Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Polish version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain

European Spine Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 995-1001

  Miekisiak, Grzegorz ^a   Kollataj, Marta ^b   Dobrogowski, Jan ^b   Kloc, Wojciech ⁱ   Libionka, Witold ^c   Banach, Mariusz ^d   Latka, Dariusz ^e   Sobolewski, Tomasz ^e   Sulewski, Adam ^f   Nowakowski, Andrzej ^f   Kiwic, Grzegorz ^g   Pala, Adam ^h   Potaczek, Tomasz ^b  

^a Specialist Medical Center   (Poland)

^b JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^c Pomeranian Traumatology Center   (Poland)

^d Sokolowski Hospital   (Poland)

^e Regional Medical Center   (Poland)

^f POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Poland)

^g Regional Specialist Hospital   (Poland)

^h Spine Department   (Poland)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF WARMIA AND MAZURY IN OLSZTYN   (Poland)

Author keywords

COMI; Low back pain; Questionnaire; Validation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CORE OUTCOME MEASURES INDEX; CULTURAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL LEAVE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL DISABILITY; WELLBEING; WORK DISABILITY;

ADULT; AGED; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; POLAND; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TRANSLATIONS;

EID: 84878230618     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: 14320932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2607-2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Mannion AF, Boneschi M, Teli M, Luca A, Zaina F, Negrini S, Schulz PJ (2011) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1741-6
2. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(22):2940-2952 (discussion 2952)
3. Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(24):3115-3124
4. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, Abenhaim L, Wood-Dauphinee S, Lamping DL, Williams JI (1995) The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: measurement properties. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(3):341-352
5. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research: a proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(18):2003-2013
6. Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Dvorak J, Jacobshagen N, Semmer NK, Boos N (2007) Predictors of multidimensional outcome after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 16(6):777-786. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0255-0
7. Ferrer M, Pellise F, Escudero O, Alvarez L, Pont A, Alonso J, Deyo R (2006) Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(12):1372-1379. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000218477.53318.bc (discussion 1380)
8. Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Dvorak J, Boos N (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14(10):1014-1026. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0911-9
9. White P, Lewith G, Prescott P (2004) The core outcomes for neck pain: validation of a new outcome measure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(17):1923-1930
10. Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstuck FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 18 Suppl 3:374-379. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0931-y
11. Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstuck FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice. Eur Spine J 18 Suppl 3:367-373. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0942-8
12. Genevay S, Cedraschi C, Marty M, Rozenberg S, De Goumoens P, Faundez A, Balague F, Porchet F, Mannion AF (2012) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J 21(1):130-137. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1992-2
13. Damasceno LH, Rocha PA, Barbosa ES, Barros CA, Canto FT, Defino HL, Mannion AF (2011) Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the Brazilian-Portuguese language. Eur Spine J. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2100-3
14. Storheim K, Brox JI, Lochting I, Werner EL, Grotle M (2012) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain. Eur Spine J. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012- 2393-x
15. Fankhauser CD, Mutter U, Aghayev E, Mannion AF (2012) Validity and responsiveness of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the neck. Eur Spine J 21(1):101-114. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1921-4
16. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(24):3186-3191
17. COMI back. EuroSpine, the Spine Society of Europe. http://www.eurospine. org/cm-data/SSE-lowback-COMI-E.pdf. Accessed 3 July 2012
18. Opara J, Szary S, Kucharz E (2006) Polish cultural adaptation of the Roland-Morris Questionnaire for evaluation of quality of life in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(23):2744-2746. doi: 10.1097/01.brs. 0000244632.76447.62
19. Hyland ME (2003) A brief guide to the selection of quality of life instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:24. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-24
20. Andresen EM (2000) Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81(12 Suppl 2):S15-S20
21. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR (1995) Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4(4):293-307
22. Feise RJ, Michael Menke J (2001) Functional rating index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(1):78-86 (discussion 87)
23. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420
24. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
25. Beaton DE (2000) Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness. Spine 25(24):3192
26. Mannion A, Junge A, Fairbank JCT, Dvorak J, Grob D (2006) Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Eur Spine J 15(1):55-65
27. Bombardier C (2000) Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(24):3100-3103
28. Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, Korsholm L, Grunnet-Nilsson N (2006) Danish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity in two different populations. Eur Spine J 15(11):1705-1716
29. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Fulton C (1991) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Int J Rehabil Res 14(4):364