Refinement of the SRS-22 health-related quality of life questionnaire function domain

Spine

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 593-597

  Asher, Marc A ^a,b   Lai, Sue Min ^b   Glattes, R Chris ^a   Burton, Douglas C ^a   Alanay, Ahmet ^c   Bago, Juan ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^d HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI VALL D HEBRON   (Spain)

Author keywords

Idiopathic scoliosis; Outcomes analysis; Scoliosis research Society 22 Health Related Quality of Life questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL CHILD; SCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY 22 HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCOLIOSIS; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCOLIOSIS; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 33645509113     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000201331.50597.ea     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multi-center study of 244 patients. Spine 1999;24:1435-40.
2. White SF, Asher MA, Lai SM, et al. Patient's perception of overall function, pain and appearance following primary posterior instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis (IS). Spine 1999;24:1693-9.
3. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC. Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument. Spine 2000;25:2381-6.
4. Berven S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S, et al. Studies in the Modified Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument in adults: validation, reliability and discriminatory capacity. Spine 2003;28:2164-9.
5. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC, et al. The reliability and concurrent validity of the SRS-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:63-9.
6. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine 2003;28:70-3.
7. Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC, et al. Discrimination validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis (IS) curve pattern and size. Spine 2003;28:74-8.
8. Bridwell K, Cats-Baril W, Berven S, et al. The validity of the SRS-22 instrument in an adult spinal deformity population compared to the Oswestry (ODI) and SF-12: a study of response distribution, concurrent validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Spine 2005;30:455-61.
9. Bago J, Climet J, Ey A, et al. The Spanish version of the SRS-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis: transcultural adaptation and reliability analysis. Spine 2004;29:1676-80.
10. Alanay A, Cil A, Berk H, et al. Validity and reliability of adapted Turkish version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Questionnaire [poster 64]. Scoliosis Research Society Annual Meeting, 2003.
11. Alanay A, Cil A, Berk H, et al. Reliability and validity of adapted Turkish version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Spine 2005;30:2464-8.
12. Climent JM, Bago J, Ey A, et al. Validity of the Spanish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire. Spine 2005;30:705-9.
13. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186-91.
14. Vitale MG, Levy DE, Johnson MG, et al. Assessment of quality of life in adolescent patients with orthopaedic problems: are adult measures appropriate? J Pediatr Orthop 2001;21:622-8.
15. Vitale MG, Levy DE, Moskowitz AJ, et al. Capturing quality of life pediatric orthopaedics: two recent measures compared. J Pediatr Orthop 2001;21:629-35.
16. Ugwonali OF, Lomas G, Choe JC, et al. Effect of bracing on the quality of life of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 2004;4:254-60.
17. Haynes RJ, Sullivan E. The Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Pediatric Orthopaedic Functional Health Questionnaire: an analysis of normals. J Pediatr Orthop 2001;21:619-21.
18. Sanders JO, Polly DW, Cats-Baril W, et al. Analysis of patient and parent assessment of deformity in idiopathic scoliosis using the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale. Spine 2003;28:2158-63.