Phenotyping and beyond: Modelling the relationships between traits

Current Opinion in Plant Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 96-102

  Granier, Christine ^a   Vile, Denis ^a  

^a UMR 759 LEPSE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DATA BASE; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT;

DATABASES AS TOPIC; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE;

EID: 84896123655     PISSN: 13695266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.02.009     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Bolger M.E., Weisshaar B., Scholz U., Stein N., Usadel B., Mayer K.F.X. Plant genome sequencing applications for crop improvement. Curr Opin Plant Biotechnol 2014, 26:31-37.
2. Yang W., Duan L., Chen G., Xiong L., Liu Q. Plant phenomics and high-throughput phenotyping: accelerating rice functional genomics using multidisciplinary technologies. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2013, 16:180-187.
3. Fiorani F., Schurr U. Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2013, 64:267-291.
4. Furbank R.T., Tester M. Phenomics - technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends Plant Sci 2011, 16:635-644.
5. Craine J.M., Engelbrecht B.M.J., Lusk C.H., McDowell N., Poorter H. Resource limitation, tolerance, and the future of ecological plant classification. Front Plant Sci 2012, 3:246.
6. Violle C., Enquist B.J., McGill B.J., Jiang L., Albert C.H., Hulshof C., Jung V., Messier J. The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 2012, 27:244-252.
7. Dhondt S., Wuyts N., Inzé D. Cell to whole-plant phenotyping: the best is yet to come. Trends Plant Sci 2013, 18:428-439.
8. Jansen M., Gilmer F., Biskup B., Nagel K.A., Rascher U., Fischbach A., Briem S., Dreissen G., Tittmann S., Braun S., et al. Simultaneous phenotyping of leaf growth and chlorophyll fluorescence via GROWSCREEN FLUORO allows detection of stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and other rosette plants. Funct Plant Biol 2009, 36:902-914.
9. Granier C., Aguirrezabal L., Chenu K., Cookson S.J., Dauzat M., Hamard P., Thioux J.J., Rolland G., Bouchier-Combaud S., Lebaudy A., et al. PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. New Phytol 2006, 169:623-635.
10. Moore C.R., Johnson L.S., Kwak I.Y., Livny M., Broman K.W., Spalding E.P. High-throughput computer vision introduces the time axis to a quantitative trait map of a plant growth response. Genetics 2013, 195:1077-1086.
11. Tisne S., Serrand Y., Bach L., Gilbault E., Ben Ameur R., Balasse H., Voisin R., Bouchez D., Durand-Tardif M., Guerche P., et al. Phenoscope: an automated large-scale phenotyping platform offering high spatial homogeneity. Plant J 2013, 74:534-544.
12. Arvidsson S., Pérez-Rodríguez, Mueller-Roeber B. A growth phenotyping pipeline for Arabidopsis thaliana integrating image analysis and rosette area modeling for robust quantification of genotype effects. New Phytol 2011, 191:895-907.
13. Skirycz A., Vandenbroucke K., Clauw P., Maleux K., De Meyer B., Dhondt S., Pucci A., Gonzalez N., Hoeberichts F., Tognetti V.B., et al. Survival and growth of Arabidopsis plants given limited water are not equal. Nat Biotechnol 2011, 29:212-214.
14. Iyer-Pascuzzi A.S., Symonova O., Mileyko Y., Hao Y.L., Belcher H., Harer J., Weitz J.S., Benfey P.N. Imaging and analysis platform for automatic phenotyping and trait ranking of plant root systems. Plant Physiol 2010, 152:1148-1157.
15. Clark R.T., MacCurdy R.B., Jung J.K., Shaff J.E., McCouch S.R., Aneshansley D.J., Kochian L.V. Three-dimensional root phenotyping with a novel imaging and software platform. Plant Physiol 2011, 156:455-465.
16. Vasseur F., Pantin F., Vile D. Changes in light intensity reveal a major role for carbon balance in Arabidopsis responses to high temperature. Plant Cell Environ 2011, 34:1563-1576.
17. Rousseau C., Belin E., Bove E., Rousseau D., Fabre F., Berruyer R., Guillaumes J., Manceau C., Jacques M.A., Boureau T. High throughput quantitative phenotyping of plant resistance using chlorophyll fluorescence image analysis. Plant Methods 2013, 9:17.
18. Woo N.S., Badger M.R., Pogson B.J. A rapid, non-invasive procedure for quantitative assessment of drought survival using chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Methods 2008, 4:27.
19. Costa J.M., Grant O.M., Chaves M.M. Thermography to explore plant-environment interactions. J Exp Bot 2013, 64:3937-3949.
