Doyle, Vinson P ^a   Young, Randee E ^a,b   Naylor, Gavin J P ^c   Brown, Jeremy M ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^c School of Business   (United States)

Author keywords

Molecular clock; Phylogenomics; Posterior prediction; Rate of evolution; Systematic error

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ASCOMYCETES; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS; HUMAN; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; ASCOMYCOTA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 84946913274     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syv041     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. AkaikeH. 1974. A newlook at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 19: 716-723.
2. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. 57: 289-300.
3. Best D.J., Roberts D.E. 1975. The upper tail probabilities of Spearman's rho. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C. 24: 377-379.
4. Betancur-R.R., Li C., Munroe T.A., Ballesteros J.A., Ortí G. 2013. Addressing gene tree discordance and non-stationarity to resolve a multi-locus phylogeny of the flatfishes (Teleostei: Pleuronectiformes). Syst. Biol. 62: 763-785.
5. Betancur-R.R., Naylor G.J.P., Ortí G. 2014. Conserved genes, sampling error, and phylogenomic inference. Syst. Biol. 63: 257-262.
6. Bogdanowicz D., Giaro K. 2012. Matching split distance for unrooted binary phylogenetic trees. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 9: 150-160.
7. Bogdanowicz D., Giaro K. 2013. On a matching distance between rooted phylogenetic trees. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 23: 669-684.
8. Bogdanowicz D., Giaro K., Wróbel B. 2012. TreeCmp: Comparison of trees in polynomial time. Evol. Bioinforma. 8: 475-487.
9. Bollback J.P. 2002. Bayesian model adequacy and choice in phylogenetics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 1171-1180.
10. Boussau B., Blanquart S., Necsulea A., Lartillot N., Gouy M. 2008. Parallel adaptations to high temperatures in the Archaean eon. Nature 456: 942-945.
11. Brinkmann H., van der Giezen M., Zhou Y., Poncelin de Raucourt G., Philippe H. 2005.Anempirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phylogenomics. Syst. Biol. 54: 743-757.
12. Brown J.M. 2014. Detection of implausible phylogenetic inferences using posterior predictive assessment of model fit. Syst. Biol. 63: 334-348.
13. Brown J.M., ElDabaje R. 2009. PuMA: Bayesian analysis of partitioned (and unpartitioned) model adequacy. Bioinformatics 25: 537-538.
14. Brown J.M., Lemmon A.R. 2007. The importance of data partitioning and the utility of Bayes factors in Bayesian phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 56: 643-655.
15. Castoe T.A., de Koning A.J., Kim H.-M., Gu W., Noonan B.P., Naylor G., Jiang Z.J., Parkinson C.L., Pollock D.D. 2009. Evidence for an ancient adaptive episode of convergent molecular evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 8986-8991.
16. Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 540-552.
17. Chiari Y., Cahais V., Galtier N., Delsuc F. 2012. Phylogenomic analyses support the position of turtles as the sister group of birds and crocodiles (Archosauria). BMC Biol. 10: 65.
18. CrawfordN.G., Faircloth B.C., McCormack J.E., Brumfield R.T.,Winker K., Glenn T.C. 2012. More than 1000 ultraconserved elements provide evidence that turtles are the sister group of archosaurs. Biol. Lett. 8: 783-786.
19. Dunn C.W., Hejnol A., Matus D.Q., Pang K., Browne W.E., Smith S.A., Seaver E., Rouse G.W., Obst M., Edgecombe G.D., Sørensen M.V, Haddock S.H.D., Schmidt-Rhaesa A., Okusu A., Kristensen R.M., Wheeler W.C., Martindale M.Q., Giribet G. 2008. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452: 745-749.
20. Edgar R.C. 2004. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: 1792-1797.
21. Faircloth B.C., McCormack J.E., Crawford N.G., Harvey M.G., Brumfield R.T., Glenn T.C. 2012. Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales. Syst. Biol. 61: 717-726.
22. Felsenstein J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27: 401-410.
23. Felsenstein J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences, a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17: 368-376.
24. Felsenstein J. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer
25. Gee H. 2003. Evolution: Ending incongruence. Nature 425: 782.
26. Goldman N. 1993a. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 36: 182-198.
27. Goldman N. 1993b. Simple diagnostic statistical tests of models for DNA substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 37: 650-661.
28. Hess J., Goldman N. 2011. Addressing inter-gene heterogeneity in maximum likelihood phylogenomic analysis: Yeasts revisited. PLoS One 6: E22783.
29. Jeffroy O., Brinkmann H., Delsuc F., Philippe H. 2006. Phylogenomics: The beginning of incongruence? Trends Genet. 22: 225-231.
30. Katoh K., Toh H. 2008. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Brief. Bioinform. 9: 286-298.
31. Kent W.J. 2002. BLAT - The BLAST-like Alignment Tool. Genome Res. 12: 656-664.
32. Kimura M. 1964. Diffusion models in population genetics. J. Appl. Probab. 1: 177-232.
33. Kimura M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 217: 624-626.
34. Kumar S., Filipski A.J., Battistuzzi F.U., Kosakovsky Pond S.L., Tamura K. 2012. Statistics and truth in phylogenomics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29: 457-472.
