LiDAR: An important tool for next-generation phenotyping technology of high potential for plant phenomics?

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Volumn 119, Issue , 2015, Pages 61-73

  Lin, Yi ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Comprehensive phenotyping; Field phenotyping; High throughput phenotyping; Hyperspectral LiDAR; Light detection and ranging (LiDAR); Plant phenomics

Indexed keywords

REMOTE SENSING; THROUGHPUT;

HIGH-THROUGHPUT PHENOTYPING; HYPERSPECTRAL; LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING; PHENOTYPING; PLANT PHENOMICS;

OPTICAL RADAR;

AGRONOMY; BIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; GENOMICS; LIDAR; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; REMOTE SENSING; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

EID: 84945333626     PISSN: 01681699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.10.011     Document Type: Review

References (147)

1. Andújar D., Rueda-Ayala V., Moreno H., Rosell-Polo J.R., Escolà A., Valero C., Gerhards R., Fernández-Quintanilla C., Dorado J., Griepentrog H.W. Discriminating crop, weeds and soil surface with a terrestrial LIDAR sensor. Sensors 2013, 13:14662-14675.
2. Araus J.L., Cairns J.E. Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19:52-61.
3. Araus J.L., Slafer G.A., Royo C., Serret M.D. Breeding for yield potential and stress adaptation in cereals. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2008, 27:377-412.
4. Armston J., Disney M., Lewis P., Scarth P., Phinn S., Lucas R., Bunting P., Goodwin N. Direct retrieval of canopy gap probability using airborne waveform lidar. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 134:24-38.
5. Azzari M., Goulden M.L., Rusu R.B. Rapid characterization of vegetation structure with a Microsoft Kinect Sensor. Sensors 2013, 13:2384-2398.
6. Baker N.R. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59:89-113.
7. Baret, F., 2009. Combination of 4D wheat architecture models and close range measurements for high throughput in field phenotyping: current status and prospects. EPSO Workshop on Plant Phenotyping, Jülish, Germany, 2-3 November 2009.
8. Berger B., Parent B., Tester M. High-throughput shoot imaging to study drought responses. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 10.1093/jxb/erq201.
9. Biskup B., Scharr H., Schurr U., Rascher U. A stereo imaging system for measuring structural parameters of plant canopies. Plant, Cell Environ. 2007, 30:1299-1308.
10. Boggess M.V., Lippolis J.D., Hurkman W.J., Fagerquist C.K., Briggs S.P., Gomes A.V., Righetti P.G., Bala K. The need for agriculture phenotyping: "Moving from genotype to phenotype". J. Proteom. 2013, 93:20-39.
11. Borisjuk L., Rolletschek H., Neuberger T. Surveying the plant's world by magnetic resonance imaging. Plant J. 2012, 70:129-146.
12. Boudreau S., Levasseur S., Perilla C., Roy S., Genest J. Chemical detection with hyperspectral lidar using dual frequency combs. Opt. Express 2013, 21:7411-7418.
13. Brown, T., 2013. SpectralPhenoClimatron - An Open Source High Throughput Phenotyping Platform for Phenome and Genome Wide Association Studies of Environmental Variation. PhenoDays'13, Kasteel Vaalsbroek, NL, 16-18 October 2013.
14. Buller G.S., Harkins R.D., McCarthy A., Hiskett P.A., MacKinnon G., Smith G., Sung R., Wallace A.M., Lamb R., Ridley K., Rarity J. Multiple wavelength time-of-flight sensor based on time-correlated single-photo counting. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2005, 76:083112.
15. Burton S.P., Ferrare R.A., Hostetler C.A., Hair J.W., Rogers R.R., Obland M.D., Butler C.F., Cook A.L., Harper D.B., Froyd K.D. Aerosol classification using airborne high spectral resolution Lidar measurements - methodology and examples. Atmosph. Measur. Techniq. 2012, 5:73-98.
