The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on postoperative gait mechanics

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 26, Issue SUPPL. 6, 2011, Pages 66-71

  Queen, Robin M ^a   Butler, Robert J ^a   Watters, Tyler S ^a   Kelley, Scott S ^a   Attarian, David E ^a   Bolognesi, Michael P ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Gait analysis; Surgical approach; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; GAIT; HIP; HUMAN; LOCOMOTION; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; STANDING; TIME; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WALKING SPEED; AGED; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GAIT; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84856183893     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.033     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Oishi C, Hoaglund F, Gordon L, et al. Total hip replacement rates are higher among Caucasians than Asians in Hawaii. CORR 1998;353:166.
2. Baker A, Bitounis VC. Abductor function after total hip replacement-an electromyographic and clinical review. J Bone Joint Surg 1989;71-B:47.
3. Barber T, Roger D, Goodman S, et al. Early outcome of total hip arthroplasty using the direct lateral vs the posterior surgical approach. Orthopedics 1996;19:873.
4. Downing N, Clark D, Hutchinson J, et al. Hip abductor strength following total hip arthroplasty-a prospective comparison of the posterior and lateral approach in 100 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2001;72:215.
5. Li E, Meding J, Ritter MA, et al. The natural history of a posteriorly dislocated total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:964.
6. Weale A, Newman P, Ferguson I, et al. Nerve injury after posterior and direct lateral approaches for hip replacement. A clinical and electrophysiological study. J Bone Joint Surg 1996;78-B:899.
7. Bennett D, Humphreys L, O'Brien S, et al. Temporospatial parameters of hip replacement patients ten years postoperatively. Int Orthop 2009;33:1203.
8. Mont M, Seyler T, Ragland P, et al. Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:100.
9. McCrory J, White S, Lifeso R. Vertical ground reaction forces: objective measures of gait following hip arthroplasty. Gait Posture 2001;14:104.
10. Meneghini RM, Smits SA, Swinford RR, et al. A randomized, prospective study of 3 minimally invasive surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty: comprehensive gait analysis. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:68.
11. Whatling G, Dabke H, Holt C, et al. Objective functional assessment of total hip arthroplasty following two common surgical approaches: the posterior and direct lateral approaches. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2008;222:897.
12. Lugade V, Wu A, Jewett B, et al. Gait asymmetry following an anterior and anterolateral approach to total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 2010;25:675.
13. Pospischill M, Kranzl A, Attwenger B, et al. Minimally invasive compared with traditional transgluteal approach for total hip arthroplasty: a comparative gait analysis. JBJS-Am 2010;92:328.
14. Rasch A, Dalén N, Berg H. Muscle strength, gait, and balance in 20 patients with hip osteoarthritis followed for 2 years after THA. Acta Orthop 2010;81:183.
15. Talis V, Grishin A, Solopova I, et al. Asymmetric leg loading during sit-to-stand, walking and quiet standing in patients after unilateral total hip replacement surgery. Clin Biomech 2008;23:424.
16. Nankaku M, Tsuboyama T, Kakinoki R, et al. Gait analysis of patients in early stages after total hip arthroplasty: effect of lateral trunk displacement on walking efficiency. J Orthop Sci 2007;12:550.
17. Miki H, Sugano N, Hagio K, et al. Recovery of walking speed and symmetricalmovement of the pelvis and lower extremity joints after unilateral THA. J Biomech 2004;37:443.
18. Cichy B, Wilk M, Sliwinski Z. Changes in gait parameters in total hip arthroplasty patients before and after surgery. Med Sci Monit 2008;14:159.
19. Madsen M, Ritter M, Morris H, et al. The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on gait. J Orthop Res 2004; 22:44.
20. Maffiuletti N, Impellizzeri F, Widler K, et al. Spatiotemporal parameters of gait after total hip replacement: anterior versus posterior approach. Orthop Clin North Am 2009;40:407.
21. Bertin K, Rottinger H. A modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;429:248.
22. Ferber R, IM D, Williams D, et al. A comparison of between-day reliability of discrete 3-D lower extremity variables in runners. J Orthop Res 2002;20:1139.
23. Yu B, Queen R, Schrodt L. Effect of external marker sets on between-day repeatability of knee kinematics and kinetics in stair climbing and level walking. Res Sports Med 2003; 11:209.
24. Jolles B, Bogoch E. Posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplastyin adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;1:CD003828.
25. Masonis J, Bourne R. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Related Res 2002;405:46.
26. Ritter M, Harty L, Keating M, et al. A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and the posterolateral approaches to the hip. Clin Orthop Related Res 2001;385.
27. Woo R, Morrey B. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Am 1982;64:1295.