20. Matsuda O., Tanaka A., Fujita T., Iba K. Hyperspectral imaging techniques for rapid identification of Arabidopsis mutants with altered leaf pigment status. Plant Cell Physiol 2012, 53:1154-1170.
21. Mahlein A.K., Steiner U., Hillnhutter C., Dehne H.W., Oerke E.C. Hyperspectral imaging for small-scale analysis of symptoms caused by different sugar beet diseases. Plant Methods 2012, 8:3.
22. Fabre J., Dauzat M., Negre V., Wuyts N., Tireau A., Gennari E., Neveu P., Tisne S., Massonnet C., Hummel I., Granier C. PHENOPSIS DB: an information system for Arabidopsis thaliana phenotypic data in an environmental context. BMC Plant Biol 2011, 11:77.
23. Pound M.P., French A.P., Atkinson J., Wells D.M., Bennet J.M., Pridmore T. RootNav: navigating images of complex root architectures. Plant Physiol 2013, 162:1802-1814.
24. Lobet G., Draye X. Novel scanning procedure enabling the vectorization of entire rhizotron-grown root systems. Plant Methods 2013, 9:2-10.
25. De Vylder J., Vandenbussche F., Hu Y., Philips W., Van Der Straeten D. Rosette Tracker: an open source image analysis tool for automatic quantification of genotype effects. Plant Physiol 2012, 160:1149-1159.
26. Herridge R.P., Day R.C., Baldwin S., Macknight R.C. Rapid analysis of seed size in Arabidopsis for mutant and QTL discovery. Plant Methods 2011, 7:3.
27. Hartmann A., Czauderna T., Hoffmann R., Stein N., Schreiber F. HTPheno: an image analysis pipeline for high-throughput plant phenotyping. BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12:148.
28. Weight C., Parnham D.R.W. LeafAnalyser: a computational method for rapid and large-scale analyses of leaf shape variation. Plant J 2008, 53:578-586.
29. Bylesjö M., Segura V., Soolanayakanahally R.Y., Rae A.M., Trygg J., Gustafsson P., Jansson S., Street N.R. LAMINA: a tool for rapid quantification of leaf size and shape parameters. BMC Plant Biol 2008, 8:82.
30. Zhang X., Hause R.J., Borevitz J.O. Natural genetic variation for growth and development revealed by high-throughput phenotyping in Arabidopsis thaliana. G3 (Bethesda) 2012, 2:29-34.
31. Massonnet C., Tisne S., Radziejwoski A., Vile D., De Veylder L., Dauzat M., Granier C. New insights into the control of endoreduplication: endoreduplication could be driven by organ growth in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol 2011, 157:2044-2055.
32. Perez-Harguindeguy N., Diaz S., Garnier E., Lavorel S., Poorter H., Jaureguiberry P., Bret-Harte M.S., Cornwell W.K., Craine J.M., Gurvich D.E., Urcelay C., et al. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 2013, 61:167-234.
33. Massonnet C., Vile D., Fabre J., Hannah M.A., Caldana C., Lisec J., Beemster G.T.S., Meyer R.C., Messerli G., Gronlund J.T., et al. Probing the reproducibility of leaf growth and molecular phenotypes: a comparison of three Arabidopsis accessions cultivated in ten laboratories. Plant Physiol 2010, 152:2142-2157.
34. Malosetti M., Ribaut J.M., van Eeuwijk F.A. The statistical analysis of multi-environment data: modeling genotype-by-environment interaction and its genetic basis. Front Physiol 2013, 4:44.
35. Reymond M., Muller B., Leonardi A., Charcosset A., Tardieu F. Combining quantitative trait loci analysis and an ecophysiological model to analyze the genetic variability of the responses of maize leaf growth to temperature and water deficit. Plant Physiol 2003, 131:664-675.
36. Lievre M., Wuyts N., Cookson S.J., Bresson J., Dapp M., Vasseur F., Massonnet C., Tisne S., Bettembourg M., Balsera C., et al. Phenotyping the kinematics of leaf development in flowering plants: recommendations and pitfalls. WIREs Dev Biol 2013, 2:809-821.
37. Andrade-Sanchez P., Gore M.A., Heun J.T., Thorp K.R., Carmo-Silva A.E., French A.N., Salvucci M.E., White J.W. Development and evaluation of a field-based high-throughput phenotyping platform. Funct Plant Biol 2013, 10.1071/FP13126.
38. Stinchcombe J.R., Kirkpatrick M. Genetics and evolution of function-valued traits: understanding environmentally responsive phenotypes. Trends Ecol Evol 2012, 27:637-647.
39. Cole B., Kay S.A., Chory J. Automated analysis of hypocotyl growth dynamics during shade avoidance in Arabidopsis. Plant J 2010, 65:991-1000.
40. Walter A., Silk W.K., Schurr U. Environmental effects on spatial and temporal patterns of leaf and root growth. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2009, 60:279-304.
