Addressing inter-gene heterogeneity in maximum likelihood phylogenomic analysis: Yeasts revisited

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 8, 2011, Pages

  Hess, Jaqueline ^a,b   Goldman, Nick ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASCOMYCETES; DATA ANALYSIS; FUNGAL GENETICS; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENOMICS; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIVERSITY; VALIDITY; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; YEAST;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PHYLOGENY; YEASTS;

EID: 79961133759     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022783     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Philippe H, Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Lartillot N, (2005) Phylogenomics. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 541-562.
2. Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Lavrov DV, Littlewood DTJ, Manuel M, et al. (2011) Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: why more sequences are not enough. PLoS Biol 9: e1000602.
3. Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA, (2009) Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 332-340.
4. Rokas A, Williams BL, King N, Carroll SB, (2003) Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425: 798-804.
5. Delsuc F, Phillips MJ, Penny D, (2003) Comment on "hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic?". Science 301: 1482; author reply 1482.
6. Brinkmann H, van der Giezen M, Zhou Y, de Raucourt GP, Philippe H, (2005) An empirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phylogenomics. Syst Biol 54: 743-757.
7. Nishihara H, Okada N, Hasegawa M, (2007) Rooting the eutherian tree: the power and pitfalls of phylogenomics. Genome Biol 8: R199.
8. Uzzell T, Corbin KW, (1971) Fitting discrete probability distributions to evolutionary events. Science 172: 1089-1096.
9. Yang Z, (1994) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from dna sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol 39: 306-314.
10. Whelan S, Goldman N, (2001) A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol Biol Evol 18: 691-699.
11. Le SQ, Gascuel O, (2008) An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol Biol Evol 25: 1307-20.
12. Le SQ, Gascuel O, (2010) Accounting for solvent accessibility and secondary structure in protein phylogenetics is clearly beneficial. Syst Biol 59: 277-87.
13. Lartillot N, Philippe H, (2004) A bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol Biol Evol 21: 1095-1109.
14. Lopez P, Casane D, Philippe H, (2002) Heterotachy, an important process of protein evolution. Mol Biol Evol 19: 1-7.
15. Pagel M, Meade A, (2008) Modelling heterotachy in phylogenetic inference by reversible-jump markov chain monte carlo. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363: 3955-3964.
16. Whelan S, (2008) Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in nucleotide sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol 25: 1683-1694.
17. Lockhart P, Steel M, Hendy M, Penny D, (1994) Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence. Mol Biol Evol 11: 605-612.
18. Ho SY, Jermiin L, (2004) Tracing the decay of the historical signal in biological sequence data. Syst Biol 53: 623-637.
19. Jeffroy O, Brinkmann H, Delsuc F, Philippe H, (2006) Phylogenomics: the beginning of incongruence? Trends Genet 22: 225-231.
20. Rodríguez-Ezpeleta N, Brinkmann H, Roure B, Lartillot N, Lang BF, et al. (2007) Detecting and overcoming systematic errors in genome-scale phylogenies. Syst Biol 56: 389-399.
21. Phillips MJ, Delsuc F, Penny D, (2004) Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol Biol Evol 21: 1455-1458.
22. Ren F, Tanaka H, Yang Z, (2008) A likelihood look at the supermatrix-supertree controversy. Gene 441: 119-125.
23. Le SQ, Lartillot N, Gascuel O, (2008) Phylogenetic mixture models for proteins. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363: 3965-3976.
24. Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ, (2003) Phylogenetic relationships among yeasts of the 'saccharomyces complex' determined from multigene sequence analyses. FEMS Yeast Res 3: 417-432.
25. Diezmann S, Cox CJ, Schönian G, Vilgalys RJ, Mitchell TG, (2004) Phylogeny and evolution of medical species of candida and related taxa: a multigenic analysis. J Clin Microbiol 42: 5624-5635.
26. Tsui CK, Daniel HM, Robert V, Meyer W, (2008) Re-examining the phylogeny of clinically relevant candida species and allied genera based on multigene analyses. FEMS Yeast Res 8: 651-659.
27. Schoch C, Sung GH, Lopez-Giraldez F, Townsend J, Miadlikowska J, et al. (2009) The ascomycota tree of life: A phylum-wide phylogeny clarifies the origin and evolution of fundamental reproductive and ecological traits. Systematic Biology 58: 224-239.
28. Bofkin L, (2005) The Causes and Consequences of Variation in Evolutionary Processes Acting on DNA Sequences. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
29. Fitzpatrick DA, Logue ME, Stajich JE, Butler G, (2006) A fungal phylogeny based on 42 complete genomes derived from supertree and combined gene analysis. BMC Evol Biol 6: 99.
30. Kuramae EE, Robert V, Snel B, Weiss M, Boekhout T, (2006) Phylogenomics reveal a robust fungal tree of life. FEMS Yeast Res 6: 1213-1220.
