Tag jumps illuminated - reducing sequence-to-sample misidentifications in metabarcoding studies

Molecular Ecology Resources

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1289-1303

  Schnell, Ida Bærholm ^a,b   Bohmann, Kristine ^a,c   Gilbert, M Thomas P ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b CENTER FOR ZOO AND WILD ANIMAL HEALTH   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^d CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Chimeras; Diversity assessment; Environmental DNA; Metabarcoding; Second generation sequencing; Tag jumping

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BAT; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DNA BARCODING; FECES; INTESTINE FLORA; LEECH; METAGENOMICS; MICROBIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; CHIROPTERA; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY; FECES; GASTROINTESTINAL MICROBIOME; LEECHES; METAGENOMICS;

EID: 84943579883     PISSN: 1755098X     EISSN: 17550998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12402     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Acinas SG, Sarma-Rupavtarm R, Klepac-Ceraj V, Polz MF (2005) PCR-induced sequence artifacts and bias: insights from comparison of two 16S rRNA clone libraries constructed from the same sample. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71, 8966-8969.
2. Binladen J, Gilbert MTP, Bollback JP et al. (2007) The use of coded PCR primers enables high-throughput sequencing of multiple homolog amplification products by 454 parallel sequencing. PLoS ONE, 2, e197.
3. Blaalid R, Kumar S, Nilsson RH et al. (2013) ITS1 versus ITS2 as DNA metabarcodes for fungi. Molecular Ecology Resources, 13, 218-224.
4. Blaalid R, Davey ML, Kauserud H et al. (2014) Arctic root-associated fungal community composition reflects environmental filtering. Molecular Ecology, 23, 649-659.
5. Bohmann K, Monadjem A, Lehmkuhl Noer C et al. (2011) Molecular diet analysis of two African free-tailed bats (Molossidae) using high throughput sequencing. PLoS ONE, 6, e21441.
6. Botnen S, Vik U, Carlsen T et al. (2014) Low host specificity of root-associated fungi at an Arctic site. Molecular Ecology, 23, 975-985.
7. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA et al. (2009) The MIQE Guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clinical Chemistry, 55, 611-622.
8. Carew ME, Pettigrove VJ, Metzeling L, Hoffmann AA (2013) Environmental monitoring using next generation sequencing: rapid identification of macroinvertebrate bioindicator species. Frontiers in Zoology, 10, 45.
9. Carlsen T, Aas AB, Lindner D et al. (2012) Don't make a mista(g)ke: is tag switching an overlooked source of error in amplicon pyrosequencing studies? Fungal Ecology, 5, 747-749.
10. Chariton AA, Court LN, Hartley DM, Colloff MJ, Hardy CM (2010) Ecological assessment of estuarine sediments by pyrosequencing eukaryotic ribosomal DNA. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8, 233-238.
11. Coissac E (2012) oligotag: a program for designing sets of tags for next-generation sequencing of multiplexed samples. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.), 888, 13-31.
12. Coissac E, Riaz T, Puillandre N (2012) Bioinformatic challenges for DNA metabarcoding of plants and animals. Molecular Ecology, 21, 1834-1847.
13. Davey ML, Heimdal R, Ohlson M, Kauserud H (2013) Host-and tissue-specificity of moss-associated Galerina and Mycena determined from amplicon pyrosequencing data. Fungal Ecology, 6, 179-186.
14. Davey ML, Kauserud H, Ohlson M (2014) Forestry impacts on the hidden fungal biodiversity associated with bryophytes. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 90, 313-325.
15. De Barba M, Miquel C, Boyer F et al. (2014) DNA metabarcoding multiplexing and validation of data accuracy for diet assessment: application to omnivorous diet. Molecular Ecology Resources, 14, 306-323.
16. Deagle BE, Kirkwood R, Jarman SN (2009) Analysis of Australian fur seal diet by pyrosequencing prey DNA in faeces. Molecular Ecology, 18, 2022-2038.
