Low-cost 3D systems: Suitable tools for plant phenotyping

Sensors (Switzerland)

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 3001-3018

  Paulus, Stefan ^a   Behmann, Jan ^a   Mahlein, Anne Katrin ^a   Plümer, Lutz ^a   Kuhlmann, Heiner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

3D imaging; Close up scanning; David laser scanning system; Low cost sensors; Microsoft Kinect; Parameterization

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893932231     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s140203001     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Furbank, R.; Tester, M. Phenomics-technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 635-644.
2. Fiorani, F.; Schurr, U. Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 267-291.
3. Dhondt, S.; Wuyts, N.; Inźe, D. Cell to whole-plant phenotyping: The best is yet to come. Trends Plant Sci. 2013, 8, 1-12.
4. Rascher, U.; Blossfeld, S.; M̈uller-Linow, M.; Nagel, K.; Pieruschka, R.; Pinto, F.; Schreiber, C.; Temperton, V.; Thorpe, M.; van Dusschoten, D.; et al. Non-invasive approaches for phenotyping of enhanced performance traits in bean. Functional Plant Biol. 2011, 38, 968-983.
5. Mahlein, A.; Oerke, E.; Steiner, U.; Dehne, H. Recent advances in sensing plant diseases for precision crop protection. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2012, 133, 197-209.
6. Frasson, R.; Krajewski, W. Three-dimensional digital model of a maize plant. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2010, 150, 478-488.
7. Fourcaud, T.; Zhang, X.; Stokes, A.; Lambers, H.; K̈orner, C. Plant growth modeling and applications: The increasing importance of plant architecture in growth models. Ann. Bot. 2008, 101, 1053-1063.
8. Omasa, K.; Hosoi, F.; Konishi, A. 3D lidar imaging for detecting and understanding plant responses and canopy structure. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 881-898.
9. Paulus, S.; Dupuis, J.; Mahlein, A.; Kuhlmann, H. Surface feature based classification of plant organs from 3D laserscanned point clouds for plant phenotyping. BMC Bioinform. 2013, 14, 238.
10. Berger, B.; Parent, B.; Tester, M. High-throughput shoot imaging to study drought responses. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 3519-3528.
11. Granier, C.; Aguirrezabal, L.; Chenu, K.; Cookson, S.; Dauzat, M.; Hamard, P.; Thioux, J.; Rolland, G.; Bouchier-Combaud, S.; Lebaudy, A.; et al. PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. New Phytol. 2006, 169, 623-635.
12. Hartmann, A.; Czauderna, T.; Hoffmann, R.; Stein, N.; Schreiber, F. HTPheno: An image analysis pipeline for high-throughput plant phenotyping. BMC Bioinform. 2011, 12, 148.
13. Keightley, K.; Bawden, G. 3D volumetric modeling of grapevine biomass using Tripod LiDAR. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2010, 74, 305-312.
14. Vos, J.; Evers, J.; Buck-Sorlin, G.; Andrieu, B.; Chelle, M.; de Visser, P. Functional-structural plant modeling: A new versatile tool in crop science. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 2101-2115.
15. El-Omari, S.; Moselhi, O. Integrating automated data acquisition technologies for progress reporting of construction projects. Autom. Constr. 2011, 20, 699-705.
16. Rusu, R.; Cousins, S. 3D is Here: Point Cloud Library (PCL). In Proceedings of the Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2011, Shanghai, 9-13 May 2011; pp. 1-4.
17. Palaći{dotless}n, J.; Palleja, T.; Tresanchez, M.; Sanz, R.; Llorens, J.; Ribes-dasi, M.; Masip, J.; Arńo, J.; Escola, A.; Rosell, J. Real-time tree-foliage surface estimation using a ground laser scanner. Instrumentation 2007, 56, 1377-1383.
18. Hosoi, F.; Omasa, K. Estimating vertical plant area density profile and growth parameters of a wheat canopy at different growth stages using three-dimensional portable lidar imaging. ISPRS J. Photogr. Remote Sens. 2009, 64, 151-158.
19. Busemeyer, L.; Ruckelshausen, A.; M̈oller, K.; Melchinger, A.; Alheit, K.; Maurer, H.; Hahn, V.; Weissmann, E.; Reif, J.; Ẅurschum, T. Precision phenotyping of biomass accumulation in triticale reveals temporal genetic patterns of regulation. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1-6.
20. Wagner, B.; Gaertner, H.; Ingensand, H.; Santini, S. Incorporating 2D tree-ring data in 3D laser scans of coarse-root systems. Plant Soil 2010, 370, 175-187.
21. Cai, X.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Damerow, L.; Schulze Lammers, P.; Sun, W.; Lin, J.; Zheng, L.; Tang, Y. Smart detection of leaf wilting by 3D image processing and 2D Fourier transform. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2013, 90, 68-75.