16. Busemeyer D., Mentrup D., Möller K., Wunder E., Alheit K., Hahn V., Maurer H.P., Reif J.C., Würschum T., Möller J., Rahe F., Ruckelshausen A. BreedVision - a multi-sensor platform for non-destructive field-based phenotyping in plant breeding. Sensors 2013, 13:2830-2847.
17. Bylesjö M., Segura V., Soolanayakanahally R., Rae A., Trygg J., Gustafsson P., Jansson S., Street N.R. LAMINA: a tool for rapid quantification of leaf size and shape parameters. BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8:82.
18. Cabrera-Bosquet L., Crossa J., von Zitzewitz J., Serret M.D., Araus J.L. High-throughput phenotyping and genomic selection: the frontiers of crop breeding converge. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2012, 54:312-320.
19. Chen Y., Räikkönen E., Kaasalainen S., Suomalainen J., Hakala T., Hyyppä J., Chen R. Two-channel hyperspectral LiDAR with a supercontinuum laser source. Sensors 2010, 10(7):7057-7066.
20. Chéné Y., Rousseau D., Lucidarme P., Bertheloot J., Caffier V., Morel P., Belin É., Chapeau-Blondeau F. On the use of depth camera for 3D phenotyping of entire plants. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2012, 82:122-127.
21. Chenu K., Chapman S.C., Tardieu F., McLean G., Welcker C., Hammer G.L. Simulating the yield impacts of organ-level quantitative trait loci associated with drought response in maize: a 'Gene-to-Phenotype' modeling approach. Genetics 2009, 183:1507-1523.
22. Chisholm R.A., Cui J., Lum S., Chen B.M. UAV LiDAR for below-canopy forest surveys. J. Unmanned Vehicle Syst. 2013, 1:61-68.
23. Chittka L., Shmida A., Troje N., Menzel R. Ultraviolet as a component of flower reflections, and the colour perception of hymenoptera. Vision. Res. 1994, 43:1489-1508.
24. Clark R.T., MacCurdy R.B., Jung J.K., Shaff J.E., McCouch S.R., Aneshansley D.J., Kochian L.V. Three-dimensional root phenotyping with a novel imaging and software platform. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156:455-465.
25. Cobb J., DeClerck G., Greenberg A., Clark R., McCouch S. Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2013, 126:867-887.
26. Colgan, M., 2014. Remote sensing of plants: state-of-the-art and applications to crop phenotyping. ARPA-E Plant Phenotyping Workshop, Chicago, IL, 18-19 June 2014.
27. Costa J., Grant O., Chaves M. Thermography to explore plant-environment interactions. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64:3937-3949.
28. Deery D., Jimenez-Berni J., Jones H., Sirault X., Furbank R. Proximal remote sensing buggies and potential applications for field-based phenotyping. Agronomy 2014, 5:349-379.
29. Dhondt S., Wuyts N., Inzé D. Cell to whole-plant phenotyping: the best is yet to come. Trends Plant Sci. 2013, 18:428-439.
30. Eberius M., Lima-Guerra J. High-throughput plant phenotyping - data acquisition, transformation, and analysis. Bioinformatics 2009, 7(1):259-278.
31. Ehlert D., Heisig M. Sources of angle-dependent errors in terrestrial laser scanner-based crop stand measurement. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2013, 93:10-16.
32. Eitel J., Magney T., Vierling L., Brown T., Huggins D. LiDAR based biomass and crop nitrogen estimates for rapid, non-destructive assessment of wheat nitrogen status. Field Crops Res. 2014, 159:21-32.
33. Eitel J., Vierling L.A., Long D.S., Hunt E.R. Early season remote sensing of wheat nitrogen status using a green scanning laser. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2011, 151:1338-1345.
34. Erdle K., Mistele B., Schmidhalter U. Comparison of active and passive spectral sensors in discriminating biomass parameters and nitrogen status in wheat cultivars. Field Crops Res. 2011, 124:74-84.