17. Dunshea G, Barros NB, Wells RS et al. (2008) Pseudogenes and DNA-based diet analyses: a cautionary tale from a relatively well sampled predator-prey system. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 98, 239-248.
18. Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than blast. Bioinformatics, 26, 2460-2461.
19. Edgar RCR, Haas BJB, Clemente JCJ, Quince CC, Knight RR (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics, 27, 2194-2200.
20. Esling P, Lejzerowicz F, Pawlowski J (2015) Accurate multiplexing and filtering for high-throughput amplicon-sequencing. Nucleic Acids Research, doi:10.1093/nar/gkv107.
21. Ficetola GF, Miaud C, Pompanon F, Taberlet P (2008) Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biology Letters, 4, 423-425.
22. Haile J, Froese DG, MacPhee RDE et al. (2009) Ancient DNA reveals late survival of mammoth and horse in interior Alaska. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 22352-22357.
23. Hope PR, Bohmann K, Gilbert MTP et al. (2014) Second generation sequencing and morphological faecal analysis reveal unexpected foraging behaviour by Myotis nattereri (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in winter. Frontiers in Zoology, 11, 39.
24. Jerde CL, Mahon AR, Chadderton WL, Lodge DM (2011) "Sight-unseen" detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA. Conservation Letters, 4, 150-157.
25. Judo MS, Wedel AB, Wilson C (1998) Stimulation and suppression of PCR-mediated recombination. Nucleic Acids Research, 26, 1819-1825.
26. Kircher M, Sawyer S, Meyer M (2011) Double indexing overcomes inaccuracies in multiplex sequencing on the Illumina platform. Nucleic Acids Research, 40, e3.
27. Kozarewa I, Ning Z, Quail MA et al. (2009) Amplification-free Illumina sequencing-library preparation facilitates improved mapping and assembly of (G+C)-biased genomes. Nature Methods, 6, 291-295.
28. Krueger F, Andrews SR, Osborne CS (2011) Large scale loss of data in low-diversity illumina sequencing libraries can be recovered by deferred cluster calling. PLoS ONE, 6, e16607.
29. Lahr DJG, Katz LA (2009) Reducing the impact of PCR-mediated recombination in molecular evolution and environmental studies using a new-generation high-fidelity DNA polymerase. BioTechniques, 47, 857-866.
30. Lindgreen S (2012) adapterremoval: easy cleaning of next-generation sequencing reads. BMC Research Notes, 5, 337.
31. Lindner DL, Carlsen T, Henrik Nilsson R et al. (2013) Employing 454 amplicon pyrosequencing to reveal intragenomic divergence in the internal transcribed spacer rDNA region in fungi. Ecology and Evolution, 3, 1751-1764.
32. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE et al. (2005) Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature, 437, 376-380.
33. Meyer M, Kircher M (2010) Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, 2010, pdb.prot5448.
34. Meyerhans A, Vartanian J-P, Wain-Hobson S (1990) DNA recombination during PCR. Nucleic Acids Research, 18, 1687-1691.
35. Murray DC, Haile J, Dortch J et al. (2013) Scrapheap Challenge: a novel bulk-bone metabarcoding method to investigate ancient DNA in faunal assemblages. Scientific Reports, 3, doi:10.1038/srep03371.
36. Nakano M, Komatsu J, Matsuura S et al. (2003) Single-molecule PCR using water-in-oil emulsion. Journal of Biotechnology, 102, 117-124.
37. Nathan LR, Jerde CL, Budny ML, Mahon AR (2014) The use of environmental DNA in invasive species surveillance of the Great Lakes commercial bait trade. Conservation Biology, doi:10.1111/cobi.12381.
38. van Orsouw NJ, Hogers RCJ, Janssen A et al. (2007) Complexity reduction of polymorphic sequences (CRoPS): a novel approach for large-scale polymorphism discovery in complex genomes. PLoS ONE, 2, e1172.
39. Pegard A, Miquel C, Valentini A et al. (2009) Universal DNA-based methods for assessing the diet of grazing livestock and wildlife from feces. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57, 5700-5706.
