Social Regulation of Learning During Collaborative Inquiry Learning in Science: How does it emerge and what are its functions?

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 37, Issue 15, 2015, Pages 2503-2532

  Ucan, Serkan ^a,b   Webb, Mary ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b HARRAN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Collaborative inquiry learning; Knowledge co construction; Social regulation of learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944160594     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1083634     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. R.Bakeman,, & J.M.Gottman, (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2. B.Barron, (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. doi: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
3. T.Bell,, D.Urhahne,, S.Schanze,, & R.Ploetzner, (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349–377. doi: 10.1080/09500690802582241
4. A.Ben-David,, & A.Zohar, (2009). Contribution of meta-strategic knowledge to scientific inquiry learning. International Journal of Science Education, 31(12), 1657–1682. doi: 10.1080/09500690802162762
5. J.Bennett,, S.Hogarth,, F.Lubben,, B.Campbell,, & A.Robinson, (2010). Talking science: The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), 69–95. doi: 10.1080/09500690802713507
6. V.Braun,, & V.Clarke, (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
7. D.L.Butler, (2011). Investigating self-regulated learning using in-depth case studies. In B.Zimmerman & D.Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 346–360). New York, NY: Routledge.
8. C.K.Chan, (2012). Co-regulation of learning in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 63–73. doi: 10.1007/s11409-012-9086-z
9. J.Creswell, (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10. H.Gijlers,, & T.de Jong, (2013). Using concept maps to facilitate collaborative simulation-based inquiry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 340–374. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2012.748664
11. V.Grau,, & D.Whitebread, (2012). Self and social regulation of learning during collaborative activities in the classroom: The interplay of individual and group cognition. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 401–412. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.03.003
12. J.Greene,, & R.Azevedo, (2009). A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 18–29. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.006
13. A.Hadwin,, S.Järvelä,, & M.Miller, (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B.Zimmerman & D.Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–84). New York, NY: Routledge.
14. T.Iiskala,, M.Vauras,, & E.Lehtinen, (2004). Socially shared metacognition in peer-learning? Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 1(2), 147–178.
15. T.Iiskala,, M.Vauras,, E.Lehtinen,, & P.Salonen, (2011). Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 379–393. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.002
16. J.Janssen,, G.Erkens,, P.A.Kirschner,, & G.Kanselaar, (2012). Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 25–43. doi: 10.1007/s11409-010-9061-5
17. S.Järvelä,, & A.Hadwin, (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.748006
18. S.Järvelä,, & H.Järvenoja, (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning in collaborative learning groups. Teacher College Records, 113(2), 350–374.
19. S.Järvelä,, H.Järvenoja,, J.Malmberg,, & A.Hadwin, (2013). Exploring collaboration. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(3), 267–286. doi: 10.1891/1945-8959.12.3.267
20. H.Järvenoja,, & S.Järvelä, (2009). Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: Do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 463–481. doi: 10.1348/000709909X402811
21. P.Kutnick,, & P.Blatchford, (2014). Effective group work in primary school classrooms. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
22. Y.S.Lincoln,, & E.G.Guba, (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
23. N.E.Perry,, & P.H.Winne, (2013). Tracing students’ regulation of learning in complex collaborative tasks. In S.Volet & M.Vauras (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: Methodological advances (pp. 45–66). London: Routledge.
24. P.Pintrich, (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. doi: 10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
25. T.K.Rogat,, & L.Linnenbrink-Garcia, (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4), 375–415. doi: 10.1080/07370008.2011.607930
26. V.Sampson,, & D.Clark, (2009). The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 93(3), 448–484. doi: 10.1002/sce.20306
27. S.Sandi-Urena,, M.Cooper,, & R.Stevens, (2011). Enhancement of metacognition use and awareness by means of a collaborative intervention. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 323–340. doi: 10.1080/09500690903452922
28. B.Slof,, G.Erkens,, P.A.Kirschner,, J.Jaspers,, & J.Janssen, (2010). Guiding students’ online complex learning-task behavior through representational scripting. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 927–939. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.007
29. G.P.Thomas, (2013). Changing the metacognitive orientation of a classroom environment to stimulate metacognitive reflection regarding the nature of physics learning. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1183–1207. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2013.778438
30. S.Volet,, M.Summers,, & J.Thurman, (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128–143. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001
31. S.Volet,, M.Vauras, D.Khosa,, & T.Iiskala, (2013). Metacognitive regulation in collaborative learning conceptual developments and methodological contextualizations. In S.Volet & M.Vauras (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: Methodological advances (pp. 67–101). London: Routledge.
32. N.M.Webb,, M.Ing,, N.Kersting,, & K.M.Nemer, (2006). Help seeking in cooperative learning groups. In S.A.Karabenick & R.S.Newman (Eds.), Academic help seeking: Goals, groups and contexts (pp. 45–88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. D.Whitebread,, & P.Coltman, (2010). Aspects of pedagogy supporting metacognition and self-regulation in mathematical learning of young children: Evidence from an observational study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 42, 163–178. doi: 10.1007/s11858-009-0233-1
34. D.Whitebread,, P.Coltman,, D.P.Pasternak,, C.Sangster,, V.Grau,, S.Bingham,, …, D.Demetriou, (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 63–85. doi: 10.1007/s11409-008-9033-1
35. P.H.Winne,, & A.F.Hadwin, (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D.H.Schunk & B.J.Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 297–314). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
36. F.I.Winters,, & P.A.Alexander, (2011). Peer collaboration: The relation of regulatory behaviors to learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 39, 407–427. doi: 10.1007/s11251-010-9134-5
37. F.I.Winters,, & R.Azevedo, (2005). High-school students’ regulation of learning during computer-based science inquiry. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 189–217. doi: 10.2190/F7HM-9JN5-JUX8-4BM9
38. R.K.Yin, (2011). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
39. B.J.Zimmerman, (2012). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B.Zimmerman & D.Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. B.J.Zimmerman,, & D.Schunk, (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. In B.J.Zimmerman & D.Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Routledge.