35. Fastig, S., Ehrlich, Y., Pearl, S., Naor, E., Kraus, Y., Inbar, T., Katz, D., 2010. Multi-spectral LiDAR system - Design, build and test. SPIE Proceedings on Laser Radar Technology and Applications XV, Orlando, Florida, 6-9 April 2010.
36. Fieber K., Davenport I., Tanase M., Ferryman J., Gurney R., Walker J., Hacker J. Effective LAI and CHP of a single tree from small-footprint full-waveform LiDAR. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2014, 11:1634-1638.
37. Fiorani F., Schurr U. Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64:17.1-17.25.
38. Freimer N., Sabatti C. The human phenome project. Nat. Genet. 2003, 34(1):15-21.
39. Furbank R. Plant phenomics: from gene to form and function. Funct. Plant Biol. 2009, 36:v-vi.
40. Furbank R.T., Tester M. Phenomics - technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16:635-644.
41. Garbout A., Munkholm L.J., Hansen S.B., Petersen B.M., Munk O.L., Pajor R. The use of PET/CT scanning technique for 3D visualization and quantification of real-time soil/plant interactions. Plant Soil 2012, 352:113-127.
42. Garcis J.E., Greentree A.D., Shrestha M., Dorin A., Dyer A.G. Flower colours through the lens: quantitative measurement with visible and ultraviolet digital photography. PLoS ONE 2014, 9(5):e96646.
43. Gmachl C., Sivco D., Colombelli R., Capasso F., Cho A.Y. Ultra-broadband semiconductor laser. Nature 2002, 415:883-887.
44. Gong W., Song S., Zhu B., Shi S., Li F., Cheng X. Multi-wavelength canopy LiDAR for remote sensing of vegetation: design and system performance. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2012, 69:1-9.
45. Granier C., Ville D. Phenotyping and beyond: modelling the relationships between traits. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 18:96-102.
46. Green J.M., Appel H., Rehrig E.M., Harnsomburana J., Chang J.F., Balint-Kurti P., Shyu C.R. PhenoPhyte: a flexible affordable method to quantify 2D phenotypes from imagery. Plant Methods 2012, 8:45.
47. Hakala T., Suomalainen J., Kaasalainen S., Chen Y. Full waveform hyperspectral LiDAR for terrestrial laser scanning. Opt. Express 2012, 20:7119-7127.
48. Harding D., Dabney P., Abshire J., Huss T., Jodor G., Machan R., Marzouk J., Rush K., Seas A., Shuman C., Sun X., Valett S., Vasilyev A., Yu A., Zheng Y. The Slope Imaging Multi-polarization Photo-counting Lidar: An Advanced Technology Airborne Laser Altimeter 2010, NASA Earth Science Technology Forum, Arlington, VA, 22-24 June 2010.
49. Heinzel J., Koch B. Exploring full-waveform LiDAR parameters for tree species classification. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2011, 13:152-160.
50. Hermosilla T., Ruiz L., Kazakova A., Coops N., Moskal L. Estimation of forest structure and canopy fuel parameters from small-footprint full-waveform LiDAR data. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2013, 23:224-233.
51. Hosoi F., Nakabayashi K., Omasa K. 3-D modeling of tomoro canopies using a high-resolution portable scanning Lidar for extracting structural information. Sensors 2011, 11:2166-2174.
52. Hosoi F., Omasa K. Estimation of vertical plant area density profiles in a rice canopy at different growth stages by high-resolution portable scanning lidar with a lightweight mirror. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2012, 74:11-19.
53. Houle D., Govindaraju D.R., Omholt S. Phenomics: the next challenge. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:855-866.
54. Huang J.R., Liao H.J., Zhu Y.B., Sun J.Y., Sun Q.H., Liu X.D. Hyperspectral detection of rice damaged by rice leaf folder (Cnaphalocrocis medinalis). Comput. Electron. Agric. 2012, 82:100-107.
