Talking science: The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 69-95

  Bennett, Judith ^a   Hogarth, Sylvia ^a   Lubben, Fred ^a   Campbell, Bob ^a   Robinson, Alison ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Learning activities; Literature review; Small group discussion

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649122620     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690802713507     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1997). Communication and learning in small groups. London: Routledge/Kegan Paul.
2. Bennett, J., Lubben, F., Hogarth, S., & Campbell, B. (2004a). A systematic review of the use of small group discussions in science teaching with students aged 11-18, and their effects on students' understanding in science or attitude to science. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education. Retrieved December 27, 2008, from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=326
3. Bennett, J., Lubben, F., Hogarth, S., Campbell, B., & Robinson, A. (2004b). A systematic review of the nature of small group discussions in science teaching aimed at improving students' understanding of evidence. In: Research evidence in education library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education. Retrieved December 27, 2008, from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=321
4. Bennett, J., Lubben, F., Hogarth, S., & Campbell, B. (2005). Systematic reviews of research in science education: Rigour or rigidity? International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 387-406.
5. Bentley, D., & Watts, M. (1992). Communicating in school science. London: Falmer.
6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: King's College.
7. Bloome, D. (Ed.). (1989). Learning to use literacy in educational settings. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8. Davies, P. (2000). The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice. Oxford Review of Education, 26, 365-378.
9. Daws, N., & Singh, B. (1996). Formative assessment: To what extent is its potential to enhance pupils' science being realised? School Science Review, 77(281), 93-100.
10. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1998). The national literacy strategy. London: DfEE.
11. De Vries, E., Lund, K., & Baker, M. (2002). Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 63-103.
12. Driver, R., & Bell, B. (1985). Students' thinking and the learning of science: A constructivist view. School Science Review, 67(240), 443-456.
13. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
14. EPPI-Centre. (2002). EPPI-centre review group manual. London: Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
15. Finkel, E. A. (1996). Making sense of genetics: Students' knowledge use during problem solving in a high school genetics class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 345-368.
16. Gayford, C. (1995). Science education and sustainability: A case-study in discussion-based learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 13, 135-45.
17. Hargreaves, D. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects. London: Teacher Training Agency (TTA).
18. Hillage, L., Pearson, R., Anderson, A., & Tamkin, P. (1998). Excellence in research on schools. Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies.
19. Hogan, K. (1999a). Sociocognitive roles in science group discourse. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 855-882.
20. Hogan, K. (1999b). Thinking aloud together: A test of an intervention to foster students' collaborative scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1085-1109.
21. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Pereiro-Muñoz, C. (2002). Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1171-1190.
22. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). 'Doing the lesson' or 'doing science': Argument in high school genetics. Science and Education, 84, 757-792.
23. Johnson, S. K., & Stewart, J. (2002). Revising and assessing explanatory models in a high school genetics class: A comparison of unsuccessful and successful performance. Science and Education, 86, 463-480.
24. Keys, C. W. (1997). An investigation of the relationship between scientific reasoning, conceptual knowledge and model formulation in a naturalistic setting. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 957-970.
25. Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(2), 319-337.
26. Kurth, L. A., Anderson, C. W., & Palincsar, A. S. (2002). The case of Carla: Dilemmas of helping all students to understand science. Science Education, 86, 287-313.
27. Kyriacou, C. (1998). Essential teaching skills (2nd ed.). Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.
28. Lajoie, S. P., Lavigne, N. C., Guerrera, C., & Munsie, S. D. (2001). Constructing knowledge in the context of BioWorld. Instructional Science, 29, 155-186.
29. Lavoie, D. R. (1999). Effects of emphasizing hypothetico-predictive reasoning within the science learning cycle on high school student's process skills and conceptual understandings in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1127-1147.
30. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science. New York: Ablex.
31. Levinson, R., & Turner, S. (2001). Valuable lessons: Engaging with the social context of science in schools. London: Wellcome Trust.
32. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A sociocultural approach. Oxford: Routledge.
33. Meyer, K., & Woodruff, E. (1997). Consensually driven explanation in science teaching. Science Education, 81, 173-192.
34. Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499-1521.
35. Millar, R., Leach, J., Osborne, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2006). Improving subject teaching: Lessons from research in science education. London: Routledge.
36. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King's College/The Nuffield Foundation.
37. Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.
38. Oakley, A. (2002). Social science and evidence-based everything: The case of education. Educational Review, 54(3), 21-33.
39. OECD. (2002). Educational research and development in England: Examiners' report. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved January 2, 2008, from www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/56.
40. Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441-467.
41. Osborne, J., Duschl, R., & Fairbrother, R. (2002). Breaking the mould? Teaching science for public understanding. London: Nuffield Foundation.
42. Palincsar, A. S., & Anderson, C., & David, Y. M. (1993). Pursuing scientific literacy in the middle grades through collaborative problem solving. Elementary School Journal, 93, 643-658.
43. Richmond, G., & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 839-858.
44. Roth, W. -M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1992). The social construction of scientific concepts or the concept map as conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science. Science and Education, 76, 531-557.
45. Scott, P. (1998). Teacher talk and meaning-making in science classrooms: A Vygotskyan analysis and review. Studies in Science Education, 32, 45-80.
46. Shavelson, R., & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2001). Scientific enquiry in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
47. Sherman, G. P., & Klein, J. D. (1995). The effects of cued interaction and ability grouping during cooperative computer-based science instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43, 5-24.
48. Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, R. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Dillon, L. (2003). Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. London: Strategy Unit.
50. Suthers, D., & Weiner, A. (1995). Groupware for developing critical discussion skills. In J. L. Schnase & E. L. Cunnius (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL '95: The First International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 341-348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. Sutton, C. (1992). Words, science and learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.
52. Tao, P. K. (2001). Developing understanding through confronting varying views: The case of solving qualitative physics problems. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 1201-1218.
53. Tolmie, A., & Howe, C. (1993). Gender and dialogue in secondary school physics. Gender and Education, 5, 191-209.
54. Toulmin, S. (1958). The use of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Tsai, C. -C. (1999). Laboratory exercises help me memorize the scientific truths: A study of eighth graders' scientific epistemological views and learning in laboratory activities. Science and Education, 83, 654-674.
56. Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
57. Williams, A. (1995). Long-distance collaboration: A case study of science teaching and learning. In S. A. Spiegel (Ed.), Perspectives from teachers' classrooms: Action research. Science FEAT (Science for Early Adolescence Teachers) (pp. 165-174). Tallahassee, FL: Southeastern Regional Vision for Education.
58. Woodruff, E., & Meyer, K. (1997). Explanations from intra- and inter-group discourse: Students building knowledge in the science classroom. Research in Science Education, 27, 25-39.
59. Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35-62.