Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index

European Spine Journal

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL. 6, 2012, Pages

  Mannion, A F ^a   Boneschi, M ^b   Teli, M ^c   Luca, A ^a   Zaina, F ^d   Negrini, S ^d   Schulz, P J ^b  

^a SCHULTHESS CLINIC   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUGANO   (Switzerland)

^c IRCCS ISTITUTO ORTOPEDICO GALEAZZI   (Italy)

^d ISICO ITALIAN SCIENTIFIC SPINE INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Back pain; Cross cultural adaptation; Outcome questionnaire; Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; CORE OUTCOME MEASURES INDEX; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CROSS CULTURAL ADAPTATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; ITALY; LEG PAIN; LIKERT SCALE; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL DISABILITY; SWITZERLAND; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VERY ELDERLY; WELLBEING; BACKACHE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; DISABILITY; EVALUATION; GERMANY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPAIN; STANDARD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BACK PAIN; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; ITALY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPAIN; SWITZERLAND;

EID: 84875806402     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: 14320932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1741-6     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Andresen EM (2000) Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:S15-S20
2. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25:3186-3191 (Pubitemid 32042951)
3. Beurskens AJHM, de Vet HCW, Köke AJA (1996) Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 65:71-76 (Pubitemid 26227690)
4. Bombardier C (2000) Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine 25:3100-3103
5. Brooks R (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37:53-72
6. Costa LO, Maher CG, Latimer J (2007) Self-report outcome measures for low back pain: searching for international cross-cultural adaptations. Spine 32:1028-1037 (Pubitemid 46642561)
7. Davidson M, Keating JL (2002) A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther 82:8-24 (Pubitemid 34052112)
8. De Girolamo G, Rucci P, Scocco P, Becchi A, Coppa F, D' Addario A, Darú E, De Leo D, Galassi L, Mangelli L, Marson C, Neri GLS (2000) Quality of life assessment: validation of the Italian version of the WHOQOL-Brief. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 9:45-55 (Pubitemid 30339846)
9. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJHM, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 23:2003-2013 (Pubitemid 28473499)
10. Ferrer M, Pellise F, Escudero O, Alvarez L, Pont A, Alonso J, Deyo R (2006) Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain. Spine 31:1372-1379, discussion 1380
11. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1417-1432 (Pubitemid 24017263)
12. Haefeli M, Elfering A (2006) Pain assessment. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 1):S17-S24 (Pubitemid 43188545)
13. Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A, Group SLSS (2003) The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:12-20 (Pubitemid 36286825)
14. Hyland ME (2003) A brief guide to the selection of quality of life instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:24
15. Kessler JT, Melloh M, Zweig T, Aghayev E, Roder C (2010) Development of a documentation instrument for the conservative treatment of spinal disorders in the International Spine Registry, Spine Tango. Eur Spine J (in press)
16. Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Semmer NK, Jacobshagen N, Dvorak J, Boos N (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14:1014-1026 (Pubitemid 41798055)
17. Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstück F, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: Part 1. The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in clinical practice. Eur Spine J 18:367-373
18. Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstuck FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D (2009) The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: Part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 18:374-379
19. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR (1995) Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4:293-307
20. Melloh M, Staub L, Aghayev E, Zweig T, Barz T, Theis JC, Chavanne A, Grob D, Aebi M, Roeder C (2008) The international spine registry SPINE TANGO: status quo and first results. Eur Spine J 17:1201-1209
21. Nevill AM, Lane AM, Kilgour LJ, Bowes N, Whyte GP (2001) Stability of psychometric questionnaires. J Sports Sci 19:273-278 (Pubitemid 32279797)
22. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41:582-592
23. Padua R, Padua L, Ceccarelli E, Romanini E, Zanoli G, Bondi R, Campi A (2002) Italian version of the Roland Disability Questionnaire, specific for low back pain: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Eur Spine J 11:126-129 (Pubitemid 34328114)
24. Prieto L, Sacristan JA (2004) What is the value of social values? The uselessness of assessing health-related quality of life through preference measures. BMC Med Res Methodol 4:10
25. Rabin R, de Charro F (2001) EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 33:337-343 (Pubitemid 32675374)
26. Roder C, Chavanne A, Mannion AF, Grob D, Aebi M, El-Kerdi A (2005) SSE Spine Tango - content, workflow, set-up. http://www.eurospine.org-Spine Tango. A European spine registry. Eur Spine J 14:920-924
27. Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8:141-144 (Pubitemid 13089565)
28. Savoia E, Fantini MP, Pandolfi PP, Dallolio L, Collina N (2006) Assessing the construct validity of the Italian version of the EQ-5D: preliminary results from a cross-sectional study in North Italy. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:47
29. Staerkle RF, Villiger P (2011) Simple questionnaire for assessing core outcomes in inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 98(1):148-155
30. Streiner DL, Norman GR (1995) Health Measurement Scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, Oxford
31. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34-42 (Pubitemid 44856236)
32. White P, Lewith G, Prescott P (2004) The core outcomes for neck pain: validation of a new outcome measure. Spine 29:1923-1930 (Pubitemid 39181054)
33. WHOQOL (1998) The World Health Organisation WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 46:1569-1585
34. Zweig T, Mannion AF, Grob D, Melloh M, Munting E, Tuschel A, Aebi M, Roder C (2009) How to Tango: a manual for implementing Spine Tango. Eur Spine J 312(Suppl 3):312-320