55. Hummel, G., 2012. PlantEye - A novel 3D sensor platform for automated determination of plant growth dynamics. PhenoDays'12, Wageningen, Netherlands, 10-12 October 2012.
56. Iyer-Pascuzzi A.S., Symonova O., Mileyko Y., Hao Y., Belcher H., Harer J., Weitz J.S., Benfey P.N. Imaging and analysis platform for automatic phenotyping and trait ranking of plant root systems. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152:1148-1157.
57. Jack, I.H., Rumi, E., Henry, D., Woodhouse, I., Nichol, C., Macdonald, M., 2011. The design of a space-borne multispectral canopy LiDAR to estimate global carbon stock and gross primary productivity. SPIE Proceedings of Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XV, Prague, Czech Republic, 19-22 September 2011.
58. Jahnke S., Menzel M.I., van Dusschoten D., Roeb G.W., Bühler J., Minwuyelet S., Blümler P., Temperton V.M., Hombach T., Streun M. Combined MRI-PET dissects dynamic changes in plant structures and functions. Plant J. 2009, 59:634-644.
59. Jansen M., Gilmer F., Biskup B., Nagel K.A., Rascher U., Fischbach A., Briem S., Dreissen G., Tittmann S., Braun S., De Jaeger I., Metzlaff M., Schurr U., Scharr H., Walter A. Simultaneous phenotyping of leaf growth and chlorophyll fluorescence via GROWSCREEN FLUORO allows detection of stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and other rosette plants. Funct. Plant Biol. 2009, 36:902-914.
60. Jimenez-Berni, J.A., 2013. New remote and proximal sensing methodologies in high throughput field phenotyping. Workshop on Remote Sensing - Beyond Images, Mexico city, Mexico, 14-15 December 2013.
61. Jones H., Serraj R., Loveys B., Xiong L., Wheaton A., Price A.H. Thermal infrared imaging of crop canopies for the remote diagnosis and quantification of plant responses to water stress in the field. Funct. Plant Biol. 2009, 36:978-989.
62. Jördens C., Scheller M., Breitenstein B., Selmar D., Koch M. Evaluation of leaf water status by means of permittivity at terahertz frequencies. J. Biol. Phys. 2009, 35:255-264.
63. Kaasalainen S., Lindroos T., Hyyppä J. Toward hyperspectral Lidar: Measurement of spectral backscatter intensity with a supercontinuum laser source. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2007, 4:211-215.
64. Kirchhof M., Jutzi B., Stilla U. Iterative processing of laser scanning data by full waveform analysis. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2008, 63:99-114.
65. Konishi A., Eguchi A., Hosoi F., Omasa K. 3D monitoring spatio-temporal effects of herbicide on a whole plant using combined range and chlorophyll a fluorescence imaging. Funct. Plant Biol. 2009, 36:874-879.
66. Korpela I., Hovi A., Morsdorf F. Understory trees in airborne LiDAR data - selective mapping due to transmission losses and echo-triggering mechanisms. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 119:92-104.
67. Kurz T., Gustafsson B., Brunk U.T. Cell sensitivity to oxidative stress is influenced by ferritin autophagy. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 50:1647-1658.
68. Ladefoged T.N., McCoy M.D., Asner G.P., Kirch P.V., Puleston C.O., Chadwick O.A., Vitousek P.M. Agricultural potential and actualized development in Hawaii: an airborne LiDAR survey of the leeward Kohala field system (Hawaii Island). J. Archaeol. Sci. 2011, 38:3605-3619.
69. Lee K., Avondo J., Morrison H., Blot L., Stark M., Sharpe J., Bangham A., Coen E. Visualizing plant development and gene expression in three dimensions using optical projection tomography. Plant Cell 2006, 18:2145-2156.
