Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hungarian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the back (COMI Back)

European Spine Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 257-264

  Klemencsics, Istvan ^a,b   Lazary, Aron ^a   Valasek, Tamas ^b   Szoverfi, Zsolt ^a,b   Bozsodi, Arpad ^a,b   Eltes, Peter ^a,b   Fekete, Tamás Fülöp ^c   Varga, Peter Pal ^a  

^a National Center for Spinal Disorders Buda Health Center   (Hungary)

^b SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^c SCHULTHESS CLINIC   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Clinimetric properties; Low back pain; Outcome measure; Quality of Life; Questionnaire; Reliability; Responsiveness; Spine surgery; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORE OUTCOME MEASURE INDEX; CROSS CULTURAL ADAPTATION; CULTURAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION PROCESS; AGED; DISABILITY; HUNGARY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMETRY; PUBLICATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; TRANSCULTURAL CARE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; CULTURALLY COMPETENT CARE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; HUNGARY; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TRANSLATIONS;

EID: 84958149202     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: 14320932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3750-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M et al (2012) Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380(9859):2163–2196. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2
2. Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK et al (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14(10):1014–1026. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0911-9
3. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R et al (2002) Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 324(7347):1183
4. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B et al (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(18):2003–2013
5. Genevay S, Cedraschi C, Marty M, Rozenberg S, De Goumoens P, Faundez A et al (2012) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J 21(1):130–137. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1992-2
6. Mannion AF, Boneschi M, Teli M, Luca A, Zaina F, Negrini S et al (2012) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 6):S737–S749. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1741-6
7. Damasceno LH, Rocha PA, Barbosa ES, Barros CA, Canto FT, Defino HL et al (2012) Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the Brazilian-Portuguese language. Eur Spine J 21(7):1273–1282. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-2100-3
8. Storheim K, Brox JI, Lochting I, Werner EL, Grotle M (2012) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain. Eur Spine J 21(12):2539–2549. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2393-x
9. Miekisiak G, Kollataj M, Dobrogowski J, Kloc W, Libionka W, Banach M et al (2013) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Polish version of the core outcome measures index for low back pain. Eur Spine J 22(5):995–1001. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2607-2
10. Qiao J, Zhu F, Zhu Z, Xu L, Wang B, Yu Y et al (2013) Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI). Eur Spine J 22(12):2821–2826. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2761-1
11. Zweig T, Mannion AF, Grob D, Melloh M, Munting E, Tuschel A et al (2009) How to Tango: a manual for implementing Spine Tango. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):312–320. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1074-x
12. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(24):3186–3191
13. Valasek T, Varga PP, Szövérfi Z, Kümin M, Fairbank J, Lazary A (2013) Reliability and validity study on the Hungarian versions of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Eur Spine J 22(5):1010–1018
14. Paulik E, Belec B, Molnar R, Muller A, Belicza E, Kullmann L et al (2007) Applicability of the abbreviated version of the World Health Organization’s quality of life questionnaire in Hungary. Orv Hetil 148(4):155–160. doi:10.1556/OH.2007.27854
15. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
16. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD (2000) Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 53(5):459–468
17. Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstuck FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V et al (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):374–379. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-0931-y
18. Fankhauser CD, Mutter U, Aghayev E, Mannion AF (2012) Validity and responsiveness of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the neck. Eur Spine J 21(1):101–114. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1921-4
19. Hyland ME (2003) A brief guide to the selection of quality of life instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:24. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-1-24
20. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ (1996) Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 65(1):71–76