Which approach for total hip arthroplasty: Anterolateral or posterior?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 467, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 473-477

  Palan, Jeya ^a   Beard, David J ^a   Murray, David W ^a   Andrew, J G ^b   Nolan, John ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b YSBYTY GWYNEDD   (United Kingdom)

^c NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; FOLLOW UP; HIP DISLOCATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL APPROACH; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REOPERATION;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 59649092639     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0560-5     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. AS Baker VC Bitounis 1989 Abductor function after total hip replacement: an electromyographic and clinical review J Bone Joint Surg Br. 71 47 50 (Pubitemid 19049578)
2. TC Barber DJ Roger SB Goodman DJ Schurman 1996 Early outcome of total hip arthroplasty using the direct lateral vs the posterior surgical approach Orthopedics. 19 873 875 (Pubitemid 26347893)
3. RL Barrack 2004 Neurovascular injury: avoiding catastrophe J Arthroplasty. 19 4 suppl 1 104 107 (Pubitemid 38746729)
4. R Bauer F Kerschbaumer S Poisel W Oberthaler 1979 The transgluteal approach to the hip joint Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 95 47 49 (Pubitemid 10162849)
5. DJ Berry M von Knoch CD Schleck WS Harmsen 2005 Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87 2456 2463 (Pubitemid 41546376)
6. KC Bertin H Rottinger 2004 Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach Clin Orthop Relat Res. 429 248 255 (Pubitemid 39579220)
7. Charnley J. Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip: Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1979.
8. J Dawson R Fitzpatrick D Murray A Carr 1996 Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery Qual Health Care. 5 81 88 (Pubitemid 126510382)
9. JJ Fahey 1949 Surgical approaches to bones and joints Surg Clin North Am. 29 65 76
10. R Fitzpatrick R Morris S Hajat B Reeves DW Murray D Hannen M Rigge O Williams P Gregg 2000 The value of short and simple measures to assess outcomes for patients of total hip replacement surgery Qual Health Care. 9 146 150 (Pubitemid 30728856)
11. A Gibson 1950 Posterior exposure of the hip joint J Bone Joint Surg Br. 32 183 186
12. S Glyn-Jones J Alfaro-Adrian DW Murray HS Gill 2006 The influence of surgical approach on cemented stem stability: an RSA study Clin Orthop Relat Res. 448 87 91 (Pubitemid 44324854)
13. DR Gore MP Murray SB Sepic GM Gardner 1982 Anterolateral compared to posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: differences in component positioning, hip strength, and hip motion Clin Orthop Relat Res. 165 180 187
14. K Hardinge 1982 The direct lateral approach to the hip J Bone Joint Surg Br. 64 17 19
15. WH Harris 1967 A new lateral approach to the hip joint J Bone Joint Surg Am. 49 891 898
16. U Hedlundh CH Hybbinette H Fredin 1995 Influence of surgical approach on dislocations after Charnley hip arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 10 609 614
17. Hoppenfeld S, deBoer P. Surgical Exposures in Orthopaedics: The Anatomic Approach. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.
18. BM Jolles ER Bogoch 2004 Posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1 CD003828
19. MS Kwon M Kuskowski KJ Mulhall W Macaulay TE Brown KJ Saleh 2006 Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 447 34 38 (Pubitemid 44324889)
20. MS Madsen MA Ritter HH Morris JB Meding ME Berend PM Faris VG Vardaxis 2004 The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on gait J Orthop Res. 22 44 50 (Pubitemid 38035444)
21. H Malchau P Herberts T Eisler G Garellick P Soderman 2002 The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register J Bone Joint Surg Am 84 suppl 2 2 20 (Pubitemid 35168331)
22. TH Mallory AV Lombardi Jr RA Fada SM Herrington RW Eberle 1999 Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using the anterolateral abductor split approach Clin Orthop Relat Res. 358 166 172 (Pubitemid 29066086)
23. JL Masonis RB Bourne 2002 Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation Clin Orthop Relat Res. 405 46 53 (Pubitemid 36008243)
24. CT Mehlman L Meiss TG DiPasquale 2000 Hyphenated-history: the Kocher-Langenbeck surgical approach J Orthop Trauma. 14 60 64
25. M Moran SL Yap P Walmsley IJ Brenkel 2004 Clinical and radiologic outcome of total hip arthroplasty performed by trainee compared with consultant orthopedic surgeons J Arthroplasty. 19 853 857 (Pubitemid 39304228)
26. ME Muller 1970 Total hip prostheses Clin Orthop Relat Res. 72 46 68
27. DW Murray R Fitzpatrick K Rogers H Pandit DJ Beard AJ Carr J Dawson 2007 The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores J Bone Joint Surg Br. 89 1010 1014 (Pubitemid 47492792)
28. M Ostendorf HF van Stel E Buskens AJ Schrijvers LN Marting AJ Verbout WJ Dhert 2004 Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement: a comparison of five instruments of health status J Bone Joint Surg Br. 86 801 808 (Pubitemid 39173464)
29. CW Pfirrmann HP Notzli C Dora J Hodler M Zanetti 2005 Abductor tendons and muscles assessed at MR imaging after total hip arthroplasty in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients Radiology. 235 969 976 (Pubitemid 40695896)
30. AA Renwick EL Bokey PH Chapuis P Zelas PJ Stewart MJ Rickard OF Dent 2005 Effect of supervised surgical training on outcomes after resection of colorectal cancer Br J Surg. 92 631 636 (Pubitemid 40685660)
31. MA Ritter LD Harty ME Keating PM Faris JB Meding 2001 A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip Clin Orthop Relat Res. 385 95 99 (Pubitemid 32246994)
32. JM Roberts FH Fu EJ McClain AB Ferguson Jr 1984 A comparison of the posterolateral and anterolateral approaches to total hip arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res. 187 205 210 (Pubitemid 14063247)
33. M Soong HE Rubash W Macaulay 2004 Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 12 314 321
34. AJ Vicar CR Coleman 1984 A comparison of the anterolateral, transtrochanteric, and posterior surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res. 188 152 159 (Pubitemid 14029167)
35. R Watson-Jones 1935 Fractures of the neck of the femur Br J Surg. 23 787
36. M Weber R Ganz 2002 Modified Smith-Petersen approach and its possibilities for extension Orthop Traumatol. 10 245 257
37. RY Woo BF Morrey 1982 Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am. 64 1295 1306 (Pubitemid 13169598)