Prosthesis survival after total hip arthroplasty - Does surgical approach matter? Analysis of 19,304 Charnley and 6,002 Exeter primary total hip arthroplasties reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 719-729

  Arthursson, Astvaldur J ^a   Furnes, Ove ^b,c   Espehaug, Birgitte ^b   Havelin, Leif I ^b,c   Söreide, Jon Arne ^a,c  

^a STAVANGER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSTEOTOMY; PROBABILITY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; OSTEOTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTRIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 38749117165     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17453670710014482     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Arthursson A J, Furnes O, Espehaug B, Havelin L I, Soreide J A. Validation of data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Patient Register: 5,134 primary total hip arthroplasties and revisions operated at a single hospital between 1987 and 2003. Acta Orthop 2005; 76: 823-8.
2. Bannister G C, Miles A W. The influence of cementing technique and blood on the strength of the bone-cement interface. Eng Med 1988; 17: 131-3.
3. Berry D J, von Knoch M, Schleck C D, Harmsen W S. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2005; 87: 2456-63.
4. Bystrom S, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin L I. Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74: 514-24.
5. Charnley J. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Springer-Verlag, New York 1979.
6. Clarke R P, Shea Jr W D, Bierbaum B E. Trochanteric osteotomy: analysis of pattern of wire fixation failure and complications. Clin Orthop 1979; (141): 102-10.
7. Downing N D, Clark D I, Hutchinson J W, Colclough K, Howard P W. Hip abductor strength following total hip arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of the posterior and lateral approach in 100 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72: 215-20.
8. Ebramzadeh E, Sarmiento A, McKellop H A, Llinas A, Gogan W. The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of long-term radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1994; 76: 77-87.
9. Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin L I, Engesaeter L B, Vollset S E. The type of cement and failure of total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002; 84: 832-8.
10. Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin L I, Engesaeter L B, Vollset S E, Kindseth O. Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2006; 77: 49-56.
11. Flivik G, Wulff K, Sanfridsson J, Ryd L. Improved acetabular pressurization gives better cement penetration: in vivo measurements during total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19: 911-8.
12. Frankel A, Booth R E, Balderston Jr R A, Cohn J, Rothman R H. Complications of trochanteric osteotomy. Long-term implications. Clin Orthop 1993; (288): 209-13.
13. Furnes O, Lie S A, Havelin L I, Vollset S E, Engesaeter L B. Exeter and Charnley arthroplasties with Boneloc or high viscosity cement. Comparison of 1,127 arthroplasties followed for 5 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 1997; 68: 515-20.
14. Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Munuera L. Early and late loosening of the acetabular cup after low-friction arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1992; 74: 1119-29.
15. Garellick G, Malchau H, Regner H, Herberts P. The Charnley versus the Spectron hip prosthesis: radiographic evaluation of a randomized, prospective study of 2 different hip implants. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 414-25.
16. Glassman A H. Complications of trochanteric osteotomy. Orthop Clin North Am 1992; 23: 321-33.
17. Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1982; 64: 17-9.
18. Havelin L. The Norwegian Joint Registry. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 1999; 58: 139-47.
19. Havelin L I, Espehaug B, Vollset S E, Engesaeter L B, Langeland N. The Norwegian arthroplasty register. A survey of 17,444 hip replacements 1987-1990. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64: 245-51.
20. Havelin L I, Espehaug B, Vollset S E, Engesaeter L B. The effect of the type of cement on early revision of Charnley total hip prostheses. A review of eight thousand five hundred and seventy-nine primary arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1995; 77: 1543-50.
21. Havelin L I, Engesaeter L B, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie S A, Vollset S E. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 337-53.
22. Hedlundh U, Hybbinette C H, Fredin H. Influence of surgical approach on dislocations after Charnley hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10: 609-14.
23. Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 111-21.
24. Jolles B M, Bogoch E R. Posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; CD003828.
25. Masonis J L, Bourne R B. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop 2002; (405): 46-53.
26. Moore A. The Moore self-locking vitallium prosthesis in fresh femoral neck fractures: a new low posterior approach (the southern exposure). In: American Academy of orthopaedic Surgeons 1995, editor. Instructional course lectures. St. Louis, CV Mosby, 1959.
27. Morrey B F. Instability after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1992; 23: 237-48.
28. Mulliken B D, Rorabeck C H, Bourne R B, Nayak N. A modified direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a comprehensive review. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13: 737-47.
29. Nercessian O A, Newton P M, Joshi R P, Sheikh B, Eftekhar N S. Trochanteric osteotomy and wire fixation: a comparison of 2 techniques. Clin Orthop 1996; (333): 208-16.
30. Ostgaard H C, Helger L, Regner H, Garellick G. Femoral alignment of the Charnley stem: a randomized trial comparing the original with the new instrumentation in 123 hips. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72: 228-32.
31. Pai V S. A comparison of three lateral approaches in primary total hip replacement. Int Orthop 1997; 21: 393-8.
32. Ranawat C S, Deshmukh R G, Peters L E, Umlas M E. Prediction of the long-term durability of all-polyethylene cemented sockets. Clin Orthop 1995; (317): 89-105.
33. Schemper M, Smith T L. A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 343-6.
34. Schinsky M F, Nercessian O A, Arons R R, Macaulay W. Comparison of complications after transtrochanteric and posterolateral approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 430-4.
35. Schmalzried T P, Kwong L M, Jasty M, Sedlacek R C, Haire T C, O'Connor D O, Bragdon C R, Kabo J M, Malcolm A J, Harris W H. The mechanism of loosening of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of specimens retrieved at autopsy. Clin Orthop 1992; (274): 60-78.
36. Stark A, Brostrom L A, Wallensten R. Total hip replacement with or without trochanteric osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1982; 100: 225-8.
37. Wroblewski B M, Shelley P. Reattachment of the greater trochanter after hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1985; 67: 736-40.