Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: Systematic review

British Medical Journal

Volumn 324, Issue 7347, 2002, Pages 1183-1185

  Edwards, Phil ^a   Roberts, Ian ^a   Clarke, Mike ^c   DiGuiseppi, Carolyn ^d   Pratap, Sarah ^b   Wentz, Reinhard ^b   Kwan, Irene ^b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b Population Health ^*  (United Kingdom)

^c UK COCHRANE CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COOPERATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOTIVATION; POSTAL MAIL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; UNIVERSITY;

DATA COLLECTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; POSTAL SERVICE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 0037129605     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple graphical test
2. Identification of randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews: Accuracy and reliability of screening records
3. Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: An empirical study of 125 meta-analyses
4. Methods to influence response to postal questionnaires