31. Cornell MJ, Alam I, Soanes DM, Wong HM, Hedeler C, et al. (2007) Comparative genome analysis across a kingdom of eukaryotic organisms: specialization and diversification in the fungi. Genome Res 17: 1809-1822.
32. Kuramae EE, Robert V, Echavarri-Erasun C, Boekhout T, (2007) Cophenetic correlation analysis as a strategy to select phylogenetically informative proteins: an example from the fungal kingdom. BMC Evol Biol 7: 134-134.
33. Marcet-Houben M, Gabaldón T, (2009) The tree versus the forest: the fungal tree of life and the topological diversity within the yeast phylome. PLoS One 4.
34. Hess J, (2011) Evolution of Transcription Factor Repertoires in the Saccharomycotina. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
35. Yang Z, Goldman N, Friday A, (1994) Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation. Mol Biol Evol 11: 316-324.
36. Sullivan J, Swofford DL, (1997) Are guinea pigs rodents? the importance of adequate models in molecular phylogenetics. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 4: 77-86.
37. Dujon B, Sherman D, Fischer G, et al. (2004) Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature 430: 35-44.
38. Wapinski I, Pfeffer A, Friedman N, Regev A, (2007) Automatic genome-wide reconstruction of phylogenetic gene trees. Bioinformatics 23: i549-i558.
39. Byrne KP, Wolfe KH, (2006) Visualizing syntenic relationships among the hemiascomycetes with the yeast gene order browser. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D452-D455.
40. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped blast and psi-blast: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389-3402.
41. Katoh K, Toh H, (2008) Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Briefings in bioinformatics 9: 286-298.
42. Castresana J, (2000) Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 17: 540-552.
43. Kent WJ, (2002) Blat-the blast-like alignment tool. Genome Res 12: 656-664.
44. Jukes T, Cantor C, (1969) Mammalian protein metabolism New York Academic Press pp. 21-132 chapter Evolution of protein molecules.
45. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T, (1985) Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial dna. J Mol Evol 22: 160-174.
46. Tavaré S, (1986) Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of dna sequences. pp. 57-86 In: Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences. volume 17.
47. Rodríguez F, Oliver JL, Marín A, Medina JR, (1990) The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J Theor Biol 142: 485-501.
48. Goldman N, Whelan S, (2002) A novel use of equilibrium frequencies in models of sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol 19: 1821-1831.
49. Yang Z, (2009) Paml: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihoodhttp://abacus.gene.ucl.ac.uk/software/pamlDOC.pdf.
50. Yang Z, (2007) Paml 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1586-1591.
51. Yang Z, (2006) Computational Molecular Evolution Oxford University Press.
52. Whelan S, (2007) New approaches to phylogenetic tree search and their application to large numbers of protein alignments. Syst Biol 56: 727-740.
53. Felsenstein J, (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
54. Sugita T, Nakase T, (1999) Nonuniversal usage of the leucine cug codon in yeasts: Investigation of basidiomycetous yeast. J Gen Appl Microbiol 45: 193-197.
55. Santos MA, Tuite MF, (1995) The cug codon is decoded in vivo as serine and not leucine in candida albicans. Nucleic Acids Res 23: 1481-6.
56. Kishino H, Hasegawa M, (1989) Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from dna sequence data, and the branching order in hominoidea. J Mol Evol 29: 170-179.
57. Felsenstein J, (2004) Inferring Phylogenies Massachusetts Sinauer Associates Inc.
58. Akaike H, (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on 19: 716-723.
59. Posada D, Buckley TR, (2004) Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst Biol 53: 793-808.
60. Burnham KP, Anderson DR, (2004) Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection. Sociological Methods Research 33: 261-304.
61. Schwarz G, (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics 6: 461-464.
62. Weaklim DL, (1999) A critique of the bayesian information criterion for model selection. Sociological Methods Research 27: 359-397.
63. Robinson DF, Foulds LR, (1981) Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Mathematical Biosciences 53: 131-147.
64. Ripplinger J, Sullivan J, (2008) Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis? Syst Biol 57: 76-85.
65. Rokas A, Chatzimanolis S, (2008) From gene-scale to genome-scale phylogenetics: the data flood in, but the challenges remain. Methods Mol Biol 422: 1-12.
66. Whelan S, de Bakker PIW, Goldman N, (2003) Pandit: a database of protein and associated nucleotide domains with inferred trees. Bioinformatics 19: 1556-1563.
67. Scannell DR, Byrne KP, Gordon JL, Wong S, Wolfe KH, (2006) Multiple rounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts. Nature 440: 341-345.
68. Wu Q, James SA, Roberts IN, Moulton V, Huber KT, (2008) Exploring contradictory phylogenetic relationships in yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res 8: 641-50.
69. Nesnidal MP, Helmkampf M, Bruchhaus I, Hausdorf B, (2010) Compositional heterogeneity and phylogenomic inference of metazoan relationships. Mol Biol Evol 27: 2095-104.