70. Lemmens M. Airborne laser-scanners. GIM Int. 2004, 18(5):45-47.
71. Lemmens M. Airborne LiDAR sensors. GIM Int. 2007, 21(2):24-27.
72. Lemmens M. Terrestrial laser scanners. GIM Int. 2007, 21(8):41-45.
73. Lemmens M. Airborne LiDAR sensors. GIM Int. 2009, 23(2):16-19.
74. Lemmens M. Terrestrial laser scanners. GIM Int. 2009, 23(8):20-23.
75. Lemmens M. Terrestrial laser scanners. GIM Int. 2010, 24(8):30-33.
76. Lemmens M. Airborne LiDAR scanners - status and developments. GIM Int. 2011, 25(2):33-39.
77. Lim K., Treitz P., Wulder M., St-Onge B., Flood M. LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2003, 27:88-106.
78. Lin Y., Hyyppä J. Multiecho-recording mobile laser scanning for enhancing individual crown reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50:4323-4332.
79. Lin Y., Hyyppä J., Jaakkola A. Mini-UAV-borne Lidar for fine-scale mapping. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2011, 8(3):426-430.
80. Llorens J., Gil E., Llop J., Escolà A. Ultrasonic and LIDAR sensors for electronic canopy characterization in vineyards: advances to improve pesticide application methods. Sensors 2011, 11:2177-2194.
81. Luo S., Wang C., Xi X., Pan F. Estimating FPAR of maize canopy using airborne discrete-return LiDAR data. Opt. Express 2014, 22:5106-5117.
82. Magney T.S., Eusden S.A., Eitel J.U.H., Logan B.A., Jiang J., Vierling L.A. Assessing leaf photoprotective mechanisms using terrestrial LiDAR: towards mapping canopy photosynthetic performance in three dimensions. New Phytol. 2014, 201:344-356.
83. Mairhofer T., Zappala S., Tracy S., Sturrock C., Bennett M.J., Mooney S.J., Pridmore T.P. Recovering complete plant root system architectures from soil via X-ray u-computed tomography. Plant Methods 2013, 9:8.
84. Mallet C., Bretar F. Full-waveform topographic lidar: state-of-the-art. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2009, 64:1-16.
85. Masuka B., Araus J.L., Das B., Sonder K., Cairns J.E. Phenotyping for abiotic stress tolerance in maize. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2012, 54(4):238-249.
86. Matsuda O., Tanaka A., Fujita T., Iba K. Hyperspectral imaging techniques for rapid identification of Arabidopsis mutants with altered leaf pigment status. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53:1154-1170.
87. Méndez V., Catalán H., Rosell-Polo J.R., Arnó J., Sanz R. LiDAR simulation in modelled orchards to optimise the use of terrestrial laser scanners and derived vegetative measures. Biosyst. Eng. 2013, 115:7-19.
88. Menzel M.I., Tittmann S., Bühler J., Preis S., Wolters N., Jahnke S., Walter A., Chlubek A., Hermes N., Offenhäuser A., Gilmer F., Blümler P., Schurr U., Krause H.J. Non-invasive determination of plant biomass with microwave resonators. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32:368-379.
89. Morsdorf F., Nicol C., Malthus T., Woodhouse I. Assessing forest structural and physiological information content of multi-spectral LiDAR waveforms by radiative transfer modelling. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113:2152-2163.
90. Murchie E., Lawson T. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64:3983-3998.
91. Nevalainen, O., Hakala, T., Suomalainen, J., Kaasalainen, S., 2013. Nitrogen concentration estimation with hyperspectral LiDAR. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, II-5/W2, pp. 205-210.
92. Nischan M.L., Joseph R.M., Libby J.C., Kerekes J.P. Active spectral imaging. Lincoln Lab. J. 2003, 14:131-144.
93. Omasa K., Hosoi F., Konishi A. 3D lidar imaging for detecting and understanding plant responses and canopy structure. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58:881-898.