40. Piñol J, San Andrés V, Clare EL, Mir G, Symondson WOC (2014) A pragmatic approach to the analysis of diets of generalist predators: the use of next-generation sequencing with no blocking probes. Molecular Ecology Resources, 14, 18-26.
41. Pompanon F, Deagle BE, Symondson WOC et al. (2012) Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing. Molecular Ecology, 21, 1931-1950.
42. Qiu X, Wu L, Huang H et al. (2001) Evaluation of PCR-generated chimeras, mutations, and heteroduplexes with 16S rRNA gene-based cloning. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67, 880-887.
43. Quéméré E, Hibert F, Miquel C et al. (2013) A DNA metabarcoding study of a primate dietary diversity and plasticity across its entire fragmented range. PLoS ONE, 8, e58971.
44. Quince C, Lanzén A, Davenport RJ, Turnbaugh PJ (2011) Removing noise from pyrosequenced amplicons. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 38.
45. Rasmussen M, Cummings LS, Gilbert MTP et al. (2009) Response to Comment by Goldberg et al. on "DNA from Pre-Clovis Human Coprolites in Oregon, North America". Science, doi:10.1126/science.1167672.
46. Rittié L, Perbal B (2008) Enzymes used in molecular biology: a useful guide. Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling, 2, 25-45.
47. Shapiro BA, Hofreiter M (eds) (2012) Ancient DNA: Methods and Protocols. Humana Press.
48. Shehzad W, Riaz T, Nawaz MA et al. (2012) Carnivore diet analysis based on next-generation sequencing: application to the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in Pakistan. Molecular Ecology, 21, 1951-1965.
49. Shin S, Lee TK, Han JM, Park J (2014) Regional effects on chimera formation in 454 pyrosequenced amplicons from a mock community. Journal of Microbiology, 52, 566-573.
50. Smyth RP, Schlub TE, Grimm A et al. (2010) Reducing chimera formation during PCR amplification to ensure accurate genotyping. Gene, 469, 45-51.
51. Soininen EM, Valentini A, Coissac E et al. (2009) Analysing diet of small herbivores: the efficiency of DNA barcoding coupled with high-throughput pyrosequencing for deciphering the composition of complex plant mixtures. Frontiers in Zoology, 6, 16.
52. Sønstebø JH, Gielly L, Brysting AK et al. (2010) Using next-generation sequencing for molecular reconstruction of past Arctic vegetation and climate. Molecular Ecology Resources, 10, 1009-1018.
53. Taberlet P, Coissac E, Hajibabaei M, Rieseberg LH (2012a) Environmental DNA. Molecular ecology, 21, 1789-1793.
54. Taberlet P, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Brochmann C, Willerslev E (2012b) Towards next-generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Molecular Ecology, 21, 2045-2050.
55. Taylor PG (1996) Reproducibility of ancient DNA sequences from extinct Pleistocene fauna. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13, 283-285.
56. Valentini A, Miquel C, Nawaz MA et al. (2009) New perspectives in diet analysis based on DNA barcoding and parallel pyrosequencing: the trnL approach. Molecular Ecology Resources, 9, 51-60.
57. Vo ATE, Jedlicka JA (2014) Protocols for metagenomic DNA extraction and Illumina amplicon library preparation for faecal and swab samples. Molecular Ecology Resources, 14, 1183-1197.
58. Wang GC, Wang Y (1996) The frequency of chimeric molecules as a consequence of PCR co-amplification of 16S rRNA genes from different bacterial species. Microbiology (Reading, England), 142(Pt 5), 1107-1114.
59. Wang GC, Wang Y (1997) Frequency of formation of chimeric molecules as a consequence of PCR coamplification of 16S rRNA genes from mixed bacterial genomes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63, 4645-4650.
60. Zeale MRK, Butlin RK, Barker GLA, Lees DC, Jones G (2010) Taxon-specific PCR for DNA barcoding arthropod prey in bat faeces. Molecular Ecology Resources, 11, 236-244.
61. Zinger L, Gobet A, Pommier T (2012) Two decades of describing the unseen majority of aquatic microbial diversity. Molecular Ecology, 21, 1878-1896.