Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the core outcome measures index (COMI) for the neck

European Spine Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 863-872

  Monticone, Marco ^a   Ferrante, Simona ^b   Maggioni, Serena ^a   Grenat, Gisel ^c   Checchia, Giovanni A ^c   Testa, Marco ^d   Teli, Marco G ^e   Mannion, Anne F ^f  

^a Institute of Care and Research   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^c SANTA CORONA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^e Department of Orthopaedics Regional Hospital   (Italy)

^f SCHULTHESS CLINIC   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Chronic neck pain; COMI neck; Outcome; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CHRONIC PAIN; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CORE OUTCOME MEASUREMENT INDEX FOR NECK PAIN; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NECK PAIN; NECK PAIN AND DISABILITY SCALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION CARE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDATION STUDY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; YOUNG ADULT; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DISABILITY; ITALY; LANGUAGE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; AGED; CHRONIC PAIN; CULTURE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; ITALY; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NECK PAIN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84897433593     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: 14320932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-3092-y     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Cotè P, van der Velde G, Cassidy D, Carroll LJ, Hogg-Johnson S, Holm LW et al (2008) The burden and determinants of neck pain in workers. The Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(Suppl):S60-S74
2. Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, Holm LW, Cassidy JD, Guzman J et al (2008) The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population. The Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(Suppl):S39-S51
3. Deyo R, Battie M, Beurskens A, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:2003-2013
4. Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstuck FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):367-373
5. Mannion A, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer N, Jacobshagen N, Dvorak J, Boos N (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14:1014-1026 (Pubitemid 41798055)
6. Ferrer M, Pellisé F, Escudero O, Alvarez L, Pont A, Alonso J, Deyo R (2006) Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:1372-1379
7. Zweig T, Mannion AF, Grob D, Melloh M, Munting E, Tuschel A, Aebi M, Roder C (2009) How to Tango: a manual for implementing Spine Tango. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):312-320
8. White P, Lewith G, Prescott P (2004) The core outcomes for neck pain: validation of a new outcome measure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:1923-1930
9. Fankhauser CD, Mutter U, Aghayev E, Mannion AF (2012) Validity and responsiveness of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the neck. Eur Spine J 21(1):101-114
10. Mannion AF, Boneschi M, Teli M, Luca A, Zaina F, Negrini S, Schulz PJ (2012) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 6):S737-S749
11. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F et al (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3186-3191
12. Kamper SJ, Ostelo RWJG, Knol DL, Maher CG, de Vet HCW, Hancock MJ (2010) Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. J Clin Epidemiol 63:760-766
13. Wheeler AH, Goolkasian P, Baird AC, Darden BV 2nd (1999) Development of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale: item analysis, face, and criterion-related validity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(13):1290-1294
14. Monticone M, Baiardi P, Nido N, Righini C, Tomba A, Giovanazzi E (2008) Development of the Italian version of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale, NPDS-I. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(13):E429-E434
15. Brooks R (2003) The measurement and valuation of health status using EQ-5D: a European perspective evidence from EuroQol BIOMED research programme. Kluwer, Dordrecht
16. Savoia E, Fantini MP, Pandolfi PP, Dallolio L, Collina N (2006) Assessing the construct validity of the Italian version of the EQ-5D: preliminary results from a cross-sectional study in North Italy. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:47
17. Prieto L, Sacristan JA (2004) What is the value of social values? The uselessness of assessing health-related quality of life through preference measures. BMC Med Res Methodol 4:10
18. Huskinson EC (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet 2:1127-1131
19. Terwee C, Bot S, de Boer M, van der Windt D, Knol D, Dekker J, Bouter L, de Vet H (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34-42 (Pubitemid 44856236)
20. Revicki D, Hay RD, Cella D, Sloan J (2006) Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 61:102-109
21. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD (2000) Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 53:459-468 (Pubitemid 30254341)
22. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
23. Kazis L, Anderson J, Meenan R (1989) Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 27:S178-S189
24. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN, Wright JG (2001) A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 54:1204-1217 (Pubitemid 34002973)
25. Zweig M, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 39:561-577 (Pubitemid 23118304)
26. Hyland M (2003) A brief guide to the selection of quality of life instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:24
27. Beurskens AJHM, de Vet HCW, Koke AJA (1996) Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 65:71-76 (Pubitemid 26227690)