94. Paulus S., Behmann J., Mahlein A.K., Plümer L., Kuhlmann H. Low-cost 3D systems: suitable tools for plant phenotyping. Sensors 2014, 14:3001-3008.
95. Paulus S., Dupuis J., Mahlein A.K., Kuhlmann H. Surface feature based classification of plant organs from 3D laserscanned point clouds for plant phenotyping. BMC Bioinformatics 2013, 14:238.
96. Paulus S., Dupuis J., Riedel S., Kuhlmann H. Automated analysis of barley organs using 3D laser scanning: an approach for high throughput phenotyping. Sensors 2014, 14:12670-12686.
97. Pereira A., Grenn S., Villa Nova N. Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration adapted to estimate irrigated tree transpiration. Agric. Water Manag. 2006, 83:153-161.
98. Peteinatos G., Weis M., Andújar D., Ayala V.R., Gerhards R. Potential use of ground-based sensor technologies for weed detection. Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70:190-199.
99. Petrie G. Airborne topographic laser scanners. GEOInformatics 2011, 1-2:34-44.
100. Polo J.R.R., Sanz R., Llorens J., Arnó J., Escolà A., Ribes-Dasi M., Masip J., Camp F., Gràcia F., Solanelles F., Pallejà T., Val L., Planas S., Gil E., Palacín J. A tractor-mounted scanning LIDAR for the non-destructive measurement of vegetative volume and surface area of tree-row plantations: a comparison with conventional destructive measurements. Biosyst. Eng. 2009, 102:128-134.
101. Powers M.A., Davis C.C. Spectral LADAR: active range-resolved three-dimensional imaging spectroscopy. Appl. Opt. 2012, 51(10):1468-1478.
102. Punshon T., Ricachenevsky F., Hindt M., Socha A., Zuber H. Methodological approaches for using synchrotron X-ray fluorescence (SXRF) imaging as a tool in ionomics: examples from Arabidipsis thaliana. Metallomics 2013, 5:1133.
103. Radtke P.J., Boland H.T., Scaglia G. An evaluation of overhead laser scanning to estimate herbage removals in pasture quadrats. Agric. For. Meterol. 2010, 150:1523-1528.
104. Rajendran K., Tester M., Roy S.J. Quantifying the three main components of salinity tolerance in cereals. Plant, Cell Environ. 2009, 32:237-249.
105. Reeves A., Parsons R.L., Hettinger J.W., Medford J.I. In vivo three-dimensional imaging of plants with optical coherence microscopy. J. Microsc. 2002, 208:177-189.
106. Römer C., Wahabzada M., Ballvora A., Pinto F., Rossini M., Panigada C., Behmann J., Léon J., Thurau C., Bauckhage C., Kersting K., Rascher U., Plümer L. Early drought stress detection in cereals: simple volume maximisation for hyperspectral imaging analysis. Funct. Plant Biol. 2012, 39:878-890.
107. Rosell J., Sanz R. A review of methods and applications of the geometric characterization of tree crops in agricultural activities. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2012, 81:124-141.
108. Roth B., Slatton K., Cohen M. On the potential for high-resolution lidar to improve rainfall interception estimates in forest ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2007, 5(8):421-428.
109. Rousseau C., Belin E., Bove E., Rousseau D., Fabre F., Berruyer R., Guillaumes J., Manceau C., Jacques M.A., Boureau T. High throughput quantitative phenotyping of plant resistance using chlorophyll fluorescence image analysis. Plant Methods 2013, 9:17.
110. Saeys W., Lenaerts B., Craessaerts G., De Baerdemaeker J. Estimation of the crop density of small grains using LiDAR sensors. Biosyst. Eng. 2009, 102:22-30.
111. Saito, Y., Kobayashi, K., Fukatsu, T., Kiura, T., Itoh, A., Hirafuji, M., Motonaga, Y., 2013. "AgriServer": A Sensor Network System Possible Remote and Real-time Monitoring of Agricultural Products Growing in Field. PhenoDays'13, Kasteel Vaalsbroek, NL, 16-18 October 2013.