35. Lanfear R.,Welch J.J., Bromham L. 2010.Watching the clock: Studying variation in rates of molecular evolution between species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 495-503.
36. LartillotN., Philippe H. 2004.ABayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 1095-1109.
37. Lartillot N., Philippe H. 2008. Improvement of molecular phylogenetic inference and the phylogeny of Bilateria. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 363: 1463-1472.
38. Lemmon A. 2007. MrConverge. Program distributed by the author.
39. Lin Y., Rajan V., Moret B.M.E. 2012. A metric for phylogenetic trees based on matching. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 9: 1014-1022.
40. Lopez P., Brinkmann H., Budin K., Laurent J., Moreira D., Guyader L. 2000. Early-branching or fast-evolving eukaryotes? An answer based on slowly evolving positions. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 267: 1213-1221.
41. MaddisonW.P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46: 523-536.
42. Nabholz B., KünstnerA.,Wang R., Jarvis E., EllegrenH. 2011. Dynamic evolution of base composition: Causes and consequences in avian phylogenomics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28: 2197-2210.
43. Nosenko T., Schreiber F., Adamska M., Adamski M., Eitel M., Hammel J., Maldonado M., Müller W.E.G., Nickel M., Schierwater B., Vacelet J., Wiens M., Wörheide G. 2013. Deep metazoan phylogeny: When different genes tell different stories. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 67: 223-233.
44. Nozaki H., Iseki M., Hasegawa M., Misawa K., Nakada T., Sasaki N., Watanabe M. 2007. Phylogeny of primary photosynthetic eukaryotes as deduced from slowly evolving nuclear genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1592-1595.
45. Nylander J.A.A. 2004. MrModelTest. Program distributed by the author.
46. Pamilo P., Nei M. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5: 568-583.
47. Penny D., Foulds L.R.,HendyM.D. 1982.Testing the theory of evolution by comparing phylogenetic trees constructed from five different protein sequences. Nature 297: 197-200.
48. Philippe H., Brinkmann H., Lavrov D.V., Littlewood D.T.J., Manuel M., Wörheide G., Baurain D. 2011. Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: Why more sequences are not enough. PLoS Biol. 9: E1000602.
49. Philippe H., Delsuc F., Brinkmann H., LartillotN. 2005. Phylogenomics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 541-562.
50. Philippe H., Derelle R., Lopez P., Pick K., Borchiellini C., Boury- Esnault N., Vacelet J., Renard E., Houliston E., Quéinnec E., Da Silva C., Wincker P., Le Guyader H., Leys S., Jackson D.J., Schreiber F., Erpenbeck D., Morgenstern B., Wörheide G., Manuel M. 2009. Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal relationships. Curr. Biol. 19: 706-712.
51. Philippe H., Douady C.J. 2003. Horizontal gene transfer and phylogenetics. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6: 498-505.
52. Phillips M.J., Delsuc F., Penny D. 2004. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 1455-1458.
53. R Core Development Team. 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
54. Rambaut A., Grassly N.C. 1997. Seq-Gen: An application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13: 235-238.
55. Robinson D.F., Foulds L.R. 1981. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math. Biosci. 53: 131-147.
56. Rokas A., Williams B.L., King N., Carroll S.B. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425: 798-804.
57. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
58. Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A., Huelsenbeck J.P. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61: 539-542.
59. Salichos L., RokasA. 2013. Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Nature 497: 327-331.
60. Schierwater B., Eitel M., JakobW., Osigus H.-J., Hadrys H., Dellaporta S.L., Kolokotronis S.-O., Desalle R. 2009. Concatenated analysis sheds light on early metazoan evolution and fuels a modern "urmetazoon" hypothesis. PLoS Biol. 7: E20.
61. Steel M., Penny D. 2000. Parsimony, likelihood, and the role of models in molecular phylogenetics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 839-850.
62. Sukumaran J., Holder M.T. 2010. DendroPy: A Python library for phylogenetic computing. Bioinformatics 26: 1569-1571.
63. Swofford D.L. 2003. PAUP∗. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
64. Tillier E.R.M., Collins R.A. 1995. Neighbor joining and maximum likelihood with RNA sequences: Addressing the interdependence of sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12: 7-15.
65. Wapinski I., PfefferA., FriedmanN.,RegevA. 2007.Automatic genomewide reconstruction of phylogenetic gene trees. Bioinformatics 23: I549-i558.
66. Yang Z. 1994.Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation fromDNA sequences with variable rates over sites: Approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39: 306-314.
67. Zhong B., Deusch O., Goremykin V.V., Penny D., Biggs P.J., Atherton R.A., Nikiforova S.V., Lockhart P.J. 2011. Systematic error in seed plant phylogenomics. Genome Biol. Evol. 3: 1340-1348.
68. Zwickl D.J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence data sets under the maximum likelihood criterion [Ph.D. dissertation]. The University of Texas at Austin.