The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) is a responsive instrument for assessing the outcome of treatment for adult spinal deformity

European Spine Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 2638-2648

  Mannion, A F ^a   Vila Casademunt, A ^b   Domingo Sabat M ^b   Wunderlin, S ^a   Pellise F ^c   Bago, J ^c   Acaroglu, E ^d   Alanay, A ^e   Perez Grueso F S ^f   Obeid, I ^g   Kleinstuck F S ^a  

^a SCHULTHESS CLINIC   (Switzerland)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI VALL D HEBRON   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI VALL D HEBRON   (Spain)

^d Ankara ART Center   (Turkey)

^e Istanbul Acibadem Maslak Hospital   (Turkey)

^f HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LA PAZ   (Spain)

^g HÔPITAL PELLEGRIN   (France)

Author keywords

Adult deformity; Core outcome measures; Non operative treatment; SRS 22; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORE OUTCOME MEASURES INDEX; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLOBAL RATING OF CHANGE SCALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RESEARCH SOCIETY 22 INSTRUMENT; SHORT FORM 36; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE SURGERY; TREATMENT DURATION; DISABILITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SPINE DISEASE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE; ROC CURVE; SPINAL CURVATURES; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84945560391     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: 14320932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4292-4     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJHM, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 23:2003–2013
2. Chiarotto A, Deyo RA, Terwee CB, Boers M, Buchbinder R, Corbin TP, Costa LO, Foster NE, Grotle M, Koes BW, Kovacs FM, Lin CW, Maher CG, Pearson AM, Peul WC, Schoene ML, Turk DC, van Tulder MW, Ostelo RW (2015) Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3892-3
3. Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Dvorak J, Boos N (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14:1014–1026
4. Ferrer M, Pellise F, Escudero O, Alvarez L, Pont A, Alonso J, Deyo R (2006) Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain. Spine 31:1372–1379 (discussion 1380)
5. Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstück F, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: part 1. The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in clinical practice. Eur Spine J 18:367–373
6. Mannion AF, Boneschi M, Teli M, Luca A, Zaina F, Negrini S, Schulz PJ (2012) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 21:S737–S749
7. Genevay S, Cedraschi C, Marty M, Rozenberg S, De Goumoens P, Faundez A, Balague F, Porchet F, Mannion AF (2011) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J 21:130–137
8. Damasceno LH, Rocha PA, Barbosa ES, Barros CA, Canto FT, Defino HL, Mannion AF (2011) Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the Brazilian-Portuguese language. Eur Spine J 21:1273–1282
9. Miekisiak G, Kollataj M, Dobrogowski J, Kloc W, Libionka W, Banach M, Latka D, Sobolewski T, Sulewski A, Nowakowski A, Kiwic G, Pala A, Potaczek T (2012) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Polish version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain. Eur Spine J 22:995–1001. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2607-2
10. Storheim K, Brox JI, Lochting I, Werner EL, Grotle M (2012) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain. Eur Spine J 21:2539–2549. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2393-x
11. Qiao J, Zhu F, Zhu Z, Xu L, Wang B, Yu Y, Qian BP, Ding Y, Qiu Y (2013) Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI). Eur Spine J 22:2821–2826. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2761-1
12. Monticone M, Ferrante S, Maggioni S, Grenat G, Checchia GA, Testa M, Teli MG, Mannion AF (2014) Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the neck. Eur Spine J 23:863–872. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-3092-y
13. Genevay S, Marty M, Courvoisier DS, Foltz V, Mahieu G, Demoulin C, Fontana AG, Norberg M, de Goumoens P, Cedraschi C, Rozenberg S, Section Rachisde la Societe Francaise de R (2014) Validity of the French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain patients: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J 23:2097–2104. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3325-8
14. Roder C, Chavanne A, Mannion AF, Grob D, Aebi M, El-Kerdi A (2005) SSE Spine Tango–content, workflow, set-up. www.eurospine.org-Spine Tango. A European spine registry. Eur Spine J 14:920–924
15. Melloh M, Staub L, Aghayev E, Zweig T, Barz T, Theis JC, Chavanne A, Grob D, Aebi M, Roeder C (2008) The international spine registry SPINE TANGO: status quo and first results. Eur Spine J 17:1201–1209
16. Zweig T, Mannion AF, Grob D, Melloh M, Munting E, Tuschel A, Aebi M, Roder C (2009) How to Tango: a manual for implementing Spine Tango. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):312–320
17. Neukamp M, Perler G, Pigott T, Munting E, Aebi M, Roder C (2013) Spine Tango annual report 2012. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 5):767–786. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2943-x
18. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL (1991) Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Controll Clin Trials 12(Suppl):142–158
19. Kirschner Guyatt A (1985) A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chron Dis 38:27–36
20. Mannion AF, Fekete TF, Wertli MM, Mattle M, Nauer S, Kleinstuck FS, Jeszenszky D, Haschtmann D, Becker HJ, Porchet F (2015) Could less be more when assessing patient-rated outcome in spinal stenosis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:710–718. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000751
21. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, Homel P, Merola AA, Grogan DP, Pugh L, Lowe TG, Murray M (1999) Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1435–1440
22. Asher MA, Min Lai S, Burton DC (2000) Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2381–2386
23. Asher MA, Lai SM, Glattes RC, Burton DC, Alanay A, Bago J (2006) Refinement of the SRS-22 health-related quality of life questionnaire function domain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:593–597. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000201331.50597.ea
24. Bridwell KH, Cats-Baril W, Harrast J, Berven S, Glassman S, Farcy JP, Horton WC, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Radake T (2005) The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared with the Oswestry and SF-12: a study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:455–461
25. Bago J, Climent JM, Ey A, Perez-Grueso FJ, Izquierdo E (2004) The Spanish version of the SRS-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis: transcultural adaptation and reliability analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:1676–1680
26. Pellise F, Vila-Casademunt A, Ferrer M, Domingo-Sabat M, Bago J, Perez-Grueso FJ, Alanay A, Mannion AF, Acaroglu E (2015) Impact on health related quality of life of adult spinal deformity (ASD) compared with other chronic conditions. Eur Spine J 24:3–11. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3542-1
27. Genevay S, Cedraschi C, Marty M, Rozenberg S, de Goumoens P, Faundez A, Balague F, Porchet F, Mannion A (2009) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI). Eur Spine J 18:S478
28. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273
29. Ware JE (2000) SF-36 health survey update. Spine 25:3130–3139
30. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Willan A, Griffith LE (1994) Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol 47:81–87. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(94)90036-1
31. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42
32. Streiner DL, Norman GR (1995) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press Inc., Oxford
33. Andresen EM (2000) Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:S15–S20
34. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD (2000) Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 53:459–468. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00206-1
35. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845
36. Bowling A (2005) Just one question: if one question works, why ask several? J Epidemiol Commun Health 59:342–345
37. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I (2002) Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 324:1183
38. Hyland ME (2003) A brief guide to the selection of quality of life instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:24
39. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR (1995) Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4:293–307
40. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR (1998) Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 2:1–74 (i–iv)
41. Deyo RA, Dworkin SF, Amtmann D, Andersson G, Borenstein D, Carragee E, Carrino J, Chou R, Cook K, DeLitto A, Goertz C, Khalsa P, Loeser J, Mackey S, Panagis J, Rainville J, Tosteson T, Turk D, Von Korff M, Weiner DK (2014) Focus article: report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 23:2028–2045. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3540-3
42. Klemencsics I, Lazary A, Valasek T, Szoverfi Z, Bozsodi A, Eltes P, Fekete TF, Varga PP (2015) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hungarian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the back (COMI Back). Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3750-8
43. Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstuck FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 18:374–379
44. Bess S, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton D, Cunningham M, Shaffrey C, Shelokov A, Hostin R, Schwab F, Wood K, Akbarnia B (2009) Pain and disability determine treatment modality for older patients with adult scoliosis, while deformity guides treatment for younger patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2186–2190. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b05146
45. Abbott JH, Schmitt JS (2014) The Patient-specific functional scale was valid for group-level change comparisons and between-group discrimination. J Clin Epidemiol 67:681–688. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.002
46. Balague F, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Cedraschi C (2007) Clinical update: low back pain. Lancet 369:726–728
47. Weiner BK (2003) Letter Re: Walsh TL, Hanscom B, Lurie JD, et al. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry disability index, MODEMS, and the SF-36. Spine 2003;28:607–15. Spine 28:2304–2305
48. Beurskens AJHM, de Vet HCW, Köke AJA (1996) Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 65:71–76
49. Campbell H, Rivero-Arias O, Johnston K, Gray A, Fairbank J, Frost H (2006) Responsiveness of objective, disease-specific, and generic outcome measures in patients with chronic low back pain: an assessment for improving, stable, and deteriorating patients. Spine 31:815–822
50. George SZ, Hirsch AT (2005) Distinguishing patient satisfaction with treatment delivery from treatment effect: a preliminary investigation of patient satisfaction with symptoms after physical therapy treatment of low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:1338–1344