Anterior and Anterolateral Approaches for THA Are Associated With Lower Dislocation Risk Without Higher Revision Risk

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 473, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 3401-3408

  Sheth, Dhiren ^a   Cafri, Guy ^a   Inacio, Maria C S ^a   Paxton, Elizabeth W ^a   Namba, Robert S ^a  

^a KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GERIATRIC SURGERY; HIP DISLOCATION; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURVIVAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CALIFORNIA; HAWAII; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION; HIP; HIP REPLACEMENT; INCIDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; REGISTER; RISK FACTOR; SURGERY; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CALIFORNIA; FEMALE; HAWAII; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84942830067     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4230-0     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alecci V, Valente M, Crucil M, Minerva M, Pellegrino CM, Sabbadini DD. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings. J Orthop Traumatol. 2011;12:123–129.
2. Arthursson AJ, Furnes O, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Soreide JA. Prosthesis survival after total hip arthroplasty—does surgical approach matter? Analysis of 19,304 Charnley and 6,002 Exeter primary total hip arthroplasties reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:719–729.
3. Bernasek TL, Lee W-S, Lee H-J, Lee J-S, Kim K-H, Yang J-J. Minimally invasive primary THA: anterolateral intermuscular approach versus lateral transmuscular approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;130:1349–1354.
4. Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2456–2463.
5. Bertin KR, Röttinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:248–255.
6. Bhandari M, Matta JM, Dodgin D, Clark C, Kregor P, Bradley G, Little L. Outcomes following the single-incision anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty: a multicenter observational study. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:329–342.
7. Bozic KJ, Ong K, Lau E, Kurtz SM, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ. Risk of complication and revision total hip arthroplasty among Medicare patients with different bearing surfaces. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2357–2362.
8. Brennan S, Khan F, Kiernan C, Queally J, McQuillan J, Gormley I, O’Byrne J. Dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty and the risk of redislocation. Hip Int. 2012;22:500–504.
9. Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, Zurakowski D, Rubash HE, Freiberg AA, Malchau H. The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:319–329.
10. D’Arrigo C, Speranza A, Monaco E, Carcangiu A, Ferretti A. Learning curve in tissue sparing total hip replacement: comparison between different approaches. J Orthop Traumatol. 2009;10:47–54.
11. De Geest T, Vansintjan P, De Loore G. Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: complications and early outcome in a series of 300 cases. Acta Orthop Belg. 2013;79:66–73.
12. de Verteuil R, Imamura M, Zhu S, Glazener C, Fraser C, Munro N, Hutchison J, Grant A, Coyle D, Coyle K, Vale L. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and economic modelling of minimal incision total hip replacement approaches in the management of arthritic disease of the hip. Health Technol Assess. 2008;12:iii–iv, ix–223.
13. Devane PA, Wraighte PJ, Ong DCG, Horne JG. Do joint registries report true rates of hip dislocation? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:3003–3006.
14. Dudda M, Gueleryuez A, Gautier E, Busato A, Roeder C. Risk factors for early dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a matched case-control study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2010;18:179–183.
15. Edmunds CT, Boscainos PJ. Effect of surgical approach for total hip replacement on hip function using Harris hip scores and Trendelenburg’s test. A retrospective analysis. Surgeon. 2011;9:124–129.
16. Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA Sr. Distal ingrowth components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:135–141.
17. FDA. Medical Devices Recalls. Recalls specific to metal-on-metal hip implant systems. DePuy ASR™ XL Acetabular System. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/MetalonMetalHipImplants/ucm241770.htm. Accessed August 13, 2012.
18. Goosen JH, Kollen BJ, Castelein RM, Kuipers BM, Verheyen CC. Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:200–208.
19. Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Karrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:442–448.
20. Howie DW, Holubowycz OT, Middleton R. Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1095–1102.
21. Inaba Y, Kobayashi N, Yukizawa Y, Ishida T, Iwamoto N, Saito T. Little clinical advantage of modified Watson-Jones approach over modified mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1117–1122.
22. Jameson SS, Baker PN, Charman SC, Deehan DJ, Reed MR, Gregg PJ, Van der Meulen JH. The effect of aspirin and low-molecular-weight heparin on venous thromboembolism after knee replacement: a non-randomised comparison using National Joint Registry Data. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;94:914–918.
23. Jerosch J, Theising C, Fadel ME. Antero-lateral minimal invasive (ALMI) approach for total hip arthroplasty technique and early results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;126:164–173.