112. Sakamoto T., Shibayama M., Takada E., Inoue A., Morita K., Takahashi W., Mura S., Kimura A. Detecting seasonal changes in crop community structure using day and night digital images. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2010, 76:713-726.
113. Schilling C.H., Edwards J.S., Palsson B.O. Toward metabolic phenomics: analysis of genomic data using flux balances. Biotechnol. Prog. 1999, 15(3):288-295.
114. Selbeck J., Dworak V., Ehlert D. Testing a vehicle-based scanning lidar sensor for crop detection. Canad. J. Remote Sens. 2010, 38:24-35.
115. Shibayama M., Sakamoto T., Takada E., Inoue A., Morita K., Takahashi W., Kimura A. Continuous monitoring of visible and near-infrared band reflectance from a rice paddy for determining nitrogen uptake using digital cameras. Plant Prod. Sci. 2009, 12:293-306.
116. Shibayama M., Sakamoto T., Takada E., Inoue A., Morita K., Yamaguchi T., Takahashi W., Kimura A. Regression-based models to predict rice leaf area index using biennial fixed point continuous observations of near infrared digital images. Plant Prod. Sci. 2011, 14:365-376.
117. Siddiqui Z.S., Cho J.I., Park S.H., Kwon T.R., Ahn B.O., Lee G.S., Jeong M.J., Kim K.W., Lee S.K., Park S.C. Phenotyping of rice in salt stress environment using high-throughput infrared imaging. Acta Botanica Croatica 2014, 73:149-158.
118. Singh C.B., Jayas D., Paliwal J., White N. Identification of insect-damaged wheat kernels using short-wave near-infrared hyperspectral and digital colour imaging. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2010, 73:118-125.
119. Song S., Gong W., Zhu B., Huang X. Wavelength selection and spectral discrimination for paddy rice, with laboratory measurements of hyperspectral leaf reflectance. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2011, 66:672-682.
120. Staedler Y.M., Masson D., Schönenberger J. Plant tissues in 3D via X-ray tomography: simple contrasting methods allow high resolution imaging. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e75295.
121. Suomalainen J., Hakala T., Kaartinen H., Räikkönen E., Kaasalainen S. Demonstration of a virtual active hyperspectral LiDAR in automated point cloud classification. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2011, 66:637-641.
122. Svanberg S. Fluorescence Lidar monitoring of vegetation status. Phys. Scr. 1995, T58:79-85.
123. Tan S., Narayanan R.M. Design and performance of a multiwavelength airborne polarimetric lidar for vegetation remote sensing. Appl. Opt. 2004, 43:2360-2368.
124. Tatarov, B., Suginoto, N., Matsui, I., 2011. Possibilities of multi-channel lidar spectrometric technique for investigation of atmospheric aerosols and pollutions. SPIE Proceedings on Lidar Remote Sensing on Environmental Monitoring XI, Incheon, Korea, 11 October 2010.
125. Tilly N., Hoffmeister D., Cao Q., Huang S., Lenz-Wiedemann V., Miao Y., Bareth G. Multitemporal crop surface models: accurate plant height measurement and biomass estimation with terrestrial laser scanning in paddy rice. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2014, 8:083671.
126. Tuberosa R. Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era. Front. Physiol. 2012, 3:347.
127. Vierling K.T., Vierling L.A., Gould W.A., Martinuzzi S., Clawges R.M. Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 6(2):90-98.
128. Wagner W., Ullrich A., Ducic V., Melzer T., Studnicka N. Gaussian decomposition and calibration of a novel small-footprint full-waveform digitising airborne laser scanner. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2006, 60:100-112.