22. Yang, W.; Duan, L.; Chen, G.; Xiong, L.; Liu, Q. Plant phenomics and high-throughput phenotyping: Accelerating rice functional genomics using multidisciplinary technologies. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2013, 16, 180-187.
23. Microsoft, Kinect Specifications. 2010. Available online: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/ library/jj131033.aspx (accessed on 11 November 2013).
24. Winkelbach, S.; Molkenstruck, S.; Wahl, F. Low-cost Laser Range Scanner and Fast Surface Registration Approach. In Pattern Recognition; Franke, K., M̈uller, K., Nickolay, B., Scḧafer, R., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 718-728.
25. Khoshelham, K.; Elberink, S. Accuracy and resolution of Kinect depth data for indoor mapping applications. Sensors 2012, 12, 1437-1454.
26. Cui, Y.; Schuon, S.; Thrun, S.; Stricker, D.; Theobalt, C. Algorithms for 3D shape scanning with a depth camera. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013, 35, 1039-1050.
27. Henry, P.; Krainin, M.; Herbst, E.; Ren, X.; Fox, D. RGB-D mapping: Using Kinect-style depth cameras for dense 3D modeling of indoor environments. Int. J. Robot. Res. 2012, 31, 647-663.
28. Azzari, G.; Goulden, M.; Rusu, R. Rapid characterization of vegetation structure with a Microsoft Kinect sensor. Sensors 2013, 13, 2384-98.
29. Ch́eńe, Y.; Rousseau, D.; Lucidarme, P.; Bertheloot, J.; Caffier, V.; Morel, P.; Beliń E.; Chapeau-Blondeau, F. On the use of depth camera for 3D phenotyping of entire plants. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2012, 82, 122-127.
30. DAVID 3D Scanning. Available online: http://www.david-3d.com/ (accessed on 11 November 2013).
31. Mankoff, K.; Russo, T. The Kinect: A low-cost, high-resolution, short-range, 3D camera. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2013, 38, 926-936.
32. Whelan, T.; Kaess, M.; Fallon, M.; Johannsson, H.; Leonard, J.; McDonald, J. Kintinuous: Spatially Extended KinectFusion. In Proceedings of te RSS Workshop on RGB-D: Advanced Reasoning with Depth Cameras, Seattle, WA, USA, 9-10 July 2012; pp. 1-7.
33. Newcombe, R.; Davison, A.; Izadi, S.; Kohli, P.; Hilliges, O.; Shotton, J.; Molyneaux, D.; Hodges, S.; Kim, D.; Fitzgibbon, A. KinectFusion: Real-Time dense Surface Mapping and Tracking. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Basel, Switzerland, 26-29 October 2011; pp. 127-136.
34. ReconstructMe. 2014. Available online: http://reconstructme.net/ (accessed on 10 January 2014).
35. Wagner, B.; Santini, S.; Ingensand, H.; G̈artner, H. A tool to model 3D coarse-root development with annual resolution. Plant Soil 2011, 346, 79-96.
36. Hosoi, F.; Nakabayashi, K.; Omasa, K. 3-D Modeling of tomato canopies using a high-resolution portable scanning lidar for extracting structural information. Sensors 2011, 11, 2166-2174.
37. Besl, P.; McKay, N. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1992, 14, 239-256.
38. Khoshelham, K. Accuracy Analysis of Kinect Depth Data. In Proceeding of ISPRS Workshop Laser Scanning, Calgary, Canada, 29-31 August 2011; Volume 38, pp. 29-31.
39. Paproki, A.; Sirault, X.; Berry, S.; Furbank, R.; Fripp, J. A novel mesh processing based technique for 3D plant analysis. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 63.
40. Tsialtas, J.; Maslaris, N. Sugar beet root shape and its relation with yield and quality. Sugar Tech 2010, 12, 47-52.
41. Anten, N. Optimal photosynthetic characteristics of individual plants in vegetation stands and implications for species coexistence. Ann. Bot. 2005, 95, 495-506.
42. Evans, J.; Poorter, H. Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: The relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain. Plant Cell Environ. 2001, 24, 755-767.
43. Andrieu, B.; Allirand, J.; Jaggard, K. Ground cover and leaf area index of maize and sugar beet crops. Agronomie 1997, 17, 315-321.
44. Munns, R.; James, R.; Sirault, X.; Furbank, R.; Jones, H. New phenotyping methods for screening wheat and barley for beneficial responses to water deficit. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 3499-3507.
45. Microsoft, Kinect 2.0 Announcement in Official Blog. Available online: http://blogs.msdn.com/ b/kinectforwindows/archive/2013/11.aspx (accessed on 10 January 2013).
46. Busemeyer, L.; Mentrup, D.; M̈oller, K.; Wunder, E.; Alheit, K.; Hahn, V.; Maurer, H.; Reif, J.; Ẅurschum, T.; M̈uller, J.; et al. BreedVision-a multi-sensor platform for non-destructive field-based phenotyping in plant breeding. Sensors 2013, 13, 2830-2847.