41. Mendez-Vigo B., de Andres M.T., Ramiro M., Martinez-Zapater J.M., Alonso-Blanco C. Temporal analysis of natural variation for the rate of leaf production and its relationship with flowering initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot 2010, 61:1611-1623.
42. Billiau K., Sprenger H., Schudoma C., Walther D., Kohl K.I. Data management pipeline for plant phenotyping in a multisite project. Funct Plant Biol 2012, 39:948-957.
43. Chapuis R., Delluc C., Debeuf R., Tardieu F., Welcker C. Resiliences to water deficit in a phenotyping platform and in the field: how related are they in maize?. Eur J Agron 2012, 42:59-67.
44. Houle D., Govindaraju D.R., Omholt S. Phenomics: the next challenge. Nat Rev Genet 2010, 11:855-866.
45. Fournier-Level A., Wilczek A.M., Cooper M.D., Roe J.L., Anderson J., Eaton D., Moyers B.T., Petipas R.H., Schaeffer R.N., Pieper B., et al. Paths to selection on life history loci in different natural environments across the native range of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Ecol 2013, 22:3552-3566.
46. Tisné S., Reymond M., Vile D., Fabre J., Dauzat M., Koornneef M., Granier C. Combined genetic and modeling approaches reveal that epidermal cell area and number in leaves are controlled by leaf and plant developmental processes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2008, 148:1117-1127.
47. Vile D., Shipley B., Garnier E. A structural equation model to integrate changes in functional strategies during old-field succession. Ecology 2006, 87:504-517.
48. Shipley B. Cause and Correlation in Biology: A User's Guide to Path Analysis, Structural Equations, and Causal Inference 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
49. Pavlicev M., Wagner G.P. A model of developmental evolution: selection, pleiotropy and compensation. Trends Ecol Evol 2012, 27:316-322.
50. Vasseur F., Violle C., Enquist B.J., Granier C., Vile D. A common genetic basis to the origin of the leaf economics spectrum and metabolic scaling allometry. Ecol Lett 2012, 15:1149-1157.
51. Li R., Tsaih S.W., Shockley K., Stylianou I.M., Wergedal J., Paigen B., Churchill G.A. Structural model analysis of multiple quantitative traits. PLoS Genet 2006, 2:e114.
52. Poorter H., Anten N.P., Marcelis L.F.M. Trait correlation networks: a whole-plant perspective on the recently criticized leaf economic spectrum. New Phytol 2013, 1-5.
53. Poorter H., Lambers H., Evans J.H. Physiological mechanisms in plant growth models: do we need a supracellular systems biology approach?. Plant Cell Environ 2013, 36:1-18.
54. Laughlin D. The intrinsic dimensionality of plant traits and its relevance to community assembly. J Ecol 2013, 10.1111/1365-2745.12187.
55. Vile D., Pervent M., Belluau M., Vasseur F., Bresson J., Muller B., Granier C., Simonneau T. Arabidopsis growth under prolonged high temperature and water deficit: independent or interactive effects?. Plant Cell Environ 2012, 35:702-718.
56. Westoby M., Falster D.S., Moles A.T., Vesk P.A., Wright I.J. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 2002, 33:125-159.
57. Topp C.N., Iyer-Pascuzzi A.S., Anderson J.T., Lee C.R., Zurek P.R., Symonova O., Zheng Y., Bucksch A., Mileyko Y., Galkovskyi T., et al. 3D phenotyping and quantitative trait locus mapping identify core regions of the rice genome controlling root architecture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013, 110:E1695-E1704.
58. van Eeuwijk F.A., Bink M.C.A.M., Chenu K., Chapman S. Detection and use of QTL for complex traits in multiple environments. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2010, 13:193-205.
59. Boer M.P., Wright D., Feng L.Z., Podlich D.W., Luo L., Cooper M., van Eeuwijk F.A. A mixed-model quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis for multiple-environment trial data using environmental covariables for QTL-by-environment interactions, with an example in maize. Genetics 2007, 177:1801-1813.
60. Kirkpatrick M., Lofsvold D., Bulmer M. Analysis of the inheritance, selection and evolution of growth trajectories. Genetics 1990, 124:979-993.
61. Blonder B., Lamanna C., Violle C., Enquist B. The n-dimensional hypervolume. Global Ecol Biogeogr 2014, (in press).
62. Sozzani R., Busch W., Spalding E.P., Benfey P.N. Advanced imaging techniques for the study of plant growth and development. Trends Plant Sci 2014, (in press).