Validity of the French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain patients: a prospective cohort study

European Spine Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 2097-2104

  Genevay, Stéphane ^a   Marty, Marc ^b   Courvoisier, Delphine S ^a   Foltz, Violaine ^c   Mahieu, Geneviève ^d   Demoulin, Christophe ^e   Fontana, Agnieszka Gierasimowicz ^f   Norberg, Michael ^g   de Goumoëns, Pierre ^g   Cedraschi, Christine ^a   Rozenberg, Sylvie ^c  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

^b HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

^c PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^d Site Dinant   (Belgium)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^f BRUGMANN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^g LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Low back pain; Multidimensional assessment; Psychometrics; Self report questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHRONIC PAIN; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORE OUTCOME MEASURES INDEX; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRANCE; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN INTENSITY; PAIN SEVERITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; VALIDATION STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; DISABILITY; EMPLOYMENT; LANGUAGE; MEDICAL LEAVE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF REPORT; STANDARDS;

ADULT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SELF REPORT; SICK LEAVE;

EID: 84918794182     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: 14320932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3325-8     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Cleland JJ, Gillani RR, Bienen EJR, Sadosky AA (2011) Assessing dimensionality and responsiveness of outcomes measures for patients with low back pain. Pain pract 11(1):57–69
2. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 23(18):2003–2013
3. Ferrer M, Pellise F, Escudero O, Alvarez L, Pont A, Alonso J, Deyo R (2006) Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain. Spine 31(12):1372–1379 discussion 1380
4. Genevay S, Cedraschi C, Marty M, Rozenberg S, De-Goumons P, Faundez A, Balagu F, Porchet F, Mannion AFA (2012) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the core outcome measures index (COMI) in patients with low back pain. Eur Spine J 21(1):130–137
5. Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Dvorak J, Boos N (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14(10):1014–1026
6. Roeder C, Chavanne A, Mannion AF, Grob D, Aebi M (2005) SSE Spine Tango–content, workflow, set-up. www.eurospine.org-Spine Tango. Eur Spine J 14(10):920–924
7. Kvien TK, Heiberg T, Hagen KB (2007) Minimal clinically important improvement/difference (MCII/MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): what do these concepts mean? Ann Rheum Dis 66(Suppl 3):iii40–iii41
8. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34–42
9. Storheim K, Brox JI, Lochting I, Werner EL, Grotle M (2012) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain. Eur Spine J 21(12):2539–2549
10. Coste J, Le Parc JM, Berge E, Delecoeuillerie G, Paolaggi JB (1993) French validation of a disability rating scale for the evaluation of low back pain (EIFEL questionnaire). Rev Rhum Ed Fr 60(5):335–341
11. Marty M, Blotman F, Avouac B, Rozenberg S, Valat JP (1998) Validation of the French version of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire in chronic low back pain patients. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 65(2):126–134
12. Perneger TV, Combescure C, Courvoisier DS (2010) General population reference values for the French version of the EuroQol EQ-5D health utility instrument. Value Health 13(5):631–635
13. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ (1996) Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 65(1):71–76
14. Tubach F, Ravaud P, Beaton D, Boers M, Bombardier C, Felson DT, van der Heijde D, Wells G, Dougados M (2007) Minimal clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state for subjective outcome measures in rheumatic disorders. J Rheumatol 34(5):1188–1193
15. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
16. Steiner D, Norman G (1995) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford
17. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310
18. Hopkins WG (2000) Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports med 30(1):1–15
19. Tubach F, Ravaud P, Baron G, Falissard B, Logeart I, Bellamy N, Bombardier C, Felson D, Hochberg M, van der Heijde D, Dougados M (2005) Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement. Ann Rheum Dis 64(1):29–33
20. Tubach F, Wells GA, Ravaud P, Dougados M (2005) Minimal clinically important difference, low disease activity state, and patient acceptable symptom state: methodological issues. J Rheumatol 32(10):2025–2029
21. Qiao J, Zhu F, Zhu Z, Xu L, Wang B, Yu Y, Qian BP, Ding Y, Qiu Y (2013) Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI). Eur Spine J 22(12):2821–2826
22. Escobar A, Gonzalez M, Quintana JM, Vrotsou K, Bilbao A, Herrera-Espineira C, Garcia-Perez L, Aizpuru F, Sarasqueta C (2012) Patient acceptable symptom state and OMERACT-OARSI set of responder criteria in joint replacement. Identification of cut-off values. Osteoarthr Cartil 20(2):87–92
23. Tubach F, Dougados M, Falissard B, Baron G, Logeart I, Ravaud P (2006) Feeling good rather than feeling better matters more to patients. Arthritis Rheum 55(4):526–530
24. Tubach F, Pham T, Skomsvoll JF, Mikkelsen K, Bjorneboe O, Ravaud P, Dougados M, Kvien TK (2006) Stability of the patient acceptable symptomatic state over time in outcome criteria in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 55(6):960–963
25. Hochberg MCM, Wohlreich MM, Gaynor PP, Hanna SS, Risser RR (2011) Clinically relevant outcomes based on analysis of pooled aata from 2 trials of Duloxetine in patients with knee Osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 39(2):352–358
26. Quintana JMJ, Aguirre UU, Barrio II, Orive MM, Garcia SS, Escobar AA (2011) Outcomes after total hip replacement based on patients’ basal status, what results you can expect. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 64(4):563–572
27. Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstuck FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient’s perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):374–379
28. Mannion AF, Boneschi M, Teli M, Luca A, Zaina F, Negrini S, Schulz PJ (2012) Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 6):S737–S749
29. Miekisiak G, Banach M, Kiwic G, Kubaszewski L, Kaczmarczyk J, Sulewski A, Kloc W, Libionka W, Latka D, Kollataj M, Zaluski R (2014) Reliability and validity of the Polish version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the neck. Eur Spine J 23(4):898–903