129. Wallace A.M., McCarthy A., Nichol C.J., Ren X., Morak S., Martinez-Ramirez D., Woodhouse I.H., Buller G.S. Design and evaluation of multispectral LiDAR for the recovery of arboreal paramters. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2014, 52:4942-4954.
130. Wallace A.M., Nichol C.N., Woodhouse I.H. Recovery of forest canopy parameters by inversion of multispectral Lidar data. Remote Sens. 2012, 4(2):509-531.
131. Walter A., Studer B., Klliker R. Advanced phenotyping offers opportunities for improved breeding of forage and turf species. Ann. Bot. 2012, 110:1271-1279.
132. Wang L.H., Hu S. Photoacoustic tomography: in vivo imaging from organelles to organs. Science 2012, 335:1458-1462.
133. Watanabe T., Hanan J.S., Room P.M., Hasegawa T., Nakagawa H., Takahashi W. Rice morphogenesis and plant architecture: measurement, specification and the reconstruction of structural development by 3D architectural modeling. Ann. Bot. 2005, 95:1131-1143.
134. White J.W., Andrade-Sanchez P., Gore M.A., Bronson K.F., Coffelt T.A., Conley M.M., Feldmann K.A., French A.N., Heun J.T., Hunsaker D.J., Jenks M.A., Kimball B.A., Roth R.L., Strand R.J., Thorp K.R., Wall G.W., Wang G. Field-based phenomics for plant genetics research. Field Crops Res. 2012, 133:101-112.
135. Willers J.L., Wu J., O'Hara C., Jenkins J.N. A categorical, improper probability method for combining NDVI and LiDAR elevation information for potential cotton precision agricultural applications. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2012, 82:15-22.
136. Wing B.M., Ritchie M.W., Boston K., Cohen W.B., Gitelman A., Olsen M.J. Prediction of understory vegetation cover with airborne lidar in an interior ponderosa pine forest. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 124:730-741.
137. Woo N.S., Badger M.R., Pogson B.J. A rapid, non-invasive procedure for quantitative assessment of drought survival using chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Methods 2008, 4:27.
138. Woodhouse I.H., Nichol C., Sinclair P., Jack J., Morsdorf F., Malthus T.J., Patenaude G. A multispectral canopy LiDAR demonstrator project. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2011, 8:839-843.
139. Yang W., Duan L., Chen G., Xiong L., Liu Q. Plant phenomics and high-throughput phenotyping: accelerating rice functional genomics using multidisciplinary technologies. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2013, 16:180-187.
140. Yao W., Krzystek P., Heurich M. Tree species classification and estimation of stem volume and DBH based on single tree extraction by exploiting airborne full-waveform LiDAR data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 123:368-380.
141. Zbuk K.M., Eng C. Cancer phenomics: RET and PTEN as illustrative models. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 7(1):35-45.
142. Zhang L., Grift T.E. A LIDAR-based crop height measurement system for Miscanthus giganteus. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2012, 85:70-76.
143. Zhao F., Yang X., Schull M., Roman-Colon M., et al. Measuring effective leaf area index, foliage profile, and stand height in New England forest stands using a full-waveform ground-based lidar. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115:2954-2964.
144. Zhao F., Yang X., Strahler A., Schaaf C., et al. A comparison of foliage profiles in the Sierra National Forest obtained with a full-waveform under-story EVI lidar system with the foliage profiles obtained with an airborne full-waveform LVIS lidar system. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 136:330-341.
145. Zheng G., Moskal L.M., Kim S.H. Retrieval of effective leaf area index in heterogeneous forests with terrestrial laser scanning. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2013, 51:777-786.
146. Zhu B., Gong W., Shi S., Song S. A multi-wavelength canopy LiDAR for vegetation monitoring: system implementation and laboratory-based tests. Proced. Environ. Sci. 2011, 10:2775-2782.
147. Zhu J.M., Ingram P.A., Benfey P.N., Elich T. From lab to field, new approaches to phenotyping root system architecture. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14:310-317.