24. Katz JN, Losina E, Barrett J, Phillips CB, Mahomed NN, Lew RA, Guadagnoli E, Harris WH, Poss R, Baron JA. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1622–1629.
25. Kennon R, Keggi J, Zatorski L, Keggi K. Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: beyond the minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(Suppl 2):91–97.
26. Khatod M, Barber T, Paxton E, Namba R, Fithian D. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:19–23.
27. Kwon M, Kuskowski M, Mulhall K, Macaulay W, Brown T, Saleh K. Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:34–38.
28. Laffosse J, Chiron P, Accadbled F, Molinier F, Tricoire J, Puget J. Learning curve for a modified Watson-Jones minimally invasive approach in primary total hip replacement: analysis of complications and early results versus the standard-incision posterior approach. Acta Orthop Belg. 2006;72:693–701.
29. Lamontagne M, Varin D, Beaulé PE. Does the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty better restore stair climbing gait mechanics? J Orthop Res. 2011;29:1412–1417.
30. Lee EW, Wei LJ, Amato DA. Cox-type regression analysis for large number of small groups of correlated failure time observations. In: Klein JP, Goel PK, eds. Survival Analysis: State of the Art. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer; 1992.
31. Lin DY, Wei LJ, Ying Z. Checking the cox model with cumulative sums of Martingale-based residuals. Biometrika. 1993;80:557–572.
32. Lindgren V, Garellick G, Kärrholm J, Wretenberg P. The type of surgical approach influences the risk of revision in total hip arthroplasty: a study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register of 90,662 total hipreplacements with 3 different cemented prostheses. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:559–565.
33. Mandereau C, Brzakala V, Matsoukis J. Functional recovery, complications and CT positioning of total hip replacement performed through a Röttinger anterolateral mini-incision. Review of a continuous series of 103 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98:8–16.
34. Martin R, Clayson PE, Troussel S, Fraser BP, Docquier PL. Anterolateral minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study with a follow-up of 1 year. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1362–1372.
35. Matta J, Ferguson T. The anterior approach for hip replacement. Orthopedics. 2005;28:959–960.
36. Morrey B. Instability after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992;23:237–248.
37. Mouilhade F, Matsoukis J, Oger P, Mandereau C, Brzakala V, Dujardin F. Component positioning in primary total hip replacement: a prospective comparative study of two anterolateral approaches, minimally invasive versus gluteus medius hemimyotomy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97:14–21.
38. Müller M, Tohtz S, Springer I, Dewey M, Perka C. Randomized controlled trial of abductor muscle damage in relation to the surgical approach for primary total hip replacement: minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131:179–189.
39. Palan J, Beard D, Murray D, Andrew J, Nolan J. Which approach for total hip arthroplasty: anterolateral or posterior? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:473–477.
40. Paxton EW, Kiley ML, Love R, Barber TC, Funahashi TT, Inacio MC. Kaiser Permanente implant registries benefit patient safety, quality improvement, cost-effectiveness. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39:246–252.
41. Pospischill M, Kranzl A, Attwenger B, Knahr K. Minimally invasive compared with traditional transgluteal approach for total hip arthroplasty: a comparative gait analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:328–337.
42. Queen RM, Butler RJ, Watters TS, Kelley SS, Attarian DE, Bolognesi MP. The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on postoperative gait mechanics. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(Suppl):66–71.
43. Restrepo C, Mortazavi SM, Brothers J, Parvizi J, Rothman RH. Hip dislocation: are hip precautions necessary in anterior approaches? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:417–422.
44. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1987.
45. Skoldenberg OG, Salemyr MO, Boden HS, Ahl TE, Adolphson PY. The effect of weekly risedronate on periprosthetic bone resorption following total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1857–1864.
46. Smith AJ, Wylde V, Berstock JR, Maclean AD, Blom AW. Surgical approach and patient-reported outcomes after total hip replacement. Hip Int. 2012;22:255–261.
47. Stroh D, Issa K, Johnson A, Delanois R, Mont M. Reduced dislocation rates and excellent functional outcomes with large-diameter femoral heads. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1415–1420.
48. White IR, Royston P. Imputing missing covariate values for the Cox model. Stat Med. 2009;28:1982–1998.
49. Yang B, Li H, He X, Wang G, Xu S. Minimally invasive surgical approaches and traditional total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of radiological and complications outcomes. PLoS One. 2012;7:e37947.
50. Yi C, Agudelo J, Dayton M, Morgan S. Early complications of anterior supine intermuscular total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2013;36:e276–281.
51. Zimmerma S, Hawkes WG, Hudson JI, Magaziner J, Hebel JR, Towheed T, Gardner J, Provenzano G, Kenzora JE. Outcomes of surgical management of total HIP replacement in patients aged 65 years and older: cemented versus cementless femoral components and lateral or anterolateral versus posterior anatomical approach. J Orthop Res. 2002;20:182–191.